Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

phantom power

(25,966 posts)
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 06:16 PM Jan 2016

Law cited against Oregon occupation was created to corral Civil War secessionists

The 154-year-old law under which Ammon Bundy and others were arrested this week was created to deal with a nation torn apart by war.

But it made sense for the armed occupiers who holed up at Oregon's Malheur National Wildlife Refuge to be charged under the Civil-War era statute, experts say, because like the Confederates, the occupiers rejected federal power.

...

The seven men and one woman worked together to control federal property and intended to impede federal officials who work on the refuge from doing their jobs, according to the criminal complaint filed by prosecutors. The refuge belongs to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

While used in the last few decades mostly against radical activists like Bundy, the charge originated at a time when entire states rejected federal power.

...

The beliefs and actions that led to the arrest of Bundy and his alleged co-conspirators parallel those of the era that gave the law life, Blight said.

"Bundy and that crowd are sort of latter-day secessionists," he said, because they've demanded federal land be handed over to local control.

The charge against Bundy and at least seven other arrestees stems from the fact that most of them were armed and threatened violence, according to their criminal complaint, preventing 16 federal employees from going to work.

http://www.oregonlive.com/oregon-standoff/2016/01/charge_against_refuge_occupier.html

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Law cited against Oregon occupation was created to corral Civil War secessionists (Original Post) phantom power Jan 2016 OP
I read the charges. It fits "domestic terrorism" guidelines dixiegrrrrl Jan 2016 #1
I could live with 6 years from the current charges. But there's likely to be more. phantom power Jan 2016 #2
There had BEST be more! Destruction of Govt. Property... firearms stuff... etc. nt Bigmack Jan 2016 #5
No it does not since it does not terrify people nadinbrzezinski Jan 2016 #7
Some more info on the history of the law... PoiBoy Jan 2016 #3
I'll be darned.....thanks. n/t dixiegrrrrl Jan 2016 #4
Any mandatory minimum sentences on this stuff? nt Bigmack Jan 2016 #6

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
1. I read the charges. It fits "domestic terrorism" guidelines
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 06:20 PM
Jan 2016

which I believe was written in the last 15 years.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
7. No it does not since it does not terrify people
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:37 PM
Jan 2016

but it does fit armed sedition, which carries 20 as a max.

PoiBoy

(1,542 posts)
3. Some more info on the history of the law...
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 06:52 PM
Jan 2016
http://www.oregonlive.com/oregon-standoff/2016/01/felony_charge_against_refuge_o.html

I hope these criminals are held accountable for much more that just this charge... IMO, if these folks are let off with a very light sentence or even probation, if would only serve to embolden others.










Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Law cited against Oregon ...