Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:12 PM Feb 2016

"on our worst days, I think it is fair to say we are 100 times better than any Republican candidate"

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Sissyk (a host of the General Discussion forum).

Sanders-Clinton debate transcript: Annotating what they say
TODD: Would you unite the party by trying to pick Senator Sanders as your running mate?

CLINTON: Well, I'm certainly going to unite the party, but I'm not -- I'm not getting ahead of myself. I think that would be a little bit presumptuous. If I'm so fortunate as to be the nominee, the first person I will call to talk to about where we go and how we get it done will be Senator Sanders.

(APPLAUSE)

TODD: Senator, would you consider the secretary?

SANDERS: I agree with what the secretary said. We shouldn't be getting ahead of ourselves. And as I have said many times, you know, sometimes in these campaigns, things get a little bit out of hand. I happen to respect the secretary very much, I hope it's mutual. And on our worst days, I think it is fair to say we are 100 times better than any Republican candidate.

In Sanders own words, he thinks that both Hillary Clinton and he are 100 times better than any Republican Candidate. I think we can take his word for that.
43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"on our worst days, I think it is fair to say we are 100 times better than any Republican candidate" (Original Post) Agnosticsherbet Feb 2016 OP
A VERY low bar Kelvin Mace Feb 2016 #1
And yet, Sanders is also under that bar. Agnosticsherbet Feb 2016 #4
That's nice, Kelvin Mace Feb 2016 #20
But that is where the bar will be in November. nt MH1 Feb 2016 #8
With Sanders standing beside Clinton. Agnosticsherbet Feb 2016 #23
I think he's a naive idealist... EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #2
Are you really throwing Sanders under the bus? Agnosticsherbet Feb 2016 #3
I wonder Andy823 Feb 2016 #7
I think in the thick of a ugly primary fight, Hyperbole sometimes gets the upper hand. Agnosticsherbet Feb 2016 #10
Lol EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #9
If you remove the word "not" I could agree with that comment. Agnosticsherbet Feb 2016 #11
I have seen EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #12
When I play games, it's Dungeon's and Dragon's 5th edition. Agnosticsherbet Feb 2016 #13
Talk to your fellow Clintonites EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #16
So far, a majority of Democrats disagrees that ugly bit. Agnosticsherbet Feb 2016 #19
No liberal EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #26
As you know, he has to say that yourpaljoey Feb 2016 #5
So you are calling him a liar? Agnosticsherbet Feb 2016 #6
We can't know EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #14
Then we will have to work harder against those who prefer a Trump Agnosticsherbet Feb 2016 #15
Lol EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #17
It's protocol, it's tact, it's grace 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #25
He either told the truth or he didn't. Agnosticsherbet Feb 2016 #29
This message was self-deleted by its author 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #33
One is 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #18
If you read the entire quote, he said "we." Agnosticsherbet Feb 2016 #21
He said we. I said one 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #22
I think Sanders told the truth. Agnosticsherbet Feb 2016 #24
I am not Sanders 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #27
Don't cheat yourself, try 1,000 to 1,000,000 Rex Feb 2016 #28
Ya know, the first problem is that this... TreasonousBastard Feb 2016 #30
That is my fault. I am sorry I brought this here. Agnosticsherbet Feb 2016 #31
"Fault" is a slippery thing... TreasonousBastard Feb 2016 #32
Read the profile 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #34
Could be, but you and a few others were only too happy to comply. TreasonousBastard Feb 2016 #36
yes the shit must be combatted 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #38
Or just ignored-- the world won't end because of a few DU posts. TreasonousBastard Feb 2016 #39
no but it might over the next president 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #42
I'm going to be presumptuous donna123 Feb 2016 #35
That's HIS opinion noretreatnosurrender Feb 2016 #37
this is a game they play 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #40
And i think he was being diplomatic. HE is 100% better than any R, SHE? #WhichHillary ? peacebird Feb 2016 #41
Locking. Sissyk Feb 2016 #43
 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
1. A VERY low bar
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:16 PM
Feb 2016

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
4. And yet, Sanders is also under that bar.
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:23 PM
Feb 2016

If Sanders loses, he will be standing beside Clinton, helping her win the General.

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
20. That's nice,
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:56 PM
Feb 2016

And certainly his decision.

MH1

(17,595 posts)
8. But that is where the bar will be in November. nt
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:36 PM
Feb 2016

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
23. With Sanders standing beside Clinton.
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:57 PM
Feb 2016

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
2. I think he's a naive idealist...
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:19 PM
Feb 2016

...when it comes to Hillary Clinton

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
3. Are you really throwing Sanders under the bus?
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:22 PM
Feb 2016

I am stunned.

Calling him a "naive idealist" is one of the best reasons I can think of not to vote for him.

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
7. I wonder
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:34 PM
Feb 2016

If that was one of those "freudian slips" there? Could it be he isn't really for Bernie or Hillary?

I know I take Bernie for his word, and I know that he would be supporting Hillary if she were to win, just like Hillary would be supporting Bernie if he wins. I honestly can figure how any "real" Democrat would not think either one of them is a 100 times better than any of the republicans in the clown care.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
10. I think in the thick of a ugly primary fight, Hyperbole sometimes gets the upper hand.
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:40 PM
Feb 2016

Sanders is not my preferred candidate, but I consider him honest, truthful, and a man of his word.

If he wins the nomination, I will vote for him and he will be a good President.

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
9. Lol
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:39 PM
Feb 2016

I'm mocking you guy's nonsensical meme.

I don't agree with everything he believes. The Sanders campaign is not about a subservient and delusional cult of personality. We're allowed to think he's wrong sometimes.

He's wrong about this.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
11. If you remove the word "not" I could agree with that comment.
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:42 PM
Feb 2016

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
12. I have seen
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:48 PM
Feb 2016

Much more criticism of Sanders by Sanders supporters than I've ever seen w/ Clinton and her supporters.

I have however seen numerous supporters justify Clinton's corruption and dishonesty and scorched earth campaign.

You might just be confused, but I assume you're just playing a game.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
13. When I play games, it's Dungeon's and Dragon's 5th edition.
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:49 PM
Feb 2016

Politics is not a game.

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
16. Talk to your fellow Clintonites
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:52 PM
Feb 2016

They tell me Hillary is just playing the game on an almost daily basis.

Hillary swaps another one of her positions. Playing the game.

Lies about past beliefs. Playing the game.

Being corrupt. Playing the game.

Being funded by weapons manufacturers. Playing the game.

Hiding who donated to her "Foundation". Playing the game.

And on and on.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
19. So far, a majority of Democrats disagrees that ugly bit.
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:54 PM
Feb 2016

It's early.
I'm good with either choice against a Republican.
I am a liberal rather than a true believer in a candidate.

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
26. No liberal
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 04:02 PM
Feb 2016

Could vote for someone that could look at Saudi Arabia - a country with one of the worst human and women's rights records - and sign off on selling them 29B in weapons. She called that weapons deal a "top priority". Not helping Saudi women. Selling their royals weapons. Weapons being used to commit war crimes as we speak.

She presided over that deal while getting 25m from the Saudis and Boeing. While her husband got 250,000 from Boeing.

And then she hired the guy who owns the lobbying firm that represents Saudi Arabia and Boeing as her campaign chairman.

And broke her promise to Obama about disclosing who donated to her Foundation - she still haven't revealed those.

And then obscured 1100+ other donors by funneling them through a campaign donors Canadian charity - those haven't been revealed either. And publicly lie about why.

None of this is liberal behaviour. And it's no wonder - she's not a liberal. She's a center-right corporatist.

yourpaljoey

(2,166 posts)
5. As you know, he has to say that
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:23 PM
Feb 2016

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
6. So you are calling him a liar?
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:24 PM
Feb 2016

Because if he says something that is not true, that is what he is doing.

I think he is telling the truth.

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
14. We can't know
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:49 PM
Feb 2016

Either way a meaningful number of his supporters won't be following his lead.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
15. Then we will have to work harder against those who prefer a Trump
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:50 PM
Feb 2016

or other as President.
I know Sanders will be with us.

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
17. Lol
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:53 PM
Feb 2016

The second Hillary is nominated Trump has one.

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
25. It's protocol, it's tact, it's grace
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 04:01 PM
Feb 2016

I understand how you missed that considering your candidate, but way to go missing the point of a message and circling it into bullshit again.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
29. He either told the truth or he didn't.
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 04:04 PM
Feb 2016

because protocol, tact, and grace are just polite ways of lying out of one's ass.

And that isn't bullshit.

I think he told the truth and will back it up with action.

Response to Agnosticsherbet (Reply #29)

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
18. One is
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:54 PM
Feb 2016

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
21. If you read the entire quote, he said "we."
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:56 PM
Feb 2016

So your comment is incorrect.

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
22. He said we. I said one
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:57 PM
Feb 2016

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
24. I think Sanders told the truth.
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:58 PM
Feb 2016

Opinions may vary.

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
27. I am not Sanders
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 04:02 PM
Feb 2016

My opinion varies in this case, but I understand his need to be tactful. I understand that you intend to use that a lot but even you must understand the politics behind the statement. He is trying to salvage a dem win regardless, while she must win regardless of breaking up the party and losing to Trump. Everything in her world is just her. No one and nothing else matters.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
28. Don't cheat yourself, try 1,000 to 1,000,000
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 04:03 PM
Feb 2016

depending on mileage.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
30. Ya know, the first problem is that this...
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 04:04 PM
Feb 2016

should be in GD-P.

But, even if there's a good argument not to put it there, you'll note that such a simple and decent statement from Sander started a small argument.

I don't get why this statement should be at all controversial, but it is evidence that GD-P was a good idea.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
31. That is my fault. I am sorry I brought this here.
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 04:06 PM
Feb 2016

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
32. "Fault" is a slippery thing...
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 04:10 PM
Feb 2016

you brought a nice little story here, whether it belongs here or not, and others decided to take a dump on it.

"Blame" is slippery, too but I'd still put it on the dumpers.

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
34. Read the profile
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 04:12 PM
Feb 2016

This was dumped here to start trouble.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
36. Could be, but you and a few others were only too happy to comply.
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 04:22 PM
Feb 2016
 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
38. yes the shit must be combatted
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 04:42 PM
Feb 2016

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
39. Or just ignored-- the world won't end because of a few DU posts.
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 04:45 PM
Feb 2016
 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
42. no but it might over the next president
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 04:46 PM
Feb 2016

donna123

(182 posts)
35. I'm going to be presumptuous
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 04:16 PM
Feb 2016

I hope she does not choose that julian castro or his brother. Those two freak me out, I don't know why, their faces just freak me out. They're also too young/callow for my taste. It reminds me of that joke from Ray Romano about twins and how it's bad if one is funny looking, to see one of them, and then another one following right after.

noretreatnosurrender

(1,890 posts)
37. That's HIS opinion
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 04:29 PM
Feb 2016

Why is it so hard for some Hillary supporters to understand that Sander's supporters do not march in lockstep? They aren't like Hillary supporters who change their principles and opinions based on what their candidate says. If we agree with Sanders we say so. If we don't we say that too. Our principles and opinions are our own. NO CANDIDATE will get blind obedience from us. They earn our support.

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
40. this is a game they play
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 04:45 PM
Feb 2016

they take one sentence and try to make it all about it, while purposefully overlooking the message of a post. I'm not sure it it is to get us angry in trying to make them understand a simple thing or if it is spinning 101 class.

I find them funny yet sad. Mostly sad that people who claim to be intelligent would vote for someone who obviously is going to change things for the worse. People will die because of Hillary. I am certain of that. It saddens me that her supporters think that every lie, cheat, immoral act she commits is a good thing.

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
41. And i think he was being diplomatic. HE is 100% better than any R, SHE? #WhichHillary ?
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 04:46 PM
Feb 2016

It totally depends on whether she is against the trade deals (as she says to voters) OR for them as she says in her private emails.

Is she FOR a womans right to choose (as she says to voters) OR is she okay limiting abortion as long as the health of the mother is included in the law?

#WhichHillary

Sissyk

(12,665 posts)
43. Locking.
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 05:11 PM
Feb 2016

Democratic Candidates belong in GDP. Please consider reposting there. GDP could use a positive thread about our Candidates.

Thank you!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"on our worst days, I thi...