General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsVery disturbed. A few months ago I had to take an ambulance ride to the ER
Today the bill came. Mind you, my insurance covered 100% BUT good grief.
The bill was just under $800, how the hell can someone without insurance cover that? Ambulance rides can be the diff between life & death. But $800??
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)But I can't figure it out, either.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)ER use
ambulance
hospital
tests
even prescriptions.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)Why we need Bernie to bring common-sense health care for every American, like every other civilized country, and reign in the insurance companies and hospitals. He'll put an end to the gouging.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)but yes, it is horrifying
Rex
(65,616 posts)They cannot, what happens is they go to the ER and then leave as soon as they are able.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)A couple of years ago I went to the ER because I needed 9 stitches in my knee. Insurance paid half.
The remaining half? $1,730 that had to come out of MY pocket.
But hey, as long as the precious insurance companies didn't get hit too hard, it's all good right?
Glitterati
(3,182 posts)My husband had a heart attack - $500 for less than a mile to the local hospital, then a life flight in a helicopter.
They only reason they had to use the helicopter was because it was the middle of rush hour and the 4 lane divided highway was bumper to bumper. 23 miles from hospital to hospital on that highway, $7,000.00
spanone
(135,815 posts)one-way doncha know
p.s. that 47 miles is on the highway, not as the crow/helicopter flies
shanti
(21,675 posts)for what you will pay. conscious/unconscious, bleeding/not bleeding, like that.
lapfog_1
(29,198 posts)because they can't afford the $10,000 ER visit much less the $800 ride.
And they simply don't pay... your insurance pays for you AND some portion of the uninsured (since the hospital and ambulance company don't want to go broke).
That's the reason for the flawed ACA... and an even better reason for single payer.
benld74
(9,904 posts)Warpy
(111,229 posts)and very close to them so my bills haven't been too bad, even with things like on board EKGs and fluid/drug administration. What really drives up the cost of an ambulance ride is the mileage.
$800 isn't that bad, all things considered. I just hope you're OK now.
malaise
(268,858 posts)an airfare across the pond?
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)Price of gas
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)hope for the best.
Total cost for having the service divided by number of rides equals total cost per ride.
The meter is ticking for facilities, equipment, and personnel down at the rescue squad whether they are hauling someone or just drinking coffee. If they average two rides a day, the cost of the service will be daily cost/2.
If your government entity wants all of the property tax payers to pay for the service, the rides can be free. If the government entity wants the service to pay for itelf, then the rides will be expensive and Medicare, Medicaid, Obamacare, private insurance, whatever will pay for the rides.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)I miss the days when our taxes were used for the "public good".
scscholar
(2,902 posts)I didn't realize there were places where ambulances still charged you.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)Talked about charging patients, the prices they gave were $100 a ride... This ride was $800 after the insurance company discount....
procon
(15,805 posts)Another reason why we need universal health insurance coverage.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)"Coverage" is just another giveaway to insurance companies, with absolutely no guarantee of receiving actual "care".
Fuck that.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)all over the country? That is not part of what is being talked about, and is not even feasible. They're talking about a single-payer insurance system. Medicare, for instance, would not pay for the entire cost of an ambulance ride. And they'll pay only if it's a true emergency (which they determine). If they deem it a true emergency (I don't think kidney stones would qualify--you could take a cab), they'll pay 80% of the Medicare rate to the private ambulance service, once you've met your annual Part B deductible. You'll then pay the rest.
I don't know what you mean by "absolutely no guarantee of receiving actual care." We just went through a year of hospitalizations, surgeries, chemo, advanced scans, and many specialist appointments for my husband, and our insurance paid for everything. For ACA plans (ours was employer insurance) there are strict rules about what insurers MUST cover.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)procon
(15,805 posts)If you want to complain about insurance companies, your argument is misdirected and they are your misperceptions, yeah?
As with any healthcare, someone is paying for the service coverage whether it's taxpayers via the government, or rate payers through the private sector, and this won't change. Universal coverage is a guarantee that everyone gets medical care, but there are still several different pay schemes available for that type of insurance as offered in other countries that offer workable solutions.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Care means the care is paid for, as in a single-payer system.
Coverage means you have insurance, and you're subject to their rules regarding what care is paid for and what isn't.
procon
(15,805 posts)And like all the similar plans in place in other countries, there are still rules and restrictions on services. That's done, yeah?
Sanity Claws
(21,846 posts)I'll bet an uninsured person was billed at a higher rate. You must have a great policy if there was no co-pay.
I got a referral to a specialist and had to pay $50 co pay because he was a specialist. A GP said I had to see a specialist but still had to pay that specialist copay. Same with physical therapy. I have to pay $30 for each PT session. All of this is in addition to the premium that my employer and I split.
I fucking hate our medical system.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)It's a gamble from beginning to end
Doremus
(7,261 posts)When will we stop being such pushovers?
I really think the time is growing near.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)lots of people can cover that without too much trouble. People ought to have a couple thousand in savings.
Truthfully that is my question. How can they live without that? WHY do they?
peacebird
(14,195 posts)is REAL money to them. Many live paycheck to paycheck as it is, having to decide between food & bills.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)but I can still pay it.
In 2003 I made $13,891 in wages. Had no insurance. Went to the ER and the bill was $800. Futhermuckers charged me $500 for X-rays I didn't even need. So typical of them to include a walletectomy in their services.
I probably could have paid that out of savings, although I was putting most of my savings in my house at the time, but they set me up on a payment plan $50 a month and then let me put that on my credit card.
That is my question though. Why do people live paycheck to paycheck? I could NOT handle that, and in my life I never have even though I have had some very slim years. I concede that some people may HAVE to live that way, income too low, living expenses too high, but I still think for most people that is a choice.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)Fortunately my parents helped out with baby food and diapers, and baby clothes when I went to visit them every other weekend!
I was not extravagent at all, but when I got out of college a GS5 position paid $10,500 a year.
Even in the early 80's it was hard to live on that and raise a child.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)Except for some reason they paid me at GS-7. It was $8.57 an hour in November 1985, and I refused the health insurance because that would have cost $200 a year.
That was pretty darned good money back then, equivalent to $18.53 today. Back in those days I was saving about $800 a month. My rent was $205, utilities included in Clearfield, Utah. My paychecks were $522 every two weeks. I used the $22 as my grocery money and banked the rest.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)series?
Approximately 62% of Americans have less than $1,000 in their savings accounts and 21% dont even have a savings account, according to a new survey of more than 5,000 adults conducted this month by Google Consumer Survey for personal finance website GOBankingRates.com.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/most-americans-have-less-than-1000-in-savings-2015-10-06
Sanity Claws
(21,846 posts)When I started to work in the 1980s, we were told that you should make sure that you have several months of living expenses ( like rent, student loans, car payments) saved up in case you get sick or get laid off. People are doing well these days if they 2 months saved up.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)Over 80% of households have more income than I do, and always have, for most of my life. So I would expect that at least 40 of that 62% make more money than I do. Some of them a lot more.
As such, it is still hard for me to believe that they CAN'T save.
Why? Because we get paid shit, that's why. We all can't be degreed professionals. Someone needed to pick up the trash folks throw on the ground, mow the lawns, work the restaurants, sell crap at the retail outlets, etc. A couple thousand in savings is a pipe dream when you make 15k/year and your rent is 7k/year.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)according to ITEP, 80% of Kansas households make more than $20,000 a year. I make about $17,000. I have spent 9 of the last 14 years as a part time janitor.
http://www.itep.org/whopays/states/kansas.php
To my surprise though, illinois is lower and California is NOT much higher. 80% make more than $23,000 in California, but $23,000 is probably not going to get you as far in California as $17,000 does in Kansas.
tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)So you have a couple thousand saved? Congrats! I make less than you. Everybody I work with makes less than you. I'm lucky because it's just me, no family or bills. Then again, I ave no furniture besides the desk the computer is on and the chair I sit in. No vehicle, either so no expenses associated with that. Still, it would take a couple years to save up 2k IF nothing happens that requires me to spend more than my budget allows.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)make less than $18,000 a year.
If it was me, I probably would not have a computer or any internet until I had some money saved.
xmas74
(29,673 posts)including looking for a new job, paying many of your bills, even getting your pay stubs. And if you decide to go back to school to brush up on skills or even learn some new skills you'd better have it or you won't be able to even hand in your homework.
My child is in high school. She takes honors classes. Nearly half of her homework has to be emailed to her teachers. There is no time to complete it at school and the public library computers always have a waiting list. Thank goodness we have a computer and internet at home or else she'd flunk.
It's no longer a luxury. It's becoming more and more of a necessity every day, especially for school age children.
liberalhistorian
(20,815 posts)to cover living expenses. You know, little things like food, clothing, a roof over their family's head, gas, insurance and maintenance on the (probably old) car that gets them to the needed job and back, child care if they have children, etc., etc. And living paycheck to paycheck means that any little thing out of the ordinary that happens (car repair, illness, $800 ambulance ride) can set off a cascade of financial emergencies that will result in a hole that too many will find very difficult to dig out of. Unless you've been there, it's really hard to fully get it.
That's not to say that I don't absolutely agree with you about the importance of having some kind of savings. Even a small amount deposited weekly or even monthly will help and can add up. The problem is, it may not add up quickly enough and there may not be enough discretionary income left to be able to do even a small amount. That's why financial education classes are important.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)60% of households in Kansas make more than $38,000 a year. 40% of them make more than $59,000 a year. The first is almost twice what I make and the second is almost four times what I make. If I have savings, then I think many of them can too. They could, if they wanted to.
I have been a few places, especially low income http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002625762
Although the $5,900 I made in 1988-89 is about the same as $12,000 today, so not as low as it seemed, about $100 over the official poverty line. That was about as poor as I have been, wealth wise. I had perhaps $5,000 saved. Then after making $5,900 in my first year and $6,100 in my second year and then getting a teaching job that paid $8,100 for part time. At the end of those three years I had $12,000 saved and decided to start my own business. So on a yearly salary average of $6,700, I had saved an average of $2,300 a year. Probably a lot of that got saved the last year, when my rent was only $160, utilities included. It was just a room, sharing kitchen and bath with two others. Of course, back then the interest rates were good, so I was probably making $400 a year in interest too.
ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)children are only half grown. The shaky nature of the job market. Rents going up. Groceries going up. The cost of a breath of air basically going up. I do not know one single person in my immediate group of friends who would not be hit hard by an $800 ambulance bill. They are all employed and used to be "middle class." Of course they still identify as that, but they aren't.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)at least milk is, and some canned goods have been on sale lately. I just stocked up big time this last Saturday.
By the time a person is 45, they should own a house. Well, them and the bank.
Everybody I know is much richer than me, well except for one guy I work with at the homeless shelter - he is on disability.
I have kind of always been unemployable since I quit the airforce in 1986. I seem only able to get the jobs that nobody else wants - low paying factory, temp, part time janitor (although that last one is semi-decent, working for a city government, I only got it because the guy they hired ahead of me would not put up with my psycho boss).
ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)(groceries that is) I'm glad $800 is not a hit for you, but it would destroy my carefully balanced world. And no, I don't buy on credit, buy new clothes, etc.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)It's more than my monthly SS check.
Why do we live without savings? You act like we choose to.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Ambulance charges enable local governments to pass costs to other units of government (to the state
and federal government in the case of Medicaid patients, and the federal government in the case of
Medicare patients) or insurance companies. Additionally they discourage people from using ambulances
as taxis to hospitals.
If you have to go to the hospital by ambulance the ambulance fee will likely be dwarfed by the
hospital charges for your treatment and as you allude to uninsured people will likely be placed under
a severe financial burden.
karadax
(284 posts)Most people pay that amount for their internet / cable tv bill.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)is not an easy amount for everyone. One coworker I had was working fulltime with me, and then went to a TJMaxx to work part time in order to support the grandkids that were living with her because their parents were gone. Very nice lady, but working her fanny off to try to support the grandkids through no fault of her own.
And that's the only bill I have outside Rent and electric. I make 300/week on 40 hours, if I get it. Usually I don't.
liberalhistorian
(20,815 posts)It depends on the particular entity. Some will accept payment plans, others will not, they want it all and they want it all now. They don't care if it's the amount of an entire paycheck that you're relying on.
ForgoTheConsequence
(4,868 posts)...
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)I had some sort of a stoke when I took a bunch of different drugs for pain from gall bladder ROCKS.
When I wanted to raise my arms...they went down, when I tried to walk down my stairs my legs went up
The ride in the ambulance was rough to say the least...why don't ambulances have better shocks?
peacebird
(14,195 posts)angstlessk
(11,862 posts)by the time it was removed it was the size of a ping pong ball...and my Dr used the size of my gall bladder to post to some medical forum??? He gave me the stone.
It was removed via lazer, but the doc wanted to cut me open since it was so large, but the attendants persuaded him to remove it via the belly button..and it worked!
peacebird
(14,195 posts)angstlessk
(11,862 posts)In the mean time I had upper gi's and lower gi's and even had a scope down my throat into my stomach...none of which discovered gall bladder problem.
I was flabbergasted to find the simple test..ultrasound could have found the problem...and was a little pissed.
shanti
(21,675 posts)if the EMTs say you need an IV....ever had an iv started in a jiggling ambulance? not fun!
democrank
(11,092 posts)had two ambulance rides, two days apart. They were $1,500.00 each. All the others were around $700.00 to $900.00.
onecaliberal
(32,812 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Dehydration, apparently.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)universal healthcare have convinced people here that it is now safe to just wear their republican sentiments on this issue out in public.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)The NEW Dem party hates the takers just like the GOP. We just want free stuff after all.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)You really can't tell them apart from Fox viewers.
LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)hospital to another facility a half hour away. This was two years ago. He had insurance and still had to pay $1200 of the $2800 tab. It's outrageous!
shanti
(21,675 posts)if they ask you which hospital you want to go to and it's not the one they usually would take you to, you will be charged extra.
madaboutharry
(40,201 posts)at college. (Broken jaw). Two blocks to the University Medical Center: $450.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)(Insurance, so I didn't have to pay more than the high deductible)
shanti
(21,675 posts)because i was going to post about my own ambulance ride fee. i had to take a trip to the hospital (kaiser) ON thanksgiving. i was having arrhythmia that wouldn't stop while i was on the phone to my mother. it lasted for at least 10 minutes before i called 911. when they arrived (a fire truck arrived first), then the EMTs. they were with me for another 10 minutes and i asked if i really had to go to the hospital.
they said yes, because your "condition" is "incompatible with life", so off i went, hooked up to a heart monitor.
i figured that my kaiser ins. would pay the bill, but i got one from the fire dept. about 3 weeks later - $2500!!!!!!! i was totally shocked, so immediately got on the phone to kaiser and was reassured that i did NOT have to pay it, so i calmed down. the bill had a "first responder fee" that was $250, something that was just recently approved due to the real estate market. also had a fee for the heart monitor, mileage, and the main fee just for the call.
THEN last saturday, i got something from kaiser saying that they couldn't process it because the bill from the fire dept. was "illegible". i'm hoping they figure it out!!
i found something on the internet about when a person calls 911 and isn't insured, but it's not pretty. scary to think about that!
glad that you were covered!
peacebird
(14,195 posts)Ambulance had my BP at 198/169
My eyes were completely bloodshot because of the high blood pressure.
No one has been able to explain why a thin white woman with poster child good BP of 120/65
5'4" and 115 pounds
Perfect cholesteral levels
Physically fit enough to bicycle halfway across the country in 2013
Why would I suddenly have my BP and Heart rate go ballistic?
shanti
(21,675 posts)mine was 165, but is usually about 120/85, often lower. i've had palpitations before, but never sustained, so it was a first, and quite scary. didn't get the bloodshot eyes, but felt like i might faint.
i also want to know why it happened, but they couldn't give me an answer!
did your bp go down quickly and did they give you beta blockers at the hospital? the rn at the hospital said that when you get palpitations, you should blow on your thumb, i.e., bear down. has something to do with nerves in the diaphragm.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)Pain in my rib, "arthritis" in my elbows and fingers, extreme exhaution, headaches. Visual distubances. Heart arrythmia, all ended while on doxy for lymes. All returned a week off doxy.
I am now on third month of doxy. Seems I missed a lymes episode with a tick bite and the little sucker got deep in different parts of my body. We are hoping an extended doxy can kill it.
MineralMan
(146,284 posts)That's how i got to the hospital after I broke my leg when I was 10. Dad picked
Me up, put me in the back seat and drove me there. He drove up to the ambulance entrance and honked the horn. A couple of hours later he put me back in the car and drove me home.
For heart attacks and strokes, you need an ambulance. Most other ER trips don't.
shanti
(21,675 posts)i'll just call a cab.
MineralMan
(146,284 posts)Isn't really necessary. Common sense is a good thing.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)In my case I was afraid if I kept driving that I would be at risk of hurting someone else. But really, if you think you are having a heart attack should you be afraid to call an ambulance?
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,336 posts)Don't drive if you think you're having a heart attack.
Mineral Man seemed to be talking about some other situation, like if you have a simple bone fracture and you have someone else to drive the car. Then it makes sense to not bother with an ambulance.
shanti
(21,675 posts)except when they TELL you that you must get in the ambulance. i was by myself, never called 911 before, feeling faint, you do the math.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)So I pulled over and called 911
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)shanti
(21,675 posts)the emt's said i made the right decision. nobody wants anyone else hurt.
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)xloadiex
(628 posts)I had to go by ambulance last year. The fire department is across the street. The hospital is less than 2 miles away. My bill was 1600.00
redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)$30000 is what a friend was billed.
bhikkhu
(10,714 posts)a few years back we had a housefire and I inhaled some smoke and scorched my eyebrows...no real harm done and everyone else was fine. The fire department had an ambulance there just in case and asked if I wanted a lift to the hospital (just down the street) to get checked out; I thought about driving but I was pretty tired, said fine. The $600 bill came in the mail a month later, which my insurance never did cover.
ileus
(15,396 posts)I received a flyer in the mail for air ambulance "insurance" last week.
postulater
(5,075 posts)oxygen treatments she had for an infected foot.
A series of thirty daily treatments at $2700 per treatment.
Insurance paid it all, she didn't pay a penny.
Laffy Kat
(16,376 posts)Almost two years ago following a car accident. I never had to pay a dime, but geesh.
K
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)B Calm
(28,762 posts)titaniumsalute
(4,742 posts)$800 doesn't sound so bad.
nilesobek
(1,423 posts)He's had a couple hundred grand mal seizures in the last 7 years.
I used to never call the ambulance because my son is an adult and didn't want me to. But a police officer informed me that if my son died, and I didn't call the ambulance, I could be charged with manslaughter.
That was over a hundred ambulance calls ago. We have racked up an impressive six figure ambulance bill with zero chance to pay.