HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » So when Trump supporters ...

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 01:44 AM

 

So when Trump supporters start showing up at D rallies...

...how do you suppose it is going to go down?

68 replies, 3898 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 68 replies Author Time Post
Reply So when Trump supporters start showing up at D rallies... (Original post)
jberryhill Mar 2016 OP
Albertoo Mar 2016 #1
daleanime Mar 2016 #4
DemocraticSocialist8 Mar 2016 #9
jberryhill Mar 2016 #13
Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #32
jberryhill Mar 2016 #35
Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #48
jberryhill Mar 2016 #50
Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #55
jberryhill Mar 2016 #58
Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #60
jberryhill Mar 2016 #61
Jim Beard Mar 2016 #42
Glitterati Mar 2016 #63
Jim Beard Mar 2016 #67
Glitterati Mar 2016 #68
Kalidurga Mar 2016 #2
napi21 Mar 2016 #3
melman Mar 2016 #47
intrepidity Mar 2016 #5
jberryhill Mar 2016 #7
intrepidity Mar 2016 #10
mikehiggins Mar 2016 #6
jberryhill Mar 2016 #8
intrepidity Mar 2016 #11
jberryhill Mar 2016 #15
intrepidity Mar 2016 #16
jberryhill Mar 2016 #19
intrepidity Mar 2016 #22
daleanime Mar 2016 #18
840high Mar 2016 #29
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Mar 2016 #12
brush Mar 2016 #14
flamingdem Mar 2016 #17
jberryhill Mar 2016 #21
flamingdem Mar 2016 #25
jberryhill Mar 2016 #27
flamingdem Mar 2016 #31
delrem Mar 2016 #20
jberryhill Mar 2016 #23
JackRiddler Mar 2016 #37
delrem Mar 2016 #44
jberryhill Mar 2016 #45
delrem Mar 2016 #46
jberryhill Mar 2016 #49
delrem Mar 2016 #51
jberryhill Mar 2016 #52
delrem Mar 2016 #53
jberryhill Mar 2016 #54
delrem Mar 2016 #56
jberryhill Mar 2016 #59
Doctor Jack Mar 2016 #28
jberryhill Mar 2016 #40
Turbineguy Mar 2016 #24
840high Mar 2016 #26
joshcryer Mar 2016 #30
jberryhill Mar 2016 #38
joshcryer Mar 2016 #41
JackRiddler Mar 2016 #39
0rganism Mar 2016 #33
DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #34
JackRiddler Mar 2016 #36
world wide wally Mar 2016 #43
PatrickforO Mar 2016 #57
Glitterati Mar 2016 #62
tabasco Mar 2016 #64
DCBob Mar 2016 #65
Teamster Jeff Mar 2016 #66

Response to jberryhill (Original post)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 01:48 AM

1. I suggest nobody should interrupt the rallies of the opposing party

 

Simple.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Albertoo (Reply #1)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 01:54 AM

4. Suggest it, no....

Advise it, no...

Plan it, no...

Understand it, oh hell yes. My only question is why did it take so long for anyone to take a stand against that kind of hate.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Albertoo (Reply #1)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:03 AM

9. I disagree. You have a candidate basically calling to round people up

You can't let that type of hatemongering and fascism slide and hope to keep your democracy. People need to stand up to him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DemocraticSocialist8 (Reply #9)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:09 AM

13. How about just not voting for him?

 


...and working to get votes for a candidate who opposes him?

What is so hard about that?

If he gets the nomination, I guarantee you that someone is going to "stand up to him".

That person will be the Democratic candidate.

Here's how this works:

He can spew ignorant stupid shit until November. Then, in the first week of November, we don't vote for him. Then, he goes home, and we will have demonstrated that his ideas were rejected.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Reply #13)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:37 AM

32. It's not just about the election though.

 

He's inciting violence and spreading hate. He's a danger to society. People have already gotten hurt and more will. Trump is not just one guy. It's a movement of violence and hate.

Peaceful protesters at his rallies are attacked and injured on a regular basis and he encourages it. He encourages political violence. He's basically a fascist. The government doesn't judge him because he has freedom of speech and the law protects that.

So that means people have to act to set a message that Trump's political violence won't be tolerated. It's self defense. It's not going to work to just ignore them and hope they go away. If they're allowed to continue they are only going to get worse. They aren't going to stop until they get met by some kind of force or disruption. Trump should crawl back under a rock with David Duke and the KKK.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cheese Sandwich (Reply #32)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:56 AM

35. Who said anything about ignoring him?

 


I may be wrong, but if he gets the R nomination, then there is going to be someone clearly denouncing his ideas for months.

Hate never ultimately wins. It is, by its very nature, self destructive. You seem not to believe that or understand it.

I didn't say anything about ignoring anyone, however.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Reply #35)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:42 AM

48. It's not enough for him to lose the election.

 

It's not just a politician. It's a movement with a physical agenda of attacking anybody who's different. It has to be met with a physical resistance, which can be non-violent disruption. Until they see some counter power pushing back they are only going to get worse, no matter who wins the election.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cheese Sandwich (Reply #48)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:52 AM

50. Do you remember this one?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Reply #50)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 04:25 AM

55. I see both sides

 

The protests are happening for a reason. It's because the establishment system is treating trump as a legitimate candidate. But the protesters view him as delegitimized because he encourages violence and attacks. The establishment in this case includes the Democratic Party, the Republican party, the mainstream media, and the government. It never should have been allowed to get this far. The media knows how to paint out a candidate as kooky or illegitimate or dangerous if they want to. They do it to progressives all the time. They let Trump grow into a huge movement. MSNBC and CNN have been constant Trump for a year. They built him up. The Republicans fostered hatred in their party for years. Now they have a monster on their hands. The Democrats can't be blamed for it but they are locked into where they have to treat Trump as legitimate because it's all they can do. They are constrained by their role. The government can do a better job of cracking down on some of these assaults that have been happening at Trump rallies. Somebody has to challenge Trump and say look this guy doesn't even deserve to be in the debate or treated as a serious candidate. He's not a legitimate candidate because he encourages violence.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cheese Sandwich (Reply #55)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 04:38 AM

58. Did you catch what Rubio said?

 


Rubio cracked me up.

In essence, he said something along the lines of "People like Trump because he says out loud what a lot of people are thinking. But when you are in politics, you can't say those things out loud."

And Obama has said more than once that Trump isn't saying anything Republican candidates haven't said for a long time - Trump just says it more clearly.

So want do you want? A GOP candidate who thinks the same shit but doesn't say it out loud, or do you want one that finally gives America a big fat honest and close face full of at what these people have really been about for a generation!

Donald Trump is the distilled essence of what Republicans have been all about for decades. I'm glad they've finally dropped the smiley mask and decided to give everyone a good look-see.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Reply #58)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 04:53 AM

60. That is funny

 

Rubio must have had another glitch and accidentally let that slip. You're right there's really not much difference. In some says Cruz might actually be worse. Trump is a bully though.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cheese Sandwich (Reply #60)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 08:41 AM

61. He repeated it on different nights

 


He said it - or something close to it - during the last debate as well.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cheese Sandwich (Reply #32)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:14 AM

42. Protesters should not be disrupting the meeting inside the building.

 

Thousands outside is best.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jim Beard (Reply #42)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 08:45 AM

63. Wrong

 

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak outó
Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak outó
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak outó
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for meóand there was no one left to speak for me.


Never forget what "behaving nicely" got us the last time a fascist came to power.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Glitterati (Reply #63)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 04:43 PM

67. Let us not be the ones who are fighting the bad ones become bad ourselves.

 

He does not have the power yet and I will only be concerned when he has the nomination and even then, we do not need to make him the victim .

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jim Beard (Reply #67)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 04:50 PM

68. More tsk, tsk, tsk, behave children BS

 

Nope. I will not go quietly.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Original post)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 01:52 AM

2. We will give em hugs and kisses

then go out for milk n cookies after

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Original post)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 01:52 AM

3. I don't know, BUT there's a very interesting oped in USA Today by Frank Luntz.

Norm Goldman mentioned it and I went to read it.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2016/03/10/frank-luntz-young-voters-spell-doom-gop/81534530/

Frank Luntz: Young voters spell doom for GOP

While Republicans fight a war over how high to build a mythical wall on our Southern border, they ignore the war for the hearts and minds of Americaís largest generation in history ó even bigger than the Baby Boomers.

The Republican Party doesnít have a problem with younger voters. Younger voters have a problem with the Republican Party, and it is rapidly becoming a long-term electoral crisis.

In our recent national survey of 1,000 first- and second-time voters ages 18 to 26, Republicans werenít just off on the wrong track. They were barely on the radar with this Snapchat generation, as it is sometimes called.


Take the time to read the whole article. It's not very long, but bearing in mind who wrote this, it's got to have the Pubbies in complete desperation!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to napi21 (Reply #3)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:41 AM

47. This guy is dishonest as they come

He would never put his real thoughts in a USA Today article.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Original post)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 01:56 AM

5. Depends who throws the first punch, and how the security/police behave

I suspect this won't happen. Trump supporters are FOR Trump, rather than opposed to the other candidates. They are star-struck or something. Doubt they'd bother to show up anywhere else.

But

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to intrepidity (Reply #5)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:02 AM

7. In a crowd nobody ever sorts out the "first punch"

 

The notion that anyone is going to sort out the particulars of "who threw the first punch" among conflicting accounts of fights breaking out in a crowd of thousands is absurd.

In the video loop they keep playing tonight, have you seen the one where the white guy is yelling in the face of the black guy? Which one throws the first punch?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Reply #7)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:04 AM

10. That is only one video

If an event becomes significant, there will be dozens more videos from different perspectives. The thing I noticed in all of the videos was the number of people holding their phones up recording everything.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Original post)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 01:58 AM

6. Trump folks showing up at Bernie's rallies?

What would be wrong with that? Sanders hasn't managed to actually insult anyone except the Establishment politicians and Wall Street.

Well, I guess you could say he's urging that the brass bull down by Wall Street should be neutered but I can't see too many Trump-ites getting in an uproar over that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mikehiggins (Reply #6)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:03 AM

8. "A commie is trying to take over America!"

 


You don't think there is someone who finds that notion upsetting?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Reply #8)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:07 AM

11. I'd bet if they took a moment to listen to Bernie

they might actually find themselves agreeing with him.

Really, it might be a good thing if Trump supporters attended Bernie rallies.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to intrepidity (Reply #11)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:12 AM

15. As if

 


They won't listen for one second.

To put it in more direct terms, no, they are not going to show up to be persuaded of anything by a commie pinko Jew who wants to take away everyone's stuff. That is what they understand him to be, and they are going to spend as much time listening to Sanders as the protesters at the Trump rallies spend listening to Trump.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Reply #15)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:16 AM

16. But Trump doesn't actually say anything

Bernie says stuff, things that are meaningful to people. I dunno, maybe I'm just not cynical enough (lol, as if).

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to intrepidity (Reply #16)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:19 AM

19. There's one thing I learned that you might find interesting

 


It is surprising how many people assume that other people think the same way they do.

If Trump is not saying anything, then why is he winning the R primaries?

Clearly, he is saying something to people inclined to hear whatever the fuck it is he is saying, and who find Sanders to be as incomprehensible as you or I find Trump to be.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Reply #19)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:26 AM

22. I hear you

and yes, I do have difficulty unscrewing the inscrutible.

I hope that he is winning due to 1) his celebrity status and 2) a rejection of the other candidates. But honestly, I don't know what his supporters see in him. He certainly does not have a message beyond "I am great, and I'll do stuff".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Reply #15)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:19 AM

18. Exactly, how can we get a republican to listen to us....

when even a Democrat won't. Have a great night.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Reply #8)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:32 AM

29. Many people.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mikehiggins (Reply #6)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:08 AM

12. They hate everything that is not them. n/m

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Original post)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:09 AM

14. Clinton and Sanders aren't goading their supporters to violence

Trump has said "in my day demonstrators would be carried out on stretchers", and I wish I could punch one of them in the face". He's also told his supporters, not security personnel to "get them out, get them out".

What are you, in favor of this or something?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Original post)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:16 AM

17. Trump supporters aren't motivated by anything other than adoring their

strongman and hoping he can improve their lives and justify their racism.

They don't care about Bernie and won't go to his rallies.

The people at the Trump rally weren't Bernie supporters anyway as a whole - they were activists of all kinds and not tied to a candidate.

I hope they keep disrupting, no one else does anything.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to flamingdem (Reply #17)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:24 AM

21. "no one else does anything"

 

You do know that the overall point of this exercise is that there will be an election in November, where quite a few people are going to "do something" - i.e. vote.

It's pretty simple to get politicians to shut up. You don't vote for them. It shuts them up pretty effectively. Been to a Sarah Palin rally lately? Neither have I.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Reply #21)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:26 AM

25. I disagree and it's an American tradition to protest

and really this wasn't very violent and made the point that people will not put up with the bs Trump is selling. Just maybe some of those undereducated racists and average Joes will realize that Trump is a fraud and they'll vote for Bernie!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to flamingdem (Reply #25)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:31 AM

27. Ah, yes, the great Lincoln-Douglas Shouting Matches

 

For most of this country's political history, electronic sound amplification did not exist, so it was actually kind of important for people to be quiet enough to hear what was being said.

The tactic of attempting to disrupt one's opponents' political rallies originated elsewhere.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to flamingdem (Reply #25)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:35 AM

31. What were the shouting matches about?

My ancestor was involved with all of that, found a speech where he introduced Lincoln for a campaign rally.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Original post)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:20 AM

20. You do realize that Trump is a hatemongering fascist?

Don't you?

Have you thought about what'll go down if Trump becomes POTUS?



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to delrem (Reply #20)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:26 AM

23. My goodness, what a startling revelation!

 

Then I would strongly suggest that we not vote for him, and that we encourage others to do the same.

In what way did tonight's events further the objective of persuading others not to vote for him?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Reply #23)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:02 AM

37. What you are thinking is not what the people in Chicago are thinking.

 

An event is announced by Trump and they respond. You are surprised?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Reply #23)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:21 AM

44. You think you can stop tonight's events by lecturing me? Or lecturing DU?

Really?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to delrem (Reply #44)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:34 AM

45. I thought this was a discussion forum

 


I don't recall making any insinuations about what "you think", nor do I recall making any general objection to you posting here.

Do I have your permission to express my opinion?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Reply #45)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:38 AM

46. It is. You do realize that Trump is a hatemongering fascist?

You do realize that he preaches violence from the stage.
Hatred of minorities, the targeting of minorities for violent repression?

You suggest that he's a normal candidate, that there's an equivalence. Well, you're wrong. Even mainstream Republicans are shocked.

So what the hell do you expect to follow a fascist like that around? Civility?

He's put it on the table: people are fighting for their lives.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to delrem (Reply #46)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:50 AM

49. Yes

 

Thank you Captain Obvious.

I realized that about Nixon too. Now perhaps you will tell me what you recall about "law and order", "hard hats", "the silent majority", and how those phrases relate to the manipulation of chaos to the advantage of an authoritarian politician.

And, here, even though you are condescending and insulting, I hunted this down just for you:


https://m.

Worked like a fucking charm.




Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Reply #49)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 04:00 AM

51. Oh ffs! Even the other R candidates are blaming Trump! /nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to delrem (Reply #51)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 04:06 AM

52. No. Cruz tonight blamed Obama

 


You know, because Obama is so divisive that it's given Trump an opening.

No shit.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Reply #52)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 04:12 AM

53. From WP, lead story:

"One of Trumpís competitors, Ohio Gov. John Kasich (R) blamed Trump for the violence on Friday.

"Tonight the seeds of division that Donald Trump has been sowing this whole campaign finally bore fruit, and it was ugly," Kasich said in a statement. "Some let their opposition to his views slip beyond protest into violence, but we can never let that happen. I urge people to resist that temptation and rise to a higher level."

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) stopped short of blaming Trump, but said that the Republican frontrunner is learning that "words have real consequences."

"I wouldnít say Mr. Trump is responsible for the events of tonight," Rubio said on Fox News, "but he is most certainly, in other events, has in the past used some pretty rough language, saying in the good old days we used to beat these people up, or Iíll pay your legal bills if you rough them up. So I think he bears some responsibility for the general tone."

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) organized an impromptu press conference outside a dinner event in Rolling Meadows, Ill., and took a harsher tone against Trump.

"The responsibility for that lies with protesters, who took violence into their own hands. But in any campaign, responsibility starts at the top," Cruz said. "Any candidate is responsible for the culture of a campaign. And when you have a campaign that disrespects the voters, when you have a campaign that affirmatively encourages violence, when you have a campaign that is facing allegations of physical violence against members of the press, you create an environment that only encourages this sort of nasty discord."
____________________
I don't know what the hell your point is, but go ahead, continue to suggest that Trump is a normal candidate and to decry the actions of those who protested, like the young black guys chanting "16 shots" and who obviously were there TO SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to delrem (Reply #53)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 04:20 AM

54. Where the fuck did I "decry the actions of protestors"

 

Where the fuck did I do that?

Trump and his crew are following Hitler's playbook. They will be sending brownshirts to opponents' rallies.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Reply #54)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 04:30 AM

56. Oh I dunno, maybe it's implied in your OP? byeeeeeee!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to delrem (Reply #56)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 04:45 AM

59. Not the implication at all

 


These Trump supporters are extremely stupid and angry people, and Donald Trump has finally taken the smiley mask off of what the GOP has been all about for decades.

Since you seem fascinated by telling me repeatedly the obvious fact that Trump is a fascist, I was pondering the consequences of his followers taking the next step in the program, which is to disrupt the gatherings of their opponents, which they will deem "fair play".




Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to delrem (Reply #20)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:31 AM

28. Well said

This isn't the normal republican candidate. You didn't see this type of reaction in 2012 when Romney was running around spouting his non-sense because he wasn't encouraging violence or throwing out fascist bullshit. You don't see this type of thing at the other republican candidate's rallies because, while they are crazy assholes, aren't dangerous in the same way trump is. Its one thing to be disruptive because you strongly disagree with someone but it is totally different to be disruptive because someone is trying to start a 21st Nazi Party in the United States. If Ted Cruz is talking about how he dislikes regulations or wants to get rid of the IRS, I don't really care. Its a really stupid idea but no one could potentially die right now because of that. But saying that you want to see protesters dragged out on stretchers and attacking people that are being escorted out by the police, and saying that we need to round up millions of people, that is completely different. That type of rhetoric needs to be strongly opposed at every turn.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to delrem (Reply #20)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:07 AM

40. And they "realize" our candidates want to kill babies

 


With the Supreme Court hanging in the balance, I think their particular mindset leads them to similar fears.

Again, the basic mistake is "other people live in my reality."

Perhaps you haven't noticed they believe Obama is the anti-Christ, Sanders is Stalin, and Hillary is "Hitlery" in their lexicon.

Yes, I perfectly well understand what Trump represents.

I also understand they believe, wrongly but sincerely, the precise same things about our candidates.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Original post)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:26 AM

24. They won't show up at D rallies.

That would be individualist action. They work as a collective.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Original post)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:31 AM

26. Actually a good question.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Original post)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:32 AM

30. I don't see this happening.

I'd be utterly shocked and stunned. For one, less than 2% of his supporters are young people, and virtually no minorities or people you'd normally associate with activism go to his rallies.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to joshcryer (Reply #30)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:02 AM

38. "people you'd normally associate with activism"

 


I don't know. The activist shown here is looking pretty spry:



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Reply #38)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:08 AM

41. Oh I can see Rusty Shackleford showing up.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to joshcryer (Reply #30)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:02 AM

39. Yes very much so.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Original post)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:50 AM

33. let them yell for a while, then lead the assembly in singing "we shall overcome"?

i dunno, but that would seem like the sane approach

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Original post)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:55 AM

34. Jeb Bush was right when he called Trump the "Chaos Candidate", chaos follows him...

I agree with the spirit of your seminal post; protesters have a right to be heard but so do the protested.That being said, Trump is flirting with fascism so the backlash was to be expected. I don't know where this ends.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Original post)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:01 AM

36. Let them. They will never be in large numbers at D rallies.

 

Chicago, hello? The people came out in a very predictable fashion. Good for them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Original post)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:16 AM

43. stick flowers in their gun barrels?

It used to work

There are actually more good people than bad peopleÖ keep the faith

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Original post)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 04:34 AM

57. The last time a fascist dictator came to power legally (Hitler in 1933),

it took 12 years and 80 million lives to get rid of him. We will oppose Trump and his jackbooted Nazis from the beginning.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PatrickforO (Reply #57)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 08:43 AM

62. Good for you Patrick!

 

THAT is how it's done.

We do NOT stand idly by and watch it happen in the name of "behaving."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Original post)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 08:50 AM

64. It's America and they have the right to be there.

 

They do not have the right to assault anyone. The opponents at the Trump rally weren't bothering anybody. They should have been left alone. Seems pretty fucking simple to me. Contrarians seem so simple-minded.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Original post)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 08:52 AM

65. What exactly will they be protesting??

That Bernie is a socialist or Hillary lied about Benghazi?

They will look like fools. Let them try.. it will backfire.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Original post)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 08:52 AM

66. Oh my!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread