Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Just saw this on Chris Matthews.... (Original Post) michaz Mar 2016 OP
lol! noamnety Mar 2016 #1
Truly a great no-answer answer.... daleanime Mar 2016 #4
I think he actually believes his own bullshit. Marr Mar 2016 #2
No surprise here Faux pas Mar 2016 #3
Olbermann of MSNBC Suspended Over Donations Omaha Steve Mar 2016 #5
This is such a non-scandal. It's ridiculous. Meldread Mar 2016 #6
Stopped watching him a while go. marew Mar 2016 #7
turn MSNBC the fuck off musiclawyer Mar 2016 #8
 

noamnety

(20,234 posts)
1. lol!
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 12:01 PM
Mar 2016

“Working women know it is possible to have their own career and not depend on their spouse for success,” said Kathleen Matthews’ campaign manager, Ethan Susseles.

 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
2. I think he actually believes his own bullshit.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 12:12 PM
Mar 2016

He's described himself as a "cop on the beat"; someone who "holds politicians' feet to the fire". It's absurd to anyone watching, of course, and his constant references to palling around with this or that politician make it clear that he is way, way to close to this system to be any sort of antagonist, but he does seem to believe it somehow.

Omaha Steve

(99,066 posts)
5. Olbermann of MSNBC Suspended Over Donations
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 12:44 PM
Mar 2016

Olbermann is a hell of a lot better than Chris Matthews. I'm so mad I bought his book: http://www.amazon.com/Jack-Kennedy-Elusive-Chris-Matthews/dp/1451635095



The indefinite suspension of Keith Olbermann of MSNBC drew swift and mixed reactions. Credit Virginia Sherwood/NBC


http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/06/us/06olbermann.html?_r=0

By BRIAN STELTER and BILL CARTERNOV. 5, 2010

Keith Olbermann, the leading liberal voice on American television in the age of Obama, was suspended Friday after his employer, MSNBC, discovered he made campaign contributions to three Democrats last month.

The indefinite suspension was a stark display of the clash between objectivity and opinion in television journalism. While Mr. Olbermann is anchor of what is essentially the “Democratic Nightly News,” the decision affirmed that he was being held to the same standards as other employees of MSNBC and its parent, NBC News, both of which answer to NBC Universal. Most journalistic outlets discourage or directly prohibit campaign contributions by employees.

Mr. Olbermann’s contributions came to light in an article by Politico on Friday morning. He said he had donated $2,400 to the campaigns of Representatives Raúl M. Grijalva and Gabrielle Giffords of Arizona and Attorney General Jack Conway of Kentucky, who lost his Senate race to Rand Paul. He told Politico, “I did not privately or publicly encourage anyone else to donate to these campaigns, nor to any others in this election or any previous ones, nor have I previously donated to any political campaign at any level.”

On Friday evening, no one at NBC suggested that Mr. Olbermann would be fired.

FULL story at link.

Meldread

(4,213 posts)
6. This is such a non-scandal. It's ridiculous.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:46 PM
Mar 2016

I don't watch his show. I find him incredibly annoying, and he is rarely insightful.

However, this "scandal" makes two ridiculous assumptions and then creates a ridiculous standard.

First, it makes the ridiculous assumption that Matthews is aware of who is donating to his wife's campaign. Second, it makes the ridiculous assumption that Matthews brings them on air as a result of their contribution to her campaign. There is absolutely no evidence of this. Does anyone want to make the argument that he only had Senator Kirsten Gillibrand on his show because she donated to his wife's campaign? Seriously?

Then there is the ridiculous standard that is being made, which is an attempt to prove the second ridiculous assumption. That ridiculous standard is that Matthews should somehow have known who would donate to his wife's campaign AFTER they appeared on his show, and therefore should be required to disclose that information. What? What does he have, a time machine? He is not only keeping personal track of his wife's campaign finances as if he is personally managing her campaign (the first ridiculous assumption being made), he now also is required to possess knowledge of what is going to happen in the future, then travel back in time to let everyone know.

The only scandal here is that this was allowed to go to print, and people are actually suckers enough to go along.

marew

(1,588 posts)
7. Stopped watching him a while go.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:36 PM
Mar 2016

There were many times he would ask guests questions and would never let them answer. I would very much like to have heard the answers. He interrupted over and over again before the respondents could ever utter an entire sentence. MSNBC has truly gone downhill and Matthews has gone down the fastest.

musiclawyer

(2,335 posts)
8. turn MSNBC the fuck off
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:47 PM
Mar 2016

The faster we kill it the better off we all are . Go TYT or Democracy now exclusively

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Just saw this on Chris Ma...