Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 05:18 PM Mar 2016

ALABAMA: Senate Votes To Eliminate Marriage Licenses

Not The Onion!

http://www.joemygod.com/2016/03/15/alabama-senate-votes-to-eliminate-marriage-licenses/

Two weeks ago the Alabama Supreme Court dismissed a challenge to Obergefell with a ruling that Chief Justice Roy Moore bizarrely contends actually upholds his state’s ban on same-sex marriage. Today the state Senate continued to ride the crazy train. The Associated Press reports:

The Alabama Senate has voted to do away with state-issued marriage licenses following the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that effectively legalized same-sex marriage. Senators approved the bill 23-3 today. It would require couples to file a form recording their marriage rather than have county probate offices issue licenses.

Republican Sen. Greg Albritton of Range says the change would end controversy over marriage licenses while ensuring that people can marry whomever they choose. A few Alabama probate judges have stopped issuing marriage licenses altogether to avoid giving them to same-sex couples.

Rep. Patricia Todd is the only openly gay legislator in the state, and she calls the bill unnecessary. Todd says probate judges should do their job and issue licenses.


38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
ALABAMA: Senate Votes To Eliminate Marriage Licenses (Original Post) KamaAina Mar 2016 OP
I see nothing wrong with this SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2016 #1
I agree. Basic LA Mar 2016 #6
Well atreides1 Mar 2016 #32
Your first line is simply not true SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2016 #33
Who's destroying the institution of marriage now? gratuitous Mar 2016 #2
How is it destroying marriages SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2016 #17
Because . . . gratuitous Mar 2016 #24
The state can still grant rights and privileges to married persons, even if it does not merrily Mar 2016 #28
Exactly SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2016 #29
This doesn't end legal marriage in Alabama SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2016 #34
No more shotgun weddings? Omaha Steve Mar 2016 #3
No, just HubertHeaver Mar 2016 #5
To get Social Security, pension, health ins, etc a license is required Omaha Steve Mar 2016 #9
Where? SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2016 #10
But they aren't going to issue them IF this passes Omaha Steve Mar 2016 #13
Where SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2016 #15
You have to file an executed license to get a certificate Omaha Steve Mar 2016 #23
If there is no license issued SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2016 #26
How are you going to get legally married to get a certificate? Omaha Steve Mar 2016 #30
If you read the article SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2016 #31
I did Omaha Steve Mar 2016 #35
Try reading the entire article SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2016 #36
It isn't Nebraska Omaha Steve Mar 2016 #37
No, Social Security does not require a certified marriage license SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2016 #38
Correct. HubertHeaver Mar 2016 #11
I think you're confusing SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2016 #12
Would this form be valid in other states? NutmegYankee Mar 2016 #4
as long as it's valid in Alabama, why not? geek tragedy Mar 2016 #7
Why wouldn't it be? SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2016 #8
so how did you get the certificate? hobbit709 Mar 2016 #14
You would get it when you register the marriage n/t SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2016 #16
No, when you register the marriage, you don't get anything muriel_volestrangler Mar 2016 #25
Depending on how this was implemented, another state could argue it isn't a valid license. NutmegYankee Mar 2016 #20
Marriages are contracts that often end up in court NightWatcher Mar 2016 #18
The registration would be the legal record n/t SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2016 #19
While this may solve some problems I suspect there might jwirr Mar 2016 #21
So now will the recording clerks revolt? mountain grammy Mar 2016 #22
Good. linuxman Mar 2016 #27

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
1. I see nothing wrong with this
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 05:21 PM
Mar 2016

Couples can marry whenever they choose and whomever they choose, and just tell the state later.

That removes state sanctioning, just like with any other contract.

atreides1

(16,066 posts)
32. Well
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 07:02 PM
Mar 2016

Currently state issued marriage licenses are required by the IRS, the Social Security Administration, the US military, and I'm sure there are other government agencies both local and federal that have the same requirement!

And as long as the state collects a fee to file the forms, it is theoretically still state sanctioned!


One last thing, what if some clerk who has a "sincere" religious belief when it comes to marriage, decides to "lose" this contract?

This doesn't do anything except makes it more difficult for same-sex couples, and it makes them scapegoats for those who will feel that their religious belief is under attack!

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
33. Your first line is simply not true
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 07:10 PM
Mar 2016

The IRS, the Social Security Administration and the U.S. military most certainly do NOT require marriage licenses, they require proof of marriage, which is a marriage certificate.

I've never had to show my marriage license to anyone, except for the priest who married us.

It doesn't make it more difficult for same-sex couples, it makes it easier for all couples. No need to get a license beforehand - just go get married, have a form signed by witnesses, and go file it.

Much handwringing about nothing, IMO.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
2. Who's destroying the institution of marriage now?
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 05:21 PM
Mar 2016

I've seen spoiled four-year-olds less childish than this.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
17. How is it destroying marriages
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 05:52 PM
Mar 2016

to say "Marry whomever you please, and tell us about it afterwards"?

Why should anyone have to have a license from the state to get married?

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
24. Because . . .
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:37 PM
Mar 2016

The state grants any number of rights and privileges to married persons, as does the federal government. From little things like tax breaks to larger things like your right to visit your critically-injured spouse in the hospital. There are all kinds of legal structures set up to automatically accommodate a married couple at little or no cost, that aren't available to unmarried couples without laborious (and expensive) contract writing that may or may not be honored by an over-officious government official or a blue-nosed business owner without recourse.

The system is geared in ways large and small to deal with married couples. By taking their ball and going home, the Alabama legislature is looking to dismantle this structure out of pique because couples they don't like will get the same benefits. Oddly enough, during the time leading up to the Obergefell decision, opponents of same sex marriage claimed that treating all couples equally under the law would "destroy marriage." Now that marriage equality is the law of the land, those same opponents are trying to fulfill their own prophecy by destroying a legal vehicle that has served human society for milennia.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
28. The state can still grant rights and privileges to married persons, even if it does not
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:51 PM
Mar 2016

interfere in who gets married and who doesn't.

The state gives rights to people born alive, but it does not give out licenses to get pregnant.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
29. Exactly
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:53 PM
Mar 2016

I see nothing at all wrong with this, so long as, upon request, the state will produce a certificate showing that a marriage took place.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
10. Where?
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 05:39 PM
Mar 2016

I've never had to show my marriage license, except to the priest who married us. For health insurance, etc., I've had to show the marriage certificate.

Omaha Steve

(99,495 posts)
23. You have to file an executed license to get a certificate
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:11 PM
Mar 2016

For my pension benefit for Marta, I was told a certificate would not be accepted. We drove up to the county we got the license at to get a certified copy. It is not filed in the county of the marriage by NE law. No idea why.

OS

Omaha Steve

(99,495 posts)
35. I did
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 07:25 PM
Mar 2016


"The Alabama Senate has voted to do away with state-issued marriage licenses"

See my reply 23. Doing away with this doesn't meet legal requirements for many legal reasons!

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
36. Try reading the entire article
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 07:46 PM
Mar 2016

Marriages will take place without the license, and be registered afterwards.

Unless a state says there is a requirement for a marriage license prior to the marriage, then there is no requirement. Right now, all 50 states require a license prior to marriage, but there is nothing that requires them to do so, except for their own laws. If they choose to change those laws, that's their call within their own states.

What Nebraska requires in order to constitute a legal marriage in Nebraska is completely irrelevant to what Alabama or any other state requires in order to constitute a legal marriage in those states.

Omaha Steve

(99,495 posts)
37. It isn't Nebraska
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 07:56 PM
Mar 2016

It is Social Security, employers, other government benefits, etc.

Social Security requires a certified marriage license. Just like I had to go through to get Marta her part of my pension with City of Omaha law. Without it she would only get to look at this below instead of getting a monthly check.



SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
38. No, Social Security does not require a certified marriage license
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 01:43 AM
Mar 2016

They require a marriage certificate, which is not the same thing at all. And if you're from a state that recognizes common-law marriage, they don't even require that.

https://www.ssa.gov/forms/ssa-2.html

Documents you may need to provide

We may ask you to provide documents to show that you are eligible, such as:
•Birth certificate or other proof of birth;
•Proof of U.S. citizenship or lawful alien status if you were not born in the United States [More Info];
•U.S. military discharge paper(s) if you had military service before 1968;
•W-2 forms(s) and/or self-employment tax returns for last year.
•Final divorce decree, if applying as a divorced spouse; and
Marriage certificate.




Nor does the federal government in general require a marriage license, they require a marriage certificate, which is not the same thing at all. I did 20 years in the military and never had to produce a marriage license to prove I had married - they wanted the certificate.
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
7. as long as it's valid in Alabama, why not?
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 05:31 PM
Mar 2016

They may run into issues with illegal marriages (bigamy, underage, etc) so not sure how that would work.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
8. Why wouldn't it be?
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 05:33 PM
Mar 2016

The only time I've ever been asked to show my marriage license was by the priest who performed the marriage. After that, our marriage certificate was proof of the marriage.

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
14. so how did you get the certificate?
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 05:45 PM
Mar 2016

In TX you file the signed and filled in license with the county clerk and get issued a certificate.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,268 posts)
25. No, when you register the marriage, you don't get anything
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:44 PM
Mar 2016

Here's the bill; the judge of probate does not issue a certificate

http://alisondb.legislature.state.al.us/ALISON/SearchableInstruments/2016RS/PrintFiles/SB143-int.pdf

You hand over the witnessed forms to the judge of probate, who sends copies each month to the Office of Vital Statistics. You don't get anything back. So presumably you have to wait until they've received that, and then ask them to give you a copy of the marriage certificate if you need it for anything.

NutmegYankee

(16,199 posts)
20. Depending on how this was implemented, another state could argue it isn't a valid license.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 05:58 PM
Mar 2016

Sure, it would be fought in court under "full faith and credit", but I can see a state taking such an act.

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
18. Marriages are contracts that often end up in court
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 05:55 PM
Mar 2016

They need to be legally sanctioned in that state.

There's a potential for a lot of problems if people claim they were married there but no record of a license could be found.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
21. While this may solve some problems I suspect there might
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 05:59 PM
Mar 2016

be some questions that come up and there will now be no ID to prove some issues. I have needed to prove that I was married to my ex for things like child support and welfare.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»ALABAMA: Senate Votes To ...