Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"let the people decide" (Original Post) handmade34 Mar 2016 OP
The senate denying the president his rights under the constitution beachbumbob Mar 2016 #1
"His rights" extend to having his nominee considered. Igel Mar 2016 #4
THE PEOPLE DID DECIDE, WHEN THEY ELECTED OBAMA - *TWICE* Skittles Mar 2016 #2
Mitch McConnell DC Fax (202) 224-2499 pat_k Mar 2016 #3
K&R Solly Mack Mar 2016 #5
 

beachbumbob

(9,263 posts)
1. The senate denying the president his rights under the constitution
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 08:23 PM
Mar 2016

The people spoke twice on this already... Time to make conservatives pay the price for the racist actions

Igel

(35,300 posts)
4. "His rights" extend to having his nominee considered.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 09:57 PM
Mar 2016

Obama was going to filibuster Alito to prevent an up-or-down vote. Why? Because he disagreed with "judicial philosophy." Details didn't matter.

Another nominee around the same time was basically rejected without much ado. She had good grades from the ABA, which had been cited as the "gold standard" under Clinton, and again under Obama. But under Bush II, the ABA's rating system was apparently in temporary disrepair.

Nominees for lower courts would flounder for years, and in some cases never had hearings in the judiciary committee or, if they passed out of committee, never had votes scheduled. And, no, there's no real distinction between SCOTUS and appeals court nominees as far as process or appointment authority goes.

That's when (D) ran the show. One has to remember that the "nuclear option" that was much vilified a decade ago was threatened against precisely (D) blocking judicial nominations. Of course, a few years later the horrible nuclear option was a grand and glorious thing.

I get whip-lash sometimes. On the other hand, the real problem is that nobody remembers what happened. If you have a small window of experience to draw on, then there's no real apparently contradiction. What happened a decade ago simply never happened, because what you see is all there is.

pat_k

(9,313 posts)
3. Mitch McConnell DC Fax (202) 224-2499
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 09:23 PM
Mar 2016

Faxes can be more effective than email. So send a fax today!

eFax has a no obligation thirty-day trial
https://www.efax.com/lp/free-trial

And find your Senator's fax number
http://www.senate.gov/index.htm


"The American people are perfectly capable of having their say on this issue, so let's give them a voice. Let's let the American people decide. The Senate will appropriately revisit the matter when it considers the qualifications of the nominee the next president nominates, whoever that might be," McConnell said.

http://www.npr.org/2016/03/16/470664561/mcconnell-blocking-supreme-court-nomination-about-a-principle-not-a-person

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"let the people decide"