General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"You have to wait. We don't have enough ballots."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1528881If you do not want that to be the chorus when you go to vote in the General Election, you need to pay attention to this issue.
Voter ID laws keep people from the polls. "We don't have enough ..." is what stops people that have ID from voting, too.
It feels like to me that we are having to fight harder than ever to preserve our democracy.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)I want people to be able to vote. This is a shameful and honestly, transparent attempt to prevent people from voting.
The door swings both ways folks.
shraby
(21,946 posts)Making them wait an undetermined amount of time for a ballot is a blatant attempt to stop them from voting. No doubt about it.
Ballots can't be too expensive to print up once the first one is done. They should have to print double the ballots they need for the number of voters they show registered, or at least half again as many, due to spoilage.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)is what it is.
Duval
(4,280 posts)Thinking about getting in touch with our Atty General. I am so disgusted and angry.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Please, make a complaint. I am so damn tired of hearing that if you want to change something you should make a complaint!
It shouldn't be a brave move, merely an act of conscientious citizenship, but anything regarding our elections is increasingly turning out to be an act of bravery.
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)to point out these things on "our" side.
I'm so disgusted with this blatant attempt to keep people from voting that I couldn't help from ranting.
Frankly, I wonder why there aren't more people connecting the dots and getting pissed off.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)I've never understood how you run out of ballots. Assume 100% turnout, then add a % for spoilage. How hard can that be?
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Unless you just want to throw votes a certain way. You know that the mother that is on her lunch break voting can't wait 4 hours. You know the Dad that has got to show up at a job site can't wait that long.
If you delay people from voting long enough, they will have to abandon the polls.
Brother_Love
(82 posts)I thought in US you can do this. No?
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Last edited Sat Mar 19, 2016, 09:08 PM - Edit history (1)
because you confirm that the people who are voting actually live where they are voting.
Which, is limited to Washington, Arizona, Oregon and Colorado.
It is as though the people in DC don't want to know what we the People think, they merely want to interpret it to translate what would be best for said Congressperson.
I might add that those three states all report the highest standard of living (not financial, just "I'm glad to be alive and live here" ratings than the rest.
Why on *EARTH* would politicians not want to implement voting by mail?
Edited to add AZ.
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)They know what people think. They just want to change their thoughts to serve their interests.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)that this election is going to be the one that breaks me.
Not because who I want to win doesn't win, but because it shatters my faith in the process.
I can stomach that my peers believe that Trump is better suited for the office of President; I *cannot* stomach that they got there via deception, lack of ballots, and bureaucratic distortion.
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)The people that we are pitted against don't have the problem of conscience. We have that problem. But it's NOT a problem. It's what makes us human. It makes us the "good guys", as far as I'm concerned.
We NEED you voice Aerows. Now more than ever. Follow your heart and you will figure it all out. And each one of us will be MUCH better for it!
Aerows
(39,961 posts)But then again, shutting me up about something I believe in (i.e. the voting process, the Democratic process) has been unsuccessful so far, so don't you worry.
The thing is, we need more than just speaking it, we need to physically be present.
It takes bodies to accomplish things.
Brother_Love
(82 posts)former9thward
(31,973 posts)We mail ballots in Arizona. Moat western states have mail in ballots.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Damn, we need to catch up!
Brother_Love
(82 posts)morningglory
(2,336 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)and it is turning into the ugliest one in my memory.
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)and I wouldn't wish this shit on the American public if she is our candidate.
phazed0
(745 posts)... when the people rise up en mass against corporate shills and corrupt campaigns.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)is a sturdy and absolutely awful way to game the polls.
"You can't vote because there are not enough ballots, we are trying to get more."
That makes "my dog ate my homework" seem like a second-level university answer.
Brother_Love
(82 posts)LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)Every state's rules for elections are different. Some states have exclusively mail ballots (Oregon,) some require an excuse (infirmity, out of state travel, etc) to get an absentee ballot, some grant one on request. Some states (California does this for sure) let you request an absentee ballot for every election, some states (Florida) want a new request every year.
Here's a breakdown for you: http://www.longdistancevoter.org/absentee_voting_rules
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Running out of people's ability to vote has to be the most ridiculous excuse to deny people to ability to vote that I have heard yet.
Please don't even excuse this, or attempt to normalize it.
This is criminal against democracy.
DesertRat
(27,995 posts)in Arizona, as do the rest of my family. It's much more convenient.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)I didn't know you had that system, as well - I didn't omit you on purpose, I just was unaware.
DesertRat
(27,995 posts)It used to be called an absentee ballot.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)voters have availed themselves of.
DesertRat
(27,995 posts)Vote2016
(1,198 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)but having enough ballots for the known number of people that are able to vote is simple enough that a tea party member could understand it, let alone the well-educated people that conduct the process.
Atman
(31,464 posts)Repubs will win this elections. Thanks to W's electronic Scam-O-Matic vote takers, they'll get the outcome they want.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)I voted in the election between Gore and Bush when I lived there.
Well, I *think* I voted.
I'm pretty sure I did?
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Most poll workers are wonderful, civic-minded people. It's great to see one's neighbors taking part in such a vital part of our badly injured but still breathing democracy.
It's one of those rare instances when I still feel a sense of solidarity and patriotism.
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)I love voting. Doing your civic duty for the betterment of all of our brothers and sisters, and chatting with good people is what it's all about for me.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)We cannot decide what we are doing as citizens in our country.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)that we are drifting away from having the people you know down the street to be a poll worker to the bored person that was hired via a temporary agency.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)How many people can do that? That is definitely something to watch for because it happened here in NC. Early Voting..
Aerows
(39,961 posts)I'm not sure what else you can call it.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)with listening to the same people that are ardently opposed to voter ID laws, which they should be, turn a blind eye to lack of ballots. As though that is any damn bit better.
Takket
(21,553 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)ladjf
(17,320 posts)have enough ballots! Well, Ok. We'll get it right next year. My bad.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)because I don't want to go to bed dreaming of what could happen if we don't "have enough ballots" and we end up with President Trump.