Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 06:15 PM Mar 2016

United flies LAX to SFO on biofuel

http://www.sfgate.com/business/article/United-flies-LAX-to-SFO-on-biofuel-6885644.php

Shortly after 10 a.m. Friday, United Airlines Flight 708 left Los Angeles for San Francisco with a full complement of passengers and crew — and biofuel coursing through its engines.

The flight, unremarkable save for the liquid in its tanks, could represent a turning point in aviation.

Airlines have dabbled for years in alternative fuels, both as a way to combat climate change and to hedge against volatile oil prices. But to date, the airlines have largely stuck to demonstration flights proving the fuels could work.

Now United has made biofuels part of its regular operations at Los Angeles International Airport. The airline has signed a three-year agreement with AltAir Paramount, which makes fuels out of animal fats and nonedible plant oils at a refinery near the airport. Over the life of the agreement, AltAir will supply United with 15 million gallons of biofuel — roughly 2 percent of all the fuel United will use at LAX.


This could be a gamechanger! I could even see an all-California biofueled airline replacing the high-speed rail project.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
United flies LAX to SFO on biofuel (Original Post) KamaAina Mar 2016 OP
A plus the exahust smells of French Fries n/t doc03 Mar 2016 #1
No. ghostsinthemachine Mar 2016 #2
Some biofuel is made from used cooking grease KamaAina Mar 2016 #3
They got it together ghostsinthemachine Mar 2016 #4
It would be the next segment south, from Palmdale to Santa Clarita, that would be of concern KamaAina Mar 2016 #5
Finally a harnessed use for baked beans whistler162 Mar 2016 #6

ghostsinthemachine

(3,569 posts)
2. No.
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 06:33 PM
Mar 2016

bio fuel isn't hardly feasible and is too unreliable due to fluctuating oil and commodity prices. And bio fuel has to be grown and would always be grown with GMO crops and pesticides. the amount need for one SF to LA trip would be astronomical, planes hold thousands of gallons of gasoline.

More planes, more airports. Bigger airports. More public expenditures. More freeways to the airports. More cars on the road.

HSR is the one and only way to go. I may not be around to ride it, but the only way to go. Not to mention the economic boon that cities and towns along the way will reap by having jobs anywhere in the state easily accessible.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
3. Some biofuel is made from used cooking grease
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 07:27 PM
Mar 2016

hence, as noted above, the exhaust smells of French fries.

I'm getting a little concerned that they may never be able to get HSR through the Tehachapis to L.A. If and when they do, though, Fresno in particular would benefit from being midway between L.A. and the Bay Area; companies that do business statewide could then take advantage of its relatively low rents and wages.

edit: And what would it matter if GMO crops were used to make the biofuel? In fact, that might be the only thing we could do with them.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
5. It would be the next segment south, from Palmdale to Santa Clarita, that would be of concern
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 07:39 PM
Mar 2016

the tunneling costs seem to be mounting.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»United flies LAX to SFO o...