Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 05:11 PM Mar 2016

What happened in Arizona wasn’t an accident: When states make voting impossible

it’s for a very clear reason

http://www.salon.com/2016/03/24/what_happened_in_arizona_wasnt_an_accident_when_states_make_voting_impossible_its_for_a_very_clear_reason/

Once again, an American election was unnecessarily thwarted by long lines and not enough ballots. To say there’s no excuse for such nonsense, especially in a nation that prides itself on its representative democracy and, yes, its exceptionalism, is understating the problem. This time around, it happened during the Arizona primary where countless voters were forced to stand in lines for hours, while others were told they weren’t registered in the first place....

Voter ID laws and punitive voter purges have been the centerpieces of a Republican strategy to rig modern elections. Republicans in nearly half of all states have managed to pass laws that make it more difficult for lower-income Democratic voters to cast ballots, forcing former Attorney General Eric Holder to compare such measures to the poll taxes used in the Jim Crow-era South in order to suppress the Black vote.. This is absolutely by design, even if some Republicans are caught in the meat grinder, too. The lower the turnout, the better Republicans fare in elections, so while voter ID laws tend to disenfranchise Democrats, the intention is more specifically to elect Republicans.

Thirty-three states boast one form of voter ID or another. Texas has perhaps the most ridiculous such law. If you don’t have one of the required forms of identification in the Lone Star State, you’ll have to apply for an Election Identification Certificate (EIC). But in order to get an EIC, you have to present your proof of citizenship and a second form of identification. Yes, that’s right, you’ll need to get an ID in order to get an ID — one of many reasons why this law is so completely absurd. And all of this on top of the normal voter registration process (which only requires a Social Security Number). If you don’t have a mandatory ID issued by the TxDPS (Texas Department of Public Safety), it might be because 70 counties don’t have a TxDPS office.

The GOP excuse for these laws? It’s voter fraud, they say. But how often do voters attempt to scam the system? Among all federal elections between 2002 and 2005, the rate of voter fraud was 0.00000013 percent. This according to a five-year probe by George W. Bush’s Justice Department. Put another way, around 26 people out of 197 million were convicted of attempting to vote illegally during all of those elections. And yet the Republicans continue to screech about voter fraud anyway. (They’re willing to believe that voter fraud exists, even though it doesn’t, and yet the climate crisis, with its 97 percent scientific consensus, is clearly fiction.)


8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What happened in Arizona wasn’t an accident: When states make voting impossible (Original Post) KamaAina Mar 2016 OP
Ridiculous Jackson3000 Mar 2016 #1
Both Sanders and Trump would have benefited from higher turnout KamaAina Mar 2016 #2
Except the county this happened to was favoring Hillary strongly. n/t pnwmom Mar 2016 #8
The pukes did it in my county. TexasProgresive Mar 2016 #3
Wow, are you new to politics? Why is there so much voter disenfranchisement and suppression? rhett o rick Mar 2016 #4
Or it could have been a test-run MurrayDelph Mar 2016 #6
It's happening all over America in varying degrees. nt ladjf Mar 2016 #5
Voting by mail doesn't make voting impossible. It's all we have in WA and OR. pnwmom Mar 2016 #7

Jackson3000

(7 posts)
1. Ridiculous
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 05:15 PM
Mar 2016

It was a primary. What possible benefit could there be in limiting participation in a primary? It was just incompetence.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
2. Both Sanders and Trump would have benefited from higher turnout
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 05:17 PM
Mar 2016

Trump, of course, prevailed anyway. Not so Sanders.

TexasProgresive

(12,157 posts)
3. The pukes did it in my county.
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 05:22 PM
Mar 2016

I think their reasoning is to give the perception that there are few of us.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
4. Wow, are you new to politics? Why is there so much voter disenfranchisement and suppression?
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 05:23 PM
Mar 2016

BECAUSE IT DOES MAKE A DIFFERENCE.

MurrayDelph

(5,293 posts)
6. Or it could have been a test-run
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 07:34 PM
Mar 2016

to see if they would be able to get away with it in the fall.

"See, we're not trying to disenfranchise the Democratic part of the state; it's ALWAYS like that!"

pnwmom

(108,973 posts)
7. Voting by mail doesn't make voting impossible. It's all we have in WA and OR.
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 08:36 PM
Mar 2016

They made a stupid mistake thinking that so many people would vote by mail that they wouldn't need all the polling places. But they could switch to all mail-in balloting, with ballots sent out automatically to registered voters for every election, and solve that problem.

And, since someone else asked, in WA there are arrangements for homeless people and people in unstable housing to vote. They can use any address they want, or they can vote in person at a few locations.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What happened in Arizona ...