General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat happened in Arizona wasn’t an accident: When states make voting impossible
its for a very clear reason
http://www.salon.com/2016/03/24/what_happened_in_arizona_wasnt_an_accident_when_states_make_voting_impossible_its_for_a_very_clear_reason/
Voter ID laws and punitive voter purges have been the centerpieces of a Republican strategy to rig modern elections. Republicans in nearly half of all states have managed to pass laws that make it more difficult for lower-income Democratic voters to cast ballots, forcing former Attorney General Eric Holder to compare such measures to the poll taxes used in the Jim Crow-era South in order to suppress the Black vote.. This is absolutely by design, even if some Republicans are caught in the meat grinder, too. The lower the turnout, the better Republicans fare in elections, so while voter ID laws tend to disenfranchise Democrats, the intention is more specifically to elect Republicans.
Thirty-three states boast one form of voter ID or another. Texas has perhaps the most ridiculous such law. If you dont have one of the required forms of identification in the Lone Star State, youll have to apply for an Election Identification Certificate (EIC). But in order to get an EIC, you have to present your proof of citizenship and a second form of identification. Yes, thats right, youll need to get an ID in order to get an ID one of many reasons why this law is so completely absurd. And all of this on top of the normal voter registration process (which only requires a Social Security Number). If you dont have a mandatory ID issued by the TxDPS (Texas Department of Public Safety), it might be because 70 counties dont have a TxDPS office.
The GOP excuse for these laws? Its voter fraud, they say. But how often do voters attempt to scam the system? Among all federal elections between 2002 and 2005, the rate of voter fraud was 0.00000013 percent. This according to a five-year probe by George W. Bushs Justice Department. Put another way, around 26 people out of 197 million were convicted of attempting to vote illegally during all of those elections. And yet the Republicans continue to screech about voter fraud anyway. (Theyre willing to believe that voter fraud exists, even though it doesnt, and yet the climate crisis, with its 97 percent scientific consensus, is clearly fiction.)
Jackson3000
(7 posts)It was a primary. What possible benefit could there be in limiting participation in a primary? It was just incompetence.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Trump, of course, prevailed anyway. Not so Sanders.
pnwmom
(108,973 posts)TexasProgresive
(12,157 posts)I think their reasoning is to give the perception that there are few of us.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)BECAUSE IT DOES MAKE A DIFFERENCE.
MurrayDelph
(5,293 posts)to see if they would be able to get away with it in the fall.
"See, we're not trying to disenfranchise the Democratic part of the state; it's ALWAYS like that!"
ladjf
(17,320 posts)pnwmom
(108,973 posts)They made a stupid mistake thinking that so many people would vote by mail that they wouldn't need all the polling places. But they could switch to all mail-in balloting, with ballots sent out automatically to registered voters for every election, and solve that problem.
And, since someone else asked, in WA there are arrangements for homeless people and people in unstable housing to vote. They can use any address they want, or they can vote in person at a few locations.