Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
56 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Humanity hanging on a cross of iron" (Original Post) kpete Mar 2016 OP
Eisenhower was prophetic. n/t Merryland Mar 2016 #1
I guess he almost ran as a Dem... Wounded Bear Mar 2016 #3
IKE is responsible for resurrecting the republican party StoneCarver Mar 2016 #25
When Nixon's Generation of Republicans went it was all over rpannier Mar 2016 #40
Ike was way to the left of most Dems in gov't today lagomorph777 Mar 2016 #53
Remember, Eisenhower was the last INDEPENDENT who became President. DrBulldog Mar 2016 #43
Imagine a modern Repub saying that... First Speaker Mar 2016 #2
Eisenhower was a commie hippie. Frank Cannon Mar 2016 #4
A regular peacenik, he was Cirque du So-What Mar 2016 #6
Pink and ready to throw the bucket. Octafish Mar 2016 #8
That is the Ike I remember. But he was a war hero so they jwirr Mar 2016 #13
Eisenhower sulphurdunn Mar 2016 #22
After many personal talks with Dr. Herbert York WHEN CRABS ROAR Mar 2016 #26
The MIC was inevitable sulphurdunn Mar 2016 #28
I guess he never heard about nuclear winter Elmer S. E. Dump Mar 2016 #39
And it was believed that being in a Fall-Out basement would save you from the blast. Then in a few DhhD Mar 2016 #49
Conventional war is one thing, nuclear another. malthaussen Mar 2016 #45
Definitely not a real man like John Wayne. Frank Cannon Mar 2016 #9
Yes and when John Wayne died... Human101948 Mar 2016 #10
Frank Plucketeer Mar 2016 #21
Heinlein whimpered that he was a "political general" MisterP Mar 2016 #20
The John Birch Society really thought that was true. pampango Mar 2016 #48
It is infuriating to see how low the Republican Party has sunk Xipe Totec Mar 2016 #5
Stop the manufacture of weapons, it is the biggest waste of natural resources in the world. Dont call me Shirley Mar 2016 #7
“The most monstrous monster is the monster with noble feelings” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky n/t jtuck004 Mar 2016 #11
Thom Hartmann fairly often plays this wonderful speech and others, Akamai Mar 2016 #12
It seems like that last paragraph is the Political Platform of the Dominionist Ted Cruz DhhD Mar 2016 #50
Scary platform, bringing on the End Times. Akamai Mar 2016 #56
Eisenhower saw personally the effects of war RoccoR5955 Mar 2016 #14
Errrr.... Lincoln.... scottie55 Mar 2016 #15
I still think, in the long run RoccoR5955 Mar 2016 #16
Eisenhower did not put forward the Interstate Highway System to create "jobs". former9thward Mar 2016 #17
Exactly eom DebbieCDC Mar 2016 #38
Common myth. A HERETIC I AM Mar 2016 #41
Your link seems to disagree with you. former9thward Mar 2016 #55
don't mean to be snarky... paleotn Mar 2016 #46
The poster I replied to implied Eisenhower did it to create jobs. former9thward Mar 2016 #54
Hey Mr. Kpete . . You are correct, FairWinds Mar 2016 #18
the "Iron Cross" AlbertCat Mar 2016 #19
In other words . . . Major Hogwash Mar 2016 #27
I believe it far more an echo of W.J. Bryan's speech at the Democratic Convention of 1896. . . Journeyman Mar 2016 #37
Agreed. The Beast is made of Iron and not of Gold (lesson in the Bible); the Iron Merchant Church DhhD Mar 2016 #52
That is a great quote. blackspade Mar 2016 #23
I wonder how any Democrat can rec this post and then vote for Kissinger/Reagan protege... whereisjustice Mar 2016 #24
Rachel did a good piece on this: bvar22 Mar 2016 #29
Eisenhower knew but zentrum Mar 2016 #30
They would have murdered him and thrown him in a dumpster, 5 stars et al Rex Mar 2016 #33
Agreed. And zentrum Mar 2016 #34
I say that. Rex Mar 2016 #35
"Now it's just an oligarchy," said Jimmy Carter on the Thom Hartmann show on 7/28/15 Akamai Mar 2016 #51
The last real Republican before they lost their fucking minds. Rex Mar 2016 #31
War tiptonic Mar 2016 #32
K&R!!!!!! burrowowl Mar 2016 #36
No more war! War is a lie! War is a racket! Fast Walker 52 Mar 2016 #42
this is from the same guy that was authorizing U2 flights over the USSR 2 weeks before... Javaman Mar 2016 #44
Too bad the MIC's coup-de-etat in November 1963 worked, isn't it? PatrickforO Mar 2016 #47

Wounded Bear

(58,603 posts)
3. I guess he almost ran as a Dem...
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 10:59 AM
Mar 2016

back in the day, military folks weren't very political, for the most part.

IMHO, the last decent Repub President.

 

StoneCarver

(249 posts)
25. IKE is responsible for resurrecting the republican party
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 01:53 PM
Mar 2016

Without him it would have withered on the vine. Nixon was the last republican who was normal. He was a crook and deserved to be impeached, but he created the EPA and signed COLAS into law for SS. Look how far we've come?
Stonecarver

rpannier

(24,328 posts)
40. When Nixon's Generation of Republicans went it was all over
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 02:10 AM
Mar 2016

Nelson Rockefeller, Howard Baker, Thomas Dewey, Hiram Fong, John Heinz, John G Beale Jr, Charles Potter, even Everett Dirksen is far preferable to today's Republican

 

DrBulldog

(841 posts)
43. Remember, Eisenhower was the last INDEPENDENT who became President.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 09:15 AM
Mar 2016

Ike was without affiliation and was recruited heavily by both parties. The Republicans succeeded only because the pragmatic Ike saw the country didn't favor Truman in 1952 because of the festering Korean war and Truman's firing of the egomaniac general MacArthur who Americans also stupidly regarded as a national hero. But when Ike became President he took charge. EVERYONE - including Congress - in the country knew who was the BOSS. Ike ended the Korean War in a year, he started a huge infrastructure building program that lasted 20 years, promoted nation-wide quality education in what we call today STEM, teachers were almost as well-paid as engineers, ordered Federal troops into Little Rock to enforce the rights of African-Americans to go to college, people who earned only twice the minimum wage could buy a house (my parents were in that category and did exactly that), and many of our top universities were practically TUITION-FREE. I earned my entire state college tuition from summer jobs. At that time - and for the LAST time - the United States was truly regarded BY THE WORLD as the best and most respected country on earth.

Gosh, this story is sounding awfully deja-vu to me. Is 2016 to become the next 1952?

First Speaker

(4,858 posts)
2. Imagine a modern Repub saying that...
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 10:59 AM
Mar 2016

...or even a modern Dem--with the honorable exception of Sanders...and doesn't *that* show how far we've come...?

Cirque du So-What

(25,908 posts)
6. A regular peacenik, he was
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 11:05 AM
Mar 2016

Speaking out against the MIC at a time when it was turgid with war-lust and profit motive. Who did Eisenhower think he was anyway - an expert in warfare or sumpin'?

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
8. Pink and ready to throw the bucket.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 11:20 AM
Mar 2016
The Real Eisenhower: Planning to Win Nuclear War

by Ira Chernus
Common Dreams
March 18, 2008

Peace activists love to quote Dwight Eisenhower. The iconic Republican war hero spoke so eloquently about the dangers of war and the need for disarmament. He makes a terrific poster-boy for peace. But after years of research and writing three books on Ike, I think it's time to see the real Eisenhower stand up. The president who planned to fight and win a nuclear war, saying "he would rather be atomized than communized," reminds us how dangerous the cold war era really was, how much our leaders will put us all at risk in the name of "national security," and how easily they can mask their intentions behind benign images.

From first to last, Eisenhower was a confirmed cold warrior. Years before he became president, while he was publicly promoting cooperation with the Soviet Union, he wrote in his diary: "Russia is definitely out to communize the world....Now we face a battle to extinction." On the home front, he warned that liberal Democrats were leading the U.S. "toward total socialism."

SNIP…

For Eisenhower, the point of amassing a huge nuclear arsenal was not to deter war but to win it. This was enshrined as official policy in NSC 5810/1: "The United States must make clear its determination to prevail if general war occurs." The only meaningful war aim, he told the NSC, was "to achieve a victory." He described his war plan as "Hit the guy fast with all you've got if he jumps on you"; "hit 'em ... with everything in the bucket."

SNIP…

Eisenhower assumed that a post-holocaust America would be a totalitarian state, ruled by martial law. But he worried about (among other things) what would happen to the credit structure of the country and how to print and sell war bonds to finance the next war if Washington were destroyed. At one NSC meeting he complained that if the President and the Vice President were "knocked off," the "damnable" law of succession would result in the Democrats (he called them "the other team&quot taking the White House. "To assure against that happening, the President thought the Vice President should be put in cotton batting."

SNIP…

And we ignore it at our peril, because it was a policy that put anticommunist ideology above human life, made by a man who would "push whole stack of chips into the pot" and "hit 'em ... with everything in the bucket"; who would "shoot your enemy before he shoots you"; who believed that the U.S. could "pick itself up from the floor" and win a nuclear war, even though "everybody is going crazy," as long as "only" 25 or 30 American cities got "shellacked" and nobody got too "hysterical."

CONTINUED…

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/03/18/7742
 

sulphurdunn

(6,891 posts)
22. Eisenhower
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 01:32 PM
Mar 2016

was the last allied commander to actually win a war. It should come as no surprise that as Commander in Chief he would adhere to that doctrine.

WHEN CRABS ROAR

(3,813 posts)
26. After many personal talks with Dr. Herbert York
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 01:56 PM
Mar 2016

and other scientists he came to see the dangers of a nuclear arms race driven mostly by the MIC.
How did that work out for us?

DhhD

(4,695 posts)
49. And it was believed that being in a Fall-Out basement would save you from the blast. Then in a few
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:45 AM
Mar 2016

weeks everything would begin to be rebuilt using Marshall Plan contracts. War then rebuild. War then rebuild at the American taxpayers expense. I say, let Europe war against IS and their taxpayers pick up the MIC/Marshall Plan tab this time. Refugees are coming into Europe.

The People knew very little about radiation and thermal neutrons (Hydrogen bomb), circulating in the Earth's winds and waters.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tritium

malthaussen

(17,175 posts)
45. Conventional war is one thing, nuclear another.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 09:40 AM
Mar 2016

I figure Mr Eisenhower could do arithmetic, and recognized that it would be impossible for the U.S. to win a conventional war without having massive forces lying around doing nothing. Whereas atomic and then nuclear weapons were a more economical and decisive stick. And let's face it, there is no nuclear strategy that is not absurd, but the genie can't be put back in the bottle. Conventional thinking still sees nuclear weapons in terms of their deterrent ability, nobody really hopes they'll be used. But if they are going to be used, then naturally one would prefer to hit the Other Guy harder than we get hit, and it doesn't make much sense militarily to hold back when it comes to blows. It's easy to criticize nuclear strategy: they don't call it MAD for nothing.

-- Mal

Frank Cannon

(7,570 posts)
9. Definitely not a real man like John Wayne.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 11:21 AM
Mar 2016

If he'd fought at Iwo Jima and in the Green Berets like Wayne did, maybe that pinko punk would know a thing or two about what it takes to defend this great Christian nation.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
20. Heinlein whimpered that he was a "political general"
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:51 PM
Mar 2016

presumably for not waiting for Martineau's magic markets to do in Hitler (or maybe just for fighting a war instead of leaving as a LT due to TB and running the SF writers' division of Naval research with L. Ron Hubbard)

pampango

(24,692 posts)
48. The John Birch Society really thought that was true.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:18 AM
Mar 2016
"Could Eisenhower really be simply a smart politician, entirely without principles and hungry for glory, who is only the tool of the Communists? The answer is yes." He went on. "With regard to ... Eisenhower, it is difficult to avoid raising the question of deliberate treason."

Values

The organization supports limited government and opposes wealth redistribution and economic interventionism. It opposes collectivism, totalitarianism, fascism and communism. It opposes socialism as well, which it asserts is infiltrating U.S. governmental administration. In a 1983 edition of Crossfire, Congressman Larry McDonald (D-Georgia), then its newly appointed president, characterized the society as belonging to the Old Right rather than the New Right.

The society opposed the 1960s civil rights movement and claimed the movement had Communists in important positions. In the latter half of 1965, the JBS produced a flyer titled "What's Wrong With Civil Rights?", which was used as a newspaper advertisement. In the piece, one of the answers was: "For the civil rights movement in the United States, with all of its growing agitation and riots and bitterness, and insidious steps towards the appearance of a civil war, has not been infiltrated by the Communists, as you now frequently hear. It has been deliberately and almost wholly created by the Communists patiently building up to this present stage for more than forty years." The society opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, claiming it violated the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and overstepped individual states' rights to enact laws regarding civil rights.

The society opposes "one world government", and it has an immigration reduction view on immigration reform. It opposes the United Nations, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA), the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA), and other free trade agreements. They argue the U.S. Constitution has been devalued in favor of political and economic globalization, and that this alleged trend is not accidental. It cited the existence of the former Security and Prosperity Partnership as evidence of a push towards a North American Union.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Birch_Society#Eisenhower_issue

Xipe Totec

(43,888 posts)
5. It is infuriating to see how low the Republican Party has sunk
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 11:03 AM
Mar 2016

Men of honor and vision are no longer its leaders.

Instead, we have court jesters playing dress up.

 

Akamai

(1,779 posts)
12. Thom Hartmann fairly often plays this wonderful speech and others,
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 11:25 AM
Mar 2016

and often reads Ike's letter to his conservative brother who wanted to do away with social security and other social programs:

The Papers of Dwight David Eisenhower, Volume XV - The Presidency: The Middle Way
Part VI: Crises Abroad, Party Problems at Home; September 1954 to December 1954
Chapter 13: "A new phase of political experience"

"Dear Ed:1 I think that such answer as I can give to your letter of November first will be arranged in reverse order--at least I shall comment first on your final paragraph.

"You keep harping on the Constitution; I should like to point out that the meaning of the Constitution is what the Supreme Court says it is. Consequently no powers are exercised by the Federal government except where such exercise is approved by the Supreme Court (lawyers) of the land.2

"Should any political party attempt to abolish social security, unemployment insurance, and eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would not hear of that party again in our political history. There is a tiny splinter group, of course, that believes you can do these things. Among them are H. L. Hunt (you possibly know his background), a few other Texas oil millionaires, and an occasional politician or business man from other areas.5 Their number is negligible and they are stupid. ...."

DhhD

(4,695 posts)
50. It seems like that last paragraph is the Political Platform of the Dominionist Ted Cruz
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:57 AM
Mar 2016

and his Seven Mountain Party.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
14. Eisenhower saw personally the effects of war
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 11:30 AM
Mar 2016

He was in Europe, and saw what WWI and WWII did to the continent. He knew that war is not the answer, even as a general.
He saw the ruins all over. He saw the people in the streets without homes, or food.
Eisenhower also put forth plans for the Interstate Highway System, which created many jobs.

Eisenhower was the best Republican president ever, bar none.

 

scottie55

(1,400 posts)
15. Errrr.... Lincoln....
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 11:43 AM
Mar 2016

Imagine if Lincoln let the South go, where they would be today.....

Idiocracy.....

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
16. I still think, in the long run
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 11:47 AM
Mar 2016

Eisenhower was better than Abe.
If Lincoln let the south go, the south would have failed.

former9thward

(31,941 posts)
17. Eisenhower did not put forward the Interstate Highway System to create "jobs".
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:01 PM
Mar 2016

He did it so the military could move equipment and men around the country quickly in a crisis. He was impressed by the efficiency of the Hitler created Autobahn in Germany.

A HERETIC I AM

(24,362 posts)
41. Common myth.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 02:16 AM
Mar 2016

He definitely saw the advantages for commerce. It wasn't all about and only about moving military equipment around.

And FWIW. the Autobahn wasn't a creation of Hitlers;

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autobahn#History

former9thward

(31,941 posts)
55. Your link seems to disagree with you.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 11:12 AM
Mar 2016
Just days after the 1933 Nazi takeover, Adolf Hitler enthusiastically embraced an ambitious autobahn construction project, appointing Fritz Todt, the Inspector General of German Road Construction, to lead it. By 1936, 130,000 workers were directly employed in construction, as well as an additional 270,000 in the supply chain for construction equipment, steel, concrete, signage, maintenance equipment, etc. In rural areas, new camps to house the workers were built near construction sites.[10] The job creation program aspect was not especially important because full employment was almost reached by 1936. The autobahns were not primarily intended as major infrastructure improvement of special value to the military as often stated. Their military value was limited as all major military transports in Germany were done by train to save fuel. The propaganda ministry turned the construction of the autobahns into a major media event that attracted international attention.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autobahn#History

No myth at all. Eisenhower was part of a military transport mission across the U.S. in 1919. He was appalled at the lack of roads and wrote a report about it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1919_Motor_Transport_Corps_convoy

paleotn

(17,884 posts)
46. don't mean to be snarky...
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:01 AM
Mar 2016

...but do you think Ike could have pursued the system with more than one benefit in mind? He was a bit more than your black and white, 2 dimensional caricature. Just like everyone else, famous or not, he was human, thus not completely good or completely bad. Just human. And by the way, in a time of national emergency, moving military personnel and equipment quickly and efficiently is of pretty damn serious importance, don't you think?

former9thward

(31,941 posts)
54. The poster I replied to implied Eisenhower did it to create jobs.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 11:08 AM
Mar 2016

That was not his purpose. I am very happy with the interstate Highway System and I don't really care why it was created.

 

FairWinds

(1,717 posts)
18. Hey Mr. Kpete . . You are correct,
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:03 PM
Mar 2016

as are the other posters, but . .

what are you going to DO about it?

I joined Veterans For Peace

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
27. In other words . . .
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 01:56 PM
Mar 2016

. . . he was saying that the United States was becoming as militarized at the same fanatical pace as Nazi Germany was during the 30s.



Journeyman

(15,024 posts)
37. I believe it far more an echo of W.J. Bryan's speech at the Democratic Convention of 1896. . .
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 12:51 AM
Mar 2016

when William Jennings Bryan castigated the idea of strict adherence to a gold standard, his famous "Cross of Gold" keynote address.

It became one of the most famous speeches in the early 20th Century, and Bryan delivered it many times over the next few decades.

The speech ends with this fervent exhortation:

If they dare to come out in the open field and defend the gold standard as a good thing, we shall fight them to the uttermost, having behind us the producing masses of the nation and the world. Having behind us the commercial interests and the laboring interests and all the toiling masses, we shall answer their demands for a gold standard by saying to them, you shall not press down upon the brow of labor this crown of thorns. You shall not crucify mankind upon a cross of gold.

DhhD

(4,695 posts)
52. Agreed. The Beast is made of Iron and not of Gold (lesson in the Bible); the Iron Merchant Church
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 11:02 AM
Mar 2016

as the financier.

whereisjustice

(2,941 posts)
24. I wonder how any Democrat can rec this post and then vote for Kissinger/Reagan protege...
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 01:48 PM
Mar 2016

Hillary Clinton. How can they do it? It's one thing to SAY you want change, its another thing when you vote to keep things the same.

zentrum

(9,865 posts)
30. Eisenhower knew but
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 10:31 PM
Mar 2016

….he never did a thing to actually challenge the Military-Indutrial complex.

In fact he promoted Cold War fears, and used the Mc Carthy hearings to stoke this narrative. He made John Foster Dulles his Secretary of State —the man in "The Devil's Chessboard", and he let the CIA be the protector of United Fruit in SA, thus allowing the government to be the enforcer of corporate power in foreign adventures.

He knew but he was a benign-looking promoter of almost anything the Military-Industrial Complex wanted to do.

Didn't the Cross of Iron speech come at the end—when he was about to leave office?

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
33. They would have murdered him and thrown him in a dumpster, 5 stars et al
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 10:41 PM
Mar 2016

Too late by the time he said it, nobody listened to him and he knew it. The American elite demanded a return to huge wealth inequality and the number of corpses didn't matter, still doesn't.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
35. I say that.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 10:57 PM
Mar 2016

Glad to know so many people do too. Brown & Root and companies like them were ready to devour up the middle class. Some in this country like to pretend the highest power in the land is the POTUS...not even close.

Some also accept the fact that Reagan turned this country into a full blown plutocracy and neither parties will admit to it. I think the proof is in the pudding.

 

Akamai

(1,779 posts)
51. "Now it's just an oligarchy," said Jimmy Carter on the Thom Hartmann show on 7/28/15
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 11:01 AM
Mar 2016

I remember listening to this when Carter said it on the Thom Hartmann show:



Go Bernie!

Javaman

(62,504 posts)
44. this is from the same guy that was authorizing U2 flights over the USSR 2 weeks before...
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 09:26 AM
Mar 2016

the US Soviet summit. AKA the Gary Powers flight that was shot down.

He help expand our nuclear stock pile to historic levels during his admin and also greatly increased the budget for national defense during the cold war.

the very thing he comments on, is is also very much responsible for, or are we going to get into a conversation about how it was all the Dulles brothers doings? (with Eisenhowers approval)

Do we need to also bring up United Fruit as well?

So while his 'duality of nature" comes through in his various speeches, please look at his policies and administration while you read his words, he is very famous for saying one thing and doing another.

PatrickforO

(14,559 posts)
47. Too bad the MIC's coup-de-etat in November 1963 worked, isn't it?
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:05 AM
Mar 2016

Real hard to pull their fangs now. Try and end up with the generals ruling in a junta. We ARE a banana republic with a huge, bloated military and nukes.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Humanity hanging on a cr...