Arizona Secretary of State Confirms Election Fraud

[OxQQme]

http://usuncut.com/politics/arizona-election-fraud-primary/

[Delphinus]

1. Now

they just need to figure out what they're going to do.

[Javaman]

38. don't hold your breath.

I've seen election fraud cases come and go.

usually some no name flunky gets fired.

[PatrynXX]

61. well naturally most Conservative cases get swept under the rug. they tend to try those Liberals but

not always. should be interesting...

[CoffeeCat]

101. I think party is irrelevant here--It bothers me that Hillary benefitted from these problems.

We see clear evidence that the power structure in modern-day US politics is comprised of both Republicans and Democrats who are in bed with the corporations. They're fiercely gripping that power with their collective talons.

Who benefitted from what happened in Arizona? I think it's important to at least discuss that Hillary Clinton was the biggest benefactor. More Bernie voters were disenfranchised, and it appears that Independents who switched to Democratic were hit the hardest. Furthermore, the drastic reduction in polling locations in Maricopa County definitely hit Bernie the hardest. Arizona State University is located in Tempe and is the largest university in the country.

Although these were Republican players Hillary benefitted. At the very least, this needs to be acknowledged and part of the discussion.

It's not extraordinary to ponder collusion here. She benefitted, not the Republicans. In fact, the whole theory that this was done as a "trial run" to help Republicans is ludicrous, in my opinion. This situation alerted everyone to a problem. The problem is being investigated. Changes will most likely be made. People will be on high alert during the GE. No....this benefitted Hillary Clinton.

The media also called the race for her with a very small percentage of the vote in. They did this while people were standing in line.

We don't need to have rock-solid proof to understand that our Democratic primary elections and caucus have been a collective shit storm. All of the chaos, dirty games, disenfranchisement, voter suppression and look at the fiasco that happened in my own state of Iowa.

In 2008, our Iowa caucuses had record attendance. This year--from top to bottom the entire process has been a hell hole. You had rampant cheating in so many locations. Some were caught on videotape. The caucus ended with a .2 margin between Clinton and Sanders. Iowans were finding errors. The head of the Iowa Democratic Party, Andy McGuire is a longtime Clinton supporter (she has the license plate that says "HRC2016&quot . She wouldn't even CONSIDER an examination of the caucus results, despite Iowans screaming that they were finding errors in the official counts--that were visible in a PDF on the Iowa Democratic Party (IDP) website.

It wasn't until the Des Moines Register wrote a scathing article, "Something Smells in the Iowa Democratic Caucuses" that McGuire was forced to relent and change a few errors. By Sunday, the PDF that was visible on the front page of the Iowa Democratic Party website had been removed. It was no longer visible. This means--no way for Iowans to find additional errors. This was only five days after the Iowa Caucuses!!!! Iowans were just learning that "something smelled" and that problems existed. But there would be no way for Iowans to check the official IDP results with their own precinct results---because the PDF that listed all officially reported precinct results---was gone.

This was the first state primary. My state. You tell me that this is nothing. All a big misunderstanding. A bunch of bad coincidences. You tell me that there is no proof and to just move along. But funny...all of these misunderstandings/coincindences/mishaps and ooopies benefitted Clinton.

How many states, and how many times, do we have to go through this? The common denominator here is the Clinton camp. Never, in the history of our Democratic primaries have we seen so much malfeasance, outright cheating, voter suppression, and unfortunate "coincidences"--all that benefit Hillary Clinton's campaign.

I think it's time to start asking some serious questions about what in the hell is going on!

[IdaBriggs]

2. Intuitively, hacked/greedy/social media win!

Either accidentally or on purpose, a hack was made to the voter database. Accidentally seems unlikely as changes were made near randomly and across large swathes of the population.

If "on purpose", the perpetrators stupidly got greedy and/or didn't anticipate the large voter turnout.

Bonus: social media and cell phones were able to quickly create a community of pissed off disenfranchised voters.

Well done, Arizona! That is going to be a topic of discussion at the next convention of Secretaries of State!

[dchill]

3. What motive could there be for anyone in power in AZ...

To have a redux of the primary?

[Cryptoad]

4. Make sure it is untraceable ,,,,

in Nov when Trump wins AZ by 80 pts

[FourScore]

5. Exactly!

You are the first Hillary supporter I have seen here on DU show any kind of concern for this. Thank you.

[Amimnoch]

21. There's others of us.

Here's just one of my own chime in's:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=1389146

This wasn't just about disenfranchising voters for the Democratic Primary for POTUS. There was likely measures and proposals on those ballots that didn't get the votes they would have gotten. There's likely Judicial runs, state legislature runs, possibly even primaries for US house seats? I've never been to a Primary where the only thing on the ballot was the presidential race.

[FourScore]

25. So true. Thank you. n/t

[mwrguy]

60. It was only the presidential primary. Nothing else was on the ballot.

[Amimnoch]

100. wow, really?

I guess that's just part of different states doing it differently.

Seems like a huge waste of resources and opportunity to have a ballot with just a single thing on it.

I know the Primary in Texas, mine was 5 pages of choices/selections to make.

[AxionExcel]

95. Bingo

Republicans scamming the system of American democracy, as usual.

[Orrex]

11. Wow--that's a dark thought.

I hadn't thought of it like that, but I have to say that it sounds chillingly feasible.

[agracie]

18. I don't understand what you are saying. Can you explain a bit ? Sorry, I am slow. Thank you. nt

[ToxMarz]

19. I think the point is that this was a dry run for the November elections

There would probably not be an orchestrated attempt to hack the primaries, it would matter much in the whole schem of things, but they are practicing what they can get away with in November

[agracie]

36. Hmmm....

[AxionExcel]

96. +1

Republican Handbook:

[AllyCat]

53. Bingo!

[billhicks76]

76. Better Explain This

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/mar/30/bernie-sanders-left-dc-primary-ballot-after-democr/

[rhett o rick]

77. Really? You need an explanation? One word "Clinton Shenanigans."

[saturnsring]

98. lol

[chervilant]

12. It seems likely

that this malfeasance was an overstep and a miscalculation. We, the vast Hoi Polloi, are supposed to be ignorant, and easily manipulated by the corporate megalomaniacs--those who've usurped our media, our politics AND our global economy.

Our species' hedonism is writ large on those who believe that money and power are their raison d'êtres.

Theirs' will be a pyrrhic victory, because We the PEOPLE are NOT ignorant. Through social media, and the internet in general, we've grown increasingly aware of their lying, their propaganda, AND their relentless assault on our freedoms.

At this point, anyone who supports Hi11ary should recognize that Bernie Sanders is the touchstone for our fervid determination to reclaim our Party AND our democracy.

Whoever is behind this fiasco in Arizona must be sorely disappointed...

(I emphasize "their," "those," and "whoever" in order to reclaim our awareness that these sociopaths exist, and are NOT some figment of a "conspiracy theory.&quot

[NJCher]

20. thank you, chervilant

I'm reading on a computer with the sound disabled, so I couldn't get the content of the clip in the OP.

I can't wait to get to my own computer and hear this!!


Cher

p.s. I loved what you said. You are right on point.

[chervilant]

33. Thank you, Cher.

(You might be interested in this. Would like to hear what you think about it.)

[riderinthestorm]

58. OT but I've always wondered what the figure is in your sig line

Is it a stylized kitty?

[SammyWinstonJack]

41. +1000000

[Raster]

62. I live in Arizona. While the power structure in Arizona is blood-red, more-and-more...

...the population is NOT! Arizona is more purple than red or blue, and tends to be turning more to the blue side.

The Republican (Teapublican, Theopublican, CraCrapublican) powers want Arizona to stay as red as possible. They don't want any "undersirable" (Latinos, Millenials, LGBTQ) to gain any kind of power in this state.

[SusanCalvin]

67. That sounds like a plausible explanation. nt

[hopemountain]

89. according to the story at the link

and the anonymous investigation link and the washington post, the story of fraud has expanded to other states - including new york, california, oregon, etc - other primary states.

[Duckfan]

92. They are whistling past the graveyard if that is what they want.

[certainot]

86. would this have been exposed if the primary was over?

maybe the primary was supposed to be over and the tricks they set in motion they set in motion too soon?

[DhhD]

97. Even though our state Primary is over (March 2-Texas), I am going to recheck my registration

with my county elections officer after every election.

The SoS needs to have in place an online statement that is printable showing the date of the confirmation of your registration. These confirmation dates would be kept in your PC saved Downloads Folder too.

By the way, I believe that telling someone they must fill out a provisional ballot when they are already registered is telling that person to resign their registration in order to remove their vote at the siting election. If I were an election official at a voting room, I would be afraid to ask someone already registered to vote to resign their right to vote at that election, by accepting and signing a provisional ballot. To me, that is against the Constitution, well past the Voting Rights Act. Section 5 then, is actually sanctioned by the Constitution in my reading. This played out in Arizona big time last week. And it seems to be happening in other states as well.

[certainot]

102. heard reports of people in CA finding they've been 'unregistered'

same in other states

same happened to me in CO a few years back but i caught it

[Hugin]

6. Yet another sneak preview of the upcoming GE. Watch for it in Nov.

This was no "Accident"... Mark my words. This was practice or a test, if you will.

There have been some shady results in several Western States over the last couple of elections. (It angers me how little has been done to find and bring the perps to justice or correct the outcomes to the Intent of the Voters. )

It staggers my mind how furious the, for the lack of a better term, Republicans are going to be in November. When not only does President Obama complete two successful terms in office, but, is succeeded by either Hillary Clinton (a woman) or Bernie Sanders (a "socialist&quot . The clown heads are going to pop like bubbles that day. I look forward to it.

But, first, we need to clearly understand that every conceivable means to thwart a fair and transparent election are going to be pulled out by the Republican Establishment, Racists, Religiously Insane, and other unfit-to-lead members of the opposition party.

Be vigilant!
Don't take bullshit!
Exercise your rights!

But, most of all...

VOTE!

[beac]

44. If this was a test-run (which I also think is likely),

I hate thinking about all they learned about how to do it better, and undetectably, in the GE.

[rladdi]

55. But our United States Supreme Court agrees with fraud and suppressed elections. They are controlled

by the GOP. Why do you think M. McConnell is not holding a nomination for Pres. Obama nominee?

[Iwillnevergiveup]

37. Over 65,000 signed so far n/t

[valerief]

56. Thanks! nt

[LiberalLovinLug]

59. So would any revote be using computers?

Just wondering.

It still astounds me that the USA actually allows private corporations to build hackable voting computers to decide elections.

Paper and pens and boxes. There is, and was, no need for building a better voter trap.

[SusanCalvin]

69. Sure there was a need.

To set up hacks. HAVA was a scam.

[Merryland]

8. Thanks for posting this -

I'd watched as much as I could of those hearings & didn't register these comments.

[Stonepounder]

9. I have lost all faith in our voting system.

Don't get me wrong, I'll go vote, but I am feeling more and more that actually voting is a useless exercise in optimism. From gerrymandering, to voter suppression, to the purging of voter rolls, to the debacle in AZ, to electronic voting machines whose code is secret (because it is a 'trade secret') and that simply find it too difficult to provide an actual paper record to allow any sort of verification that votes are registered properly, and on and on and on.

The fix is in, the USA as my generation knew it is toast and it doesn't make a damn bit of difference who you vote for. The experiment in 'representative democracy' is dying, the 1% are working to turn the US (and the rest of the world) back to feudalism, and there is not a damn thing we can do about it. The 1% toss us the occasional Bernie Sanders or Donald Trump, but it is nothing more than bread and circuses. The TPP will get signed and corporations and climate change will do the rest.

Sorry if I sound a bit cynical, but having a grumpy morning.

[Hugin]

10. I want to thank you in advance for your Defiance Vote!

NGU!

[Bernardo de La Paz]

32. With fraud, the more you vote, the more likely the fraudsters get caught

The more votes against the fraudsters, the harder it is to cover up and the more likely they will make mistakes.

[Stonepounder]

47. Unfortunately, if there is fraud in an election and it changes the actual winner,

...then the winner(s) have absolutely no incentive to push for an investigation and the loser doesn't usually have the clout to push for it. Take a look at the last election for Governor in Ky. The election results made absolutely no sense, what with down ballot Democratic candidates getting more votes than the Democratic Gov candidate. Also, exit polls (which are normally extremely reliable) were off by a huge margin. And even though the newspapers screamed about it, and statisticians said, basically, "No fu**ing way!", no one in Frankfort was the least bit interested in looking more closely.

[aggiesal]

49. Or money to challenge the vote count ...

In San Diego County, the ROV required that the candidate that challenged the
vote, pay up front, $1 per vote. Since we already had the ballots counted, we
knew exactly how many ballots needed recounting. This would run in the
$100,000's for a candidate to challenge the vote. If you don't have it, tough luck,
unless it was triggered automatically.

Riverside County on the other hand only charged about 15 cents per ballot
for a candidate to challenge. That's an 85% discount on the San Diego County rate.

No standards.

Just the wim of the ROV.

[Bernardo de La Paz]

50. Sure, but the bigger the fraud the easier for media & internet to expose it. Vote & GOTV. . . nt

[AgerolanAmerican]

51. Do what I do

when I vote Bernie I will push the buttons in the booth with my middle fingers

[daleanime]

52. +1

[chapdrum]

64. It's less cynicism to me

than it is pragmatism.

Under the oligarchy, voting could also be considered a crumb tossed to us.

[lordsummerisle]

72. Thanks, it's how I feel most days

[Beartracks]

81. Yeah, what's the purpose of the "secret" and "proprietary" code?

My wristwatch has a SUM function, fer crissakes. No need for secret code to add up friggin votes.

===================

[brett_jv]

94. What part of "The WAY we sum the votes ... is PROPRIETARY" ... do you not understand?

Sure, your watch can endlessly calculate a sequence of '1+1+1+1...etc', but you see, THAT ... is not 'how we do it' in our proprietary code!

Obviously you aren't capable of understanding how complex the REAL counting ... has to be. It requires TEAMS of highly trained PhD's in calculus, veteran code developers, and secret patents, and all kinda shit.

Don't even PRETEND you understand how COMPLICATED it REALLY IS to 'add up the votes'. Your piddly little watch would EXPLODE if it had to do what these highly sophisticated algorithms actually DO!!!11!!!

[Beartracks]

103. Some of the highly sophisticated algorithms...

... explode, too. Apparently.

=============

[bemildred]

13. Perhaps having the primary voting system in the hands of partisan hacks is a mistake. nt

[2naSalit]

15. There's no perhas about it.......nt

[Helen Borg]

14. Always "we wanna make sure it does not happen again".

And never: somebody is gonna go to jail this time.

[NJCher]

23. exactly

It is the biggest crime ever, yet no one ever is punished for it and the crook always gets in.


Cher

[d_legendary1]

16. Great! Now we know the election was rigged!

Now who is going to jail for fucking it up? Hopefully the DOJ was listening.

[saidsimplesimon]

22. DOJ and FBI resources are tied up

investigating the "damn email scandal". I think I heard a media talking head say 187 investigators?

SCOTUS gutted our voting rights in Arizona. Now Republicans have their Koch funded take over of the Legislature and establishing Alec voter suppression rules.

[awake]

35. There are more than enough resources in the DOJ to go after this only if they wanted to

My biggest grip of the last 7 years is that starting with the feckless Eric Holder the DOJ has not done an all out war on illegal voter suppression and vote manipulation. If we could start putting in jail not just the crooked Wall-street Banksters but the political hackers who have been screwing with our votes since 1999 and before, then we could start taking our government back to the people. My concern is that the top players in both parties want to keep thing they way they are, believing that they know what is best, more of the same "nothing to see here move along" and "do not worry we have this"

[Dont call me Shirley]

57. Exact description of what's going on!

[LisaM]

74. Eric Holder worked very hard on voting rights.

Unfortunately, it's a state by state battle with a lot of obstacles being constantly flung in the way. Eviscerating the Voting Rights Act was a huge issue, obviously, and there was a reason Arizona had been on a watch list. IIRC, didn't Rehnquist or someone get their political start suppressing voting rights in Arizona? (would have to look that up to confirm my facts).

There are many ways to suppress voting and making it inconvenient is near the top (remember Ohio in 2004 and the disproportionately longer lines in urban areas like Cincinnati compared to affluent white areas?) Others are making it harder to register, gerrymandering, intimidation, and so on. Without even speaking to voting registrations being flipped (I'm not discounting that as an issue, too) it was really easy to disenfranchise voters in Arizona simply by slashing the number of polling sites. They'd better take a hard look at that before the November election.

But I think saying Eric Holder was feckless and not working on this is dead wrong.


http://www.thenation.com/article/eric-holders-voting-rights-legacy/

[mrdmk]

87. Thank you for The Nation article. Kudos AG Holder, give credit to where credit is due

Yes the GW Bush administration made a shambles out of government agencies in charge of regulation. People know this and it is call blowback. Another reason why Jeb "the smart one" Bush is now looking for something else to do other than run for president.

[LisaM]

88. Restoring voting rights is a long, difficult task.

And it's complicated because it's a moving target.

[L. Coyote]

17. 2 busy trying 2 figure out which votes count 2 see if this happened before and 2 clueless 2 know

Wow, is she the perp? She sure placed a lot of distance between herself and even common knowledge about the field she is supposedly in charge of, administration of elections.

[Starry Messenger]

24. Restore the VRA petition:

http://www.civilrights.org/action_center/petition-comments/voting-rights-petition.html

[ananda]

27. I signed this.

But it was a complicated process and my rep
is a trog put into office by Tom Delay when
my district was gerrymandered out to Katy, TX.

[Starry Messenger]

30. Thank you for signing!

Every little bit helps. If we could get millions of names, the media might take note.

[Sunlei]

26. what stops 'someone' from sending in another voter registration on anyone? Or 'registering'

Or registering people who never vote and then voting by mail for them?

[safeinOhio]

28. As long as everyone

Showed their picture ID.

[SCVDem]

29. Jail my ass

Messing with our most cherished and important institution needs a quick death penalty.

No ifs and or buts!

Yes, it's that important!

[turbinetree]

31. Now that there is admission of fraud................................

being perpetuated by basically the majority legislative body in this state--------------what are they going to do.....................
there should be indictments

To the voters in Arizona we have your back..................

http://www.snagfilms.com/films/title/hacking_democracy

Honk---------------------for a political revolution Bernie 2016

[unapatriciated]

34. Here is the hearing

It is long but worth it. There were so many mistakes an anomalies in that election, it boggles the mind how they thought they would get away with it.

I sent yesterday morning watching it in full. Would love to see a link for what happened after they adjourned and went to the house.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1038&pid=3171

[SusanCalvin]

70. But they will get away with it.

No one will be prosecuted and the election will not be done over. Maybe a few resignations, that's it.

Hope I'm wrong.

[Vinca]

39. For starters, the election results need to be thrown out.

[Iwillnevergiveup]

40. The SOS

in speaking reminded me of someone who is experiencing or has experienced a stroke. Very slow to respond to the questions and also to speak.

[Bad Dog]

42. We call it going through the motions.

Just giving the impression that you're doing something.

[chknltl]

43. KnR nt

[NowSam]

45. So let's talk remedy

for those who were robbed their right to vote. All affected voters should have a new day to cast their ballots. That would be justice. If it changes the outcome, well, that is the way it goes.

[BernieforPres2016]

46. I am happy to see this issue is still alive in Arizona

and showing no signs of going away. John Oliver did a piece on the various GOP voter ID tactics to suppress voter participation that have been going on at a state level a few weeks ago (I only saw it last night). Hopefully these are signs that this bullshit has run its course, people are going to be watching it like a hawk and the pendulum is about to start swinging back in the other direction.

Here's a link to John Oliver's video on Voter ID for those who haven't seen it. It is entertaining as well as illuminating, as Oliver always is:

[aggiesal]

48. My brother lives in Chandler, AZ. He sent me the following last night ...

The election officials did get their budget cut thanks to Gov Ducey's budget, but guess who was the first person to say this was inexcusable. But the election dept was re-budgeted close to 90%. During general elections there are 200+ polling locations.

This is probably very clever voter suppression. The polling in south Phoenix will not effect Cruz vs Trump or so, but if voters think 3-5 hr wait during a primary election is bad, they won't even show up during general elections for fear that they will wait even longer. In a sad sick way, I'm constantly impressed by the GOP clever voter suppression tactics.

Fountain Hills (home of Joe Arpiao) had around 6000 voters per polling location, but west and southwest valley had 4x-5x times voters per polling location. So some affluent neighborhoods had just as bad voters/polling ratio but the fact is that the higher income neighborhoods tend to use mail in voting far more than lesser / lower income areas. So the voters per polling might be just as bad but realistically a ton of those voters never stood in line, they mailed in the ballots. Therefore it only looks equal on paper but is no where near the same issue as far as wait times and lines out the door and down the street.

Here are the Voters to Polling ratios in some AZ counties:

"Total "Number of
Eligible Polling Average
Voters" Locations" Voters/Polls"
Maricopa 1,250,000 60 20,833.33
Pima 300,000 130 2,307.69
Cochise 45,952 18 2,552.89
Coconino 45,385 26 1,745.58
Yuma 44,287 7 6,326.71
Navajo 42,264 38 1,112.21
Apache 34,635 41 844.76
Gila 23,812 20 1,190.60
Santa Cruz 15,722 11 1,429.27
Graham 13,073 8 1,634.13
Pinal 98,194 82 1,197.49
Yavapai 82,003 29 2,827.69
La Paz 5,592 8 699.00
Greenlee 3,401 3 1133.67



**********************************************
* Does anyone know how to make this table look readable? *
**********************************************

[Raster]

73. Try this....

[aggiesal]

84. How did you do that?

For future reference of course.

Nice job.

[Raster]

85. Thank you!

1. Transferred the data to Excel for formatting;
2. Printed to PDF;
3. Converted to jpeg;
5. Used IMGUR to upload to WEB.

AND I MIGHT ADD: Thank you for posting the original data. Over the next day or so, I am going to add: (1) How many ballots were actually cast; and (2) How many received for Sanders and Clinton.

[LiberalFighter]

78. What someone needs to do is separate the absentee, early voting, and election day voting data.

To get the voter to voting location ratio. If they don't have it online. Make an official request. If they refuse or delay do an end round by going through a Democratic official who might be able to get access.

Write letters to the newspapers asking why the election board is hiding the data if it is not easily available.

[c-ville rook]

54. Look AZ is probably going "RED"

By one or million votes it will not matter. Thank you Electoral College.

So, who benefits when Democrats, almost exclusive, were left out of the Democratic primary? It ain't a Republican.

Just my thought.

[nadinbrzezinski]

63. Too many people here poo poed this happening

will they now apologize?

And this is why I say we have pretend elections.

[chapdrum]

65. If we don't have democracy,

the U.S. as we've know it is over for anyone not intent on plunder and pillage.

[mrdmk]

93. Tell me about it, I was asked if I Hyperbole much

Another poster into the cyber ignore black hole.




To answer your question, doubtful!

[cer7711]

66. Paging Jimmy Carter ...

Election monitoring needed . . . HERE!

[SusanCalvin]

71. Didn't they refuse to monitor here because we don't meet international standards? nt

[cer7711]

80. Good Grief; You're Right!

Thank you for educating me; I missed this. Simply appalling!

http://www.thenation.com/article/failing-electoral-standards/

[SusanCalvin]

82. Hey, thanks for finding that.

I looked for confirmation the other day and couldn't find it at that time. Even though it's 2005, might you consider making this an OP? I don't think things have gotten any better.

[babydollhead]

68. signed! over 74,000 n/t

[AllyCat]

79. So, they are working on provisional ballots.

It's been weeks and hey still aren't counted? Bull.

[kadaholo]

83. OUR DEMOCRATIC VOTER REGISTRATION INFORMATION MYSTERIOUSLY MISSING IN PA

This is UNBELIEVABLE! After reading an article at Anonymous on the antics in Arizona, I noticed a comment attached to the article that stated there are widespread reports of voter registration manipulation in PA and NY.

See article: Anonymous Investigate Arizona Election Fraud, “Sanders Was Hacked”
Link: http://www.anonews.co/anonymous-sanders-hack/

Since I live in PA and am a Bernie supporter, I decided to confirm my registration immediately.

I checked the VotesPA website and, sure enough, voter registration information on both my husband and me is not available!!! We have been registered Democrats and voting at this location since 1987 and 1994 respectively.

This is the message that came up for both of us: "No Voter Registration information could be found for the data provided. Either search again using different data or contact your County Voter Registration Office."

Calling tomorrow and surprise (not), we are Bernie supporters!!! INCREDIBLE!!! Just coincidence in state after state???? I think not!!!

Seems like those two lapses in the firewall (both reported by the Sanders Campaign) are benefitting only one of our two Democratic candidates...

HIGHEST PRIORITY!!! PLEASE TELL EVERYONE WHO IS STILL WAITING TO VOTE IN PRIMARIES TO CHECK THEIR REGISTRATION...ESPECIALLY FRIENDS IN NY AND PA!!!

[hopemountain]

91. make sure to enter your names correctly.

screenshot the verification. i entered my full (including middle name) because that is how i registered and got the same message your received. turns out the data base had me listed according to my first and last names only.

thank you for your post.

[pansypoo53219]

90. OOPS. we got caught.

[bonniebgood]

99. I guess its perfectly legal way to suppress the vote to just have fewer polling places

than abortions clinics. Especially TX and AZ.