Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

DetlefK

(16,423 posts) Wed Mar 30, 2016, 09:42 AM Mar 2016

Trump vows to nominate judges who will investigate Clinton's emails.

http://www.rawstory.com/2016/03/trump-vows-to-appoint-supreme-court-justices-who-will-investigate-hillary-clintons-emails/comments/#disqus

Judges. Investigating.

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump vows to nominate judges who will investigate Clinton's emails. (Original Post) DetlefK Mar 2016 OP

Tell that to Sarandon. She's not familiar with the Judicial Branch......LOL Trust Buster Mar 2016 #1

Yea, we'll jump right on it Donald'cause that's what we do, investigate shit! leftofcool Mar 2016 #2

Trump is a fucking dunce malaise Mar 2016 #3

I So Want To Agree ProfessorGAC Mar 2016 #4

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)

1. Tell that to Sarandon. She's not familiar with the Judicial Branch......LOL

Reply to DetlefK (Original post)

Wed Mar 30, 2016, 09:46 AM

Mar 2016

leftofcool

(19,460 posts)

2. Yea, we'll jump right on it Donald'cause that's what we do, investigate shit!

Reply to DetlefK (Original post)

Wed Mar 30, 2016, 10:19 AM

Mar 2016

malaise

(268,846 posts)

3. Trump is a fucking dunce

Reply to DetlefK (Original post)

Wed Mar 30, 2016, 10:28 AM

Mar 2016

seriously - he knows nothing about anything

ProfessorGAC

(64,960 posts)

4. I So Want To Agree

Reply to malaise (Reply #3)

Wed Mar 30, 2016, 10:38 AM

Mar 2016

But, i still have a sense that this is performance art knowing that his dimwitted audience will lap up every opaque statement he makes.

Is he just having a fine old hoot at the expense of yahoos who find him an attractive candidate?

Reply to this discussion