Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCalifornia voters reject tobacco tax
Source: Reuters
California voters reject tobacco tax
SAN FRANCISCO | Wed Jun 6, 2012 11:25am EDT
(Reuters) - A California ballot measure that would have added a $1 tax to a pack of cigarettes was narrowly defeated in the state's primary election Tuesday, an outcome observers attributed to a $47 million ad blitz by the tobacco industry.
The measure was defeated 50.8 percent to 49.2 percent on a day of light voter turnout across the state. The result reflected a long-standing political divide in California, with San Francisco, Silicon Valley and Bay Area counties showing heavy support for the measure, while conservative suburban counties in Southern California were overwhelmingly opposed.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
The measure, championed, among others, by the American Cancer Society, cycling great and cancer survivor Lance Armstrong, had enjoyed a commanding lead in polls earlier in the year.
But opponents, led by tobacco giants Altria's Philip Morris and Reynolds American Inc, vastly outspent its rivals, blanketing the airwaves in much of the state in recent weeks with a message that cast doubt on how the new tax revenues would be spent.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
SAN FRANCISCO | Wed Jun 6, 2012 11:25am EDT
(Reuters) - A California ballot measure that would have added a $1 tax to a pack of cigarettes was narrowly defeated in the state's primary election Tuesday, an outcome observers attributed to a $47 million ad blitz by the tobacco industry.
The measure was defeated 50.8 percent to 49.2 percent on a day of light voter turnout across the state. The result reflected a long-standing political divide in California, with San Francisco, Silicon Valley and Bay Area counties showing heavy support for the measure, while conservative suburban counties in Southern California were overwhelmingly opposed.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
The measure, championed, among others, by the American Cancer Society, cycling great and cancer survivor Lance Armstrong, had enjoyed a commanding lead in polls earlier in the year.
But opponents, led by tobacco giants Altria's Philip Morris and Reynolds American Inc, vastly outspent its rivals, blanketing the airwaves in much of the state in recent weeks with a message that cast doubt on how the new tax revenues would be spent.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/06/06/us-usa-campaign-primaries-prop-idUSBRE85508020120606
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1235 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
California voters reject tobacco tax (Original Post)
Eugene
Jun 2012
OP
FirstLight
(13,359 posts)1. good
sorry, but $6 a pack for American Spirits is bad enough... I am not a pack a day smoker, just a couple at night after the kids to bed, but still...
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)2. I'm not a fan of "sin taxes". They are discriminatory
kelly1mm
(4,732 posts)3. .... and regressive! nt
xxqqqzme
(14,887 posts)4. If that money had been mandated for treatment.
I probably would have voted for it. Generally though, given the state's financial woes, I do not vote for measures mandating how funds must be spent.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)5. Even when I was a smoker, I would've gladly welcomed tobacco taxes to cover budget shortfalls....
...especially budget shortfalls related to state healthcare costs.
People can shut the fuck up about "sin taxes". Its not a sin tax, its a liability tax.