Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,855 posts)
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 11:37 AM Jun 2012

California voters reject tobacco tax

Source: Reuters

California voters reject tobacco tax

SAN FRANCISCO | Wed Jun 6, 2012 11:25am EDT

(Reuters) - A California ballot measure that would have added a $1 tax to a pack of cigarettes was narrowly defeated in the state's primary election Tuesday, an outcome observers attributed to a $47 million ad blitz by the tobacco industry.

The measure was defeated 50.8 percent to 49.2 percent on a day of light voter turnout across the state. The result reflected a long-standing political divide in California, with San Francisco, Silicon Valley and Bay Area counties showing heavy support for the measure, while conservative suburban counties in Southern California were overwhelmingly opposed.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]

The measure, championed, among others, by the American Cancer Society, cycling great and cancer survivor Lance Armstrong, had enjoyed a commanding lead in polls earlier in the year.

But opponents, led by tobacco giants Altria's Philip Morris and Reynolds American Inc, vastly outspent its rivals, blanketing the airwaves in much of the state in recent weeks with a message that cast doubt on how the new tax revenues would be spent.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/06/06/us-usa-campaign-primaries-prop-idUSBRE85508020120606
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
California voters reject tobacco tax (Original Post) Eugene Jun 2012 OP
good FirstLight Jun 2012 #1
I'm not a fan of "sin taxes". They are discriminatory badtoworse Jun 2012 #2
.... and regressive! nt kelly1mm Jun 2012 #3
If that money had been mandated for treatment. xxqqqzme Jun 2012 #4
Even when I was a smoker, I would've gladly welcomed tobacco taxes to cover budget shortfalls.... phleshdef Jun 2012 #5

FirstLight

(13,359 posts)
1. good
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 11:39 AM
Jun 2012

sorry, but $6 a pack for American Spirits is bad enough... I am not a pack a day smoker, just a couple at night after the kids to bed, but still...

xxqqqzme

(14,887 posts)
4. If that money had been mandated for treatment.
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 12:57 PM
Jun 2012

I probably would have voted for it. Generally though, given the state's financial woes, I do not vote for measures mandating how funds must be spent.

 

phleshdef

(11,936 posts)
5. Even when I was a smoker, I would've gladly welcomed tobacco taxes to cover budget shortfalls....
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 01:00 PM
Jun 2012

...especially budget shortfalls related to state healthcare costs.

People can shut the fuck up about "sin taxes". Its not a sin tax, its a liability tax.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»California voters reject ...