Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 07:08 PM Jun 2012

Massive fish kill outside Tokyo in Chiba — “The sight is somewhat apocalyptic”



There are tons and tons of dead sardines washing up on the shore [at the fishing port of Ohara in Isumi City of Chiba Prefecture]

[...]

According to the news, the dead fish started washing up around noon of June 3rd, and as of early afternoon on June 4th, the situation still remained pretty much out of control.

http://enenews.com/massive-fish-kill-outside-tokyo-in-chiba-the-sight-is-somewhat-apocalyptic-almost-looks-like-a-carpet-of-sardines-photos

37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Massive fish kill outside Tokyo in Chiba — “The sight is somewhat apocalyptic” (Original Post) Generic Other Jun 2012 OP
Must've been something they ate. meanit Jun 2012 #1
odd that the kill would show up 200 miles from fukushima. HiPointDem Jun 2012 #2
odd that Fukushima fishing boats would wash up on the California coast too. meanit Jun 2012 #5
water dilutes contaminants. it doesn't dilute boats. and you might note the red tinge at the HiPointDem Jun 2012 #7
Well, I'm certainly not an expert on the subject, meanit Jun 2012 #8
Not radioactivity, apparently. Octafish Jun 2012 #11
water dilutes radioactivity. HiPointDem Jun 2012 #13
You know, that's what the expert said on CNN a year ago. Octafish Jun 2012 #17
It's a scientific fact. and your link does not contradict it. also the fish kill is not reported HiPointDem Jun 2012 #20
Nice smear, the 'winger conspiracy sites.' You know your stuff. Octafish Jun 2012 #24
fact, not smear. the report appears only on sites like "beyond top secret" & "what really happened". HiPointDem Jun 2012 #26
What fact? Octafish Jun 2012 #28
water dilutes radioactivity. as your link acknowleges: "as much as expected". saying that HiPointDem Jun 2012 #30
That's half-life. Her point is sea water reacts with radioactive nucleides in unpredicted ways. Octafish Jun 2012 #33
nothing you've highlighted contradicts anything i said, and the link you posted here is not HiPointDem Jun 2012 #34
Octafish, did you see this? countryjake Jun 2012 #22
Thank you for the heads-up, countryjake! Octafish Jun 2012 #23
And thanks to you for continuing to try & inform on this issue... countryjake Jun 2012 #31
M6.3 quake hits off Chiba, M4.2 near Fukushima Daiichi an hour later dixiegrrrrl Jun 2012 #19
Uh, this sort of thing happens pretty regularly. TheWraith Jun 2012 #6
Imaginary effects of Fukushima? meanit Jun 2012 #9
"the imaginary effects of Fukushima" brentspeak Jun 2012 #10
More imaginary effects? Generic Other Jun 2012 #12
That's a lot of dead fish malaise Jun 2012 #3
Looks like a Red Tide algae bloom PufPuf23 Jun 2012 #4
Do you know if these are ever associated with release of methane gas from underwater fissures? Generic Other Jun 2012 #14
Often killing red tides are associated with low oxygen in the water. PufPuf23 Jun 2012 #15
That will do wonders for Disneyland spinbaby Jun 2012 #16
couldn't have picked a better country to wash up on Shankapotomus Jun 2012 #18
Ewwwwww Generic Other Jun 2012 #37
i'll have a thousand of these to go please.... spanone Jun 2012 #21
Yikes. BlueIris Jun 2012 #25
There was one of these in Southern CA last year - I'll bet it smelled (smelt?) amazing petronius Jun 2012 #27
Does red tide actually turn the water red? Generic Other Jun 2012 #36
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jun 2012 #29
K&R! countryjake Jun 2012 #32
NBC reporting the surf is bloody not red tide Generic Other Jun 2012 #35
 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
7. water dilutes contaminants. it doesn't dilute boats. and you might note the red tinge at the
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 07:47 PM
Jun 2012

shoreline.

meanit

(455 posts)
8. Well, I'm certainly not an expert on the subject,
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 08:36 PM
Jun 2012

but thousands of dead fish washing up in Japan while Fukushima still spews radiation just isn't too reassuring to me.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
17. You know, that's what the expert said on CNN a year ago.
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 09:42 PM
Jun 2012
http://articles.cnn.com/2011-04-07/opinion/safina.radiation.water.leak.japan_1_cesium-water-leak-radiation?_s=PM:OPINION

Funny, he doesn't seem to be on the air anymore.

Almost forgot. Every tuna measured for radiation off California showed exposure. The fish were on the other side of the Pacific last year. The ones which passed through the worst stuff have yet to migrate. Who knows what their readings will be?

http://thechart.blogs.cnn.com/2012/05/28/low-levels-of-fukushima-cesium-found-in-west-coast-tuna/

One thing else: You may count on CNN to tell the truth. I don't.
 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
20. It's a scientific fact. and your link does not contradict it. also the fish kill is not reported
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 11:54 PM
Jun 2012

anywhere but at the alarmist enews and winger conspiracy sites via "anonymous tip".

well, ok then.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
24. Nice smear, the 'winger conspiracy sites.' You know your stuff.
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 10:41 AM
Jun 2012

Fukushima should be of concern to people who eat seafood or not, as well as those who count on the Pacific dilluting the radioactivity or not.

Here are a few things I have found alarming:

Trivializing Fukushima

The Fukushima Crisis Demonstrates how Lowly the Global Elites Hold the Common People

''We never meant to conceal the information, but it never occurred to us to make it public.''

PS: Congrats on 2,200 posts in 90 days. The GOOGLE helped me find a couple on Fukushima. For example:

Yeah, it sure is.

Interesting stuff.

 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
26. fact, not smear. the report appears only on sites like "beyond top secret" & "what really happened".
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 12:09 PM
Jun 2012

not in msm.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
28. What fact?
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 01:35 PM
Jun 2012

You haven't posted a single link?

Here's the latest on the subject, courtesy of a DUer who knows how to use links:

A Radioactive Nightmare

His source, BTW, is Alexandra Navrotsky, Ph.D., director of nanomaterials research at U.C. Davis. She helps explain why the Pacific isn't dilluting the radiation as much as expected.

 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
30. water dilutes radioactivity. as your link acknowleges: "as much as expected". saying that
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 01:56 PM
Jun 2012

dilution may not be "as much as expected" in no way contradicts the fact that water dilutes radioactivity.

moreover, the only information from dr. navrotsky in that article is this quote where she says that water dilutes radioactivity:

A given isotope has the same radioactivity (half-life) regardless of what chemical state it is in,” Alexandra Navrotsky, Ph.D., director of nanomaterials research at U.C. Davis, told the VCReporter. “So the radioactivity for a constant number of U atoms depends on the proportion of different isotopes in the sample.”


Octafish

(55,745 posts)
33. That's half-life. Her point is sea water reacts with radioactive nucleides in unpredicted ways.
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 03:48 PM
Jun 2012

You took the quote out of context. In that example, Dr. Navrotsky is talking about the half-life of Cesium 137. She also described the point, which is the discovery of new process that work to keep radioactive substances intact as they travel around the Pacific Ocean. Here's the press release from UC Davis:


How sea water could corrode nuclear fuel

January 26, 2012

Japan used seawater to cool nuclear fuel at the stricken Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear plant after the tsunami in March 2011 -- and that was probably the best action to take at the time, says Professor Alexandra Navrotsky of the University of California, Davis.

But Navrotsky and others have since discovered a new way in which seawater can corrode nuclear fuel, [font color="green"]forming uranium compounds that could potentially travel long distances, either in solution or as very small particles[/font color]. The research team published its work Jan. 23 in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

“This is a phenomenon that has not been considered before,” said Alexandra Navrotsky, distinguished professor of ceramic, earth and environmental materials chemistry. “We don’t know how much this will increase the rate of corrosion, but it is something that will have to be considered in future.”

Japan used seawater to avoid a much more serious accident at the Fukushima-Daiichi plant, and Navrotsky said, to her knowledge, there is no evidence of long-distance uranium contamination from the plant.

[font color="green"]Uranium in nuclear fuel rods is in a chemical form that is “pretty insoluble” in water[/font color], Navrotsky said, unless the uranium is oxidized to uranium-VI — a process that can be facilitated when radiation converts water into peroxide, a powerful oxidizing agent.

Peter Burns, professor of civil engineering and geological sciences at the University of Notre Dame and a co-author of the new paper, had previously made spherical uranium peroxide clusters, rather like carbon “buckyballs,” that can dissolve or exist as solids.

In the new paper, the researchers show that in the presence of alkali metal ions such as sodium — for example, in seawater — these clusters are stable enough to persist in solution or as small particles even when the oxidizing agent is removed.

In other words, these clusters could form on the surface of a fuel rod exposed to seawater and then be transported away, surviving in the environment for months or years before reverting to more common forms of uranium, without peroxide, and settling to the bottom of the ocean. There is no data yet on how fast these uranium peroxide clusters will break down in the environment, Navrotsky said.

Navrotsky and Burns worked with the following co-authors: postdoctoral researcher Christopher Armstrong and project scientist Tatiana Shvareva, UC Davis; May Nyman, Sandia National Laboratory, Albuquerque, N.M.; and Ginger Sigmon, University of Notre Dame. The U.S. Department of Energy supported the project.

About UC Davis

For more than 100 years, UC Davis has engaged in teaching, research and public service that matter to California and transform the world. Located close to the state capital, UC Davis has more than 32,000 students, more than 2,500 faculty and more than 21,000 staff, an annual research budget that exceeds $684 million, a comprehensive health system and 13 specialized research centers. The university offers interdisciplinary graduate study and more than 100 undergraduate majors in four colleges — Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Biological Sciences, Engineering, and Letters and Science. It also houses six professional schools — Education, Law, Management, Medicine, Veterinary Medicine and the Betty Irene Moore School of Nursing.

SOURCE: http://www.news.ucdavis.edu/search/news_detail.lasso?id=10131

 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
34. nothing you've highlighted contradicts anything i said, and the link you posted here is not
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 04:06 PM
Jun 2012

the same link you posted earlier.

"could" is not "does" or "is"

water dilutes radioactivity, & there's no reason to assume the fish kill in chiba had anything to do with fukushima.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
23. Thank you for the heads-up, countryjake!
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 10:20 AM
Jun 2012

From the SF Gate article:

"We were frankly kind of startled," said Nicholas Fisher, one of the researchers reporting the findings online Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The levels of radioactive cesium were 10 times higher than the amount measured in tuna off the California coast in previous years. But even so, that's still far below safe-to-eat limits set by the U.S. and Japanese governments.


Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2012/05/28/national/a120114D60.DTL#ixzz1x7H6kkbL

Helen Caldicott discusses how there is no "safe" level for radiation exposure:

http://www.infiniteunknown.net/2011/12/13/dr-helen-caldicott-after-fukushima-enough-is-enough-new-york-times/

Here's a good resource on Cesium from the EPA:

http://www.epa.gov/rpdweb00/radionuclides/cesium.html

A bit more from the DOE on Plutonium:

http://sync.democraticunderground.com/1002145466

Shocking to see how quickly the story faded from the front page and the television screen. Thank you for knowing what's at stake.

countryjake

(8,554 posts)
31. And thanks to you for continuing to try & inform on this issue...
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 02:16 PM
Jun 2012

there's simply too much at stake for the nuclear power advocates (and the MIC) to allow any of us to dwell on or even contemplate the actual ramifications of the Fukushima disaster. Even here on the West Coast, we get brief stories (such as the one I linked you to) in our local news reports, but then it is dropped the next day.

As someone who lives in an area where many survive on the catch they get from our waters (my own freezer is still stocked with the salmon we smoked last year) these radioactivity alarms from the Tsunami and even the "dead zones" of depleted oxygen (which have become steadily worse off the coasts of both OR and WA since 2002) are of deep concern to me and many of the people I know up here.

I believe that not only are the citizens of Japan being duped about the "safety" of their current environment, but that our own government is highly complicit in this "move along, nothing to see here" attitude. Too much at stake for them.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
19. M6.3 quake hits off Chiba, M4.2 near Fukushima Daiichi an hour later
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 10:59 PM
Jun 2012

yesterday..
wonder if that had anything to do with it?

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
6. Uh, this sort of thing happens pretty regularly.
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 07:35 PM
Jun 2012

I remember seeing one happen firsthand in Lake Ontario years back. You get some kind of disease spreading through the fish population, and in no time you've got a lot of dead fish. There's also the Red Tide phenomenon mentioned downthread.

These are actual, scientifically based conditions, as opposed to the imaginary effects of Fukushima.

brentspeak

(18,290 posts)
10. "the imaginary effects of Fukushima"
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 08:39 PM
Jun 2012

Just when it didn't seem possible to one-up yourself for sheer unintentional hilarity, you've managed to do the impossible.

PufPuf23

(8,756 posts)
4. Looks like a Red Tide algae bloom
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 07:24 PM
Jun 2012

I believe the Japanese nuke disaster is understated and more than enough reason to put a stop to current nuclear energy and may be a contributing fact but it does look like a red tide event from photo.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_tide

Red tide is a common name for a phenomenon also known as an algal bloom (large concentrations of aquatic microorganisms), an event in which estuarine, marine, or fresh water algae accumulate rapidly in the water column and results in discoloration of the surface water. It is usually found in coastal areas.[1]

These algae, known as phytoplankton, are single-celled protists, plant-like organisms that can form dense, visible patches near the water's surface. Certain species of phytoplankton, dinoflagellates, contain photosynthetic pigments that vary in color from green to brown to red.

When the algae are present in high concentrations, the water appears to be discolored or murky, varying in color from purple to almost pink, normally being red or green. Not all algal blooms are dense enough to cause water discoloration, and not all discolored waters associated with algal blooms are red. Additionally, red tides are not typically associated with tidal movement of water, hence the preference among scientists to use the term algal bloom.

Some red tides are associated with the production of natural toxins, depletion of dissolved oxygen or other harmful effects, and are generally described as harmful algal blooms. The most conspicuous effects of these kind of red tides are the associated wildlife mortalities of marine and coastal species of fish, birds, marine mammals, and other organisms.

etc.

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
14. Do you know if these are ever associated with release of methane gas from underwater fissures?
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 08:49 PM
Jun 2012

Or whether earthquakes ever trigger red tide blooms? Chiba had an earthquake lately. The fish kills also occurred in the Gulf after BP. I am just curious if anyone has ever done any research in this area.

PufPuf23

(8,756 posts)
15. Often killing red tides are associated with low oxygen in the water.
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 09:04 PM
Jun 2012

Never have thought nor read anything regards to methane gas release.

That is an interesting question.

Shankapotomus

(4,840 posts)
18. couldn't have picked a better country to wash up on
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 10:42 PM
Jun 2012

they are sure not to go to waste if they are still edible. (^▽^

petronius

(26,598 posts)
27. There was one of these in Southern CA last year - I'll bet it smelled (smelt?) amazing
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 12:21 PM
Jun 2012
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2011/03/redondo-beach-authorities-report-large-fish-kill-at-king-harbor.html

Looking at the water in the photo from Japan, it certainly looks like a pretty severe red tide is the immediate cause.

Off topic, I think I'll have sardines for lunch...

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
36. Does red tide actually turn the water red?
Fri Jun 8, 2012, 09:22 AM
Jun 2012

The reports from Japan are suggesting fish blood not red tide.

Your pics are pretty horrible looking BTW. Yikes.

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
35. NBC reporting the surf is bloody not red tide
Fri Jun 8, 2012, 09:17 AM
Jun 2012

Rotting Sardines Block Japanese Port
NBC Chicago
Reena Roy
June 7, 2012

[...]

A bloody surf has turned a Japanese port city into a dumping ground for rotting fish.

Tons of sardines began washing up onto Chiba Shore in Isumi City on June 3 and continued into this week, according to Japan Today.

The Ohara fishing port was reportedly covered with the dead fish, the ocean stained with their blood

[...]

The reason for the phenomenon has not been confirmed.

http://enenews.com/nbc-a-bloody-surf-has-turned-a-japanese-port-city-gizmodo-ocean-stained-with-blood-of-200-tons-of-sardines-the-scariest-thing-is-that-no-one-is-sure-why-this-is-happening-photos

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Massive fish kill outside...