Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsYo Boston Globe we think you mean to put us above the fold. Love you<2
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
12 replies, 1698 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (45)
ReplyReply to this post
12 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Yo Boston Globe we think you mean to put us above the fold. Love you<2 (Original Post)
Playinghardball
May 2016
OP
what dirt? Given the convoy of slag following Hillary around, you seemed to have confused the two
roguevalley
May 2016
#10
pnwmom
(108,955 posts)1. That popularity number sure hasn't helped him in actual VOTES or DELEGATES.
Hillary is millions of votes and hundreds of delegates ahead even though she isn't one of the cool, popular crowd.
Good for her!
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)2. Understandable as they limit voter participation
pnwmom
(108,955 posts)3. Yes, the caucuses certainly do that. n/t
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)7. For sure that is half of it.
I hate paying for a primary I could not vote in until this year. You want to limit the voters, then the democratic party needs to pay 100% of the primary cost.
You keep saying that
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)4. Sanders beats Trump by 20 points!
SunSeeker
(51,508 posts)9. He does, but that's before any negative ads have been run against him.
His favorables would drop like a rock once Trump started mining all the dirt that is out there on Sanders.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)10. what dirt? Given the convoy of slag following Hillary around, you seemed to have confused the two
SunSeeker
(51,508 posts)12. I can't tell you because it would immediately be hidden.
Like this post:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1107125158
whereisjustice
(2,941 posts)6. Awesome, isn't it?
Jopin Klobe
(779 posts)8. Holy crap ...
... nothing obvious here ...
oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)11. ahhhhh the media, giggle