Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jmowreader

(50,528 posts)
Tue May 10, 2016, 05:10 PM May 2016

Ammon Bundy intended occupation to end up in civil court

http://www.sltrib.com/home/3872441-155/lawyers-ammon-bundy-intended-oregon-occupation

His lawyers in the 33-page motion say Bundy isn't an extremist or a member of any militia and doesn't hold anti-government views.

"Defendant Ammon Bundy organized his fellow citizens in protest of the expansive and unsupported interpretation of the Constitution that purports to allow the federal government to own and control more territory, and exercise jurisdiction over more land in the Western States, than the States themselves," lawyers Lissa Casey and Mike Arnold wrote in the motion.


Because everyone knows no one who attempts to overthrow the government all by his little lonesome has any anti-government views, right?
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
1. LOL ... When you make anti-government speeches, arm yourself, and threaten violence ...
Tue May 10, 2016, 05:17 PM
May 2016

and encourage others to come support you and they are anti-government, armed and take aim at Federal Agents and you don't tell your supporters to stop ... you pretty much foreclose on the chances of ending up in civil court.

cheapdate

(3,811 posts)
4. Uh huh. And LaVoy Finicum was trying to surrender,
Tue May 10, 2016, 05:42 PM
May 2016

David Fry was just a confused kid, and the Civil War was fought over "state's rights".

Shrike47

(6,913 posts)
6. His attorney is an a-hole. This is an obvious lie. And who cares what he thought would happen?
Tue May 10, 2016, 05:51 PM
May 2016

It's no defense to felony murder that you didn't think your accomplice would use that gun to shoot anybody. Why would the purported reasoning help Bundy?

lpbk2713

(42,736 posts)
7. The "I was only kidding" cop out isn't even in the picture.
Tue May 10, 2016, 05:55 PM
May 2016



Better think up a better defense than that guys.

csziggy

(34,131 posts)
8. The ownership of Malheur was settled in civil court a hundred years ago
Tue May 10, 2016, 06:02 PM
May 2016

Maybe these dumbasses should learn a little history!

The full history of the refuge, its various parts and the executive orders and court cases involved are detailed in this report, beginning on page 10: http://www.fws.gov/uploadedFiles/Region_1/NWRS/Zone_2/Malheur/Documents/MalheurNWR_FCCP_chapter1.pdf

Not only the US Supreme Court but various Oregon courts have ruled and found in favor of the US government.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ammon Bundy intended occu...