Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

YouDig

(2,280 posts)
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 12:28 PM Jun 2016

How rational societies respond to mass shootings.

Australia. Port Arthur massacre. Response: much tighter gun laws. Result: a lot less shootings.
UK. Dunblane massacre. Response: much tighter gun laws. Result: a lot less shootings.

US. Massacre after massacre. Response: nothing. Result: massacre after massacre.

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
2. The Second Amendment
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 12:32 PM
Jun 2016

I think only members of a well regulated militia should have access to firearms. "Well regulated" means overseen by the government in a way that weeds out the nut jobs. Unfortunately, the courts do not agree with me.

Waldorf

(654 posts)
5. When the 2nd was written "well regulated" had nothing to do with being overseen by the government.
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 12:42 PM
Jun 2016

"The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order. Something that was well-regulated was calibrated correctly, functioning as expected."

Dem2

(8,166 posts)
8. Yes, we've heard these arguments 1000 times
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 12:50 PM
Jun 2016

I'm tired of gun-promoting people even though I own guns. Bye.

 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
9. Yes, good working order.
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 12:54 PM
Jun 2016

For a militia that means being comprised of sane people who will follow directions, not turn on their fellow citizens, etc. A militia cannot function if its members are a bunch of random "patriots" who believe the biggest threat is from their own government.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
3. "Insanity in individuals is something rare - but in groups, parties, nations and epochs
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 12:35 PM
Jun 2016
"Insanity in individuals is something rare - but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule." - Friedrich Nietzsche

Bluzmann57

(12,336 posts)
4. Just heard a guy on MSNBC say 134 this year alone
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 12:38 PM
Jun 2016

June 12, 2016. Not even halfway through the year and 134 mass shootings. I've said it before, I'll say it again; STOP THE MADNESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
7. This gets definitional; Mother Jones found 72 mass shootings in the US since 1982
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 12:44 PM
Jun 2016

They mean things like this: largely random shootings of large groups of people, generally strangers to the shooter.

When people say "134 mass shootings this year" they include for example a brawl in the parking lot of a roadhouse where two bikers pull guns and shoot each other and one other person. Not that that's not bad, but it's not what people think when they say "mass shooting".

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
6. OTOH I'd rather we focused policy on the "normal" shootings that kill many more people
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 12:42 PM
Jun 2016

I get that you have to follow public engagement, and unfortunately it's mass shootings that do that, but if this is a "normal" day 60 people died from "normal" shootings (40 of them suicides) in addition to the 50 at the nightclub. I bring this up because the policies that might address the one problem might not address the other...

Odin2005

(53,521 posts)
10. Yeah, fuck people's constitutional rights!
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 12:58 PM
Jun 2016

What other parts of the Bill of Rights do you want to take away to "keep us safe"?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How rational societies re...