General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWarren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)rinse. repeat.
Johonny
(20,833 posts)The guy on the right is very active today on the DU. I personally welcome their fear because the person on the left has actual moral weight and the person on the right just has fear, factoids, and gun manufacturer bought NRA talking points.
saidsimplesimon
(7,888 posts)I agree.
Off topic, a quote from a "B" movie:
"My life is an endless highway, full of toll booths and no exits."
Dem2
(8,168 posts)mountain grammy
(26,619 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)Could have saved many of the more than 280,000+ who have died due to gun violence in the last ten years in the U.S.
brush
(53,764 posts)Last edited Tue Jun 14, 2016, 09:49 AM - Edit history (1)
who is shooting and killing people left and right?
JanMichael
(24,885 posts)...but rarely does it work. That one teacher in a school in Washington or Oregon is one example of fast thinking (she or he just grabbed the rifle from the kid). not that many more though.
ManiacJoe
(10,136 posts)aikoaiko
(34,169 posts)Allow me to introduce the Girardoni air rifle. A .46 calibre rifle with a 20-round capacity. It served the Lewis and Clark expedition famously and served the Austrian Army for 25 years.
It was the AR15 of its day.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)All laws should be based on when they were written.
No free speach on the internet, the founding fathers couldn't have predicted that. If you want free speech you have to walk down to the town square, and don't you even think about bring a megaphone.
I have more to say, but I'm afraid I cant say it here. I will be posting an open letter on the doors of the mayors office tomorrow morning. Please respond. But not tomorrow, we are expecting rain, and they just don't make parchment paper like they used to.
63splitwindow
(2,657 posts)the Constitution is a living, breathing document whose meaning and application is what the United States Supreme Court says it is from time to time?
PJMcK
(22,031 posts)63splitwindow
(2,657 posts)So if the US Supreme Court determines that the Founding Fathers could surely not have meant to have a society flooded with military style rapid and multi fire firearms then I would welcome that.
Wednesdays
(17,342 posts)scores of people being mowed down by a single shooter in the 18th century.
Who knew?
hunter
(38,310 posts)Brilliant. Eat some sweet lead paint chips.
Piss on guns and those who love them.
63splitwindow
(2,657 posts)"The Girardoni air rifle was in service with the Austrian army from 1780 to around 1815. The advantages of a high rate of fire, no smoke from propellants, and low muzzle report granted it initial acceptance, but it was eventually removed from service for several reasons. While the detachable air reservoir was capable of around 30 shots it took nearly 1,500 strokes of a hand pump to fill those reservoirs. Later, a wagon-mounted pump was provided. The reservoirs, made from hammered sheet iron held together with rivets and sealed by brazing, proved very difficult to manufacture using the techniques of the period and were always in short supply.
In addition, the weapon was very delicate and a small break in the reservoir could make it inoperable. Finally, it was very different from any other weapon of the time and any soldier using it needed to be highly trained.
The Lewis and Clark Expedition used the rifle in the demonstrations that they performed for nearly every Native American tribe they encountered on the expedition"
aikoaiko
(34,169 posts)Should sound familiar.
63splitwindow
(2,657 posts)aikoaiko
(34,169 posts)It was the "assault weapon" if its day.
63splitwindow
(2,657 posts)American civilians were killed by one while going about their civilian life?
aikoaiko
(34,169 posts)is not quite as strong as some people think it is. We were already moving beyond single shot muzzle loaders and the writers of the Bill of Rights would have know that.
63splitwindow
(2,657 posts)that it is your opinion that the Founding Fathers would look at the civilian murders our society is enduring today and would say, "Yep, simply a cost of the 2nd Amendment as we intended it be implemented."
aikoaiko
(34,169 posts)Massacres happened. One of the earliest recording school shootings was in the 1760s.
63splitwindow
(2,657 posts)aikoaiko
(34,169 posts)63splitwindow
(2,657 posts)"By the late 10th century in the Song Dynasty (960-1279), the Chinese had adapted gunpowder to rockets. To make such an arrow, first a paper tube was made; then the gunpowder was put inside the tube, which was then attached to an arrow to be launched by a bow. Those were the first and most primitive rockets in the history of humankind."
http://www.chinaculture.org/gb/en_madeinchina/2005-07/21/content_70826.htm
aikoaiko
(34,169 posts)But the few manufacturers won't sell them to civilians.
State laws may also prohibit civilians owning such a device.
Jim Beard
(2,535 posts)It was a military rifle, one a Milita man would use. BTW, how many people owned rifles in the early days?
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)It was the weapon of choice for Lewis and Clark
63splitwindow
(2,657 posts)"The Girardoni air rifle was in service with the Austrian army from 1780 to around 1815. The advantages of a high rate of fire, no smoke from propellants, and low muzzle report granted it initial acceptance, but it was eventually removed from service for several reasons. While the detachable air reservoir was capable of around 30 shots it took nearly 1,500 strokes of a hand pump to fill those reservoirs. Later, a wagon-mounted pump was provided. The reservoirs, made from hammered sheet iron held together with rivets and sealed by brazing, proved very difficult to manufacture using the techniques of the period and were always in short supply.
In addition, the weapon was very delicate and a small break in the reservoir could make it inoperable. Finally, it was very different from any other weapon of the time and any soldier using it needed to be highly trained.
The Lewis and Clark Expedition used the rifle in the demonstrations that they performed for nearly every Native American tribe they encountered on the expedition"
Gore1FL
(21,127 posts)Orrex
(63,203 posts)How long did it take to pump the cylinder 1500 times, by the way? And how many shots could the wielder get at full power?
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)And ate a few.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)jtuck004
(15,882 posts)SCantiGOP
(13,869 posts)You will never win an argument with an ideologue.
Edit: not aimed at you jtuck, but at some posts upstream.
saidsimplesimon
(7,888 posts)jmg257
(11,996 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Disarming those 80 million+ gun owners? Not a chance...
jmg257
(11,996 posts)Much easier, and challenges much harder.
Just reading posts
(688 posts)jmg257
(11,996 posts)There are too many wilderness areas of the US where you need a rifle to protect against wildlife that threatens your family and pets on your land.
That said, you are a rotten shot if you need that many bullets to bring down something feral on your property.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)It has nothing to do with militias.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)jmg257
(11,996 posts)Why this:
"There are too many wilderness areas of the US where you need a rifle to protect against wildlife that threatens your family and pets on your land."
relates to this:
"Let's get on with it and repeal the 2nd (and the militia clauses and US code)"
was confusing to me. Not sure of the connection you intended between a rifle to protect against wildlife and the militia clauses in the constitution. As you explained, "nothing", so...
Aerows
(39,961 posts)that you and I are on two different trains of thought.
Don't have time right now, but I'll try to catch you at the station later
jmg257
(11,996 posts)JEB
(4,748 posts)Laser102
(816 posts)greiner3
(5,214 posts)But I've read prior to cartridges in the Civil War, the average gun fired 3 times a minute; in practice; by a seasoned vet. Maybe 2 shots a minute or less?
Aerows
(39,961 posts)"People need them for hunting".
"I don't hunt anymore."
Why in the name of everything does someone need to expend that many rounds for "training", pretend hunting, and then reveal that they don't even hunt?
What in the hell is somebody doing hunting with an AR-15? Is their aim that damn bad that they need to spew that many bullets?
The arguments are getting absolutely absurd.