General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWomen may soon be required to register for Selective Service. How do you feel?
The Senate just passed a $602 billion defense spending bill. In it, among other things, is a requirement for women to register for Selective Service, just like men. The Senate bill still has to be reconciled with the House version, though. And if Obama vetoes it, the Senate may very well override the veto since it already had/has 85 votes in the Senate.
What are your thoughts on it?
My thoughts are that this is going to be a highly unpopular move, but it's the fair thing to do. I do not agree with the societal attitude that if a man dies in combat, it is less tragic than if a woman dies in combat - which seems to be part of the attitude driving the notion that only men should be drafted and not women (society really does not consider all deaths to be equal). I think this is one of those "equality goes both ways" situations. At any rate, it's not like a military draft is going to be reinstated any time soon, so registering for Selective Service is simply going to entail filling out some unpopular paperwork.

obamanut2012
(28,343 posts)csziggy
(34,189 posts)If women have all the obligations as men we should be assured we have all the rights that men have.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Want equal rights, shoulder equal responsibilities.
Have equal responsibilities, no excuse to deny equal rights.
obamanut2012
(28,343 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)a long time ago now, we can do far better for ourselves than sit around waiting for things to be given to us and to come along. Just imo.
obamanut2012
(28,343 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,376 posts)gollygee
(22,336 posts)Agreed.
obamanut2012
(28,343 posts)JanMichael
(25,541 posts)bemildred
(90,061 posts)
scscholar
(2,902 posts)obamanut2012
(28,343 posts)Calista241
(5,621 posts)no_hypocrisy
(50,733 posts)A) It might discourage a capricious vote by Congress to enact a draft for war, or
B) We may continue having unitary engagements without the votes of Congress indefinitely because the draft would be so unpopular.
ancianita
(40,136 posts)should never have to fight both an enemy in front of her and one in back of her who's supposed to actually protect her as he would any brother-in-arms. There is no harassment or rape that ever -- ever -- should be endured for any alleged greater good.
If you don't protect your female military, you don't get to draft them.
My vote is no until the DoD has restructured all justice processes for military rape.
No fucking exceptions.
demmiblue
(38,126 posts)
apcalc
(4,518 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)This and No ERA, no draft for women. Both those conditions MUST be met before women can be forced to register.
MerryBlooms
(11,917 posts)
appalachiablue
(43,493 posts)rainy
(6,273 posts)can register.
JustinL
(722 posts)Shouldn't nonwhite and nonreligious people also be exempt since they're also underrepresented in Congress? For that matter, what about young people?
FWIW, I believe the draft should be eliminated entirely.
PlanetaryOrbit
(155 posts)What about every racial minority in America?
mahina
(19,580 posts)Both to politics and international affairs, as well.
It should increase voter turnout too, this go round at least, as young women become aware that this is on the horizon.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)extend right through the 40s or so. THAT would make more people pay attention.
Just reading posts
(688 posts)Um....really?
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)to unnecessary, for-profit wars, don't you think? I also feel that mature adults are exactly the ones who should be going to war, instead of sending their kids. I won't be holding my breath waiting for a national wave of proud responsibility, though.
Just reading posts
(688 posts)I hope not, since your proposal hasn't the slightest chance of ever being put into effect.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)Isn't that ageism!
JustinL
(722 posts)Are they just unwilling martyrs to the cause?
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)of people to just say no when it's their own comfort and economic wellbeing on the line, JustinL. I'm pretty sure that, short of the equivalent of another bombing of Pearl Harbor and threats invasion across both oceans, using a draft that could hit anyone any time during a quarter century of their adulthood would be bad for a party at reelection.
I imagine the citizenry might even have a whole new viewpoint about the desirability of protecting Middle East or Asian oil pipelines in 115 degree temperatures versus putting sustainable energy programs in high gear right here at home. Just for one for-instance.
I must say I'm a little disappointed at all this resistance to even an unrealistic air-dream of sharing responsibility and sacrifice. '"Give" me the Equal Rights Amendment and then maybe I'll consider whether I'm interested in shouldering the equal responsibilities that should come with it.' 'Our kids can go to war and all we'll do is grumble that war is evil or wave flags, but don't even think we'd go instead.'
Just maybe if it were older women voters who were being raped we'd scream bloody murder legally, make lousier victims than our daughters? What would our husbands have to say about it? Would people who've grown relatively educated and prosperous in maturity see institutionalized victimization as appropriate for them?
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)As recently as 2011, the army allowed anyone up to the age of 42 years old to enlist and complete basic training.
-none
(1,884 posts)Never mind both my daughters are in their 30's and not subject to the draft.
A better plan is to stop our corporate wars of choice, then we would not need a possible draft.
Just reading posts
(688 posts)Basic LA
(2,047 posts)I'm against the draft. (I speak as a Vietnam vet.) I'm even against jury duty, except for DU.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Putting aside the whole issue of whether ANYONE should have to register, I don't see why only men should.
pnwmom
(109,780 posts)The main excuses for not passing it before were gay marriage and women being drafted. If they want to draft women, the ERA needs to get passed first.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)a potential remake of the Paul Simon classic.
JennyMominFL
(224 posts)I think it's fair for all Americans to register. However, as someone who served in the Miltary, I would rather have someone serving next to me because they choose to rather than being forced to. I'd rather just get rid of it completely. and I agree with the poster above who said we should pass the ERA first
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)I'd want to be sure that the differences in assignment to modes of service wouldn't be unreasonably sex-biased.
Making conscription acceptable to congress critters could create a real mess of gender bias
apcalc
(4,518 posts)Then it would be fine.
auntpurl
(4,311 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)WAR PROFITEERS.
hunter
(39,406 posts)The Vietnam war ended before I was draft age and I also missed this registration crap. Registered or not, Uncle Sam knows who you are.
My mom's family are pacifists. That's how most of her ancestors ended up in the U.S.A.. They escaped the U.S. Civil War too.
Both my dad and his dad served in the military. My grandpa was an Army Air Force officer in World War II. He didn't fly; they decided he was more valuable on the ground. After the war he was an aerospace engineer and worked on the Apollo Project making some especially difficult bits of metal.
If I was asked to fight an unjust war I'd walk away. If my kids were asked, and they chose not to fight, I'd find a way that they could walk away.
My mom's dad was a conscientious objector in World War II. He was also a welder. They gave him a choice, prison or building and repairing ships for the Merchant Marine. He built ships.
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)....who will be just as war-hawkish as her white male predecessors. And women want to have no skin in the game?
I mean if you are going to have this system, then it should be for both genders. That is if you believe in equality and want combat jobs open to women.
Otherwise, just scrap the whole damn thing.
You can't just have equality only in the areas you want. It's ridiculous to scream for equal rights for an entire century but still expect men to go out and be the only ones forced to die for their country whether they agree with the war or not.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)So no draft until the ERA is passed.
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)I'm all for it.
But I don't know what it would legally accomplish. Since it failed to pass in the 1980s, most states and the federal government have passed laws already that do what the ERA would have accomplished back then. So it has made it a bit redundant, legally speaking.
Like I've said before, Democrats should have pushed for a full blown ERA back in 2009 instead of Lilly Ledbetter Act, which has turned out to have practically no effect.
REP
(21,691 posts)Women have traditionally been exempted from the battlefield simply because of the one-to-one ratio of woman to birth at a time, whereas a single male can impregnate many women within a short time period. So if the male population was decimated or even more severely reduced, the few remaining men could impregnate the ample supply of women to bring up the numbers of available cannon fodder.
Dress it up with some sentimental excuses, such as the delicate nature of the fairer sex or women might go insane on their periods and defect, but the true reason is that women have traditionally been reserved to serve in the trenches as breeding stock.
LeftRant
(524 posts)We already know they CAN serve. I think the furtherance of equality demands this
catnhatnh
(8,976 posts)What the hell kind of idiot thinks the draft has ever been fair to males??? And now filling out a fucking form is less fair to women then that part where males were actually killed half way around the world for years in Vietnam??? Equality? But filling out a sheet of paper is bullshit?
PlanetaryOrbit
(155 posts)Does anyone know if the main penalty for not registering for Selective Service, is that you cannot get FAFSA federal student financial aid?
uppityperson
(115,917 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)JustinL
(722 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)That is perfectly ok and right. Any opposition I have torched raft is another issue
struggle4progress
(121,969 posts)Zing Zing Zingbah
(6,496 posts)if ever called up to draft. The draft would be for women at prime ages for child bearing. I imagine attempting to draft women would result in a large baby boom in this country. Sure they can register, but I just don't think actually drafting them is going to work out so well.
tonyt53
(5,737 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)libodem
(19,288 posts)None of the perks. That was a big issue when we tried to ratify the ERA.
Maybe this issue eill help make us equal to that one fucking rib from Adam?
Signed
Paying For It Ever Since
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)Equality means equality.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)Currently we have an all volunteer military not a draft so registering for the draft is kinda meaningless.
Now what they should do is require all young people to serve in the military, no exceptions. Religious get no breaks, college students get no breaks, rich get no breaks. Everyone has skin in the game.
I could almost guarantee our leaders wouldn't be so quick to lob bombs when they determine they want to loot other countries of their resources if they have to risk losing their offspring for $$s
Peace Patriot
(24,010 posts)Especially after TPP gets shoved down our throats, and automation then cuts our throats, and the last of our working class jobs disappear, what are people gonna do to make a living, huh? Women will need to be equal opportunity killers to have any income at all, and, hey, I hear the health care is terrific and it's included in the package if you survive the oil wars and need prosthetic devices or whatever.
Yes! Draft women! It's only fair!
I considered using but I'm not really being sarcastic.
Positive statement: Feminism is, and always has been, about peace and social justice--NOT about war, and especially not about UNJUST war to make the uber-rich uber-richer!
Peace (I'm a 71 year old woman. Been in the struggle for equality, human rights, peace and social justice for a lo-o-o-ong time.)
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Particularly if gender is really a meaningless fiction, or whatever. I don't know how anyone can justify handling it an other way. How are we supposed to approach 18 year olds who identify as non gender binary, etc?
Only fair way to handle it is, everyone registers.
But really we should do away with the whole thing.
PlanetaryOrbit
(155 posts)Is the House typically more likely to cave in to the Senate, or vice versa?
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)If we ever needed a draft again, we could easily come up with one without wasting millions of dollars a year during peacetime on a bullshit bureaucracy that serves no purpose.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)I support equal rights. I support treating genders equally.
I strongly oppose the Selective Service System in total.
This shouldn't be unpopular due to gender. It should be unpopular because it's a move in the wrong direction. It's doubling the number that are mandated to register, from 50% to 100%.
Instead, the Selective Service should be abolished. That 50% should be dropped to 0%.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)Stellar
(5,644 posts)The Pentagons annual report on sexual assault in the military uses data from a survey of active-duty members to extrapolate an estimate of how many have experienced some form of assault.
Its most recent report, released this week, estimated that 26,000 service members experienced unwanted sexual contact, which includes rape, attempted rape and unwanted sexual touching. Of these, an estimated 12,100 were women and 13,900 were men. Fewer than half of the incidents involved alcohol.
Frontline
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Stellar
(5,644 posts)frogmarch
(12,243 posts)military bases?
OK, what about pay? Would the women receive equal pay to the men's?
RAFisher
(466 posts)I remember in high school when I found out that only males could be drafted. It struck me as very old. As a male I didn't think it was fair, especially in this day and age when so much of warfare is with the Air Force and Navy. What, women can't fly a plane just as well as a man?
lunatica
(53,410 posts)Let the politicians go themselves and not be allowed to even send their children. We'll see how many wars we start then.
bonemachine
(757 posts)Period.
OldHippieChick
(2,434 posts)As much as I was against the draft during Viet Nam, now I say bring it back. Bring it back for men and women and no more "rich" guy deferments. These same folks who have had to make several return trips to Iraq and Afghanistan should get to share the glory w the sons and daughters of the well-to-do.
I predict we would stop all this endless war talk. People need to realize what is at stake. if it is their children, they might not be so rah-rah.
peace13
(11,076 posts)Both!
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Selective Service.
shenmue
(38,540 posts)
Vinca
(51,776 posts)You can't cherry pick what parts of equality you like.
Skittles
(162,646 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)There is something to be said of electing a commander in chief who controls the fate of lives they value as well as those they don't.
I think it's funny that people condition their support for the responsibilities of citizenship on passage of the ERA. Every single law that would be rendered unconstitutional by its passage were intended to help women.
Now that women can serve in combat, the entire premise of Rotsker vs Goldberg is irrelevant. The male-only draft is unconstitutional and counterproductive.
One of the primary reasons young men are poorly educated is because if they don't register to be drafted, they aren't allowed to apply for student aid.