General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA filibustering senator cannot sit down
If he or she does, he yields the floor. Senator Murphy has been standing since 11:21 am eastern time. I wish I lived in Connecticutt so I could vote for him. Hell, I wish I could marry him!
brooklynite
(94,467 posts)Once he sits, it's over.
Quackers
(2,256 posts)Good for him! Good for everyone!
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)Or are they only bad when republicans are in power?
oberliner
(58,724 posts)That's the whole point.
charlyvi
(6,537 posts)Senator Murphy is doing an actual Jimmy Stewart Mr Smith Goes to Washington filibuster. It is magnificent.
Iggo
(47,545 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)babylonsister
(171,048 posts)just accepting failure.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Republicans don't have a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate.
They wouldn't fail they'd succeed by just one of the Senators placing a block on the legislation.
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)AllyCat
(16,174 posts)It's the "feet up on my desk, phone-in filibuster" that people don't like.
NYC Liberal
(20,135 posts)That is what Republicans have done in unprecedented numbers.
valerief
(53,235 posts)to break it. Isn't that how the GOP filibusters?
arcane1
(38,613 posts)How "convenient".
valerief
(53,235 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)charlyvi
(6,537 posts)Then the other party agrees that the filibuster is overruled. Without having a talking filibuster. Because no one wants to go through the classic filibuster anymore. That is what makes Murphy's filibuster special. Her is doing an ACTUAL filibuster in the classic sense.
valerief
(53,235 posts)joshcryer
(62,269 posts)But to break a physical filibuster would be bad form and it's unlikely they had the votes for it or even the desire to do it. The virtual filibuster has made senators soft in that regard.
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)charlyvi
(6,537 posts)But the effort is wonderful.
AllyCat
(16,174 posts)Kang Colby
(1,941 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)What about someone in a wheelchair? Someone with arthritis?
I have arthritis in both my knees. No way I could stand for more than an hour without intense pain.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)And perhaps you could write down your thought as a senator and give it to another senator who could stand for as long as needed. There's ways around everything.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Chan790
(20,176 posts)but we are talking about the US Senate, the same body that from the founding of the nation until 1990 had a rule forbidding women from wearing men's clothes on the Senate floor...and by men's clothes, they meant pants and flat-soled shoes. If you were called to testify before Congress or were a staffer, you had to wear a dress or skirt and feminine shoes. The Senate has no dress code for men, other than an admonition to dress presentably and appropriately.
My point is that the US Senate hes never been sane or egalitarian where it can be recalcitrant to defend its traditions.
Maru Kitteh
(28,333 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)Though neither of them did a "Mr. Smith" style filibuster during their tenures.
charlyvi
(6,537 posts)Except for a person who said that not allowing a disabled senator to filibuster would be a violation of the Americans With Disabilities Act. Since no disabled senator has tried a talking filibuster, no solution has been developed for the situation, but I have to think a disabled senator would be allowed to filibuster. If not, I agree with you wholeheartedly.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)SwankyXomb
(2,030 posts)Congress has made themselves exempt from the ADA, and most other federal laws.
Mariana
(14,854 posts)I'm not sure it does - Congress (both houses) have been famous for exempting themselves from laws everyone else has to obey.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)A. The ADA does not cover the executive branch of the Federal government. The executive branch continues to be covered by title V of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which prohibits discrimination in services and employment on the basis of handicap and which is a model for the requirements of the ADA. The ADA, however, does cover Congress and other entities in the legislative branch of the Federal government.
sheshe2
(83,710 posts)The Texas state senator whose filibuster of an abortion bill became a national phenomenon has a long history of persisting against tough odds.
Wendy Davis -- the 50-year-old Democrat who stood and spoke for 13 hours Tuesday at the Texas Capitol -- went from being a teen mom to graduating from Harvard Law School.
snip//
"Thank you all for your expressions of support and concern," Davis said on Twitter at the time. "My team and I are concentrating on moving forward and staying focused."
With tens of thousands of new followers Wednesday as a result of her filibuster, Davis tweeted, "Thanks to the powerful voices of thousands of Texans, #SB5 is dead. An incredible victory for Texas women and those who love them."
http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/26/politics/wendy-davis-profile/index.html
Hey! Tampons were confiscated and guns were allowed, Gotta love Texas. Not.
13 hours.
Response to charlyvi (Original post)
k8conant This message was self-deleted by its author.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)what is right for the US and they can uphold whatever the NRA wants.
Arazi
(6,829 posts)And has since been proven 100% correct in opposing it
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/10/AR2010121005431.html
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Bucky
(53,986 posts)This is inherently discriminatory against any wheelchair-bound senators.
Chan790
(20,176 posts)The only reason the chambers are handi-accessable is because they happen to be, not by intent or design.