Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

daaron

(763 posts)
Mon Jun 11, 2012, 10:27 AM Jun 2012

House Homeland Security chief: drone strikes spread 'righteousness and goodness'!

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/06/10/peter-king-drones-carry-out-the-policies-of-righteousness-and-goodness/

House Homeland Security Chairman Peter King (R-NY) on Sunday refused to confirm the existence of U.S. drone strikes in other countries, but later insisted that the unmanned flying machines were being used to “carry out the policies of righteousness and goodness.”

During an interview on CNN, host Candy noted that an analysis by the New America Foundation estimated that drone strikes have had an 17 percent civilian casualty rate since 2004.


-------

FUCK THAT, asswipe! Fuck these idiot motherfuckers. Let's bring the hate to the voting booth, people!

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Autumn

(45,031 posts)
1. I delight in the hate I have for these bastards
Mon Jun 11, 2012, 10:31 AM
Jun 2012

"policies of righteousness and goodness." Fucking sick

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
7. I guess a 17% civilian kill rate is good news to the school of "the better of evils".
Mon Jun 11, 2012, 12:39 PM
Jun 2012

Much better than Hiroshima or Dresden.

 

coalition_unwilling

(14,180 posts)
8. I started singing "Praise the Lord and pass the
Mon Jun 11, 2012, 12:44 PM
Jun 2012

ammunition" as soon as I read this.

(in case it's needed)

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
9. The sarcasm icon is always needed by some
Mon Jun 11, 2012, 01:03 PM
Jun 2012

esp me. I usually go around half-cocked. And not in a good way.

TheKentuckian

(25,023 posts)
13. Since the level of threat is orders of magnitude less than Axis powers
Mon Jun 11, 2012, 01:25 PM
Jun 2012

and our enemy has no country, no navy, no air force, no army, no population centers, no infrastructure, no financial sector, and we declare anyone that might be able to shave that isn't of grandfatherly age to be a "militant" then it seems pretty bad to me.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
16. If you are saying that allowing our government to kill anyone, anywhere
Mon Jun 11, 2012, 02:27 PM
Jun 2012

with the rationalization that they are a terrorist is "pretty bad", I would have to agree. Heaven forbid that the Republicans gain access to this power.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
10. Lets hope his days as chairman are numbered. But are we disparging (and rightly so)
Mon Jun 11, 2012, 01:06 PM
Jun 2012

him for his sick support of drone kills, but not condemning the program? Do we approve of the drone kill project but not his rationalization?

 

daaron

(763 posts)
12. Hell no. I don't approve of the program -->
Mon Jun 11, 2012, 01:18 PM
Jun 2012

but his rationalization is yet another LAST STRAW and wake-up call.

 

Zalatix

(8,994 posts)
14. 17% of all drone-related deaths were civilian casualties? WTF.
Mon Jun 11, 2012, 01:30 PM
Jun 2012

How in the world can we support that crap?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»House Homeland Security c...