General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums'People Are Really, Really Hoping This Theory About David Cameron and Brexit is True'
http://indy100.independent.co.uk/article/people-are-really-really-hoping-this-theory-about-david-cameron-and-brexit-is-true--bJhqBql0VZPeople are really, really hoping this theory about David Cameron and Brexit is true
David Camerons decision to resign before enacting Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty...
- snip -
While panic ensues, one persons musings in the comments section of the Guardian has an interesting hypothesis on these complications:
If Boris Johnson looked downbeat yesterday, that is because he realises that he has lost.
Perhaps many Brexiters do not realise it yet, but they have actually lost, and it is all down to one man: David Cameron.
With one fell swoop yesterday at 9:15 am, Cameron effectively annulled the referendum result, and simultaneously destroyed the political careers of Boris Johnson, Michael Gove and leading Brexiters who cost him so much anguish, not to mention his premiership.
How?
- snip -
The referendum result is not binding. It is advisory. Parliament is not bound to commit itself in that same direction.
- snip -
If he runs for leadership of the party, and then fails to follow through on triggering Article 50, then he is finished. If he does not run and effectively abandons the field, then he is finished. If he runs, wins and pulls the UK out of the EU, then it will all be over - Scotland will break away, there will be upheaval in Ireland, a recession ... broken trade agreements. Then he is also finished. Boris Johnson knows all of this. When he acts like the dumb blond it is just that: an act.
REST AT LINK
midnight
(26,624 posts)Skinner
(63,645 posts)Click the link and read the whole thing.
Skinner
(63,645 posts)It'll be interesting to see if it turns out to be true.
JustAnotherGen
(33,732 posts)TubbersUK
(1,441 posts)I kinda like it, but unfortunately this could still happen:
A Pyrrhic victory for us Remainers.
Loving the other scenarios though.
surrealAmerican
(11,496 posts)... and the chalice from the palace has the brew that is true?
There's enough poison to go around on this deal.
TubbersUK
(1,441 posts)longship
(40,416 posts)Here:
And of course, Basil Rathbone and Angela Lansbury make appearances.
meaculpa2011
(918 posts)The flagon with the dragon has the brew that is true?
No, no, no. The vessel with the pestle has the pellet with the poison.
The flagon with the dragon has the brew that is true.
Response to Hissyspit (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
TubbersUK
(1,441 posts)A Panelbase survey for the Sunday Times indicated an almost direct reversal of the result of the 2014 referendum, with 52% in favour of independence, up seven points, and 48% against, down seven points.
The snapshot of 620 adults also found that 52% thought Scotland was likely to become independent within 10 years, rising from 30% when the same question was asked in April.
A poll for the Sunday Post that asked respondents how they would vote if a second referendum were held tomorrow, revealed 59% would vote yes to independence, 32% no and 9% undecided.
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/26/nicola-sturgeon-new-scottish-referendum-brexit
Denzil_DC
(8,001 posts)that it really needs to be polling steady at around 60% for independence over a period before Sturgeon would be comfortable calling another referendum. That poll sample's small, so the margin of error is too high to make it more than broadly indicative.
Things are moving fast here. No-supporting media have started switching, SNP membership is climbing again and ex-No public figures are declaring for Yes.
It's early days yet, and I'm glad we have the politicians in charge in Scotland that we do at the moment. They seem to be the only ones who've had a Plan A, let alone Plans B, C, D and counting, prepared.
TubbersUK
(1,441 posts)Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)AwakeAtLast
(14,265 posts)" If he runs, wins and pulls the UK out of the EU, then it will all be over - Scotland will break away, there will be upheaval in Ireland, a recession ... broken trade agreements. Then he is also finished. Boris Johnson knows all of this."
If he did, then why would he be for Brexit, unless he was fine with the result?
Either he DOESN'T know it, or he DOES and is fine with it. Either way, it doesn't change much.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Cameron to trigger Article 50 immediately after the vote, and to take the lethal political hit from all the fallout.
He has refused to do that and has resigned instead, leaving the now poisonous political moves to his successor. Boris would be declared DOA even if he did manage to get the Premiership. Thus, the "poison chalice" allusion.
48 hours after the fact and Britain is reeling, waking up to the reality they have ignorantly wrought.
For the Brexit Bandits, Brexit has always been a naked ploy to gain power--nothing more. Gaining that power would now mean their nearly instantaneous political death.
Craig234
(335 posts)"48 hours after the fact and Britain is reeling, waking up to the reality they have ignorantly wrought. "
Is there any measurable information on that? Like a national poll showing 60%+ saying it was a mistake?
The problem with these things politically is when the politics get mixed up.
So all the good things about the EU, mixed up with the neo-liberal austerity garbage.
The opposition to the austerity, mixed up with the xenophobes.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)The UK is NOT ON THE EURO. The UK has its own currency (the pound sterling), its own central bank (the Bank of England) and complete fiscal autonomy and control over its own budgets. Budget cuts and austerity in the UK have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with the EU.
Craig234
(335 posts)I never said anything different than that the UK is on its own currency and so on.
I discussed the POLITICS of it in terms of who voters blame etc.
And you're wrong as well that the EU has 'nothing to do with austerity'. While England sets its own budget policies, the EU has been pushing austerity, and is viewed as having gone to the neo-liberal policies.
Or perhaps you'd like to explain to the BBC why they were wrong in their article titled "EU austerity drive country by country" to list UK austerity passed by the UK government as one of the countries.
http://www.bbc.com/news/10162176
There has been a broad push for austerity across Europe.
Voters don't like it much. They're rebelling, and many link it with the EU though it's more about the conservatives.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)And the Tories have much more to do with UK austerity. The leaders of the Brexit campaign were right-wingers (Nigel Farage, Boris Johnson, Michael Gove). "Austerity" was never part of the argument for Brexit. "Take back control of our borders", "immigration is out of control", pandering to xenophobia was the main thrust of the campaign.
Craig234
(335 posts)instead of acknowledging and taking any responsibility for your tone and reading errors.
So you are partly saying the same thing I am, while party in denial about how voters can take their anger over austerity out.
So while I agree and said xenophobia is a big part, the Nation disagrees with you and agrees with me in this story headline that a quick google on "austerity brexit" finds as the first match:
"Political Elites Program of Austerity Set the Stage for Brexit
Scapegoating immigrants for economic suffering is easier than confronting the politicians that crafted austerity policy. "
vintx
(1,748 posts)Just think of him as the UK's version of a Tea Partier. You know how those legislators don't seem to think much past their own next election / campaign fund? Same kind of thing.
BlueMTexpat
(15,502 posts)for posting this, HS!
pampango
(24,692 posts)all kinds of international agreements). Voters would abandon them in an instant if they did not follow through. It is the reason they were elected - if they are elected.
If (Trump) runs, wins and pulls the (US out of NAFTA and the WTO), then it will all be over - a recession ... broken trade agreements.
Only in Trump's case he would be around for 4 years to continue to do damage to the US. Johnson might get replaced much sooner than that.
auntpurl
(4,311 posts)Thanks for posting.
JustAnotherGen
(33,732 posts)Well played sir.
Stinky The Clown
(68,472 posts)I STILL think Cameron is a boob, but that theory is pretty slick. It almost rises to Michael Corleone's actions on the day he became godfather to Connie's son and, at the same time, wiped out every one of his enemies.
paleotn
(19,374 posts)..but why didn't he and others suspect this before? Didn't they game this thing out to identify the possible and probably ramifications of a out vote? Maybe this is a monumental case of beware what you wish for, you might just get it.
The Second Stone
(2,900 posts)get exactly what they wanted.
craigmatic
(4,510 posts)bucolic_frolic
(47,309 posts)The EU will only let one country go, and make an example of them in the process
Just like our Fed, only one bank would be allowed to fail, to make sure the others
know the consequences.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)roamer65
(37,222 posts)Kicking Britain out is just stupid Eurocrat talk.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)to the dog that finally caught the car: what does he/they do now?
bucolic_frolic
(47,309 posts)on a question of national sovereignty
in a parliamentary system with, in my limited understanding, both
regular elections and spontaneous confidence polls
In the U.S., the political middle, the mainstream is hollowed out
In UK, the middle sharply divided, following different agendas
So a series of elections and falling governments could result in
relatively quick succession until someone gets tired of it, or a
consensus is reached
I suspect Brexit will be viewed as a hasty decision as well as
its aftermath. Cameron sure left quickly, what a leader.
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)Hekate
(95,049 posts)What a weird world it is ...