General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAndrea Mitchell-married-to-Alan-Greenspan to interview Gowdy very soon.
Last edited Tue Jun 28, 2016, 01:39 PM - Edit history (1)
care to supply questions for her.
like these:
Congressman Gowdy, just HOW morally reprehensible was her leadership, on a scale of one to ten, ten being the apotheosis of evil, and one being criminally negligent?
the morally reprehensible, btw, comes from none other than the egregiously hypocritical Joe Pompeo
http://americannewsx.com/politics/watch-why-republicans-are-such-abominable-lying-hypocrites-video/
from link, quoting Pompeo, and they add their own (bolded by me) pompeothoughts to heighten the levity:
Chuck, this isnt about the committee, this is about the American people and demagoguery. Weve been working since May of 2014 to get them the answers that they already have. Theres (grammar isnt our strong suit ) four Americans that were killed and our first ambassador murdered since 1979.
This week, were going to speak with former Secretary Clinton, weve conducted dozens and dozens of interviews, and found absolutely nothing, we will ask her the same kind of fact-centric questions that weve asked the other witnesses like does Papa Smurf smurf other smurfs when Benghazing?. We have an obligation to hold folks accountable and make sure that we reduce the risk that something like this could ever possibly happen again.
right now she's grilling Bernie on why he's not giving up.
hope you keep persisting and persisting (like I've never seen you do) with Gowdy.
not holding breath
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)star witness
no questions about the severe cutbacks by congress for defending foreign counselates
waiting to see
not ONE countervailing question so far
just NAUSEA-inducing
she's almost panting in expectation of each tawdry revelation
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)with his narrative
disgusting, but not at all surprising
how much is Comcast paying her. she really earned her bloated salary today.
wonder if there's a transcript anywhere. if I can find it, I'll post it
chillfactor
(7,573 posts)she sold her soul long ago....
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)she gave it willingly; from the beginning of her career she's been nothing but a powers that be enabler
chillfactor
(7,573 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Her interview was very, very weak.
OTOH, I though she soft-pedaled Bernie too.
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)narrative
was only partly paying attention while typing garbage
am I mischaracterizing the thrust of the interview? it didn't last very long
thx
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)I personally think she let both of them express their narrative with little challenge. She did press Bernie a tad, but never more than a one-question follow-up for either of them.
Not that I particularly wanted her to grill Sanders. I don't see much of a point to that anymore.
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)dead air after Schiff responds initially that the whole thing was BS, specifically mentioning how there was NO WAY any armed force could get there in time to help. after that, they lost contact
how convenient for her
her totally acceptance of Everything Gowdy said was just indescribably pathetic.
EVERYTHING!
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)wondering if he'll get a chance to answer the BS
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)on the attack, donning her prosector vs. defendant robes
question after question designed to paint the state dept/Hillary in a negative light
so far, not ONE reference to would be house speaker McCarthy's egregious slip of the tongue:
Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), the man likely to become the next speaker of the House, applauded the Select Committee on Benghazi for damaging the poll numbers of Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.
McCarthy said Tuesday that Clinton would have remained unbeatable, had it not been for the committee.
Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special committee, a select committee, what are her numbers today? McCarthy told Fox News Sean Hannity. Her numbers are dropping, why? Because shes untrustable. But no one would have known any of that had happened.
not going to fault Schiff, because the interview was so short, but the dems MUST include the above quote EVERY TIME they get a chance to talk about this, because it gets to the very heart of the republicans mal intentions
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)so early?
was it because they knew the pugs were going to do it, or did they realize that the earlier they did it, the sooner the pugs would have to release their fantasy version, thus lessening the impact of, say, a September or October release?
anybody know about the inner workings on this?
thx
Demonaut
(8,914 posts)MattBaggins
(7,897 posts)Attempting to diminish her via sexism is not the way to go.
Demonaut
(8,914 posts)Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)Scientific
(314 posts)...a point that needs to be made. She's not a journalist now, if she ever way. She's a right-wing stooge, and it shows.
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)by the way, she just advance the republican narrative by repeating their main talking point, unquestioning, again, in the noon news round
are you good with that?
find something better to moan about
obamanut2012
(26,047 posts)Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)talking points so far, uncritically accepting the BS
now....finally they're giving the dems some equal time, via one of the anchors, a STRONG woman!
I LOVE the women! they love me, too! they're the strongest sex, and they have the best words! they're terrific with their words. and their tight dresses, and their cleavage....gotta be a C cup, at least, though, to be a 10.
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)pulse.msnbc.com
and how the hell does one interpret their moving graph?
help!
is it 20% range say no, or what?
obamanut2012
(26,047 posts)The Mrs. Greenspan thing is beyond demeaning and sexist -- no matter how much I don't like her.
randome
(34,845 posts)Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)''Andrea Mitchell-married-to-Alan-Greenspan''
is that unsexist enough for you, or is merely mentioning the fact that she's married unspeakably sexist as well?
jesus
this place is getting to be more trouble than it's worth
malaise
(268,724 posts)He fugged up the economy with his neo-liberal BS
randome
(34,845 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)still_one
(92,061 posts)Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)if it doesn't matter, why are you commenting?
still_one
(92,061 posts)Why are you so defensive?
Response to still_one (Reply #37)
Post removed
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)are not trying hard enough.
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)don't you have anything better to do, or is the PC police being paid by the stroke?
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)goal. I've got a few hours. I'll wait.
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)Andrea Mitchell-married-to-Alan-Greenspan's leading the witness approach, accepting every accusation at face value
anybody see it
winstars
(4,219 posts)Just one single question, then Jordan speaking in tongues and then the "thank you for being here and now on to the impact of Brexit"...
No follow up questions sure but none were needed. Jordan unhinged was just fine.
It was sorta funny.
HAHAHAHA
malaise
(268,724 posts)Saw Bernie but the phone rang - ah well - will watch it later.
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)fact checking
the occasional dem response, but the overall effect is very slanted
now their Ace junior reporter is trying to speak (very clumsily) on the subject, dropping in an irrelevant detail, but, finally and grudgingly, admitting that there was no there
finally comes to the point that it was ALL about the emails, even though they turned up by accident, much the way Ken Starr found only that Whitewater was a money losing fiasco for the Clinton's, but the blue dress dropped in his lap, enabling the impeachment inquisition
gotta give credit to Russert for putting the onus on the military for not getting the troops there. oops, when talking about the inadequate programs in place on site, he NEGLECTED to mention the budget cuts.
NOBODY is talking about those budget cuts
what a surprise
malaise
(268,724 posts)That's going nowhere
comradebillyboy
(10,128 posts)for the actions of their husbands...One might think at a supposedly liberal board women might be viewed and judged on their own actions as unique individuals.
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)I hold them equally responsible for their actions, his for wrecking the economy, hers for being a stenographer for the right wing maniacs who've taken control of our nation for the last 35 years
keep helping them stay in power. keep those blinders firmly attached
comradebillyboy
(10,128 posts)spanone
(135,795 posts)i piss in their general direction.