Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Gabi Hayes

(28,795 posts)
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 12:21 PM Jun 2016

Andrea Mitchell-married-to-Alan-Greenspan to interview Gowdy very soon.

Last edited Tue Jun 28, 2016, 01:39 PM - Edit history (1)

care to supply questions for her.

like these:

Congressman Gowdy, just HOW morally reprehensible was her leadership, on a scale of one to ten, ten being the apotheosis of evil, and one being criminally negligent?

the morally reprehensible, btw, comes from none other than the egregiously hypocritical Joe Pompeo

http://americannewsx.com/politics/watch-why-republicans-are-such-abominable-lying-hypocrites-video/

from link, quoting Pompeo, and they add their own (bolded by me) pompeothoughts to heighten the levity:

Chuck, this isn’t about the committee, this is about the American people and demagoguery. We’ve been working since May of 2014 to get them the answers that they already have. There’s (grammar isn’t our strong suit ) four Americans that were killed and our first ambassador murdered since 1979.

This week, we’re going to speak with former Secretary Clinton, we’ve conducted dozens and dozens of interviews, and found absolutely nothing, we will ask her the same kind of fact-centric questions that we’ve asked the other witnesses like does Papa Smurf smurf other smurfs when Benghazing?. We have an obligation to hold folks accountable and make sure that we reduce the risk that something like this could ever possibly happen again.”


right now she's grilling Bernie on why he's not giving up.

hope you keep persisting and persisting (like I've never seen you do) with Gowdy.

not holding breath

45 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Andrea Mitchell-married-to-Alan-Greenspan to interview Gowdy very soon. (Original Post) Gabi Hayes Jun 2016 OP
so far she's leading him on like a prosecutor feathering her Gabi Hayes Jun 2016 #1
unbelievable. it was like she was on the committee with him, helping him along Gabi Hayes Jun 2016 #2
I had to switch channels and turn her off.. chillfactor Jun 2016 #3
she never sold her soul. Gabi Hayes Jun 2016 #9
good point n/t chillfactor Jun 2016 #29
Yeah, she completely facilitated him. Adrahil Jun 2016 #4
I only caught the part where she doggedly persisted on "when are you going to endorse?" Gabi Hayes Jun 2016 #6
It's a matter of perspective. Adrahil Jun 2016 #8
cong. schiff is on now. will she grill him, the way she did NOT do Gowdy? Gabi Hayes Jun 2016 #5
what a surprise....on to Brexit. Schiff had his chance. too bad, dems. Gabi Hayes Jun 2016 #7
schiff back on. instead of asking leading questions, she's...surprise, surprise... Gabi Hayes Jun 2016 #10
one last bit. did anybody discuss how smart it was of the dems to release their version Gabi Hayes Jun 2016 #11
good move, so unlike the democrats Demonaut Jun 2016 #13
Her name is Andrea Mitchell MattBaggins Jun 2016 #12
sexism? he's just making the point that her bias is a family tradition Demonaut Jun 2016 #14
thanks! you made my point better and more succinctly that I just did Gabi Hayes Jun 2016 #16
...and that Andrea M. is an in-the-bag Republican hack Scientific Jun 2016 #24
exactly....check out the apologists downthread Gabi Hayes Jun 2016 #32
what are you, a mindreader? to whom is she married? isn't his name Greenspan? thank you Gabi Hayes Jun 2016 #15
Thank you -- it is so sexist obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #20
wow! the top of the hour roundup is just about a total rehash of right wing Gabi Hayes Jun 2016 #17
vote here on whether the benghazi inquistion will affect the election, if you like: Gabi Hayes Jun 2016 #18
Her name is Andrea Mitchell -- call her that obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #19
Agreed. randome Jun 2016 #21
jesus christ on a segway... how's this, forever on which I'll call her: Gabi Hayes Jun 2016 #23
I rarely mention her without the spouse malaise Jun 2016 #34
What does being married have to do with anything? She kept her 'maiden' name. That's her name. randome Jun 2016 #44
If you can't critique Andrea Mitchell without being sexist, you're not helping our cause. nt msanthrope Jun 2016 #22
happy now? read the new title. now please go away Gabi Hayes Jun 2016 #25
I cannot stand Andrea Mitchell, but why does it matter who she is married to? still_one Jun 2016 #26
seriously? do you know who he is? Gabi Hayes Jun 2016 #30
Andrea Mitchel is her own person. Who her husband is, is immaterial still_one Jun 2016 #37
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #41
Again.....if you can't critique Andrea Mitchell without resorting to her spouse, you simply msanthrope Jun 2016 #28
and you're clearly trying too hard Gabi Hayes Jun 2016 #31
Insisting that you critique a woman fairly, without reference to a man, is a pretty laudable msanthrope Jun 2016 #35
cnn just ran another hatchet job on Benghazi, with con. jordan, echoing Gabi Hayes Jun 2016 #27
It was actually great. They asked him 1 question, he talked gibberish for 5 minutes and the end. winstars Jun 2016 #36
Missed it malaise Jun 2016 #33
msnbc and cnn are running nonstop clips at the top of every hour, with ZERO Gabi Hayes Jun 2016 #38
One big expensive flop malaise Jun 2016 #40
There seems to be a contingent at DU that holds certain women responsible comradebillyboy Jun 2016 #39
you really don't see the power link? Gabi Hayes Jun 2016 #42
It's not possible for me to take you seriously... comradebillyboy Jun 2016 #43
andrea and alan hate the clintons with all their might.... spanone Jun 2016 #45
 

Gabi Hayes

(28,795 posts)
1. so far she's leading him on like a prosecutor feathering her
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 12:24 PM
Jun 2016

star witness

no questions about the severe cutbacks by congress for defending foreign counselates

waiting to see

not ONE countervailing question so far

just NAUSEA-inducing

she's almost panting in expectation of each tawdry revelation

 

Gabi Hayes

(28,795 posts)
2. unbelievable. it was like she was on the committee with him, helping him along
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 12:28 PM
Jun 2016

with his narrative

disgusting, but not at all surprising

how much is Comcast paying her. she really earned her bloated salary today.

wonder if there's a transcript anywhere. if I can find it, I'll post it

 

Gabi Hayes

(28,795 posts)
9. she never sold her soul.
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 12:37 PM
Jun 2016

she gave it willingly; from the beginning of her career she's been nothing but a powers that be enabler

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
4. Yeah, she completely facilitated him.
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 12:31 PM
Jun 2016

Her interview was very, very weak.

OTOH, I though she soft-pedaled Bernie too.

 

Gabi Hayes

(28,795 posts)
6. I only caught the part where she doggedly persisted on "when are you going to endorse?"
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 12:35 PM
Jun 2016

narrative

was only partly paying attention while typing garbage

am I mischaracterizing the thrust of the interview? it didn't last very long

thx

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
8. It's a matter of perspective.
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 12:37 PM
Jun 2016

I personally think she let both of them express their narrative with little challenge. She did press Bernie a tad, but never more than a one-question follow-up for either of them.

Not that I particularly wanted her to grill Sanders. I don't see much of a point to that anymore.

 

Gabi Hayes

(28,795 posts)
5. cong. schiff is on now. will she grill him, the way she did NOT do Gowdy?
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 12:33 PM
Jun 2016

dead air after Schiff responds initially that the whole thing was BS, specifically mentioning how there was NO WAY any armed force could get there in time to help. after that, they lost contact

how convenient for her

her totally acceptance of Everything Gowdy said was just indescribably pathetic.

EVERYTHING!

 

Gabi Hayes

(28,795 posts)
7. what a surprise....on to Brexit. Schiff had his chance. too bad, dems.
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 12:36 PM
Jun 2016

wondering if he'll get a chance to answer the BS

 

Gabi Hayes

(28,795 posts)
10. schiff back on. instead of asking leading questions, she's...surprise, surprise...
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 12:48 PM
Jun 2016

on the attack, donning her prosector vs. defendant robes

question after question designed to paint the state dept/Hillary in a negative light

so far, not ONE reference to would be house speaker McCarthy's egregious slip of the tongue:

Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), the man likely to become the next speaker of the House, applauded the Select Committee on Benghazi for damaging the poll numbers of Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

McCarthy said Tuesday that Clinton would have remained “unbeatable,” had it not been for the committee.

Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special committee, a select committee, what are her numbers today?” McCarthy told Fox News’ Sean Hannity. “Her numbers are dropping, why? Because she’s untrustable. But no one would have known any of that had happened.”


not going to fault Schiff, because the interview was so short, but the dems MUST include the above quote EVERY TIME they get a chance to talk about this, because it gets to the very heart of the republicans mal intentions

 

Gabi Hayes

(28,795 posts)
11. one last bit. did anybody discuss how smart it was of the dems to release their version
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 12:51 PM
Jun 2016

so early?

was it because they knew the pugs were going to do it, or did they realize that the earlier they did it, the sooner the pugs would have to release their fantasy version, thus lessening the impact of, say, a September or October release?

anybody know about the inner workings on this?

thx

Scientific

(314 posts)
24. ...and that Andrea M. is an in-the-bag Republican hack
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 01:40 PM
Jun 2016

...a point that needs to be made. She's not a journalist now, if she ever way. She's a right-wing stooge, and it shows.

 

Gabi Hayes

(28,795 posts)
15. what are you, a mindreader? to whom is she married? isn't his name Greenspan? thank you
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 01:07 PM
Jun 2016

by the way, she just advance the republican narrative by repeating their main talking point, unquestioning, again, in the noon news round

are you good with that?

find something better to moan about

 

Gabi Hayes

(28,795 posts)
17. wow! the top of the hour roundup is just about a total rehash of right wing
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 01:12 PM
Jun 2016

talking points so far, uncritically accepting the BS

now....finally they're giving the dems some equal time, via one of the anchors, a STRONG woman!

I LOVE the women! they love me, too! they're the strongest sex, and they have the best words! they're terrific with their words. and their tight dresses, and their cleavage....gotta be a C cup, at least, though, to be a 10.

 

Gabi Hayes

(28,795 posts)
18. vote here on whether the benghazi inquistion will affect the election, if you like:
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 01:18 PM
Jun 2016

pulse.msnbc.com

and how the hell does one interpret their moving graph?

help!

is it 20% range say no, or what?

obamanut2012

(26,047 posts)
19. Her name is Andrea Mitchell -- call her that
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 01:30 PM
Jun 2016

The Mrs. Greenspan thing is beyond demeaning and sexist -- no matter how much I don't like her.

 

Gabi Hayes

(28,795 posts)
23. jesus christ on a segway... how's this, forever on which I'll call her:
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 01:38 PM
Jun 2016

''Andrea Mitchell-married-to-Alan-Greenspan''

is that unsexist enough for you, or is merely mentioning the fact that she's married unspeakably sexist as well?

jesus

this place is getting to be more trouble than it's worth

Response to still_one (Reply #37)

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
28. Again.....if you can't critique Andrea Mitchell without resorting to her spouse, you simply
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 01:43 PM
Jun 2016

are not trying hard enough.

 

Gabi Hayes

(28,795 posts)
31. and you're clearly trying too hard
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 01:45 PM
Jun 2016

don't you have anything better to do, or is the PC police being paid by the stroke?

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
35. Insisting that you critique a woman fairly, without reference to a man, is a pretty laudable
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 02:02 PM
Jun 2016

goal. I've got a few hours. I'll wait.

 

Gabi Hayes

(28,795 posts)
27. cnn just ran another hatchet job on Benghazi, with con. jordan, echoing
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 01:43 PM
Jun 2016

Andrea Mitchell-married-to-Alan-Greenspan's leading the witness approach, accepting every accusation at face value

anybody see it

winstars

(4,219 posts)
36. It was actually great. They asked him 1 question, he talked gibberish for 5 minutes and the end.
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 02:03 PM
Jun 2016

Just one single question, then Jordan speaking in tongues and then the "thank you for being here and now on to the impact of Brexit"...

No follow up questions sure but none were needed. Jordan unhinged was just fine.

It was sorta funny.

HAHAHAHA

 

Gabi Hayes

(28,795 posts)
38. msnbc and cnn are running nonstop clips at the top of every hour, with ZERO
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 02:08 PM
Jun 2016

fact checking

the occasional dem response, but the overall effect is very slanted

now their Ace junior reporter is trying to speak (very clumsily) on the subject, dropping in an irrelevant detail, but, finally and grudgingly, admitting that there was no there

finally comes to the point that it was ALL about the emails, even though they turned up by accident, much the way Ken Starr found only that Whitewater was a money losing fiasco for the Clinton's, but the blue dress dropped in his lap, enabling the impeachment inquisition

gotta give credit to Russert for putting the onus on the military for not getting the troops there. oops, when talking about the inadequate programs in place on site, he NEGLECTED to mention the budget cuts.

NOBODY is talking about those budget cuts

what a surprise

comradebillyboy

(10,128 posts)
39. There seems to be a contingent at DU that holds certain women responsible
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 02:10 PM
Jun 2016

for the actions of their husbands...One might think at a supposedly liberal board women might be viewed and judged on their own actions as unique individuals.

 

Gabi Hayes

(28,795 posts)
42. you really don't see the power link?
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 02:15 PM
Jun 2016

I hold them equally responsible for their actions, his for wrecking the economy, hers for being a stenographer for the right wing maniacs who've taken control of our nation for the last 35 years

keep helping them stay in power. keep those blinders firmly attached

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Andrea Mitchell-married-t...