Now if Scalia were replaced by me (Trump) we wouldn't have that

[kpete]

“Now if we had—Scalia was living, or if Scalia was replaced by me, you wouldn’t have had that, OK? It would’ve been the opposite,” Trump said of the ruling, which struck down a restrictive Texas abortion law.

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_57754e2ae4b0bd4b0b13db65

[MohRokTah]

1. Nobody ever said Trump had been trained in the most basic mathematical functions.

A 5-3 ruling that suddenly becomes a 5-4 ruling does not alter the outcome.

Because MATH!

[spanone]

2. trump makes clarence thomas look scholarly....

Last edited Fri Jul 1, 2016, 12:06 PM - Edit history (1)

so trump would trade his white hooded robe for a black one?

[Yavin4]

3. Is this Trump U math? n/t

[malthaussen]

4. No, no, you misunderstand.

Had it been Mr Justice Trump on the Court, the force of his personality and intellect would have swayed all the justices into a unanimous vote.

Well, except maybe for the women.

-- Mal

[RussBLib]

5. if any women needed another reason to vote against Trump

He would be just fine with making it next-to-impossible for women to get a constitutionally-protected right to abortion.