Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Gabi Hayes

(28,795 posts)
Wed Jul 6, 2016, 06:26 PM Jul 2016

Comey has had it in for Hillary for TWENTY YEARS!

from what looks to be an anti-Hillary site, here's the first entry into its 'timeline' of the email 'scandal'

http://www.thompsontimeline.com/tag/investigation/

James Comey is deputy special counsel to the Senate Whitewater Committee. According to Time Magazine in March 2016: “In 1996, after months of work, Comey came to some damning conclusions: Hillary Clinton was personally involved in mishandling documents and had ordered others to block investigators as they pursued their case.

Worse, her behavior fit into a pattern of concealment: she and her husband had tried to hide their roles in two other matters under investigation by law enforcement. Taken together, the interference by White House officials, which included destruction of documents, amounted to ‘far more than just aggressive lawyering or political naiveté,’ Comey and his fellow investigators concluded. It constituted ‘a highly improper pattern of deliberate misconduct.’”

However, Comey is not in charge of the case, and his superiors decide not to press charges against Bill or Hillary Clinton in the matter.


gee, sound familiar? no there there twenty years ago, Comey? bet you're still pissed about the fact that even your crazed superiors didn't think much of your so-called evidence. and note how the source, Time Mag, was one of the Fools for Scandal, as they were called by Gene Lyons, in his precursor to The Hunting of the President, which puts paid to the entire Whitewater confabulation
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Comey has had it in for Hillary for TWENTY YEARS! (Original Post) Gabi Hayes Jul 2016 OP
see he didnt INDICT MFM008 Jul 2016 #1
exactly....his 'evidence' was SO piss poor that even the lunatics Gabi Hayes Jul 2016 #2
and Alberto Gonzalez, of all people, is on with Heileman/Halperin, Gabi Hayes Jul 2016 #3
So he was 2naSalit Jul 2016 #4
the ONLY place I've seen this tidbit was by reading in passing a one Gabi Hayes Jul 2016 #5
That performance yesterday... dawnie51 Jul 2016 #6

MFM008

(19,806 posts)
1. see he didnt INDICT
Wed Jul 6, 2016, 06:29 PM
Jul 2016

there was no THERE there.
Instead he got up and BITCHED about how she "gets away with it"

Eat ship and die Comey
Put up or shut up.
Now you gotta explain this to the raving repukes in congress.


 

Gabi Hayes

(28,795 posts)
2. exactly....his 'evidence' was SO piss poor that even the lunatics
Wed Jul 6, 2016, 06:32 PM
Jul 2016

working for Starr couldn't swallow it, and the ONLY thing they could come up with was the lying about the sex!

 

Gabi Hayes

(28,795 posts)
3. and Alberto Gonzalez, of all people, is on with Heileman/Halperin,
Wed Jul 6, 2016, 06:37 PM
Jul 2016

demonstrating absolutely ZERO knowledge of the situation as it unfolds. does he not know that Lynch has said she will abide by Comey's recommendation, taking herself out of the loop.

Alberto is carrying on about how she is NOT bound by his recommendation, and should carefully consider the evidence being presented to her

what an IDIOT, and he sounds like one, barely able to speak in understandable terms, hemming and hawing, and uhhhing his way through.

of course humpty and dumpty didn't catch his egregious misunderstanding of the basis of the handover of prosecutorial judgment, from which Lynch CLEARLY removed herself

truly amazing stupidity on the part of both Alberto G., and the moronic H/H brothers. if jackass like me can catch that, why not these gazillionaire 'journalists'

2naSalit

(86,569 posts)
4. So he was
Wed Jul 6, 2016, 06:39 PM
Jul 2016

Ken Starr's lapdog, interesting. I think this needs more exposure.

Hillary was right about that "...vast RW conspiracy".


 

Gabi Hayes

(28,795 posts)
5. the ONLY place I've seen this tidbit was by reading in passing a one
Wed Jul 6, 2016, 06:43 PM
Jul 2016

time reference while I was looking for something else.

it took me all of five minutes' googling to find the connection. there isn't much, but what I found pretty much says it all, yes?

and absolutely zero mention of this fact on TV.....only what a standup guy this creep is, even from the so-called stalwarts on MSNBC

fffff YOU, Larry ODonnell, and your jagoff report last night. why don't you hire ME to do some of your research?

dawnie51

(959 posts)
6. That performance yesterday...
Wed Jul 6, 2016, 06:44 PM
Jul 2016

was shameful. Indicting with statements, THEN stating that there is no evidence to charge. He is a disgrace. And it's going to bite him in the ass. He can spend a few days explaining his BS to the idiots in Congress. He made no friends of anyone with that stunt yesterday.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Comey has had it in for H...