Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Fri Jul 8, 2016, 03:19 PM Jul 2016

AP interview: Ginsburg doesn’t want to envision a Trump win

WASHINGTON (AP) — Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg says she doesn’t want to think about the possibility of Donald Trump winning the White House, and she predicts the next president — “whoever she will be” — will have a few appointments to make to the Supreme Court.

In an interview Thursday in her court office, the 83-year-old justice and leader of the court’s liberal wing said she presumes Democrat Hillary Clinton will be the next president. Asked what if Republican Donald Trump won instead, she said, “I don’t want to think about that possibility, but if it should be, then everything is up for grabs.”

That includes the future of the high court itself, on which she is the oldest justice. Two justices, Anthony Kennedy and Stephen Breyer, are in their late 70s.

“It’s likely that the next president, whoever she will be, will have a few appointments to make,” Ginsburg said, smiling.

more
http://www.salon.com/2016/07/08/ap_interview_ginsburg_doesnt_want_to_envision_a_trump_win/

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
AP interview: Ginsburg doesn’t want to envision a Trump win (Original Post) DonViejo Jul 2016 OP
I love her Skinner Jul 2016 #1
Her saying she opposes Roe v Wade really tarnishes her legacy imo. nm mr_liberal Jul 2016 #3
She should have retired for Obama then she wouldnt have to worry. nm mr_liberal Jul 2016 #2
Then there would be 7 on the court TexasProgresive Jul 2016 #4
They would have confirmed someone if it was last year, just like they did with Kagan mr_liberal Jul 2016 #5
She should retire the next time the Dems have both the Senate and WH pstokely Jul 2016 #6
Thats what Thurgood Marshall thought. nm mr_liberal Jul 2016 #7
 

mr_liberal

(1,017 posts)
5. They would have confirmed someone if it was last year, just like they did with Kagan
Fri Jul 8, 2016, 08:12 PM
Jul 2016

and Sotomayor. Itd be a liberal for a liberal. The reason theyre not this year is because its an election year and its for Scalia.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»AP interview: Ginsburg do...