General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Horrific, Predictable Result of a Widely Armed Citizenry
The killings in Dallas are one more reminder that guns are central, not accessory, to the American plague of violence. They were central fifty-plus years ago, when a troubled ex-Marine had only to send a coupon to a mail-order gun house in Chicago to get a military rifle with which to kill John F. Kennedythat assassin-sniper also fired from a Dallas building onto a Dallas street. They are central now, when the increased fetishism of guns and carrying guns has made such horrors as last nights not merely predictable but unsurprising. The one thing we can be sure of, after we have mourned the last massacre, is that there will be another. You wake up at three in the morning, check the news, and there it is.
We dont yet know exactly by whom and for what deranged reason or mutant cause five police officers were murdered last night, but, as the President rightly suggested, we do know howand the how is a huge part of what happened. By having a widely armed citizenry, we create a situation in which gun violence becomes a common occurrence, not the rarity it ought to be and is everywhere else in the civilized world. That this happened amid a general decline in violence throughout the Western world only serves to make the crisis more acute; Americas gun-violence problem remains the great and terrible outlier.
Weapons empower extremes. Allowing members of any fringe of any movement to get their hands on military weapons guarantees that any normal disputepolitical or, for that matter, domesticcan quickly lead to a massacre. Our guns have outraced our restrictions, but not our imaginations. Sometime in the not-too-distant past, annihilation replaced street theatre and demonstrations as the central possibility of the enraged American imagination. Guns allow the fringe to occupy the center.
The seeming breakdown of normal expectations about violence and public life reminds some of 1968, a terrible yearalthough, if you think this is like 1968, you werent there, since that year was marked by a generational breakdown far more extreme, a continuing foreign war far more violent, and a departing President infinitely more unpopular. But then, too, gun violence wasnt just incidental but instrumentalpointed, causalto the breakdown of social order. If Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Jr., had not been so easily killed with easily available weapons, 1968 would have had a different shape and meaning.
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/the-horrific-predictable-result-of-a-widely-armed-citizenry
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Back in the Wild West, what was the new sherriff's first course of action when gun violence was tearing apart a frontier town?
Confiscate all of the guns and keep them on the wall in the sherriff's office until cooler heads could prevail.