Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

struggle4progress

(118,224 posts)
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 12:27 PM Jul 2016

Dallas shooter used military skills for murder

By Sue Ambrose, Holly K. Hacker and Steve Thompson
Published: 08 July 2016 10:32 PM
Updated: 09 July 2016 10:45 AM

... officials said Friday that a search of his home in Mesquite had turned up "bomb-making materials, ballistic vests, rifles, ammunition and a personal journal of combat tactics." They said he was described as a loner.

Johnson told police he had been training for the deadly ambush; one neighboring family said Friday that he had been performing what looked like military training exercises in his yard ...

One family friend said Johnson had changed when he returned from overseas.

"He was withdrawn, didn't want to talk to people anymore, didn't believe in God anymore," said Myrtle Booker, 62, who knew his mother through church.His interest in guns had grown, she said ...


http://www.dallasnews.com/news/crime/headlines/20160708-ousted-from-army-dallas-shooter-used-military-skills-for-murder.ece

189 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dallas shooter used military skills for murder (Original Post) struggle4progress Jul 2016 OP
Time to register all guns and their owners. Require annual tests and re-registration. onehandle Jul 2016 #1
And this would have changed what? Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #2
Banning assault weapons might have helped keep him away from them or make it harder to get. Rex Jul 2016 #3
That is not what the OP posted about Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #5
Yes and your reply was not to the OP. Nice dodge but fail. Rex Jul 2016 #7
Actually he was responding to the previous failed post. JonathanRackham Jul 2016 #38
Oh are you here to speak for him? Rex Jul 2016 #56
Pointing out the errors and facts. JonathanRackham Jul 2016 #61
Sure sure. Rex Jul 2016 #64
Good comeback Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #69
Thanks I know. Rex Jul 2016 #70
Yes, the last ban worked great for 10 years! Eleanors38 Jul 2016 #130
Right. We should do nothing. Thanks for playing. Rex Jul 2016 #131
How about things that do work Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #133
Rex, you seem satisfied with anything what sticks on the wall. Trouble is... Eleanors38 Jul 2016 #179
Well your opinion has been noted. Rex Jul 2016 #184
I have offered ways of dealing with violence in the 10+ years I have been on DU... Eleanors38 Jul 2016 #187
Just get rid of assault weapons, there is no good justification for having them for civilian use. Rex Jul 2016 #4
The SKS has a fixed 10 round magazine Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #6
You are confusing assault weapons and assault rifles. Rex Jul 2016 #8
No, I am not Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #10
I'm afraid so. Rex Jul 2016 #11
Then explain why, bet you can not Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #17
Just did down thread. Rex Jul 2016 #19
What post? Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #23
18 Rex Jul 2016 #26
You did not, that is the definition of assault weapon. Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #35
See post 34. Rex Jul 2016 #37
The SKS.... Adrahil Jul 2016 #188
A standard SKS doesn't meet the assault weapon definition of any proposed laws or the 1994 AWB aikoaiko Jul 2016 #127
What do we do about modified weapons? Rex Jul 2016 #128
So, about 1850? ;) Adrahil Jul 2016 #189
Which waters the tree of liberty faster? GeorgeGist Jul 2016 #15
What is the definition of "assault weapon"? Marengo Jul 2016 #14
Here ya go. Rex Jul 2016 #18
Was his SKS detachable magazine fed? I've not been following that closely. Marengo Jul 2016 #25
Yes he had clips for the weapon. Rex Jul 2016 #27
Not to be pedantic, but were they clips or magazines. Different feed devices. Marengo Jul 2016 #36
The were quick clips, it might be an old weapon but it is still an assault weapon. Rex Jul 2016 #41
Magazines, as in the type of feed device used by the AK-47? Base model SKS uses 10 round clips... Marengo Jul 2016 #53
Evidently he has a modified assault weapon. Rex Jul 2016 #58
Stripper clips? Travis_0004 Jul 2016 #138
Yep an SKS Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #28
Right it had clips thanks again for saying so. Rex Jul 2016 #30
It appears the model of SKS he used Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #39
Well magazines makes it an assault weapon. Clips maybe not so much. Rex Jul 2016 #43
And the function of the rifle is the same Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #47
Yes as an assault weapon, thanks. Rex Jul 2016 #49
Not if it had a fixed magazine Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #57
You said he didn't have a fixed magazine, make up your mind. Rex Jul 2016 #59
Lol, I said it appears that he had a rifle with removable magazines Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #67
But he was using a modified assault weapon. Rex Jul 2016 #72
Never said that, you did Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #74
Yes and? Rex Jul 2016 #76
Please read my posts Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #87
You did, but hey you are not really paying attention right? Rex Jul 2016 #89
I am , you must like me, lol Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #92
I like that you keep contradicting yourself and don't know what an assault weapon is. Rex Jul 2016 #95
Clips and magazines are different feed devices, and in terms of defining whether or not... Marengo Jul 2016 #42
I thought he used clips, but up thread someone else said he used magazines Rex Jul 2016 #46
It appears that model used removable magazines Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #52
So he had a modified assault weapon. Rex Jul 2016 #54
Probably not Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #60
Probably so. Rex Jul 2016 #62
Ah, that makes sense. There were several models of SKS imported from China modified for detachable.. Marengo Jul 2016 #66
Interchangeable parts makes it easy to modify a weapon. Rex Jul 2016 #68
May or may not have been an old rifle Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #71
Probably was vintage. Rex Jul 2016 #73
We do not know Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #96
Not true, you said he did not have an assault weapon. Rex Jul 2016 #98
I believe I said IF Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #107
So this is all pure speculation? Rex Jul 2016 #109
Pretty much at the moment Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #119
It Orlando shooting was an assault weapon. Rex Jul 2016 #123
It was first reported as an AR-15 Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #132
A semi-automatic rifle Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #20
Right the weapon used in the Dallas shooting was an assault weapon. Rex Jul 2016 #24
I said if it had a removable magazine and Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #33
Yes you keep contradicting yourself, but already admitted it was an assault weapon. Rex Jul 2016 #34
Yes I have said many times now Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #45
Your post 39 contradicts what you just typed. Rex Jul 2016 #48
Nope, been very consistent Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #75
Not at all, just don't edit #39. Rex Jul 2016 #78
I plan not to and if I did Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #88
Good. Rex Jul 2016 #90
Nothing wrong with that post Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #103
If you say so. Rex Jul 2016 #104
I did twice, thank you Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #108
If you say so, twice. Rex Jul 2016 #110
This is a SKS witout a removable magazine. It is loaded with 10shot stripper clips. oneshooter Jul 2016 #181
How will carpenters pound nails? JonathanRackham Jul 2016 #40
With a hammer, a nail gun is right out. Rex Jul 2016 #50
Screw....... JonathanRackham Jul 2016 #55
Why a public database? Wouldn't that increase the possibility of theft? Marengo Jul 2016 #83
Yes, but some do not seem to care Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #94
That, and perhaps the goal is harassment and increased exposure to danger. Marengo Jul 2016 #116
We should probably listen in on their phonecalls and monitor their internet use as well. name not needed Jul 2016 #163
Time to bad assault weapons, there is no reason for them to be in civilian hands. nt Rex Jul 2016 #9
So you want door to door Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #13
LOL. Nice fail, I said ban as in don't sell them anymore. Rex Jul 2016 #16
So leave the millions out there, ok Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #21
It might help stop, you don't seem to care much about prevention. Rex Jul 2016 #22
Might, right Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #79
Might, right...exactly. Rex Jul 2016 #81
My Dad was an army vet who became a psychologist. TexasProgresive Jul 2016 #12
So what to do sarisataka Jul 2016 #29
Nothing, just ban the sale of assault weapons, it would be a start. Rex Jul 2016 #32
More murders are done with handguns. JonathanRackham Jul 2016 #44
But most mass murders are done with assault weapons. Rex Jul 2016 #51
Should we be focusing on mass murders Lonusca Jul 2016 #97
Okay you have convinced me, we go after both then. Rex Jul 2016 #101
Go for it Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #111
Go for what? Rex Jul 2016 #112
Ban all weapons Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #114
Of course you are. Rex Jul 2016 #117
Yes I was, you have an issue with that Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #122
Pure projection on your part. Rex Jul 2016 #124
Good winning strategy. nt Lonusca Jul 2016 #121
Can you prove that? hack89 Jul 2016 #100
You sound like a broken record Naruto Uzimaki Jul 2016 #63
Thanks for the wasted reply. Rex Jul 2016 #65
Not really Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #85
Yeah you are still replying. Rex Jul 2016 #86
There lies the rub sarisataka Jul 2016 #77
No rub, the shooter used a modified assault weapon. Rex Jul 2016 #80
Under the '94 legal definition sarisataka Jul 2016 #99
Just ban weapons that can be turned into assault weapons. Easy. Rex Jul 2016 #102
And again sarisataka Jul 2016 #105
Well with all the experts in this thread, I have a feeling that is not a problem in RL. Rex Jul 2016 #106
Taking the role sarisataka Jul 2016 #118
No it is their use of these weapons to massacre innocent people. Rex Jul 2016 #120
I must respectfully dispute sarisataka Jul 2016 #125
I think some of it is projection, by folks that don't notice at all. Rex Jul 2016 #126
Sometimes true sarisataka Jul 2016 #129
I dunno I get the feeling people think others are talking about them Rex Jul 2016 #134
You are not the only one that uses those insults Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #137
Right and I can only speak for myself, just like you can only speak for yourself. Rex Jul 2016 #141
That is why I do not use terms that are used for Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #145
Insults to whom? You seem to think someone is talking about you? Rex Jul 2016 #147
Work calls sarisataka Jul 2016 #140
Have a good day at work! Rex Jul 2016 #142
I love your last point Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #136
My weapons have harmed not a living thing Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #135
Are you someone that hoards guns and has fanatical ideas about our government? Rex Jul 2016 #143
What statement? Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #146
So you self identify with those terms? Rex Jul 2016 #148
No they have been directed at me several times Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #150
I gotcha, I let insults roll down my back. Rex Jul 2016 #152
But a dem Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #159
Sure - just not hoard guns an want to kill people, you agree with that too I would surmise? Rex Jul 2016 #161
I do not think anyone should have firearms Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #165
Then we agree. Rex Jul 2016 #166
That is always the big problem Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #168
Well then if we do nothing, then the number of weapons just continues to pile up. Rex Jul 2016 #171
We definitely can improve background checks Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #172
Good luck, now you are going to get accused of being soft on gun control. Rex Jul 2016 #173
Not really, you will find most here Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #174
I believe that. Rex Jul 2016 #175
When have I ever used these weapons as you say I did? oneshooter Jul 2016 #182
LOL! As if anyone was talking about you! Rex Jul 2016 #185
So an SKS style weapon with a fixed magazine Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #82
Why you need it to go deer hunting? Rex Jul 2016 #84
That is not the only reason for a weapon Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #91
But we are not talking about just any weapon. Rex Jul 2016 #93
Firearms are not owned to just shoot DEER Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #113
Oh right, they are used to shoot and massacre people as well. Rex Jul 2016 #115
Maybe because he wants to? Travis_0004 Jul 2016 #139
Yes it does matter, you just want to protect your sport. Rex Jul 2016 #144
Ive never hunted before in my life Travis_0004 Jul 2016 #149
Funny, I do not hunt either Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #151
LOL! Well I guess you need to change your username. Rex Jul 2016 #153
Why, it has nothing to do with hunting Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #156
Right. Rex Jul 2016 #157
Never hunted, do not care for taste of deer Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #162
So you just hunted military ducks for 30 years? Rex Jul 2016 #164
Nope, I repaired radar systems Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #167
I C now - I was a ground surveillance system operator, I get the duck part now. Rex Jul 2016 #170
Google says "duckhunter" Igel Jul 2016 #180
Is that a first for you? Rex Jul 2016 #183
I did blast a few ducks back in '89 Travis_0004 Jul 2016 #154
Oh? Rex Jul 2016 #155
Its good to know Im important enough that you keep tabs on me. Travis_0004 Jul 2016 #158
Just remember a conversation where you made fun of my lack of knowledge. Rex Jul 2016 #160
Yep, I am not a real hunter Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #169
Blowback. nt Xipe Totec Jul 2016 #31
Ban assault weapons in the military .. that'll show em n/t DustyJoe Jul 2016 #176
War what is it good for malaise Jul 2016 #177
I doubt military skills... SuperDutyTX Jul 2016 #178
He would have learned basic combat tactics. Rex Jul 2016 #186

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
1. Time to register all guns and their owners. Require annual tests and re-registration.
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 12:34 PM
Jul 2016

They must have insurance and their names, every gun, clip, and bullet available in a public database.

Well regulate them.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
2. And this would have changed what?
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 12:39 PM
Jul 2016

As far as we know. He was not a prohibited person and was very capable with his weapons. Would what you have called for make any difference?

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
3. Banning assault weapons might have helped keep him away from them or make it harder to get.
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 12:41 PM
Jul 2016

Kinda common sense.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
7. Yes and your reply was not to the OP. Nice dodge but fail.
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 12:46 PM
Jul 2016

I understand, you have no retort to my answer.

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
179. Rex, you seem satisfied with anything what sticks on the wall. Trouble is...
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 05:08 PM
Jul 2016

another crappy (non) Ban is worse than meaningless. It is a signal that portions of the Democratic Party WILL pursue ANY kind of legislation to ban and restrict, and those pro-2A groups you love to hate WILL double down to defeat those Democrats and carve out even more chunks of the country so the Grand Old Potty can redistrict itself into "permanent power." Worse, your approach will further discredit the notion that government can work fot the benefit of all by passing credible legislation which deals with widespread problems and societal breakdowns.

Your approach seems like gratuitous taunting at best, and destructive to generations of progressive/liberal thought at worst.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
184. Well your opinion has been noted.
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 07:15 PM
Jul 2016

Just do nothing, the rest of us will figure out a solution.

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
187. I have offered ways of dealing with violence in the 10+ years I have been on DU...
Sun Jul 10, 2016, 02:33 PM
Jul 2016

Most controllers do not like them, or refuse to even acknowledge them because they don't deal with the central component of gun-control: Pohibitions of firearms.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
4. Just get rid of assault weapons, there is no good justification for having them for civilian use.
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 12:42 PM
Jul 2016

IMO.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
6. The SKS has a fixed 10 round magazine
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 12:46 PM
Jul 2016

Functionally the same as the murderers weapon, by definition not an assault weapon. Reloaded very quickly with stripper clips.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
10. No, I am not
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 12:55 PM
Jul 2016

If he had a semi-automatic SKS with removable magazines and certain cosmetic features it may have been classified as an assault weapon. IIf you have an SKS that has a 10 round fixed magazines can be quickly reloaded with stripper clips, it is by definition NOT an assault weapon. Functionally the same rifle. An assault rifle is not only semi-automatic but select fire, full auto or burst fire capable and not manufactured for civilian purchase since 1986. An assault rifle is super expensive and requires additional background checks and additional taxes but can be owned by civilians, they are not used in crimes.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
35. You did not, that is the definition of assault weapon.
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:08 PM
Jul 2016

You accused me of not knowing the difference of assault weapon and assault rifle. Tell me what was incorrect in my post please.

aikoaiko

(34,162 posts)
127. A standard SKS doesn't meet the assault weapon definition of any proposed laws or the 1994 AWB
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 02:05 PM
Jul 2016


It might have been modifed where it would meet the definition.

For example, the standard SKS is not illegal to own in the assault weapon hating state of California.
 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
128. What do we do about modified weapons?
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 02:08 PM
Jul 2016

Current theory is he modified the thing into an assault weapon. How do we stop that? Me personally, I think we were fucked the day firearms started using interchangeable parts.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
18. Here ya go.
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 12:59 PM
Jul 2016
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_weapon

Assault weapon is a term used in the United States to define some types of firearms.[1] The definition varies among regulating jurisdictions, but usually includes semi-automatic firearms with a detachable magazine and a pistol grip, and sometimes other features such as a flash suppressor or barrel shroud.[1][2
 

Marengo

(3,477 posts)
36. Not to be pedantic, but were they clips or magazines. Different feed devices.
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:09 PM
Jul 2016

An important distinction.

 

Marengo

(3,477 posts)
53. Magazines, as in the type of feed device used by the AK-47? Base model SKS uses 10 round clips...
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:16 PM
Jul 2016

The rounds being pushed by thumb pressure down into the fixed magazine after the bottom of the clip is fitted into a slot in the bolt carrier.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
28. Yep an SKS
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:04 PM
Jul 2016

With a fixed magazine that was standard with the weapon is not an assault weapon. It is quickly reloaded using stripper clips and functions identically as the rigles that would be classified as an assault weapon.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
57. Not if it had a fixed magazine
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:17 PM
Jul 2016

Fully legal even in California that has had an assault weapons ban for decades

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
67. Lol, I said it appears that he had a rifle with removable magazines
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:21 PM
Jul 2016

But the SKS type of rifle is also available with a fixed magazine that makes it NOT an assault weapon. Functionally they are identical, both semi-automatic rifles.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
76. Yes and?
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:25 PM
Jul 2016

You said he used quick clips then you said he used a magazine. He used a modified assault weapon.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
87. Please read my posts
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:31 PM
Jul 2016

I never sad he used clips. As we really do not know as the weapon has not been produced.

 

Marengo

(3,477 posts)
42. Clips and magazines are different feed devices, and in terms of defining whether or not...
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:12 PM
Jul 2016

The SKS is an assault weapon, technical accuracy is crucial.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
46. I thought he used clips, but up thread someone else said he used magazines
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:13 PM
Jul 2016

So it was a modified assault weapon.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
52. It appears that model used removable magazines
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:15 PM
Jul 2016

The original SKS used a fixed magazine and was reloaded via stripper clips. There are many variants of the SKS model by several manufacturers.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
60. Probably not
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:19 PM
Jul 2016

There are different models of the SKS type of rifle, both fixed and removable magazines.

 

Marengo

(3,477 posts)
66. Ah, that makes sense. There were several models of SKS imported from China modified for detachable..
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:20 PM
Jul 2016

Magazines, but the base model has a fixed internal magazine. There are a variety of after market magazines designed to replace the factory fixed with larger capacity, but there have been considerable reliability issues.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
98. Not true, you said he did not have an assault weapon.
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:35 PM
Jul 2016

So now you admit to just making stuff up? Okay.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
107. I believe I said IF
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:41 PM
Jul 2016

he used aan SKS type rifle that had a removable magazine and certain other features it could have been an assault weapon. IF that weapon he was using had the fixed magazine, it would not have been an assault weapon.both weapons function identically. Of course we really do not know the type or model he used.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
119. Pretty much at the moment
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:50 PM
Jul 2016

Facts usually change in the type of weapon. The Navy yard shooting was not done by an AR-15 as first reported. The Orlando murders were not by an AR-15 as first reported. Hell, I still have not found out the caliber of that rifle that was used in Orlando.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
123. It Orlando shooting was an assault weapon.
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:51 PM
Jul 2016

It takes all of 10 seconds on google to find the correct weapon used.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
132. It was first reported as an AR-15
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 02:11 PM
Jul 2016

It was not and the weapon type identified comes in a variety of calibers. Do tell me which caliber if is do easy.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
20. A semi-automatic rifle
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 12:59 PM
Jul 2016

With s removable magazine and certain other features. Have a fixed magazine and it is not an assault weapon.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
24. Right the weapon used in the Dallas shooting was an assault weapon.
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:03 PM
Jul 2016

Thanks for saying so in another reply.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
33. I said if it had a removable magazine and
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:07 PM
Jul 2016

Certain other features it could be classified as an assault weapon. That is true. I also stated the same rifle with a fixed magazine that I'd quickly reloaded via stripper clips is not an assault weapon. Again a true statement.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
45. Yes I have said many times now
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:13 PM
Jul 2016

If the SKS model he used had removable magazines and other features it would be an assault weapon. I have also stated the exact same rifle with a fixed magazine loaded with stripper clips would NOT be an assault weapon. I have never said it was an assault rifle.thst was you bringing that term into the thread.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
103. Nothing wrong with that post
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:38 PM
Jul 2016

It does APPEAR from what we know know he used a rifle that has been identified as an SKS type rifle that used removable magazines and was not reloaded using stripper clips.

oneshooter

(8,614 posts)
181. This is a SKS witout a removable magazine. It is loaded with 10shot stripper clips.
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 07:00 PM
Jul 2016


The bayonet is removable and many states do not allow it to be mounted.

name not needed

(11,660 posts)
163. We should probably listen in on their phonecalls and monitor their internet use as well.
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 03:43 PM
Jul 2016

You can never be too safe.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
13. So you want door to door
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 12:57 PM
Jul 2016

Confiscation to get rid of the.millions in private hands that have done nothing wrong. Go for it.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
21. So leave the millions out there, ok
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:01 PM
Jul 2016

That will stop the next person bent on murder like this asshole.

YOU did say civilians should not own them, moving the goalposts?

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
22. It might help stop, you don't seem to care much about prevention.
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:01 PM
Jul 2016

Then again, that is on you not me.

TexasProgresive

(12,155 posts)
12. My Dad was an army vet who became a psychologist.
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 12:57 PM
Jul 2016

He spent a large part of his career counseling Vietnam vets. He was amazed that they never completely snapped and did something like Johnson. They were so filled with anger at the government that sent them half way around the world to kill or be killed for no real good reason. I know many Nam vets don't feel that way, but maybe finding pride in what they did has let them cope with the horror. And we do tend to remember the good things of long ago better than the bad things. That's why some of us oldsters hanker for the "good ole days."

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
32. Nothing, just ban the sale of assault weapons, it would be a start.
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:06 PM
Jul 2016

As opposed to just sitting around talking about it.

Lonusca

(202 posts)
97. Should we be focusing on mass murders
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:35 PM
Jul 2016

or overall murders?

If we are going to expend a huge amount of political capital, shouldn't we go after the one that that is more destructive?

Naruto Uzimaki

(24 posts)
63. You sound like a broken record
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:19 PM
Jul 2016

everyone stopped listening to after the second time you repeated your post.

sarisataka

(18,483 posts)
77. There lies the rub
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:26 PM
Jul 2016

As others point out, what constitutes an assault weapon? An unmodified SKS did not fall under the '94 AWB but a one modified to have a removable magazine would.

Or do we paraphrase Justice Stewart- 'I cannot define an assault weapon but I know one when I see one'

sarisataka

(18,483 posts)
99. Under the '94 legal definition
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:36 PM
Jul 2016

An unmodified SKS was not an assault weapon.

Banning 'modified' guns is a different can of worms. Is my .223 bolt action rifle 'modified' because I put a scope on it?

To come up with an effective assault weapon law will require technical knowledge and precise terminology. Exactly the things many gun control advocates pride themselves on being ignorant.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
102. Just ban weapons that can be turned into assault weapons. Easy.
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:37 PM
Jul 2016

Not like they are needed for hunting or home protection.

sarisataka

(18,483 posts)
118. Taking the role
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:48 PM
Jul 2016

Of devil's advocate I pose the question-

Why should any of the tiny penis, gun humping, ammosexual, potential terrorist, racist cowards offer to help? It is their knowledge of firearms that has caused these epithets to be labeled on them?

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
120. No it is their use of these weapons to massacre innocent people.
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:50 PM
Jul 2016

So they get called all kinds of names. Haven't you noticed? IF firearms were not used to kill thousands of people each year - there would probably less insults toward these maniacs that like to kill thousands of people a year with firearms.

I don't expect any help from gun hoarders, they have severe mental issues imo that require professional help.

sarisataka

(18,483 posts)
125. I must respectfully dispute
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:56 PM
Jul 2016

The notion that these terms have only been directed towards those who massacred innocent people. They have been broadly applied.

I am no mental health expert but I do believe hoarding is a sign of mental illness. Yet there are collectors of many things including firearms so I do not believe owning many versions of something is an immediate sign of mental illness.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
126. I think some of it is projection, by folks that don't notice at all.
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:59 PM
Jul 2016

I always find it interesting when a label is so vehemently opposed by people that it was never applied to. Guilty conscience? I see it about a lot more then just firearms.

sarisataka

(18,483 posts)
129. Sometimes true
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 02:09 PM
Jul 2016

I do not consider such terms apply to myself even though I have acquired a professional knowledge of firearms and continue to own more than one.

I am sure you have seen such wide spread insult such as 'gun humping cowards that cannot leave the house without a gun stuffed down their pants.' or 'only an ammosexual needs a gun to go to _____. People who have CCW are not uncommon and it takes no projection to see that these are directed towards them.

I must also point out, such terms were not used to refer to Philandro Castile, even though he chose to become licensed and carried a conceled firearm.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
134. I dunno I get the feeling people think others are talking about them
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 02:13 PM
Jul 2016

because they relate in some way to the message. I've never once thought of anyone here as a gun humper-ammosexual etc.. Most people imo when they talk of that are talking about the folks that like to go out and murder people with assault weapons and own thousands of firearms and an untold number of bullets.

Hoarding is a mental illness, hoarding firearms makes it doubly dangerous imo.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
147. Insults to whom? You seem to think someone is talking about you?
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 03:14 PM
Jul 2016

Seriously? You are a nobody on an website, just like me. How curious you feel that way.

sarisataka

(18,483 posts)
140. Work calls
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 02:34 PM
Jul 2016

But the civil conversation has been good. We may have staunchly different views on the cause of the problem and solutions but by communicating rather than accusing we may find middle ground is not as unreachable as it seems.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
142. Have a good day at work!
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 03:02 PM
Jul 2016

Yes I agree 100%. And I am glad we both knows where the other stands on the subject.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
135. My weapons have harmed not a living thing
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 02:16 PM
Jul 2016

Since I owned them. Not sure about my bolt action military weapons have never killed anyone as they have been to war. I have been called those names and worse. Care to update your statement?

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
143. Are you someone that hoards guns and has fanatical ideas about our government?
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 03:03 PM
Jul 2016

Care to retract your statement?

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
146. What statement?
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 03:09 PM
Jul 2016

I own firearms and have been called a gun humpers and ammosexual and worse. I have no fear of the government as I have worked for it since 1985.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
148. So you self identify with those terms?
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 03:16 PM
Jul 2016

Interesting. I would have thought nobody here was like that.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
150. No they have been directed at me several times
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 03:22 PM
Jul 2016

Most times they have been correctly hidden after being alerted on.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
152. I gotcha, I let insults roll down my back.
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 03:28 PM
Jul 2016

Then again everyone has different sensitivity levels. I can promise you I personally will never call you those insults. Nor will I call anyone here those names. I see being a Dem and being a gun hoarder as mutually exclusive. Just me though.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
159. But a dem
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 03:38 PM
Jul 2016

Can own firearms, correct. A dem can also have different viewpoints then you also, am I right?

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
161. Sure - just not hoard guns an want to kill people, you agree with that too I would surmise?
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 03:40 PM
Jul 2016

Or not?

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
165. I do not think anyone should have firearms
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 03:43 PM
Jul 2016

That wants to kill people. Some people collect firearms, mine are about 50% antiques.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
166. Then we agree.
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 03:45 PM
Jul 2016

Now we just need to figure out how to keep people that want to kill other people with firearms, from doing so.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
168. That is always the big problem
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 03:48 PM
Jul 2016

And that would be all firearms, not just so called assault weapons.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
171. Well then if we do nothing, then the number of weapons just continues to pile up.
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 03:56 PM
Jul 2016

Maybe we can't do anything in a mass consumer nation like America.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
172. We definitely can improve background checks
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 03:58 PM
Jul 2016

And mental health. Not to mention tighten and heavily enforce current laws. But those are just NRA talking points

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
173. Good luck, now you are going to get accused of being soft on gun control.
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 04:00 PM
Jul 2016

Can't bring up mental health that seems to be taboo.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
174. Not really, you will find most here
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 04:03 PM
Jul 2016

believe in that. Of course you would also see we are dismissed and insulted for saying that. That just might be where I get a little thin skinned when you go around with the gun humper, ammosexual bullshit.

oneshooter

(8,614 posts)
182. When have I ever used these weapons as you say I did?
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 07:02 PM
Jul 2016

"No it is their use of these weapons to massacre innocent people."

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
185. LOL! As if anyone was talking about you!
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 07:16 PM
Jul 2016

Wow, some folks here think the world works only at their say so.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
82. So an SKS style weapon with a fixed magazine
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:28 PM
Jul 2016

Quickly reloaded with stripper clips would be OK. Nice to know.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
93. But we are not talking about just any weapon.
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:33 PM
Jul 2016

Stop moving the goalposts. You need an SKS to kill a deer?

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
113. Firearms are not owned to just shoot DEER
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:45 PM
Jul 2016

The hundreds of thousands of SKS type of rifles in civilian hands are used legally for other purposes.

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
139. Maybe because he wants to?
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 02:33 PM
Jul 2016

Maybe he want some meat to feed his family.

Does it really matter. Deer are overpopulated here, somebody needs to keep them in check. I would rather some hunters buy permits which helps fund the parks and wildlife department.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
156. Why, it has nothing to do with hunting
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 03:36 PM
Jul 2016

It has to do with my 30+ years as a soldier and now a civilian in army air defense. Knowledge is power.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
162. Never hunted, do not care for taste of deer
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 03:41 PM
Jul 2016

Did have some moose up in Alaska that was quite good. But another guy I knew provided it. Spent enough time in the field in the military. I go to the store for food and stay in hotels when I am on vacation.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
167. Nope, I repaired radar systems
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 03:47 PM
Jul 2016

I never manned the van to monitor and fire on anyone. Actually Patriot and THAAD are used for missile defense and not against aircraft. That is what the Air Force is for.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
170. I C now - I was a ground surveillance system operator, I get the duck part now.
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 03:50 PM
Jul 2016

Turn on the radar and duck!

Igel

(35,274 posts)
180. Google says "duckhunter"
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 06:07 PM
Jul 2016

is just "Army slang for someone in the Air Defense function."

Probably uses "duck" as metaphor for any bogey. The "hunter" part follows.

Gee, that took 5 seconds. With no ill-will or hostility, just thinking, "Maybe there's something I don't know."

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
154. I did blast a few ducks back in '89
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 03:32 PM
Jul 2016

I didnt want to shoot them, but I was forced to. If I missed that damn dog would laugh at me.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
160. Just remember a conversation where you made fun of my lack of knowledge.
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 03:39 PM
Jul 2016

And gosh! There was duckhunter (not a real hunter) to admonish you for being crabby with me! So that was just a cool story...good to know.

SuperDutyTX

(79 posts)
178. I doubt military skills...
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 05:01 PM
Jul 2016

I doubt his military training had much to do with any of this. His MOS was 12W (Carpenter/Mason); his Army training in pistols/rifles likely didn't consist of much more than what he learned in basic, and any re-qualifications. He also wouldn't have been taught firefighting tactics etc.

Not exactly an Infantryman.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dallas shooter used milit...