Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OnDoutside

(19,953 posts)
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 06:54 AM Jul 2016

18,000 Police forces in the US, and you wonder why there's an issue ?

It was mentioned yesterday by a retired Police Chief (possibly of Washington), that there are 18,000 police forces in the US. That's just staggering. How can you hope to have standards in how your police deal with the public, when they all could have different (or no) interpretations ?

Wiki says

In 2008, state and local law enforcement agencies employed more than 1.1 million persons on a full-time basis, including about 765,000 sworn personnel (defined as those with general arrest powers). Agencies also employed approximately 100,000 part-time employees, including 44,000 sworn officers


In somewhere comparable like the UK,

There were 129,584 full-time equivalent ( FTE ) police officers in the 43 police forces of England and Wales as at 31 March 2013.


21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
18,000 Police forces in the US, and you wonder why there's an issue ? (Original Post) OnDoutside Jul 2016 OP
What's the per capita number? Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #1
1 per 432 people in UK, 1 per 289 in US however in terms of Police forces it is OnDoutside Jul 2016 #2
3023 officers per force? cherokeeprogressive Jul 2016 #6
I think you are missing the point that there should be standardised police training within a country OnDoutside Jul 2016 #12
18,000 forces with 3023 officers per force is over 54.4 million LEOs. cherokeeprogressive Jul 2016 #13
No, the first figure was UK police forces, the 2nd was US forces, so 61*18000= 1.1m US police OnDoutside Jul 2016 #15
My bad! I'm sorry I read it wrong. cherokeeprogressive Jul 2016 #16
No problem :) OnDoutside Jul 2016 #17
"mentioned yesterday by a retired Police Chief" BumRushDaShow Jul 2016 #3
18,000 Police forces is at least 17,000 too many and must be massively inefficient, administrativel OnDoutside Jul 2016 #4
Well note BumRushDaShow Jul 2016 #8
Chiefs are appointed by mayors. JustABozoOnThisBus Jul 2016 #5
By all means, let's do away with a few thousand police forces. Dreamer Tatum Jul 2016 #7
Too big a bucket for all the different categories. Igel Jul 2016 #9
Imagine having the US Army split into thousands of separate autonomous forces and not having OnDoutside Jul 2016 #14
Here is a tyical situation - in the Northeast anyway jmg257 Jul 2016 #10
I think we have too many cops in general Calculating Jul 2016 #11
I'd guess most police departments don't run police academies, now for-profit colleges do HereSince1628 Jul 2016 #18
The US is 50 States which don't have the same laws nor the same cultures at all. Bluenorthwest Jul 2016 #19
Read the wiki about law enforcement agencies in the UK, you suggest it's on giant foce Bluenorthwest Jul 2016 #20
Where did I suggest that ? OnDoutside Jul 2016 #21

OnDoutside

(19,953 posts)
2. 1 per 432 people in UK, 1 per 289 in US however in terms of Police forces it is
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 07:15 AM
Jul 2016

3023 police officers per Police force

61 police officers per Police force

On average of course. That's nuts.

Populations :


64m in UK

318m in US

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
6. 3023 officers per force?
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 10:34 AM
Jul 2016

Even in places like Mayberry?

I live in a community of <16,000 and our Sheriff's substation has 16 Deputies.

OnDoutside

(19,953 posts)
12. I think you are missing the point that there should be standardised police training within a country
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 05:08 PM
Jul 2016

but how can there be with 18,000 police forces, and I'm not talking about firing police officers ?

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
13. 18,000 forces with 3023 officers per force is over 54.4 million LEOs.
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 06:00 PM
Jul 2016

I think your numbers are either wrong or fudged.

I get that standardized training is hard with that many different forces but explain those numbers please.

OnDoutside

(19,953 posts)
15. No, the first figure was UK police forces, the 2nd was US forces, so 61*18000= 1.1m US police
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 07:12 PM
Jul 2016

So you could potentially have 18,000 different Training programmes.

BumRushDaShow

(128,844 posts)
3. "mentioned yesterday by a retired Police Chief"
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 07:49 AM
Jul 2016

Charles Ramsey (who had been chief in several cities including D.C. (famously during the D.C. sniper ordeal, but recently retired from here in Philadelphia). He was a co-chair of the Presidential Task Force on 21st Century Policing.

Also, I wouldn't compare the UK (total population 64 million, with England alone @ 53 million) to the U.S. (population 318 million).

But it is daunting. Which is why one of his suggestions was to do more "regionalization" of these forces to bring about some more consistency in SOPs, and his preference was actually to see the number of forces "cut in half. Good luck with that! (although some forces have had to, or were forced to consolidate due to lack of money, where some smaller municipalities - e.g., Camden, NJ, ended up consolidating with the Camden County force)

OnDoutside

(19,953 posts)
4. 18,000 Police forces is at least 17,000 too many and must be massively inefficient, administrativel
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 10:07 AM
Jul 2016

y at the very least. What's clear in this case, it is massively inefficient in rolling out up to date training.

The UK is actually a good comparison in terms of number of police forces, my own brother in law is a London Metropolitan Police Officer, and they are regularly being upskilled in their interaction with the public.

Thanks for the Charles Ramsay reminder.

BumRushDaShow

(128,844 posts)
8. Well note
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 11:49 AM
Jul 2016

that you have some large cities that hold the bulk of the officers and the rest are scattered around the states as county police - some covering large geographic areas.

I think the issue is geography that to a degree, limits consolidation - particularly in the larger western states (which makes me think of the "Texas Rangers", who cover the whole state via 6 divisions - they are in addition to the regular state and local police). The geographic size of the UK is like 94,000 sq miles & the U.S. is 3.8 million sq miles... Basically the UK is geographically around the same size as the state of Michigan.



It would probably make more sense comparing the numbers in the U.S. to all of Europe (similar total populations), which doesn't mean that the U.S. wouldn't still have more but again, geography.

The other issue of course is the proliferation of guns in the U.S., something that exists nowhere else in the world (except maybe countries involved in civil wars).

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,338 posts)
5. Chiefs are appointed by mayors.
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 10:15 AM
Jul 2016

Mayors might not want to lose that power.

Or, maybe there are too many municipalities in the U.S. If all the large cities absorbed their suburbs and even extended into absorbing distant rural communities, there would be a manageable number of local governments, so a manageable number of police forces.

D.C. could absorb Arlington and Chevy Chase, eg.

Dreamer Tatum

(10,926 posts)
7. By all means, let's do away with a few thousand police forces.
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 11:00 AM
Jul 2016

No police force - no arrests, no disparity.

Boom - solved.

Igel

(35,300 posts)
9. Too big a bucket for all the different categories.
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 11:57 AM
Jul 2016

Take where my kid had his robotics meet last winter.

Five sets of cops could have arrested us. County. City. School district. There are also state-level police. FBI, if we were doing a federal crime. Didn't see a single cop.

Thing is, they do different things, have different purposes, patrol different areas. Most of the county cops stay out of the city. Not all. If there were fewer county cops, they'd hire more city cops. But the city folk pay county taxes, too. (I grew up near Baltimore. Different there. There are county cops and city cops, and they don't mix much. Baltimore City is contained within but is not part of Baltimore County. Houston is contained within but also part of Harris County.)

But I pass through little towns sometimes where there are maybe 4 cops. It's very "Twin Peaks" like. They're also covered by county police, but the county police are concentrated by population. The county taxes paid by that little town wouldn't pay for a single officer's salary.

OnDoutside

(19,953 posts)
14. Imagine having the US Army split into thousands of separate autonomous forces and not having
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 07:04 PM
Jul 2016

a standard training methodology.

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
10. Here is a tyical situation - in the Northeast anyway
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 12:29 PM
Jul 2016

I was Town/PD LE - roughly 55 sq miles. We had maybe 20 officers (chief, 2 sgts), only 2 full time. 24 hr coverage only on the weekends (2 cops on after 12), 8a-12m coverage weekdays.

In the town, were 3 villages (a few sq miles each) - each with its own smaller PD - similar partial coverage.

There is also the County Sheriff dept.

And the State Police.

So in this 55 sq mile area there are 6 PDs with some sort of jurisdiction.


Calculating

(2,955 posts)
11. I think we have too many cops in general
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 12:31 PM
Jul 2016

It leads to bored cops who have nothing better to do than harass citizens over broken taillights, rolling stop signs and stuff like that.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
18. I'd guess most police departments don't run police academies, now for-profit colleges do
Tue Jul 12, 2016, 07:58 AM
Jul 2016

as well as universities. I'd guess most of the basic curricula is pretty similar, and I'd guess all police coming from MP backgrounds all have pretty much identical military police training.

What really varies is what's learned on the job, because -that- is what their peers and mentors perceive as important within their departments contexts.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
19. The US is 50 States which don't have the same laws nor the same cultures at all.
Tue Jul 12, 2016, 11:01 AM
Jul 2016

Yesterday I watched a documentary about a man sentenced to 13 years in Louisiana Prison for having two joints. In my State, you can go to the store and buy joints if you are 21. The Sheriff in LA was saying 'Here the Sheriff is Big Daddy, he provides' and shit like that which gets him elected there, would get him run out of town on a rail here.

You seem to be calling for a Federal Police, with no local oversight or control, with some East Coast city as Headquarters. That's a plan for a disintegrating Union.

Here in Oregon, we recently had that Bundy Gang occupation of a wildlife refuge, you might recall it. It took place in a county larger than the State of Maryland with way under a dozen officers to serve it. Larger than Maryland. The refuge itself larger than the City of Chicago in size. They don't have enough officers to really even deal with the public safety issues in any actually 'emergency' sense.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»18,000 Police forces in t...