General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBaton Rouge: Homeowner invites protestors, cops barge in and arrest them for future crimes
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/07/baton-rouge-cops-barge-into-womans-yard-to-arrest-black-lives-matter-protesters-she-invited/A Baton Rouge homeowner invited Black Lives Matter protesters to have a rally on her property but that didnt stop cops from arresting dozens of them.
...
The protesters had been peacefully protesting on her property for around 90 minutes, The Daily Beast reports, when officers in riot gear started moving in. At this point, protesters started yelling at the officers that they were trespassing on private property.
The police justified their aggressive behavior by claiming that protesters had been planning to march down to the highway and form a blockade. The police decided to preempt this action by blocking off the interstate ramps themselves, local news station WWLV reports.
hlthe2b
(102,190 posts)DOJ needs to step in.
Moostache
(9,895 posts)That sounds like a massive violation of civil rights to me...especially because the protesters were INVITED onto the private property and the police were NOT.
Another step down the slippery slope to a police state is taken...
Omaha Steve
(99,556 posts)cynzke
(1,254 posts)The protesters will be released, no charges filed. They didn't break any laws and no DA is going to bring charges. Resources (tax payer money) wasted in this fruitless exercise. But the HO has an excellent basis for filing a lawsuit. WELL, as far as the police TRESPASSING, State laws give law enforcement officers exemptions from certain criminal laws if it is necessary to violate them in the process of doing their jobs. Would love to see this case go before a court, challenge the exemption here. If the protesters hadn't broken any laws, were invited on to private property, there was no legal excuse for the police to trespass. They were not carrying out a legitimate duty. This wasn't a simple mistake, however. Most police know the law. They violate it all the time because when that happens, it is hardly challenged by anyone except by the victim in a civil court. If the victim wins their case....HO HUM. The tax payer foots the bill, the police department is off the hook, hardly ever held responsible for reigning in police officers who knowingly violate laws.
Saviolo
(3,280 posts)This way, they get to log their interaction with everyone they arrested as a police interaction, which can count against you in a background check even if you weren't convicted of anything. Even if you have any charges removed from your record with a pardon service, you will still have that "police interaction." They also get to put all of those protesters through the incarceration system, even if only for a night. In the case, they want to punish these people who they see as enemies, and the process is the punishment.
I don't know if the rules are exactly the same, but here in Canada, "police interactions" have been used to deny jobs or arrest people who are "known associates" of people with "police interactions." What that means in practical terms: If you have been seen in public with someone who has been carded by police, you could be detained in the future as a "known associate" of someone with a "police interaction."
It's a mess.
kimmylavin
(2,284 posts)Pre-crime didn't make sense in the movie; it sure as hell doesn't make sense in real life.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)where the police don't have to obey the law, because they ARE the law. They are also often the judge, jury, and executioner.
Hulk
(6,699 posts)A sad day.
lpbk2713
(42,750 posts)They will be conspiring to block grocery store entrances with their next cookie sale.
(Is there really a difference here? )
underpants
(182,720 posts)Orrex
(63,185 posts)"Sure, they weren't threatening us now, but they were totally going to in the future."
Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)If you are a resident of Louisiana, or know a resident of Louisiana, let them know to please contact the governors office and let him know this is absolutely unacceptable behavior by the goon squad.
I have family and friends there that I'm pushing hard to take action.
http://gov.louisiana.gov/page/meet-the-governor
SILENCE IS ACCEPTANCE!
kacekwl
(7,016 posts)is making decisions like this. Go block the highway and leave peaceful protesters alone.
Initech
(100,054 posts)Are people getting arrested for pre crime? How is this constitutional?
raven mad
(4,940 posts)they're also clairvoyant.
Bullshit. Just bullshit - every one of the cops that pulled this "arrest" should be prosecuted for false arrest, harassment and intimidation. But that'll never happen.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)gopiscrap
(23,733 posts)hate fucking cops
niyad
(113,205 posts)(who probably were the same ones who mocked a young woman who had been raped by her father)
Not Quite Singing Kumbayah
Baton Rouge Thought Cops Killing Black People Was Hilarious Until Now
image:
It's funny because don't you have a sense of humor?
Youll be astonished to learn the shooting death of Alton Sterling in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, took place in a community that was not entirely free of racial stresses. Yes, really, even though racism is officially over. So please keep in mind that while some hotheads may consider some of what we discuss here examples of racial conflict, that is only because you are a liberal racist who sees racism everywhere.
Still, there are probably some people who might find Februarys Mardi Gras parade, known in Baton Rouge as the Spanish Town Parade, a tad problematic, seeing as how it featured some hilarious jokes about cops killing black people, like the big Pink Lives Matter float pictured above and below. You see, it was a funny little play on the black lives matter movement, only it featured a photo of a cop shooting a flamingo, the parades mascot. But its OK, you see, because the Spanish Town Parade is famous for its outrageous humor. Besides, there were no racist images, just pictures of flamingos getting abused by police. Totally different!
image:
Flamingo float
The back of the float featured amusing bird jokes (and thats all they were, you hater), like an invitation to join the Million Perp March with Louis Fair Hawk Khan, Wings Up, Dont Shoot! and something about Freddie Gray Goose, although we cant find a copy of whats written underneath:
image:
Flamingo float 4
Then there was another float featuring this amusing image of a flamingo being beaten with police nightsticks, wearing a sign reading I cant breathe. You know, like that guy who had to die for selling loose cigarettes. It, too, is only a joke:
image:
flamingo float 3
Oh, and also some guys waved Confederate flags, because Mardi Gras is all about venerating Heritage.
Now, while the people who made the floats and signs no doubt thought they were really a hoot another bird joke! not everyone in Baton Rouge has a jolly sense of humor about the topic of cops killing black men; one local blogger labeled the floats a piss poor parade. She noted,
Parades are public events, for public enjoyment. The ENTIRE public. If Spanish Town was for whites only, someone should have posted a sign. Im sure some residents still have a sign or two stored, just in case
I shouldnt have had to look at the black children around me and wonder if they recognized what they were seeing. I shouldnt have had to feel like an outsider in my hometown.
. . . .
Read more at http://wonkette.com/603771/baton-rouge-thought-cops-killing-black-people-was-hilarious-until-now#MI78YV7WgGwOoP7r.99
malthaussen
(17,183 posts)... oh, pardon me, paraders, I am sense-of-humor challenged.
Eric Garner seems to be a popular target for this kind of "humor." I guess killing someone while he is actively telling you that you're killing him is a real rush-fantasy for some.
-- Mal
niyad
(113,205 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(48,986 posts)There needs to be accountability for the leadership of the police that trains police like that so badly or approved this stupid decision.
Festivito
(13,452 posts)Dumb asses seems harsh, but stupid dumb asses would be technically correct.
Lunabell
(6,068 posts)Cops have gone wild.
malthaussen
(17,183 posts)... since they, too, are based on the presumption of future commission of a crime. I imagine the defenders of this act will use some variation of this theme to excuse the BRPD.
-- Mal