General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDo progressives really believe the GOP saved the safety net?
http://jackpineradicals.com/boards/topic/god-bless-our-loyal-opposition/
emulatorloo
(44,115 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Look at the original votes on SS, Medicare, and Medicaid.
I know Food stamps had some bipartisan support because it was a boon for agricultural states, but they don't seem to like the program any more.
emulatorloo
(44,115 posts)But as you remember, the head Admin there claimed Obama was going to announce cuts to Social Security in the '09 SOTU address.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)emulatorloo
(44,115 posts)trolls. I think it is only a matter of time before those are either banned or leave JPR of their own accord. Those posters are realizing that the site has degenerated into being more about Hillary Hate than promoting progressive policy.
Human101948
(3,457 posts)While there were dozens of reform plans circulating around Washington, ranging from minor tinkering to radical overhaul, there was a growing consensus around "middle ground'' proposals that combined some structural changes in the retirement age with some form of private accounts. There were also hopeful signs that the public was ready for a serious discussion about Social Security reform. An August 1997 survey by Clinton pollster Mark Penn found that 73 percent of Democratic voters favored some form of privatization, and support was especially strong among younger workers. Independent polls also showed that many young people believed that without significant change the programs would not be able to provide for them in their old age.
Given the high risk involved, Clinton realized that he could not undertake this without bipartisan support, and, Chief of Staff Erskine Bowles reflected, "He knew to do this he needed to work with Gingrich.'' He was confident that he could hold moderate and conservative Democrats and bring enough Republicans to the table to make significant reform. The danger, however, was that Republicans would seize the surplus and use it for tax cuts. Some of Clinton's advisers suggested that he make a surprise announcement of a total overhaul of Social Security in the 1998 State of the Union speech. Mindful of the healthcare debacle, Clinton rejected this option, believing it was important to bring Gingrich and other Republican leaders into the discussions...
....It did not take long, however, for Gingrich to recognize the potential of a possible Social Security reform package. Bowles provided Gingrich with the same assurances that the president offered to Archer. The president would take the political heat for controversial proposals. Politically, the president and the speaker were closer than anyone realized. They recognized that their parties needed to change in response to new circumstances. They both believed that any effort to update Social Security would require government to incorporate some measure of choice, and that meant some form of privately managed account.http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2008/05/29/the-pact-between-bill-clinton-and-newt-gingrich
Emphasis added
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)http://jackpineradicals.com/boards/topic/god-bless-our-loyal-opposition/
whatthehey
(3,660 posts)Along with an inability to understand GE dynamics and, well, basic English really.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)believe or even attempt to argue that the GOP is saving the social safety net that they've been trying to destroy for decades??
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)...with John Boehner. Obama would give him Chained CPI (a stingier method of calculating increases to Social Security benefits) in exchange for Boehner giving Obama the elimination of some tax deductions for the rich.
Boehlert agreed, but then changed his mind. So Social Security benefits were helped by Republicans being unwilling to compromise.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)And this is impossible to get past:
http://jackpineradicals.com/boards/topic/god-bless-our-loyal-opposition/
emulatorloo
(44,115 posts)Republicans are pro-chained CPI. In effect Obama showed them up as dishonest ideologues, catering to their extremist Tea Party base.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)segments here wanted to believe the evil (President) Obama narrative, that they were hearing now of it ... even though the gop for all intent and purposes, acknowledged it was a bluff that even they knew they couldn't call ... and survive politically.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)haven't been listening. Ugh.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)NT
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,406 posts)That is a huge stretch- though I'm not unfamiliar with the assertion. Of course, what they seem to fail to realize is that, if true, things like cutting Social Security, Medicare, and other public welfare programs etc. wouldn't even be on the table without the GOP having control of Congress pushing those things in the first place. When has a Democratic Congress and President actually conspired to cut those things?
BainsBane
(53,031 posts)You say you're not unfamiliar with the assertion. Can you say more about what they are talking about? I've never heard it before, and it strikes me a bizarre.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,406 posts)I had heard from a DUer at some point that Clinton and Gingrich had supposedly once made a deal to cut SS but the Lewinsky scandal blew it- supposedly.
BainsBane
(53,031 posts)Well, not really, but I suppose in CT lala land it makes sense.
Thanks.
Loki
(3,825 posts)They call the GOP the "Loyal Opposition". How f**ked up is that. Cut CHIPS programs, drug test welfare and disability recipients, try to privatize our Social Security, shut down the government, lie us into never-ending wars by letting their minions attack anyone who may oppose it with death threats, cut housing allowances to the military, cut funding to the VA, never admonish anyone in that party that verbalizes death threats against this president, spend billions on a witch hunt over Benghazi, but will gladly let any corporation pollute your air, water and health if it makes them a buck. They are sick.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)Hayduke Bomgarte
(1,965 posts)Kneecapped, undercut, ripped apart, and destroy, then yeah... I believe it.
mcar
(42,302 posts)No matter what they call themselves.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)cosmicone
(11,014 posts)BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)FSogol
(45,476 posts)Ignore them and stop giving them hits is my advice.
BainsBane
(53,031 posts)Pakid
(478 posts)I have a bridge in Brooklyn I would love to sell
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)We need to stop taking crazies so seriously
greatauntoftriplets
(175,731 posts)It's called reality.
TwilightZone
(25,464 posts)Some of it is so blatantly obvious that I'm surprised anyone there believes it.
Response to TwilightZone (Reply #33)
retrowire This message was self-deleted by its author.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Tal Vez
(660 posts)We should never forget that the things that Trump is saying appeal to a lot of voters. There are folks out there who think that we have too many people of color in this country. They honestly believe that Trump will "disappear" millions of our Mexican residents. They know that a man with Mexican ancestry cannot be considered for a judicial appointment because they can't be fair. They honestly believe that the White House should be reserved for the white race. They honestly believe that President Obama was born in Africa to a mother who decided at his birth that he would be her vehicle to subverting the USA. They honestly believe that we should cut everyone's taxes, spend more on the military, protect senior benefits and still eliminate the debt. They believe that Trump can defeat ISIS without a plan. They believe that the Jews are corrupting our government. They believe that Trump has proven that he can do anything.
I just don't happen to agree with them about any of this baloney. But, I acknowledge that he has a pitch.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)-hobbit709
Are there denizens of our august board whose reading comprehension doesn't meet your lofty standards?
Could you share their names with the rest of us?
Thank you in advance.
And while you are at it could you please share with us the names of the small (r) republicans
http://jackpineradicals.com/boards/topic/god-bless-our-loyal-opposition/
the gentleman or lady is referring to.