Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lovuian

(19,362 posts)
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 01:19 PM Jul 2016

China’s space station is out of control could crash to Earth

http://metro.co.uk/2016/07/11/chinas-space-station-is-out-of-control-and-could-crash-to-earth-in-a-fireball-6000268/

A huge, orbiting Chinese space station could crash to Earth in a deadly fireball, space experts have warned.

Speaking to Space.com last month, several experts suggested that signs hint that the eight-ton Tiangong-1 space station is out of control.
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
China’s space station is out of control could crash to Earth (Original Post) lovuian Jul 2016 OP
Failure Ptah Jul 2016 #1
Yep lovuian Jul 2016 #2
No, if we are lucky, it will land on the Republican Convention... FSogol Jul 2016 #3
Now where did I put my Skylab insurance? Throckmorton Jul 2016 #7
Trump hates the Chinese. milestogo Jul 2016 #4
Seems like a space station would weigh more than 8 tons. Gidney N Cloyd Jul 2016 #5
Those things are made out of mylar and aluminum. Act_of_Reparation Jul 2016 #6
But unmanned satellites can weigh more than that. I would have guessed anything that was built to... Gidney N Cloyd Jul 2016 #8
Well, 16,000 lbs is no wee payload. longship Jul 2016 #9
As far as space stations go it is pretty small. Smaller than a single module of the ISS. Statistical Jul 2016 #10
Crash and burn like all the other shit they make n/t doc03 Jul 2016 #11
That's disappointing DavidDvorkin Jul 2016 #12
Or they may still have some control muriel_volestrangler Jul 2016 #13

Ptah

(33,024 posts)
1. Failure
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 01:24 PM
Jul 2016

The Tiangong-1 was launched September 2011 with an intended two year service span, after the last crew departed the module in June 2013 it was put into sleep mode and it is intended that it would remain in orbit for some time allowing China to collect data on the longevity of key components before being commanded to gradually re-enter the atmosphere in the coming months.[58] However 21 March 2016 the Manned Space Engineering Office announced that all telemetry had failed[3] leaving no ability to safely control its descent.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiangong-1#Failure

Throckmorton

(3,579 posts)
7. Now where did I put my Skylab insurance?
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 01:44 PM
Jul 2016

I bought it outside Grand Central Station in 1979. Paid off big if l got hit as I recall.

Act_of_Reparation

(9,116 posts)
6. Those things are made out of mylar and aluminum.
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 01:36 PM
Jul 2016

They have to be light, otherwise the cost of putting them into orbit would become prohibitive.

Gidney N Cloyd

(19,833 posts)
8. But unmanned satellites can weigh more than that. I would have guessed anything that was built to...
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 01:46 PM
Jul 2016

...support life would be bigger and heavier.
https://www.quora.com/How-big-is-an-average-satellite

longship

(40,416 posts)
9. Well, 16,000 lbs is no wee payload.
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 02:05 PM
Jul 2016

And in LEO it is not likely to last very long before crashing into the Earth.

BTW, it has been abandoned for years.

Statistical

(19,264 posts)
10. As far as space stations go it is pretty small. Smaller than a single module of the ISS.
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 02:50 PM
Jul 2016

It is even smaller than Skylab (US single module space station launched in the 70s).

The ISS in comparison weighs 150 tons.

Not throwing shade on the Chinese everyone has to start somewhere but when most people here Space Station they are probably thinking about something an order of magnitude larger.

DavidDvorkin

(19,473 posts)
12. That's disappointing
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 04:31 PM
Jul 2016

I assume -- and very much hope -- that China will keep pressing ahead with its space program despite this setback.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,306 posts)
13. Or they may still have some control
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 04:59 PM
Jul 2016

The full space.com article from last month, as well as quoting Thomas Dorman, also quotes T.S. Kelso, a senior research astrodynamicist at the Center for Space Standards & Innovation (CSSI), a research arm of Analytical Graphics:

Kelso has plotted the altitude history of Tiangong-1 from just after its launch to more recent times. He told Space.com that the Chinese space lab's orbit was reboosted relatively recently, in mid-December 2015.

"That reboost put it higher than it had been anytime prior to that in its mission," Kelso said.
...
If China does indeed have control over the space lab, why keep it in orbit rather than nudging it back to Earth immediately?

"The suggestion has been made," Dorman said, that "the reason China hasn't done a re-entry of Tiangong-1 is, the space station is low on fuel, and China is waiting on a natural decay to a much lower orbit before they can do a burn to bring the station down."

http://www.space.com/33140-china-tiangong-1-space-lab-falling-to-earth.html
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»China’s space station is ...