General Discussion

63splitwindow

(2,657 posts) Sun Jul 17, 2016, 09:10 PM Jul 2016

Don the Con displaying new level of orangeness...

on 60 minutes tonight. Pence looking orange also. Whassup with this, REALLY, what is the orange all about?

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Don the Con displaying new level of orangeness... (Original Post) 63splitwindow Jul 2016 OP

And Lesley Stahl is gently humiliating the orange guy... 63splitwindow Jul 2016 #1

The Con and his stooge... 63splitwindow Jul 2016 #2

Does a picture exist of him not talking about himself? 6000eliot Jul 2016 #3

Trumpthink. 2naSalit Jul 2016 #4

He was insultingly condescending to Pense. Stinky The Clown Jul 2016 #5

Didn't know him--- now have zero respect for such a sycophant. nt 63splitwindow Jul 2016 #6

Together they make a Creamsicle! applegrove Jul 2016 #7

63splitwindow

(2,657 posts)

1. And Lesley Stahl is gently humiliating the orange guy...

Reply to 63splitwindow (Original post)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 09:15 PM

Jul 2016

if he was smart enough to understand the inconsistencies she is pointing out.

63splitwindow

(2,657 posts)

2. The Con and his stooge...

Reply to 63splitwindow (Original post)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 09:38 PM

Jul 2016

6000eliot

(5,643 posts)

3. Does a picture exist of him not talking about himself?

Reply to 63splitwindow (Reply #2)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 09:42 PM

Jul 2016

2naSalit

(86,336 posts)

4. Trumpthink.

Reply to 63splitwindow (Original post)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 10:52 PM

Jul 2016

Stinky The Clown

(67,764 posts)

5. He was insultingly condescending to Pense.

Reply to 63splitwindow (Original post)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 10:53 PM

Jul 2016

Not that I give a shit about Pense.

63splitwindow

(2,657 posts)

6. Didn't know him--- now have zero respect for such a sycophant. nt

Reply to Stinky The Clown (Reply #5)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 10:57 PM

Jul 2016

applegrove

(118,501 posts)

7. Together they make a Creamsicle!

Reply to 63splitwindow (Original post)

Mon Jul 18, 2016, 01:09 AM

Jul 2016

Reply to this discussion