General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumswhat is this BULLSHIT about the 'beautifully delivered' speech? did anyone actually pay
attention while she read it off the teleprompter to her left?
almost exclusively, that is. she looked outwardly very occasionally
she read in a flat, emotionless tone, devoid of affect, for the most part, stumbling over many words. the contrast between her delivery and that of Michelle was STRIKING, almost exactly the same way her husband's amazing speech in Dallas differed from twerp #43, who barely looked up from his notes.
the way to see the speeches is to look for the side by side shots of the two women, and note how empty Melania's words seem, how lacking conviction. then, when it's Michelle's turn, you see a vibrant, animated human being, someone who actually believes and understands the words she's saying, projecting an aura of confidence and compassion very much lacking in Melania's rote recitation
am I wrong? these media goobers astound me with their lazy herd behavior. they even went gaga over dumpster boy's WWE foggy entrance, their tongues hanging halfway to their knees in stupefied astonishment. that EVERY SINGLY bobblehead agreed on the brilliance of Melania's oratory is all you need to know how strong the Groupthink rules in Oceania.
kimbutgar
(21,111 posts)Watching it with my husband and Mother in law we all commented how striking his wife was but the presentation of her speech was dull. She was just eye candy for the cheeto brainwashed zombie supporters.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)And you better believe if she didn't look like that, Trump would have no use for her. She didn't even have a personal vignette about "the Donald". Regardless of how she looks, it was poor decision making on her part to read a speech she didn't bother to double-check before assuming the words as her own.
kimbutgar
(21,111 posts)Nothing she said humanized the cheeto.
The_Casual_Observer
(27,742 posts)Of a 3rd rate beauty contest.
They were amazed that the nitwit knew how to read I guess.
hamsterjill
(15,220 posts)The contract is undeniable. Michelle is an engaged participant in her husband's life, and in her own right. Melania is an accessory.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Maybe they don't want to kick her down anymore then she is. Donald should be the focus. No talk of nasty speeches last night on any network but all about her speech. I personally don't think this should be the focus but the other destructive speeches should be. In fact, with all the drama going on, I wouldn't doubt trump did this himself.
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)of similar anti-social behaviors.
since it was probably she that did the bulk of the speech, maybe he helped her a bit.
that said, this is just another episode in the endless tale of mendacity that is at the core of doncon the swindler. the media, for whatever reason, chose, for once, to make a big deal out of it instead of the literally countless examples of his perfidy, including, THREE cases of testified to sexual assault. whey have the media NEVER, ever mentioned any of those?
anything that moves the ball closer to his end zone is fine and dandy. they are nothing but parasites, who take no more care of the MANY MANY lives they've left broken in their wake than you would stepping crushing an annoying flea between your fingernails
so there
Kingofalldems
(38,442 posts)Do you realize Trump blamed it on Hillary?
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)cnn/msnbc from about 10PM last night, til about 9 this morning, and have some more on my machine.
so yes, I've enjoyed those moments of the pushback
speaking of which, some MANIAC, the worst of a bad lot, just went insane, and got laughed at by a republican isn't insane. she said she felt SORRY for him and all the other surrogates who are out there making fools of themselves
B2G
(9,766 posts)Seriously.
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)I can do ANYTHING! gonna go touch my toes, polish my shoes, clip my nosehairs, braid my pits, have some bourbon with a dash of spoors.
sounds like FUN!
tonyt53
(5,737 posts)I picked boogers from my nose while Rudy was talking.
Cosmocat
(14,561 posts)so the pre programmed narrative was breathless gushing about how awesome it was.
But, it was a bland, non-descript speech which had its best paragraphs amatureishly ripped form MO, and delivered in a stiff, monotone manner.
Sad that it was either hailing her as a the greatest wife of a POTUS ever or this shitfest.
REP
(21,691 posts)"Sir, {Ms Trump giving a speech} is like a dog's walking on his hind legs. It is not done well; but you are surprised to find it done at all."
sarae
(3,284 posts)I'm not surprised they concocted some bs about her presentation being "eloquent" and "classy". To them, she's amazing just because she presents as their ideal of femininity beautiful, well-dressed, thin, white and perfectly content to stay in her place.
I still see Donald Trump as enemy number one, but I have a hard time feeling sympathy for the supportive wife of a lying racist.
B2G
(9,766 posts)Just saying.
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)at the likes of Kellyanne Conway, Manafart, Kaily blonde whatshername, and all the other miserable, lying screwnoses who have turned themselves into pretzels defending, as usual, the indefensible
CNN did their pulse poll a moment ago and it's 92 to 8, that she copied.
they had a guy quote the likelihood of an accidental matching of words as one in a TRILLION!
no strokes for me, not by a long shot. schadenfreude may not be an admirable emotion, but I'm BATHING in it, at least until this horrifically, trainwreckily comedic tale dies down. the queen is dead. long live the queen of mirth!
Orrex
(63,191 posts)Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)Whitewater, and all the other NONEXISTENT Clinton scandals that have followed, ALL ginned up by the right wing propaganda mill. the funny thing is that the Clintons are moderate republicans.
but, then, Goldwater would have been a knee jerk libtard to most of the waterheads that comprise the new Whig/Know Nothing partiers
Orrex
(63,191 posts)Since Clinton and and the famously leftist Bernie Sanders have a 97% identical voting record, I guess that means that Sanders is 97% a moderate Republican.
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)you can make statistics say anything?
he does caucus with the dems; you realize that, don't you? who's he going to vote with?
Orrex
(63,191 posts)Calling her a Republican is pretty much explicitly bashing the Democratic nominee, by the way.
Perhaps you should reflect upon the venue in which you choose to complain from your soapbox.
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)posts I've made before you do.
thanks
Orrex
(63,191 posts)Nice try.
If you've posted something that you think is worth reading, then you're welcome to provide links to those pearls of wisdom. Otherwise I'm not going to waste time hunting down your mutterings.
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)I treasure your wisdom
why the hostility?
we will both vote for Hillary, myself with a bit less enthusiasm, yes.
EDIT: forgot....you could waste a few seconds here, and look at the many posts I've put up, then satisfy that I'm not worth your precious time.
waste some "precious time" on the above. not a very good version, but I didn't waste any of my precious time surveying the myriad versions
Orrex
(63,191 posts)What you project as hostility is a reasonable response to the bullshit claim that Hillary=Republican. Accusations of hostility are a favorite tactic by those who want to deflect from the actual discussion, by the way. It's akin to calling someone "defensive" or telling them not to "take it personally."
And if you didn't want a response, then you shouldn't have posted your attack on the Democratic nominee, unless you're simply trolling.
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)so I guess you haven't read any of my posts, then, because that minor demurrer is by far the most critical one you'll see from me about any dem. now, run along, and enforce your iron orthodoxy on somebody more deserving
Atman
(31,464 posts)Okay, so they hate Obama for just breathing, but that's beside the point.
But I've listened to this bullshit for seven years..."Obama isn't a good speaker, he just reads off of a TelePrompTer!"
When Melania Trump reads a blatantly plagiarized speech off of a TelePrompTer, she's giving a "beautifully delivered" speech.
The depths of Republican hypocrisy knows no bounds.
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)I'm very happy!
Cracklin Charlie
(12,904 posts)spanone
(135,814 posts)Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)from the throng, and others are beginning to follow, as they are realizing that they can maintain their thought-free processes and continue to follow the lead of whomever's in front of them'
very simple.....like the lemming myths of olden times
the latest comment is me
Initech
(100,056 posts)nolabear
(41,959 posts)Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)and eva gabor, only with poorer command of English, which is her second third, or fifth language, depending upon which pretzel is spewing at the time. can't they even get the correct number of languages she supposedly speaks?
is it two, three, or five? haven't heard four. anybody know? can't trust her bio, that's for sure
what a surprise that they lie about everything
Skittles
(153,138 posts)jeez, they've always made it sound like Melania is a linguistic genius, but she sure seemed to be struggling
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)surefired turdpolishing technique
cynannmarie
(113 posts)(for someone who has lived in the US for 18 years or so.) My daughter married a Frenchman who spoke almost no English until he came to live here when they married. The French accent is typically one of the hardest ones to lose when speaking in English. Yet after just a couple years of living here and studying English (ESL program) for 1 year, his French accent is quite mild, and he is thoroughly fluent. If Melania is such a "linguist" as claimed, I would expect that she would have far better pronunciation skills by now. I wonder if she took the time and effort to formally study the language and have her pronunciation better coached.
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)any way?
as I mentioned elsewhere, the hardest work she's done in decades is trying to roll out from under gross jabbahut richfux like her current sugardaddy
erpowers
(9,350 posts)I did not watch the speech last night but, I saw clips this morning and I am in total agreement with you. It was easy to see that she was reading the speech. From what I saw I felt it was a bad idea to have her speak at the convention. I thought most of the people outside of the arena would not believe what she said.
I guess they are giving her a pass because she is neither a politician, nor a polished speaker. It could also be that they know the right wing would attack them if they claimed Melania Trump's delivery was poor. Right wingers are already claiming the media is lying about Melania's speech being overly similar to First Lady Obama's 2008 speech.
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)said it was a speech worthy of demosthenenes
I am not exaggerating. I've been watching this trainwreck for, jesus! about sixteen hours straight!!!!!!! and nobody....NObody had anything but abject praise for this empty headed, walking billboard for hotness=$$$, and nothing else.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Including a few trying to gaslight you here.
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)speech consists of hot air, empty words.
I did, however find Obama's Dallas speech very moving, heartfelt, and courageous. politically bad for Hillary, but, it could go down as his best ever. almost lincolnesque, in terms of his true yearning for a healing of the rift that was ruptured a hundred fifty five years ago
who's gaslighting....too thick to notice, except for one possibility
could it be.....