Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is Melania trying to throw her husband's campaign? (Original Post) imanamerican63 Jul 2016 OP
people who don't want limelight / attention Skittles Jul 2016 #1
Succinctly put! auntpurl Jul 2016 #4
I think someone just handed her the final draft and she read it JenniferJuniper Jul 2016 #2
Too stupid for tricks like that. The_Casual_Observer Jul 2016 #3
No. Of course not. SheilaT Jul 2016 #5
Good answer! imanamerican63 Jul 2016 #6
Glad you appreciated it. SheilaT Jul 2016 #8
As usual, I was being sarcastic & poking fun at Trump "HUGE " mistakes. imanamerican63 Jul 2016 #12
I agree with you that throwing the campaign is a stretch chade Jul 2016 #15
The suggestion that someone, some staffer, SheilaT Jul 2016 #16
Think about what you just said....they HAD Michelle's speech - whether on paper Laura PourMeADrink Jul 2016 #18
It was another poster who suggested the google. SheilaT Jul 2016 #19
Maybe she's had enough of his abuse C_U_L8R Jul 2016 #7
I don't think she is, but I think LuvNewcastle Jul 2016 #9
Trump is doing a good enough job doing that himself... scscholar Jul 2016 #10
I teach college English, and I have seen many students commit plagiarism without realizing that tblue37 Jul 2016 #11
Thank you for such a thoughtful explanation oioioi Jul 2016 #14
I don't think she's very bright ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2016 #13
I think Trump himself has been trying to throw it... awoke_in_2003 Jul 2016 #17
That was one of my early theories...he threw it in so he could Laura PourMeADrink Jul 2016 #20
It's a possibility seanbnewyork4 Jul 2016 #21

JenniferJuniper

(4,507 posts)
2. I think someone just handed her the final draft and she read it
Tue Jul 19, 2016, 06:52 PM
Jul 2016

Who added the Michelle material is the big question.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
5. No. Of course not.
Tue Jul 19, 2016, 06:55 PM
Jul 2016

This is the sort of convoluted thinking that pops up all the time, and it's not in any way sensible or believable. Plus, for her to think, "Oh, I don't really want the Donald to be President so, let's see, what can I do to completely sabotage his campaign? I know! I'll plagiarize part of my speech from Michelle Obama! That's the ticket! If I do that there's no way he'll win!" is a non starter.

I mean, think about it. Right now everyone -- well a lot of Democrats anyway -- is in a huge uproar about this. But trust me, this will blow over in a day or two. Plus, why in the world would she seize upon that particular thing to do? Why would she think anyone would notice or care.

I'm sure that whoever took the phrases from Michelle Obama's speech just doesn't quite understand what plagiarism really is. People are so used to cutting and pasting from the internet all the time that it does not seem like a big deal. And they're quite surprised when anyone notices.

Someone who is a fashion model is not someone who doesn't like the limelight or want a lot of attention.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
8. Glad you appreciated it.
Tue Jul 19, 2016, 07:00 PM
Jul 2016

Whenever you, or anyone else, asks a question like that, it is helpful to think it all the way through, try to puzzle out at least some of the ramifications.

Not to mention you should always hold Occam's Razor firmly in mind, that the simplest answer is likely the correct one.

chade

(103 posts)
15. I agree with you that throwing the campaign is a stretch
Tue Jul 19, 2016, 08:19 PM
Jul 2016

But I'm not so sure about anybody not seeing or understanding what they were doing as plagiarism. What really bakes my noodle is that republicans have historically been masters of message...to the point where, let's be real here, we on the left get outgunned pretty often in this department. So how did this happen? It's unbelievable to me that the Capital-R, Capital-P Republican Party would just be like 'you do you, Melania' and roll with it, especially given their history.

If you're about to have someone in your party give an internationally high-profile speech, wouldn't you for sure have some staffer run everything through Google first? That to me would be, like, step 1. So who made the oversight? I haven't the slightest idea and it totally blows my mind.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
16. The suggestion that someone, some staffer,
Tue Jul 19, 2016, 09:43 PM
Jul 2016

run everything through Google first is so incredibly sensible, that I'm even more convinced that such a thing simply wasn't done, and that whoever strung those words together simply has not understanding of what plagiarism really is. It's a vast and growing problem.

It's slightly possible that whoever cribbed those phrases may have thought they came under the fair usage umbrella.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
18. Think about what you just said....they HAD Michelle's speech - whether on paper
Tue Jul 19, 2016, 11:06 PM
Jul 2016

or on a screen. They didn't have to google their final against whatever is out there *i.e. Michelle's speech. They KNEW it was Michelle's speech.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
19. It was another poster who suggested the google.
Tue Jul 19, 2016, 11:38 PM
Jul 2016

I still maintain that the people who put those phrases into Melania's speech simply don't understand what plagiarism actually is.

C_U_L8R

(44,986 posts)
7. Maybe she's had enough of his abuse
Tue Jul 19, 2016, 07:00 PM
Jul 2016

Not saying he's abusing her but people
say that he's an abusive guy so it
makes you wonder. There's something
going on there. There's definitely something
going on there. Right back at ya Donald.

 

scscholar

(2,902 posts)
10. Trump is doing a good enough job doing that himself...
Tue Jul 19, 2016, 07:09 PM
Jul 2016

to need help. Some people accuse Bill Clinton of doing the same, but he's only done a fraction of what Trump has done to himself.

tblue37

(65,216 posts)
11. I teach college English, and I have seen many students commit plagiarism without realizing that
Tue Jul 19, 2016, 07:25 PM
Jul 2016

they are doing so.

Many American students do not really understand what plagiarism is, so they often unintentionally commit what is called patchwork (or mosaic) plagiarism because they just don't understand how to properly integrate ideas and information from their source material. Unless they are carefully taught how to use sources properly, most students wrongly believe that if they just change some words or rearrange words and sentences borrowed from their sources, that is enough to avoid plagiarism.

They end up lifting bits and pieces of sentences or even whole sentences--maybe borrowing the bits from just one source, or maybe from more than one source--and then putting them together like a jigsaw puzzle. They change a few words in some or all of the bits, maybe rearrange some parts of some sentences, and then use words of their own to stitch the bits and pieces together. They are typically astonished and appalled when their teachers accuse them of plagiarism, because they thought they were doing everything necessary to avoid plagiarizing their sources.

OTOH, many of my otherwise excellent international students actually have trouble at first even understanding why we consider plagiarism to be such a big deal here. Not all other countries are blasé about it, but a few definitely are.

It seems possible to me that after receiving a preliminary draft prepared by a professional writer, Melania tweaked the speech herself. Quite possibly she went online to watch speeches given by other nominees' wives and, liking Michelle's style and sentiments, decided to incorporate some of her comments and phrases into her speech, assuming it would be OK as long as she made a few minor changes, just as I have seen untrained students do when they don't realize that sort of thing is still considered plagiarism.

oioioi

(1,127 posts)
14. Thank you for such a thoughtful explanation
Tue Jul 19, 2016, 07:56 PM
Jul 2016

It is the most likely scenario. Perhaps the Rick roll was the original speechwriter's prank then, which might have gotten a giggle but probably not much attention were it not for her finishing touches. I think you're right in that she felt it was probably fine to reiterate stock phrases.

It's still very very amusing

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
13. I don't think she's very bright
Tue Jul 19, 2016, 07:49 PM
Jul 2016

I think she decided last minute to toss shit in that she liked from Michelle's speech and probably didn't realize it's wrong to plagiarize. It slipped past the clowns running this circus.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
20. That was one of my early theories...he threw it in so he could
Tue Jul 19, 2016, 11:52 PM
Jul 2016

create some "outraged love-my-wife, love women, type emotional moment" in defense of people piling on. But, he didn't.

Still think his marks all over this. But why?

 

seanbnewyork4

(32 posts)
21. It's a possibility
Wed Jul 20, 2016, 12:16 AM
Jul 2016

After all, being President is a high-risk job, and Don might croak after a few years. Honestly, I don't think Trump is really out to win, considering his outrageous behavior during his campaign trail.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is Melania trying to thro...