General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDonald Trump's New York Times interview reveals a dangerously lazy mind at work
http://www.vox.com/2016/7/21/12245562/donald-trump-new-york-times-interview-full-transcriptDonald Trump's New York Times interview reveals a dangerously lazy mind at work
Updated by Matthew Yglesias on July 21, 2016, 11:30 a.m. ET @mattyglesias matt@vox.com
Being president of the United States is hard work, its important work, and Donald Trump has proven time and again hes much too lazy to do the job. Not too lazy in the sense of sleeps in too much hes clearly happy to maintain a frenetic pace of activity when doing things that engage him like tweeting or doing television phone interviews but too lazy in the sense of being unwilling to put in the time and reps necessary to master new things.
That is the unescapable message of the interview he conducted with David Sanger and Maggie Haberman of the New York Times thats published today on their website. Its an interview that demands to be read in full, because the full context is much more horrifying than the one headline feature where Trump suggests he would unilaterally abrogate Americas NATO commitments to the Baltic countries and possibly spark a third world war.
The problem with Trump is not just the specific things he says but the casual way in which he says them and the comical logic that ties them together. Most of all, its the repetition the fact that it keeps happening without Trump showing any capacity for growth or any interest in doing the work that would make him better at answering questions. For better or worse, Trump is now the GOP nominee and there are hundreds of professional Republican Party politicians and operatives around the country who would gladly help him become a sharper, better-informed candidate.
It doesnt happen because he cant be bothered. Its terrifying.
more...
http://www.vox.com/2016/7/21/12245562/donald-trump-new-york-times-interview-full-transcript
apcalc
(4,463 posts)He knows nothing, and doesn't care to learn.
wryter2000
(46,037 posts)And we all know how that presidency worked out.
ffr
(22,669 posts)Yes, we lost a lot of innocent lives right off the bat, changed the government's tax policy and set us on path to record $12T in debt by 2009, when the GAO forecast that Bill Clinton's tax policies would pay off then entire debt of the U.S. treasury by 2009 and we'd all have lower taxes since then, without the burden of trillions of dollars of public debt. And we had unfunded wars and entitlement programs that added to our debt. And we had an additional 2 million unqualified homeowners added to W's 2003 or 2004 home ownership program. And we had the deregulation of the financial markets and the market collapse of both them and the housing market, which caused trillions and trillions of dollars in losses to average Americans. And we had a war without end in Iraq that decapitated a functioning government that was by far more stable than how it is today. And we had the outing of at least one CIA operative for purely political reasons and hundreds of thousands of brave lives lost, maimed or injured unnecessarily in our preemptive war, without any idea of what to do about nation building or how to care for those injured when they returned.
I could go on, but I think that other than that, it wasn't that bad. Really!
Mister K
(450 posts)bjobotts
(9,141 posts)"...not only torture them, but kill their families too". Make no mistake he will blunder us into war.
No Vested Interest
(5,166 posts)And, yes, that is a distinct possibility.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)in an interview I saw on CNN, and I believe is also in the New Yorker saying Trump is intellectually lazy and has the attention span of only a few minutes. Probably has the attention span of a pre-schooler.
He said he couldn't get Trump to answer his questions without Trump just hopping around on any subject or tangent that occurred to him. He said he actually went to the publisher and quit in frustration, but then he found a way by asking Trump to let him listen in on his dealing and wheeling business calls where he was able to get the information about how Trump works.
ancianita
(36,023 posts)TryLogic
(1,722 posts)KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)pitting bureaucratic rivals against one another to see which one could out-do the next in brutality and savagery, meanwhile relying on a small circle of trusted family and friends to look out for his best interests.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)tclambert
(11,085 posts)At least Dubya read "The Pet Goat." Wait, I forget, he didn't get to finish that one. Something interrupted him.
napkinz
(17,199 posts)gratuitous
(82,849 posts)He just pops off with whatever sounds good at the moment, and there's no thought given to what it might take or how it's going to happen. That's for his underlings to take care of, and don't bother him with your problems, just make it happen. All that matters is his vision of what he wants to accomplish. If you're luckless enough to be in the position of keeping all these dishes spinning on the tops of poles, your job security is measured in minutes.
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)There's this:
RUMP: I dont want to tell you what Id do because I dont want Putin to know what Id do. I have a serious chance of becoming president and Im not like Obama, that every time they send some troops into Iraq or anyplace else, he has a news conference to announce it.
And this:
David, I have statisticians, and I know, like if I went to Pennsylvania, I say, Give me the statistics on what is going on with respect to manufacturing. Numbers 45, 55, 65, I have states that are so bad. New England.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)So that when everything doesn't work out just right, Trump can complain about that and then fire the underling. If you've seen "Swimming with Sharks," you get the gist of it.
Ilsa
(61,694 posts)He'll use the time for smearing, not discussing substantive issues. The average listener to see their IQ drop listening only to him and not Sec. Clinton.
lark
(23,091 posts)He's ignorant and doesn't care and won't change. He wants his VP to run things because he's too lazy, just wants to be the barn burner who blows up the structure. GW blew up the economy purposefully so his friends could steal our $$, Trump wants to blow it up so he can steal it all for himself and disappear into the sunset, laughing his ass off.
mgardener
(1,816 posts)Ask him how he will remove himself from his business empire if elected?
Who will run that?
Where are his tax returns? Did Mike Pence have to submit them to Trump? If so, then why can't we see Trumps?
Why would anybody support this orange buffoon?
tanyev
(42,550 posts)By making Trump Inc. the greatest company of all time. And the kids will handle the running of it and in their spare time serve as members of his cabinet. USA! USA!
Chicago1980
(1,968 posts)4lbs
(6,855 posts)n/t
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(48,994 posts)napkinz
(17,199 posts)Oneironaut
(5,492 posts)Corrupt to the core, values strength over principles (might = right), and wants to create an elite inner circle of yes-men. I imagine the two would get along quite well. On the other hand, the world will suffer (especially Americans). Trump is a dangerous sociopath who has values more like a dictator than a President.
nruthie
(466 posts)Oneironaut
(5,492 posts)I've met multiple people who worked with or talked to Trump or his kids. They never had anything good to say about any of them except Ivanka.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)Really doesn't give a damn about America, people who are not his family, effects of policy on real lives, the suffering of others or any of it.
He knows his wealth protects him, cushions him, privileges him.
His laziness is a sign of supreme, ice cold, indifference.