'Christian Post' breaks tradition to oppose Trump

[The Straight Story]

The outlet, founded in 2000, said it was making an exception to its rule "because Trump is exceptionally bad and claims to speak for and represent the interests of evangelicals.

Its senior editors encouraged readers to "back away" from the Republican presidential nominee. "We feel compelled by our moral responsibility to our readers to make clear that Donald Trump does not represent the interests of evangelicals and would be a dangerous leader for our country."

They note he has never repented sin or asked for forgiveness– a "non-negotiable" Christian activity– and conclude he is a chameleon-like "misogynist and philanderer" who "cannot possibly" deliver on his promises.


http://www.jpost.com/Breaking-News/Christian-Post-breaks-tradition-to-oppose-Trump-462085

[OldHippieChick]

1. I have no idea what their readership or following is, but

this cannot be good news for dTrumpf. They are not claiming he is not "born again" as Hillary has not claimed that either. But she has repented sin and asked for forgiveness. This could be "huge" if they have much of a following.

[Iliyah]

2. Say what?

[tallahasseedem]

3. I've never heard of them...

HOWEVER, any organization with a christian audience that breaks tradition to speak out against the Republican nominee is a pretty damn good thing!

[63splitwindow]

4. + 1000000

[Wednesdays]

5. This will surely create a rift among fundie Repugs

Because all during the convention on various media, delegate after delegate sang Rump's praises as "God's answer for the USA" and "Deep down, he is really a good Christian." I remember those interviews well because I could barely suppress my vomit reflex.