General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsStop drinking alcohol
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5792c2ede4b0d3568f83637e"But many epidemiologists agree that research confirms alcohol actually causes cancer,"...
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)Lol
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)No caffeine.
No protein.
No booze, or
Nicotine.
ms liberty
(8,552 posts)ErikJ
(6,335 posts)Nearly 6 percent of cancer deaths worldwide can be linked to alcohol, including in people who drink light to moderate amounts of alcohol.
From the link
Major Nikon
(36,818 posts)If things like smoking and other factors that increase the risk of cancer aren't factored out, then the correlative evidence doesn't tell you that much.
apcalc
(4,462 posts)Warpy
(111,124 posts)and even light to moderate drinking was studied and found problematic.
Alcohol is also a favorite social lubricant so I can't imagine that even a sane drug policy instead of the WOD would make much of a dent in the number of people who drink it.
RegexReader
(416 posts)solvent. Water is the first universal solvent. Alcohols are the second universal solvent.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Alcohol poisoning on the other hand........
RegexReader
(416 posts)RegexReader
(416 posts)Massive overdose can result in death.[100][101] The LD50 of caffeine in humans is dependent on individual sensitivity, but is estimated to be 150 to 200 milligrams per kilogram of body mass (75100 cups of coffee for a 70 kilogram adult).[102] A number of fatalities have been caused by overdoses of readily available powdered caffeine supplements, for which the estimated lethal amount is less than a tablespoon.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)I may have a drink once every six months, or so, if that often.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)Jemmons
(711 posts)Which means that there is not a lot of potential for becoming dependent. Those who get a big spike of endorphins are in much greater danger of getting into a bad habit.
?w=634
source: http://www.resourceaddiction.com/naltrexone-alcohol/
What Stewart is pointing to is the fact that some people are in risk for alcoholism exactly because they are more sensitive to alcohol: Their bodies will react to alcohol with a much larger effect on endorphin levels after drinking. This probably just a genetic quirk, but it this kind of sensitivity can have a big impact on the probability that someone will become addicted to alcohol.
Freddie
(9,256 posts)Drank plenty in college but never developed any tolerance. 3 beers I'm drunk. Then during 9 months of abstinence due to pregnancy I totally lost any desire to drink. My daughter is 30 so it's been a long time! I'll have a tablespoon of wine at Holy Communion twice a month.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)I hear cigarettes might be bad too, and crack cocaine.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)such is life!
Mz Pip
(27,430 posts)I've given up desserts. I've given up fried foods. I don't eat much meat. I eat lots of fresh fruit send vegetables. I keep my weight down. I move.
So now I shouldn't have my wine with dinner.
I'm not going to live forever. Something will take me out and if genetics are any indicator it won't be cancer. I'll stroke out at 90 like all my old female great aunts.
May I have another glass of Reisling please?
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)I refuse to give up one more thing for a life with no joy....
Margarita for me
LuvNewcastle
(16,834 posts)Sooner or later, everyone who lives eventually dies.
ileus
(15,396 posts)Nevernose
(13,081 posts)Because the answer, my friend, is a resounding no. I might pause here and there, so I assume the cancer will, too. That's how biology works, right?
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)Nevernose
(13,081 posts)Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)Bad stink.
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)cwydro
(51,308 posts)Still makes a mean martini.
And she can drink me under the table any day of the week.
Logical
(22,457 posts)HuckleB
(35,773 posts)tavernier
(12,368 posts)without a drink or a steak or a smoke or cookie or a kiss from a dog or a vacation in the Alps sniffing fumes from a tour bus?
Maybe 20 miserable years longer than me.
I give you your Depends and Ensure years. Gladly.
Mendocino
(7,480 posts)excessive drinker and smoker, died two years ago of throat, lung and brain cancer at the age of 57. Time from diagnosis to death was about 5 1/2 months. He suffered terribly.
Freddie
(9,256 posts)Is slowly dying of COPD after decades of smoking. On an oxygen tank 24/7 and pretty much can't leave the house as her lungs can't tolerate heat or cold. She's only 62.
Her moron husband (DH's brother) still smokes.
Aristus
(66,278 posts)Family history.
Grandfather: Lung cancer - (he smoked, so no surprise there.)
Father: Pancreatic cancer - (didn't smoke, drank in moderation, fitness enthusiast.)
If I give up alcohol, I won't live longer; it'll just seem longer...
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)is good for you?
The one thing, and pretty much the only one thing that is conclusively shown to cause cancer is smoking. And that causation is very strong.
All the other studies that link something or another with an increased risk of something, are pretty much correlation, rather than causation. And sometimes, even when the correlation is quite strong, it's an increase in an already very low chance of getting whatever disease is being looked at.
In the end, everything can be shown to be linked to some terrible something. And all of you who avoid various things to insure you won't get some awful disease, you're probably giving up something you'd enjoy for almost no improvement or lengthening of your life.
Me? I'm going to cheerfully drink as long as I can.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)"Relax. Don't worry. Have a homebrew."
-- Charlie Papzian
HipChick
(25,485 posts)Every fucking thing kills yer..
daleo
(21,317 posts)Which has an overall benefit.
milestogo
(16,829 posts)you should have it along with good cardiovascular health.
daleo
(21,317 posts)JI7
(89,239 posts)HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Still, people seem to need some excuse.
Either be ok with drinking and its side effects or not, but don't pretend you're getting benefits to make yourself feel better about it.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)hardluck
(637 posts)But I'm not supposed to drink beer?? That's crazy talk.
Lady Freedom Returns
(14,120 posts)Last edited Tue Jul 26, 2016, 01:45 AM - Edit history (1)
The lead will get me soon enough anyway.
malaise
(268,674 posts)where people do not drink alcohol, I'll think about it.
Major Nikon
(36,818 posts)malaise
(268,674 posts)Nah
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)On rare occasion I will have a beer with co-workers or a glass of wine with a meal, but that is it.
Monitoring my liver functions because of medications I am on and my numbers stay in the normal range when my alcohol consumption is next to nothing. Not.that I was a heavy drinker before this but cutting it way way down made a noticable difference.
SheriffBob
(552 posts)is classified as a toxin. However, so is most tap water
However, it does relieve stress a lot and stress is a huge factor in causing many different health problems.
"there' s a lot more old drunks than their are old doctors"
Vinca
(50,236 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Maeve
(42,269 posts)blogslut
(37,981 posts)Stellababy2
(12 posts)why not man
6chars
(3,967 posts)It is in a major journal, so that gives it credibility. On the other hand, the meta-analysis itself has some tempering features, e.g., rates for certain types of cancers that are higher in drinkers than non-drinkers, but where there is no difference in heavy drinkers and light drinkers (that is often a signal that there is correlation but not causation). After reading it closely, my sense is still that heavy drinking - as is well known already - is responsible for all sorts of deaths, while the impact of light drinking is close to nil and much of the statistical effects there are for light drinking might be due to lifestyle factors that go along with it but are not accounted for in the study.
Somebody get me a doctor. Somebody give me a shot.
daleo
(21,317 posts)I think the evidence shows that light drinking has some positive effects, but the stress is on "light". The tables get turned pretty quickly as consumption goes up.
Bad Thoughts
(2,514 posts)Two drinks per night for a man seems a bit much. 2 pints of beer (relatively week, not specialty) would get the average man close to the point of being impaired when driving.
Bad Thoughts
(2,514 posts)Let alone a general medical journal, whose author is also one of the journals associate editors, who works in a field that tends to deliver results with excessive alarm.
6chars
(3,967 posts)reduces even further the amount i will worry about it.
JHB
(37,153 posts)...is how it holds up over time.Let's check back on how well it's regarded in 5 or 10 years, when the follow-up work consists of papers more substantial than a press release.
DFW
(54,270 posts)I never started.
Throd
(7,208 posts)HuckleB
(35,773 posts)... are liking and freaking out about pseudoscience claiming problems with things like glyphosate.
It's astounding to see such massive disconnect at DU.
nolabels
(13,133 posts)I would basically lose my Job if was a drinker. My blood pressure shoots up like a rocket if i do and it needs to stay low so i can pass my DMV physical to keep my commercial drivers license which my employer requires me to have. And besides, about one can of beer will make me blow over my legal limit for driving which is .004.
That crap messes your health up in so many ways but at least it isn't illegal anymore. That compounding in prohibition was really stupid in retrospect.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Polluted air causes cancer, too.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)bluedigger
(17,085 posts)The life of an abstemious troll ill suits me.