General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsnytimes: Yes, Slaves Did Help Build the White House
But the first ladys assertion was met with derision and disbelief by some, who questioned whether it was true and said her choice to mention it amounted to an attempt to divide the country along racial lines.
There is little dispute among historians that slaves had a role in the building of the White House. According to the White House Historical Associations website, planners had initially intended to import workers from Europe but had trouble recruiting any, so they turned to African-American enslaved and free to provide the bulk of labor that built the White House, the United States Capitol, and other early government buildings.
The association said slaves had worked at the governments quarry in Aquia, Va., to cut the stone for the walls of the White House. The construction team included white laborers from Maryland and Virginia and immigrants from Ireland, Scotland and other parts of Europe, the association said.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/27/us/politics/michelle-obama-white-house-slavery.html
MichiganVote
(21,086 posts)Xipe Totec
(43,888 posts)ManiacJoe
(10,136 posts)StraightRazor
(260 posts)they just reported the facts is all.
The white-washing accusation is subjective - and tiring.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)So you are dramatically unaware of the definition of 'white-wash', eh? Tiring, indeed.
Xipe Totec
(43,888 posts)To whitewash is a metaphor meaning "to gloss over or cover up vices, crimes or scandals or to exonerate by means of a perfunctory investigation or through biased presentation of data".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitewashing_%28censorship%29
In this case, trying to minimize the fact that the White House was built with slave labor by pointing out the fact that "at least some of the labor force was not slaves and some wasn't even black".
Putting a light coat of white labor on a very dark project.
Clear now?
ManiacJoe
(10,136 posts)The statement at the slave labor was less than 100% of the labor pool is much more of an accurate statement than being a white wash. It would take a lot more than saying "some of the workers were not slaves" to be a white wash given that we all know that the vast majority of the labor were slaves.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)eleny
(46,166 posts)An instructive book by Jesse H. Holland.
I'd suggest it to anyone interested in history.