General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWTF is a Neo-Liberal?
Dr. Cornell West used this term on tonights Real Time with Bill Maher show.
This is how he defines our next president.
Whatizzit? Anyone? Bueller?
Why is this guy a thing?
At 61, am I a Paleo-Lib?
applegrove
(118,629 posts)Think Ireland before the financial meltdown or Reagan and Thatcher.
Is not a neolib.
This word must die!
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)Neoliberalism (or sometimes neo-liberalism)[1] refers primarily to the 20th century resurgence of 19th century ideas associated with laissez-faire economic liberalism.[2]: 7 These include extensive economic liberalization policies such as privatization, fiscal austerity, deregulation, free trade, and reductions in government spending in order to enhance the role of the private sector in the economy.[3][4][5][6][7][8][9] The implementation of neoliberal policies and the acceptance of neoliberal economic theories in the 1970s are seen by some academics as the root of financialization, with the financial crisis of 200708 as one of the ultimate results.[10][11][12][13][14]
The term has been used since 1938[15] but became more prevalent in its current meaning in the 1970s and '80s by scholars in a wide variety of social sciences[16] and critics.[17] Advocates of Free Market policies avoid the term "neoliberal".
and later in the same article:
United States[edit]
David Harvey uses the term neoliberalism to describe Lewis Powell's 1971 confidential memorandum to the US Chamber of Commerce.[56] A call to arms to the business community to counter criticism of the free enterprise system, it was a significant factor in the rise of conservative organizations and think-tanks which advocated for neoliberal policies, such as the Business Roundtable, The Heritage Foundation, The Cato Institute, Citizens for a Sound Economy, Accuracy in Academia and the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research. For Powell, universities were becoming an ideological battleground and recommended the establishment of an intellectual infrastructure to serve as a counterweight to the increasingly popular ideas of Ralph Nader and other opponents of big business.[58][59][60]
Neoliberalism gained prominence in the United States in 1981 with policies put into place by the Reagan Administration which included tax cuts, increased defense spending, financial deregulation and trade deficit expansion. Congress followed Reagan's basic proposal and cut federal income taxes across the board by 25% in 1981.[61][62]
During the 1990s, the Clinton Administration also embraced neoliberalism by supporting the passage of the North American Free Trade Agreement, continuing the deregulation of the financial sector through passage of the Commodity Futures Modernization Act and the repeal of the GlassSteagall Act, and implementing cuts to the welfare state through passage of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act.[62][63][64] The neoliberalism of the Clinton Administration differs from that of Reagan as the former purged it of neoconservative positions on militarism, family values, opposition to multiculturalism and neglect of ecological issues.[57]:50-1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoliberalism
ronnie624
(5,764 posts)You've posted more than 2000 messages here, in a period of more than four years, and you've never seen the term before?
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=376
SCVDem
(5,103 posts)I don't recall.
But. When applied to OUR candidate for president, it got my attention.
dembotoz
(16,799 posts)ask away
a discussion like this is good because sometimes meanings get distorted and it is good to redefine and recenter
Lord Magus
(1,999 posts)The latter is the definition used by Pinebaggers who claim Hillary is a neoliberal.
ronnie624
(5,764 posts)Political leaders are judged to be neoliberal, based on the economic policies they support.
Marr
(20,317 posts)I don't see the point in pretending the word is some kind of vague slur.
Lord Magus
(1,999 posts)Neoliberals support things like austerity and privatization. Neoliberals are fundamentally anti-Keynesian. Anybody who calls Hillary Clinton a neoliberal has no idea what the word actually means.
mdbl
(4,973 posts)Her speech resonated that she's left of the neolibs, but her husband was a big one!
mcar
(42,307 posts)He is not the nominee.
Response to mcar (Reply #28)
Post removed
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)Tom Kitten
(7,346 posts)61 is middle age, so I'd say Meso-Lib!
As far as I have it figured, neo-liberals are said to push for more deregulation & privatization, free trade, austerity, globalization, that sort of thing. And like a previous poster stated, minus the neo-con foreign craziness. It's a term I started hearing since the recession, comes from a left perspective.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)What are you, a 100?
From Wiki:
For women, 81 years. For men, 76 years.
LuvNewcastle
(16,844 posts)61 is definitely over the hill. I can say that because I'm almost 47 and will soon be over the hill.
OhioBlue
(5,126 posts)Essentially, more centrist, business-friendly dems that steer away from economic populism. It isn't an insult, it is a fact that there is a faction of Dems that lean this way. Al From founded the DLC and Bill and Hillary were both members.
It is my hope now that Hillary wins and adopts a more populist platform as President.
Warpy
(111,253 posts)where it isn't really left at all. Second, neoliberalism has been around long enough that most people here should be acquainted with the term. Wikipedia's got a pretty good discussion of it, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoliberalism
It's not a good thing, at all, unless you're in the top 0.1%, in which case it's the best thing ever.
SCVDem
(5,103 posts)Neo Con
Neo Lib
Neo Nazi
It appears to be the same old crap in a new wrapper.
geomon666
(7,512 posts)That's some good ice cream.
OhioBlue
(5,126 posts)Neo Liberal describes a movement within the Democratic party to move the party to a more centrist position on economic issues. Research the Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) and New Democrats. Bill Clinton was a chairman of the DLC and Hillary was a member while she was in the Senate. This isn't some slur by Dr. West. (btw - I am not defending the positions or things that he has said, but THIS thing that he said isn't something outrageous, he is stating a fact.)
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)People object to their brand being identified as not desireable. It's something to fight against. And if you can't win that fight you have to abandon your public brand. We saw that when the name change of the DLC into 3rd-Way took place.
It's pretty amazing how anti-DLC DU was for many years. Now when major players in that movement cycle toward seats within the executive branch, they do it under a different label, but one which can still be criticized and which has again made people unhappy about a brand label
But the important thing is it doesn't really matter what the definition of neo-liberal, or who those New Dems have been (ya know Al Gore was a DLC chair, too).
GaYellowDawg
(4,446 posts)But I think he's full of shit when it comes to President Obama and Sec. Clinton.
Hekate
(90,658 posts)justhanginon
(3,290 posts)auntpurl
(4,311 posts)Paladin
(28,254 posts)gollygee
(22,336 posts)Reagan, Margaret Thatcher, Donald Rumsfeld, there are lots of them. The issue is that HRC isn't one.
Hekate
(90,658 posts)oh, I don't know, like Third Way. I used to have some notion of what that might have meant back in 1995, but here at DU it was always said with a sneer, then a snarl, then with utter ferocity and dripping contempt. Before I myself actually got called a "Turd Wayer" I had it figured out. It no longer meant anything beyond "You shithead, I disagree with you."
Then, very abruptly toward the end of last year or the beginning of this one, the term disappeared at DU. But never fear, a handly replacement immediately appeared: Neo-liberal.
How do I know this is the replacement? It could be the sneer and the snarl. It could be the contempt.
Whatever it used to mean before it got here, it's pretty clear what it's being used for in DU discourse.
Cal Carpenter
(4,959 posts)It is an economics term, and it describes the prevailing economics of the western world (including, for the most part, the Dem econ platform).
Not everything can be filtered through an election-year partisan lens. At least, not if you want some minimal amount of intellectual honesty anyway.
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)Hekate
(90,658 posts)You are welcome
AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)It's a term the populist far left use to try to trick people into believing that there is no difference between the mainstream left and the mainstream right, and make the former look bad.
It's an invective, not a description; an attempt to attack rather than to describe.
Marr
(20,317 posts)It's a word with a distinct meaning, that's been used all around the globe for decades now to describe a fairly specific economic stance.
People who pretend otherwise just want to take the discussion of the policies the word describes off the table. Pretending the word 'neoliberal' is some empty epithet is just dishonest.
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)Yes, Neoliberalism did once refer to the ideas of people like Rand, Hayek and Friedmann.
But it's now usually used to refer to people who disagree strongly with those ideas, by people who couldn't even tell you what those ideas were, and has become a - largely meaningless - invective.
Marr
(20,317 posts)There are people who use the word as an empty invective, of course. There are people who use the word "Polish" as an empty invective. It doesn't mean word is meaningless, or that people who use it don't know what it means.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)auntpurl
(4,311 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)SCVDem
(5,103 posts)For the responses and links.
DU at its best when it can be an educational forum.
As for Dr. West? I guess he's an acquired taste. He is a touch overwhelming for me.
Thanks again!
Grey Lemercier
(1,429 posts)http://www.mediaite.com/tv/cornel-west-on-cnn-obama-is-americas-first-nggerized-president/
African-American academic Cornel West said on CNN that President Barack Obama was the countrys first niggerized president, because he was too scared to address white supremacy.
Look, you cant talk about wealth inequality, you cant talk about decrepit education, you cant talk about massive unemployment and underemployment, and you cant talk about drones being dropped on people in other parts of the world without talking about white supremacy, and its ways in which it operates, he said.
It doesnt have to be overt, the president is right about that, West continued. But too many black people are niggerized. I would say the first black president has become the first niggerized black president.
What do you mean by that? asked dismayed host Poppy Harlow.
A niggerized black person is a black person who is afraid and scared and intimidated when it comes to putting a spotlight on white supremacy and fighting against white supremacy, West responded. We know hes president of all America, but white supremacy is as American as cherry pie! Were talking about moral issues, spiritual issues!
sickening
Rex
(65,616 posts)A lot of people with Dr. in front of their names are slinging mud at our nominee. Dr. West is one of them. You can look at HRC voting record while she was a Senator and look at her policy while she was SoS, it is solid liberal.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Doing just a little research shows HRC is a solid liberal. Libertarians are neo-liberal. The idiots that wanted the BREXIT are neo-liberal.
It just means someone that want unfettered trade with almost no restrictions, government out of everything, privatize everything and let that good old "invisible hand" sort out the details.
It is kinda like Reagnomics.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)Exilednight
(9,359 posts)There is a major flaw with this theory, markets have moral limits.
jamese777
(546 posts)JHB
(37,158 posts)...and not have heard this term?