Sun Jul 31, 2016, 03:00 AM

Jnclr89 (128 posts)

IMO the Meliania Trump nudes are so fake

I look at a lot of celeb nude fakes. And this one OK, but is totally fake. I give it a D+

27 replies, 4193 views

Thread info Bookmark this thread Trash this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

27 replies	Author	Time	Post
IMO the Meliania Trump nudes are so fake (Original post)	Jnclr89	Jul 2016	OP
No, they aren't fake, they just aren't new. These have been making the rounds for the past year.	MADem	Jul 2016	#1
Since you have 130,000k more posts than me	Jnclr89	Jul 2016	#3
It has nothing to do with post count. Google will show you that these aren't new. nt	MADem	Jul 2016	#9
Don't you dare waltz in here and start in on MADem.	kestrel91316	Jul 2016	#26
Boy, that's where you go when someone disagrees?	nolabear	Jul 2016	#27
Okey-dokey then!	NanceGreggs	Jul 2016	#2
they're real, and they're old news.	Warren DeMontague	Jul 2016	#4
As an internet porn lover	Jnclr89	Jul 2016	#5
like I said, they've been around -and identified as her- for a while.	Warren DeMontague	Jul 2016	#6
This is performance art, right? nt	MrScorpio	Jul 2016	#8
Sure looks that way.	JNelson6563	Jul 2016	#13
It's a simple matter of assembling various body parts. For example...	pinboy3niner	Jul 2016	#14
Poe's Law. nt	Tommy_Carcetti	Jul 2016	#19
The NY Post is a Murdoch right wing paper. Whether fake or not it's a RW problem.	Bernardo de La Paz	Jul 2016	#12
Okay, I'll bite.	sofa king	Jul 2016	#7
Seriously ?	treestar	Jul 2016	#24
Well, you got one thing right...	MrScorpio	Jul 2016	#10
they're real	wheniwasincongress	Jul 2016	#11
They may be real	grubbs	Jul 2016	#15
I think you may have just claimed to have 'photographic' memory!	HereSince1628	Jul 2016	#16
Ha!	grubbs	Jul 2016	#17
Don't know. Don't care.	Tommy_Carcetti	Jul 2016	#18
The only thing worth talk about re: these pics	auntpurl	Jul 2016	#20
She looks more like a woman that might be first lady	avebury	Jul 2016	#21
You would have saved yourself the embarrassment of being wrong with a little work	Tempest	Jul 2016	#22
+1	treestar	Jul 2016	#23
"I look at a lot of celeb nude fakes."	Adrahil	Jul 2016	#25

Response to Jnclr89 (Original post)

Sun Jul 31, 2016, 03:03 AM

MADem (135,425 posts)

1. No, they aren't fake, they just aren't new. These have been making the rounds for the past year.

No one cares.

She's a mail order bride. She traded a self-actualized and fun life for what she believed was financial security. I suppose she hopes he'll die soon. More so if he's in debt up to his orange ass to the Russian mafia...

Reply to this post

Response to MADem (Reply #1)

Sun Jul 31, 2016, 03:10 AM

Jnclr89 (128 posts)

3. Since you have 130,000k more posts than me

I must be wrong and you are right. congrats.

Reply to this post

Response to Jnclr89 (Reply #3)

Sun Jul 31, 2016, 03:52 AM

MADem (135,425 posts)

9. It has nothing to do with post count. Google will show you that these aren't new. nt

Reply to this post

Response to Jnclr89 (Reply #3)

Sun Jul 31, 2016, 12:57 PM

kestrel91316 (51,666 posts)

26. Don't you dare waltz in here and start in on MADem.

Grow up.

Reply to this post

Response to Jnclr89 (Reply #3)

Sun Jul 31, 2016, 01:16 PM

nolabear (39,625 posts)

27. Boy, that's where you go when someone disagrees?

Support your argument, ask for more info, do SOMETHING to add to DU.

Reply to this post

Response to Jnclr89 (Original post)

Sun Jul 31, 2016, 03:03 AM

NanceGreggs (27,038 posts)

2. Okey-dokey then!

Reply to this post

Response to Jnclr89 (Original post)

Sun Jul 31, 2016, 03:13 AM

Warren DeMontague (80,708 posts)

4. they're real, and they're old news.

bottom line, though, essentially the only people who wet themselves with panic and outrage over things like consensually taken pictures of naked adults are the Christian fundamentalists in the base of the GOP, so really who cares? Let them sort it out.

Reply to this post

Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #4)

Sun Jul 31, 2016, 03:21 AM

Jnclr89 (128 posts)

5. As an internet porn lover

I tell you these are all fake. Including the new NYPost pics. We in the porn world hold integrity at a high standard. Not political.

Reply to this post

Response to Jnclr89 (Reply #5)

Sun Jul 31, 2016, 03:22 AM

Warren DeMontague (80,708 posts)

6. like I said, they've been around -and identified as her- for a while.

so if someone faked em, they faked em a while ago.

Reply to this post

Response to Jnclr89 (Reply #5)

Sun Jul 31, 2016, 03:51 AM

MrScorpio (73,332 posts)

8. This is performance art, right? nt

Reply to this post

Response to MrScorpio (Reply #8)

Sun Jul 31, 2016, 04:51 AM

JNelson6563 (28,147 posts)

13. Sure looks that way.

Not very well done at that.

Reply to this post

Response to MrScorpio (Reply #8)

Sun Jul 31, 2016, 04:59 AM

pinboy3niner (53,339 posts)

14. It's a simple matter of assembling various body parts. For example...

You want a toe? I can get you a toe.

Reply to this post

Response to MrScorpio (Reply #8)

Sun Jul 31, 2016, 07:34 AM

Tommy_Carcetti (41,284 posts)

19. Poe's Law. nt

Reply to this post

Response to Jnclr89 (Reply #5)

Sun Jul 31, 2016, 04:15 AM

Bernardo de La Paz (41,742 posts)

12. The NY Post is a Murdoch right wing paper. Whether fake or not it's a RW problem.

Democrats need not get involved.

If you have "high porn standards", debate the issue on some porn forums.

DU is probably not the best place to debate porn standards, especially if you say it is "not political".

Reply to this post

Response to Jnclr89 (Original post)

Sun Jul 31, 2016, 03:25 AM

sofa king (10,857 posts)

7. Okay, I'll bite.

Can you give us a few pointers on what, precisely, makes these pictures appear fake to you? Is there something in particular that one can see when a picture if Photoshopped or otherwise not real?

Reply to this post

Response to sofa king (Reply #7)

Sun Jul 31, 2016, 12:24 PM

treestar (79,869 posts)

24. Seriously ?

The skin is plastic looking.

Reply to this post

Response to Jnclr89 (Original post)

Sun Jul 31, 2016, 03:53 AM

MrScorpio (73,332 posts)

10. Well, you got one thing right...

Reply to this post

Response to Jnclr89 (Original post)

Sun Jul 31, 2016, 04:07 AM

wheniwasincongress (1,307 posts)

11. they're real

they've been floating around for years, the article has the photographer's name and comments.

Reply to this post

Response to Jnclr89 (Original post)

Sun Jul 31, 2016, 05:53 AM

grubbs (356 posts)

15. They may be real

but I saw that Pamela Anderson did the same poses in the same order in the same setting 8 years before meliania did. Totally true story. Believe me.

Reply to this post

Response to grubbs (Reply #15)

Sun Jul 31, 2016, 06:43 AM

HereSince1628 (36,063 posts)

16. I think you may have just claimed to have 'photographic' memory!

and it lasts at least 8 years.

Reply to this post

Response to HereSince1628 (Reply #16)

Sun Jul 31, 2016, 07:19 AM

grubbs (356 posts)

17. Ha!

Reply to this post

Response to Jnclr89 (Original post)

Sun Jul 31, 2016, 07:34 AM

Tommy_Carcetti (41,284 posts)

18. Don't know. Don't care.

Melania strikes me as a shallow, materialistic person who had to resort to stealing the First Lady's speech, but it's hardly the biggest issue in this campaign.

Reply to this post

Response to Jnclr89 (Original post)

Sun Jul 31, 2016, 07:37 AM

auntpurl (4,311 posts)

20. The only thing worth talk about re: these pics

is that they were released as a DELIBERATE DISTRACTION from the Khan story, which has so much traction that it could be the seed that leads to the destruction of Trump's campaign.

Reply to this post

Response to Jnclr89 (Original post)

Sun Jul 31, 2016, 07:41 AM

avebury (10,702 posts)