Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,560 posts)
Tue Aug 23, 2016, 03:01 PM Aug 2016

From today's LA Times...a psychiatrist's view of Trump.

Because of Donald Trump’s unusual public conduct, legions of armchair analysts have wondered aloud about his mental health. A former dean of Harvard Medical School tweeted that Trump “defines” narcissistic personality disorder. New York Times columnist David Brooks has said the GOP nominee “appears haunted by multiple personality disorders.” Entrepreneur Mark Cuban was cruder, calling Trump “batshit crazy.” Trump’s coauthor for “The Art of the Deal,” Tony Schwartz, labeled him a “sociopath.” Washington Post columnist Kathleen Parker found Trump’s behavior reminiscent of a brain injury.

As a psychiatrist, I have frequently encountered questions about Trump’s mental status in my daily life. A new neighbor asked me what I thought of him. A medical student wondered, would I diagnose him with a mental illness? On a recent phone call, my mother was more specific: —“Is he a narcissist or what?!”
The lessons I learned in kindergarten — not in medical school and years of psychiatric practice — are what tell me that Trump is unfit for the job.

I’m not supposed to answer that question. To underline that point, the American Psychiatric Assn. issued a statement this month reminding its physician members, myself included, to avoid psychoanalyzing the presidential candidates.

That ethical standard has been in place for decades. In 1964, thousands of psychiatrists, in response to a magazine survey, openly questioned then-GOP nominee Barry Goldwater’s fitness for White House duty. Several psychiatrists offered specific diagnoses. The fact that so many psychiatrists were willing to casually diagnose a person they'd never met embarrassed the profession and led to the codification of the so-called Goldwater Rule — no professional opinions on people we have not personally examined.


The rest at the link: http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-goldenberg-trump-mental-health-20160823-snap-story.html



4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
From today's LA Times...a psychiatrist's view of Trump. (Original Post) CaliforniaPeggy Aug 2016 OP
When it's bad FigTree Aug 2016 #1
Great article treestar Aug 2016 #2
Is being an asshole a mental condition? world wide wally Aug 2016 #3
Worth a read Sanity Claws Aug 2016 #4

FigTree

(347 posts)
1. When it's bad
Tue Aug 23, 2016, 03:22 PM
Aug 2016

it's always "psychoanalyzing".
However, although there might be a few psychiatrist psychoanalysts left out there, thanks to the tireless efforts of the APA, diagnosis is now based on objective criteria. There are about 7 of such criteria in the DSM4 and even less in the DSM5. When one objectifies and standardizes diagnoses in this way, one is logically entitled to such questions.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
2. Great article
Tue Aug 23, 2016, 03:27 PM
Aug 2016

Donald does not have to have a mental illness to be considered unfit. He already just is, by his regular personality. Love use of the word regarding Donald's behavior: "Indecorous." Donald is crude and bigoted and that doesn't require mental illness.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»From today's LA Times...a...