Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFrom today's LA Times...a psychiatrist's view of Trump.
Because of Donald Trumps unusual public conduct, legions of armchair analysts have wondered aloud about his mental health. A former dean of Harvard Medical School tweeted that Trump defines narcissistic personality disorder. New York Times columnist David Brooks has said the GOP nominee appears haunted by multiple personality disorders. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban was cruder, calling Trump batshit crazy. Trumps coauthor for The Art of the Deal, Tony Schwartz, labeled him a sociopath. Washington Post columnist Kathleen Parker found Trumps behavior reminiscent of a brain injury.As a psychiatrist, I have frequently encountered questions about Trumps mental status in my daily life. A new neighbor asked me what I thought of him. A medical student wondered, would I diagnose him with a mental illness? On a recent phone call, my mother was more specific: Is he a narcissist or what?!
The lessons I learned in kindergarten not in medical school and years of psychiatric practice are what tell me that Trump is unfit for the job.
Im not supposed to answer that question. To underline that point, the American Psychiatric Assn. issued a statement this month reminding its physician members, myself included, to avoid psychoanalyzing the presidential candidates.
That ethical standard has been in place for decades. In 1964, thousands of psychiatrists, in response to a magazine survey, openly questioned then-GOP nominee Barry Goldwaters fitness for White House duty. Several psychiatrists offered specific diagnoses. The fact that so many psychiatrists were willing to casually diagnose a person they'd never met embarrassed the profession and led to the codification of the so-called Goldwater Rule no professional opinions on people we have not personally examined.
The rest at the link: http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-goldenberg-trump-mental-health-20160823-snap-story.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1396 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
From today's LA Times...a psychiatrist's view of Trump. (Original Post)
CaliforniaPeggy
Aug 2016
OP
FigTree
(347 posts)1. When it's bad
it's always "psychoanalyzing".
However, although there might be a few psychiatrist psychoanalysts left out there, thanks to the tireless efforts of the APA, diagnosis is now based on objective criteria. There are about 7 of such criteria in the DSM4 and even less in the DSM5. When one objectifies and standardizes diagnoses in this way, one is logically entitled to such questions.
treestar
(82,383 posts)2. Great article
Donald does not have to have a mental illness to be considered unfit. He already just is, by his regular personality. Love use of the word regarding Donald's behavior: "Indecorous." Donald is crude and bigoted and that doesn't require mental illness.
world wide wally
(21,739 posts)3. Is being an asshole a mental condition?
Sanity Claws
(21,846 posts)4. Worth a read
Shows a way of answering the question without using labels.