Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(111,912 posts)
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 01:51 AM Sep 2016

US court upholds ban on gun sales to marijuana card holders

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — A federal ban on the sale of guns to medical marijuana card holders does not violate the Second Amendment, a federal appeals court said Wednesday.

The ruling by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals applies to the nine Western states that fall under the court's jurisdiction, including California, Washington and Oregon.

It came in a lawsuit filed by S. Rowan Wilson, a Nevada woman who said she tried to buy a firearm for self-defense in 2011 after obtaining a medical marijuana card. The gun store refused, citing the federal rule banning the sale of firearms to illegal drug users.

Marijuana remains illegal under federal law.

Read more: http://hosted2.ap.org/AKKEN/00873362e3ae4101a4238b054d709f4d/Article_2016-08-31-US--Medical%20Marijuana-Guns/id-7a1ecd1df7d44aa8be0504ea5172edf5

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
US court upholds ban on gun sales to marijuana card holders (Original Post) TexasTowelie Sep 2016 OP
So for pot smokers the right to bear arms does not apply? Lint Head Sep 2016 #1
I guess that it could be that the judges TexasTowelie Sep 2016 #2
I'm sure the NRA will be all over this - right? right? (nt) Locrian Sep 2016 #5
Common sense is rare it seems. ScepticD Sep 2016 #3
I worked in a PD for over 15 years. We never once had a violent arrest due to marijuana use. appleannie1 Sep 2016 #4
I agree Lee-Lee Sep 2016 #6
but hey, you can take guns into bars! Javaman Sep 2016 #7

Lint Head

(15,064 posts)
1. So for pot smokers the right to bear arms does not apply?
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 02:47 AM
Sep 2016

What about those alcohol users? Alcohol legal = right to bear arms. Pot illegal = no right to bear arms. I'd rather someone who smoked a J shoot at me than a drunk.

TexasTowelie

(111,912 posts)
2. I guess that it could be that the judges
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 02:55 AM
Sep 2016

think that the shooter will be more likely to miss if they are drunk rather than high so that the drunks are less threatening.

ScepticD

(13 posts)
3. Common sense is rare it seems.
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 03:16 AM
Sep 2016

It's funny that 420 blazing people are seen as "high risk" when it comes to gun violence.
Drugs are bad, hmmmkay. Alcohol is fine!

Only in 'Murica

appleannie1

(5,060 posts)
4. I worked in a PD for over 15 years. We never once had a violent arrest due to marijuana use.
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 03:35 AM
Sep 2016

However, we had almost daily violent arrests due to alcohol. If they are going to ban guns, it should be for anyone that have had any type of arrest due to alcohol, not medical marijuana.

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
6. I agree
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 07:00 AM
Sep 2016

But the law is written as it is written, and users of illegal drugs are prohibited under it. So until that is changed or the Federal prohibition on marijuana goes away it is what it is.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»US court upholds ban on g...