Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

anamandujano

(7,004 posts)
1. Why does the gov't make it so difficult for someone with a critically important job
Fri Sep 2, 2016, 04:04 PM
Sep 2016

to be able to communicate and know that everything is secure? Why not issue a secure server with the job?

Maybe I'm not understanding the situation. Could someone explain it to me.

I read elsewhere that she asked for a secure server when taking on the job and was denied. Then she did the best she could. What am I missing?

pamela

(3,469 posts)
2. That's what I don't understand.
Fri Sep 2, 2016, 04:26 PM
Sep 2016

I think what this whole thing really highlights is how seriously deficient our government is tech-wise. I always pictured the Secretary of State entering her office the first day and being handed a a highly secure smartphone that isn't even on the market yet and maybe a shoe phone. (I thought those brooches Hillary and Albright always wore we're probably tech devices with capabilities we could only imagine.) As for her home, I pictured a mini-situation room set up by some of the top techies in the business and so secure that any government business could be conducted without the SoS having to give it a second thought.

Ok, I'm kidding about the shoe phone and brooches but seriously, every tech story out of the government sounds like they are behind the times when I honestly thought they'd have state of the art tech and a whole team to set it up and advise the SoS, President, V.P, etc. There never should have been a question about what she would use because there should have been a secure set-up ready to go that met both her personal and professional needs at home, in the office and on-the-go.

Response to anamandujano (Reply #1)

okaawhatever

(9,461 posts)
6. IIRC the issue is the timing.He admits to the email conversation, but that was months after Clinton
Fri Sep 2, 2016, 08:56 PM
Sep 2016

set up her private email. Clinton claimed she talked to Powell about it during a dinner shortly after she was appointed. Powell didn't remember that dinner.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Colin Powell emailed Hill...