Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Lint Head

(15,064 posts)
Wed Sep 7, 2016, 05:42 PM Sep 2016

So a Russian jet comes within 10 feet of our military.

What should our response be? You know the Huge Pumpkin will say something about it tonight at the military town hall.

A Russian fighter jet flew within 10 feet of a U.S. Navy surveillance aircraft, in what American officials called an unsafe intercept over the Black Sea, the Pentagon said Wednesday.

https://www.navytimes.com/articles/reports-russian-fighter-jet-came-within-10-feet-of-us-navy-poseidon
38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So a Russian jet comes within 10 feet of our military. (Original Post) Lint Head Sep 2016 OP
That is the decision of the military in chain of command. gordianot Sep 2016 #1
It's kind of obvious that it would be left up to the military. Lint Head Sep 2016 #2
That US plane knows when another plane has their weapons system armed. tonyt53 Sep 2016 #3
Why does America believe it owns the world's oceans and seas malaise Sep 2016 #4
+1 nt chknltl Sep 2016 #5
The US can fly over international waters like any other country.. EX500rider Sep 2016 #6
What a strange reply sharp_stick Sep 2016 #10
Interesting Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2016 #13
I see what you did GulfCoast66 Sep 2016 #22
Who? Me? Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2016 #24
What does that have to due with reckless endangerment hack89 Sep 2016 #16
Who is trying to deny sarisataka Sep 2016 #17
FFS is correct GulfCoast66 Sep 2016 #21
Can it have a 10 foot clearance? Renew Deal Sep 2016 #29
Umm...there are clear rules/conventions in place citood Sep 2016 #32
Do you ever miss an opportunity to whine about the US? name not needed Sep 2016 #33
The Pentagon would never disseminate propaganda about something like this. ronnie624 Sep 2016 #36
Laugh. (n/t) Iggo Sep 2016 #7
It's not unusual. I've done it. trof Sep 2016 #8
Wow. Interesting. Now THAT would be a memory to keep. Lint Head Sep 2016 #9
Oh yeah. The 60s were 'interesting times'. trof Sep 2016 #11
We had a song about the F-84. trof Sep 2016 #15
I hope you write your memories down. Lint Head Sep 2016 #37
Wow! GulfCoast66 Sep 2016 #26
move over 10 feet... ileus Sep 2016 #12
Give 'em the finger! Brother Buzz Sep 2016 #14
Aren't our guys and theirs always dicking with each other this way? Gidney N Cloyd Sep 2016 #18
Too close. EX500rider Sep 2016 #20
How close is considered international incident close? Gidney N Cloyd Sep 2016 #23
Most the pics I can find of western intercepts show about this: EX500rider Sep 2016 #25
I never get tired of looking at those wicked cool contra-rotating propellers Brother Buzz Sep 2016 #30
That photo sums up the arms race with the USSR GulfCoast66 Sep 2016 #31
The Fighter Is A ozone82 Sep 2016 #34
I'm not 100% sure sarisataka Sep 2016 #35
Take a Polaroid. AngryAmish Sep 2016 #19
Watch the birdie Brother Buzz Sep 2016 #28
Sounds like that scene from Top Gun upaloopa Sep 2016 #27
Nothing unusual HerrKarlMarx Sep 2016 #38

Lint Head

(15,064 posts)
2. It's kind of obvious that it would be left up to the military.
Wed Sep 7, 2016, 05:48 PM
Sep 2016

It's also obvious Trump has no clue about anything much less the military. I'm not second guessing. Just curious as to opinions.

 

tonyt53

(5,737 posts)
3. That US plane knows when another plane has their weapons system armed.
Wed Sep 7, 2016, 05:48 PM
Sep 2016

The problem is how close they came, not whether they would fire or not.

EX500rider

(10,835 posts)
6. The US can fly over international waters like any other country..
Wed Sep 7, 2016, 06:06 PM
Sep 2016

...are you under the impression that Russian military planes don't fly off US airspace sometimes?

And when they do US fighters intercept them in a professional and safe manner.

sharp_stick

(14,400 posts)
10. What a strange reply
Wed Sep 7, 2016, 06:36 PM
Sep 2016

I guess it's cool if a US plane buzzes a couple of Soviet, oops Russian,aircraft?

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
13. Interesting
Wed Sep 7, 2016, 06:43 PM
Sep 2016

Do your sympathies for Russia trump the US or does your resentment of the US trump Russian recklessness?

hack89

(39,171 posts)
16. What does that have to due with reckless endangerment
Wed Sep 7, 2016, 06:48 PM
Sep 2016

Of US pilots? Are you saying Russia was justified?

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
21. FFS is correct
Wed Sep 7, 2016, 07:39 PM
Sep 2016

So we should abandon the principle of freedom of the seas?

And of course, this incident is totally the fault of the US, harassing those poor innocent Russians.

name not needed

(11,660 posts)
33. Do you ever miss an opportunity to whine about the US?
Wed Sep 7, 2016, 08:23 PM
Sep 2016

An American so much as farts overseas and you're the first to grab a pitchfork.

ronnie624

(5,764 posts)
36. The Pentagon would never disseminate propaganda about something like this.
Wed Sep 7, 2016, 09:11 PM
Sep 2016

You should be ashamed for expressing skepticism. Don't you love the flag and the national anthem?

trof

(54,256 posts)
8. It's not unusual. I've done it.
Wed Sep 7, 2016, 06:23 PM
Sep 2016

I buzzed and harassed a Russian trawler (spy ship) off the coast of Puerto Rico, under orders to do so, during a joint military exercise (Clove Hitch III? I think.).
I was in an RF-84 and crossed their decks at 10 feet and 350 knots for an hour.
Fun.

trof

(54,256 posts)
15. We had a song about the F-84.
Wed Sep 7, 2016, 06:46 PM
Sep 2016

Don't give me a F-84
She's just a ground loving whore.
She'll moan and she'll wheeze,
and head straight for the trees,
Don't give me a F-84

The 84 was notoriously underpowered.
Take off rolls were L O N G.

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
26. Wow!
Wed Sep 7, 2016, 07:51 PM
Sep 2016

It must have been a blast to have been a young man and a fighter pilot. If it were me, I would have been out of control with the ladies. Which is why I was not a military pilot. No discipline when I was young.

Serious question though; would you have been ordered to do so to a Soviet Destroyer? Or any armed Soviet or Russian warship?

Because while I am a liberal, I am an FDR liberal and support a strong US military. I really do not want a Russian Warplane flying 10 feet above the deck of an American Warship. That seems too much a risk for our sailors.

What is you opinion of telling the Russians, privately and thru secure diplomacy, that if one of their plane comes within, say, 20 meters or one of our ships we are going to shoot it down?

Is that reasonable, or is buzzing other nations warships that closely common practice? To me it seem that if you let a competing powers planes too close you are running a risk. But I will be first to admit I am an idiot when it comes to this issue.

Have a nice evening.

EX500rider

(10,835 posts)
20. Too close.
Wed Sep 7, 2016, 07:38 PM
Sep 2016

We prefer not to have another incident like when the Chinese fighter plane rammed a US military plane.

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
31. That photo sums up the arms race with the USSR
Wed Sep 7, 2016, 08:02 PM
Sep 2016

Someone please correct me if I am wrong, but I thinking that is not a US interceptor? Maybe a Mirage or one of the Nordic countries fighters. Regardless, this photo says so much about the difference in the military capability of the West and the Russians. Although this photo seems to be from Soviet times.

The plane it is 'escorting' is pretty much a jazzed up B-29 which we developed in WW2. The Soviets got their hand on some of them and pretty much copied them forever.

Again, if I am wrong, let me know. But I just looked at B-29's online and it looks like a carbon copy.

sarisataka

(18,598 posts)
35. I'm not 100% sure
Wed Sep 7, 2016, 08:50 PM
Sep 2016

But I think it is an RAF Eurofighter Typhoon.

The Russian plane is a Tupolev Tu-95. It came into service in 1956, a year after the B-52. Russia still has 50+ in service.

Although there are significant differences, it does trace its lineage to reverse engineered B-29s.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-95

 

HerrKarlMarx

(37 posts)
38. Nothing unusual
Wed Sep 7, 2016, 09:42 PM
Sep 2016

During the Cold War, Western and Soviet assets 'intercepted' each other like this all the time. American F4s and F15s meeting Soviet TU95s happened over Alaska on a standard basis.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So a Russian jet comes wi...