General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThese Three Disastrous Statements By Trump Tonight Should DOMINATE The News Cycle!
US Military Generals Have Been Reduced To RubbleIntelligence Agency Briefers Told Me They Are Unhappy With President Obama
Sexual Assault In the Military "A Problem" But Not Unexpected with Men & Women Together
Johnny2X2X
(19,060 posts)How about his voracious defense of Putin.
napkinz
(17,199 posts)And Hillary is hitting him on it at her press conference.
SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)napkinz
(17,199 posts)Satch59
(1,353 posts)Hillary was level headed and Matt interrupted her way too much...
Trump is coming off as a no nothing insulting USA prick... He's really awful...
Good choice of the 3 highlights...amazingly telling of his absolute non qualifications to be President!!!
napkinz
(17,199 posts)He said, "Trump, President. Hillary, Jail."
Jeffersons Ghost
(15,235 posts)stopbush
(24,396 posts)He is an absolute buffoon.
This election season has been a stinging indictment of our lazy, stupid media.
world wide wally
(21,741 posts)napkinz
(17,199 posts)stopbush
(24,396 posts)I live about 5 miles from his place in Irvine and I can smell him from here.
napkinz
(17,199 posts)stopbush
(24,396 posts)napkinz
(17,199 posts)are the MSM living in an alternate universe???????
wordpix
(18,652 posts)I see he's changed his tune
napkinz
(17,199 posts)is going to win the presidency.
stopbush
(24,396 posts)Designate one or two publicly visible Rs to be "skeptical" about a RW politician or policy, then watch in amazement as they are miraculously "won over" by the politician/policy at a later date.
Hewitt was just one of the designated skeptics for 2016. He was never really anti-Trump. He was playing his assigned role.
napkinz
(17,199 posts)anamandujano
(7,004 posts)They will conclude they were not lazy, stupid or bought and paid for Repuke shills.
napkinz
(17,199 posts)They weren't reporting, they were cheerleading.
It was shameful.
True Dough
(17,303 posts)"To the victor goes the spoils."
The moron's idea of foreign policy is as much as a gong show as everything else he advocates.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,412 posts)said that the Iraq War of being all about taking Iraq's oil and were accused of being paranoid/hyperbolic? Well, now we now have a Presidential candidate pretty much saying that that taking Iraq's oil (and, by extension, anybody's) would have been/would be justifiable. Why THIS would not immediately disqualify him as a Presidential candidate is beyond me.
onecaliberal
(32,840 posts)Will still support him.
napkinz
(17,199 posts)the nuclear codes but still prefer him over Hillary.
onecaliberal
(32,840 posts)TipTok
(2,474 posts)Most of my military circle is voting for Johnson with a few rabid Trump fans.
Haven't found an overt Hillary fan yet.
YMMV...
napkinz
(17,199 posts)One was for Stein. A couple were for Clinton, and the rest of them were for Trump.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)holding back when they can "win" with force.
Yes, they can "win" a place like Fallujah or Anbar Province but unless the US commits 10's of thousands of troops in each place we "win," we cannot hold these places.
It's like spinning out democratic votes. He's great, really, really great!
applegrove
(118,631 posts)napkinz
(17,199 posts)wordpix
(18,652 posts)Must check twitter.
Update: yes, there is #taketheoil and looks like it's trending.
Donald has a great way of wording things; he makes it easy for hashtag trends.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)snip: It used to be, to the victor belong the spoils, Mr.Trump said. snip
But Laurie Blank, director of the International Humanitarian Law Clinic at Emory University School of Law, said Mr. Trumps proposal would be a violation of the fourth Geneva Convention, as well as international agreements made at the Hague Conventions in 1899 and 1907.
Under the fourth Geneva Convention, when you are an occupying power, you are a caretaker, you are administering the territory, Ms. Blank said. The idea is to keep it as close to status quo as possible and give it back. Its not yours to do with it what you want.
She also said that because Iraq is a sovereign nation, the U.S. cant simply take its natural resources.
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)napkinz
(17,199 posts)lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)brush
(53,771 posts)He's not just a douche bag, he's an imperialist douche bag.
napkinz
(17,199 posts)By TIERNEY SNEED
September 7, 2016
To the victor goes the oil!
That was the theme of Donald Trump's master plan for how he would keep the Middle East from reigniting after he swiftly dispatches the Islamic State as president.
Asked at the NBC News' Commander-In-Chief forum about he planned to keep the Islamic State out of Iraq once he defeated them, Trump returned to his oft-recited call for the U.S. to "take the oil" from Iraq, and even offered a few details how he would go about it as President.
"If we had taken the oil, you wouldn't have ISIS. ISIS formed with the power and wealth of that oil," Trump claimed.
Pressed to explained exactly how the U.S. should take the oil, Trump said, "You would leave a certain group behind and take various sections where they have the oil."
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/trump-take-the-oil
Stonepounder
(4,033 posts)"Take the oil" How? Where is the infrastructure? How do you get the oil from the interior of a country where you just have a 'certain group' and then you 'take various sections' and ...?
The guy has absolutely NO specifics about anything and the media just lets him slide with these nonsense statements and 'the crowd goes wild'.
My country tis dying.... <sigh>
napkinz
(17,199 posts)Matt had no business moderating that forum.
NBC should have chosen Joy Reid!
wordpix
(18,652 posts)wordpix
(18,652 posts)Mr. Know Nothing has No Plan
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Seriously?
napkinz
(17,199 posts)ecstatic
(32,689 posts)will let it slide.
napkinz
(17,199 posts)We just have to be tenacious.
underpants
(182,788 posts)#2 was based on his read body language and nothing else.
napkinz
(17,199 posts)napkinz
(17,199 posts)by James Fallows
September 8, 2106
Last night, at the Commander-in-Chief forum, Donald Trump characterized what he had heard from intelligence officials in a classified briefing, and said why he believed the briefers agreed with his political perspective and shared his disdain for the current administration. I am not aware of any previous nominee ever having done anything of this sort.
--snip--
According to a story by NBC, two former heads of the CIA share the view that Trump has crossed yet another line. As Ken Dilanian and Robert Windrem report:
Former CIA and NSA director Mike Hayden, who opposes Trump, told NBC News that in almost four decades in intelligence I have never seen anything like this before. (JF note: Hayden, a retired four-star Air Force general, is no ones idea of a political lefty, and is in the camp of national-security conservatives who oppose Trump.)
A political candidate has used professional intelligence officers briefing him in a totally non-political setting as props to buttress an argument for his political campaign, said Hayden.
The I can read body language line was quite remarkable.
I am confident Director Clapper sent senior professionals to this meeting and so I am equally confident that no such body language ever existed. Its simply not what we do.
read more: http://www.theatlantic.com/notes/2016/09/trump-time-capsule-98-the-classified-briefing/499190/
https://twitter.com/JamesFallows/status/773956636016803841
Ilsa
(61,694 posts)Iraq's oil should be of concern, too.
annabanana
(52,791 posts)"Not many people know" how much oil is there
good god man
underpants
(182,788 posts)They went through the whole planning stages with the acronym O. I. L.
It wasn't until they first said this to people outside of their meetings that they changed it to Operation Iraqi FREEDOM.
napkinz
(17,199 posts)Leave the gun, take the oil.
Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)malaise
(268,957 posts)Great post
napkinz
(17,199 posts)that was a disaster last night
the media had better not push any other narrative
Stuart G
(38,420 posts)spanone
(135,828 posts)he's totally full of shit. bluster. nothing below the surface.
napkinz
(17,199 posts)WHEN?????
I thought he had a secret plan.
Now he says he's going to give the generals 30 days to come up with a plan.
Where are the media demanding clarification?
classof56
(5,376 posts)But heard a caller on the Thom Hartmann show this morning report that Drumpf had stated he's going to unite the US under "One God".
As an atheist, I can only say--Lord have mercy!
napkinz
(17,199 posts)On Tuesday, Donald Trump delivered another of his infamous harangues. He was shooting for a theme of unity, but made a statement that is pointedly un-American and discriminatory.
One God? And which God would that be? Trump is demonstrating his innate bigotry with the suggestion that there is a single faith in America that takes precedence over others and unites the whole nation. There may be some Jews, Buddhists, Hindus, Muslims, and a vast array of Christian sects that disagree.
Once again he proves that he doesnt understand America, its Constitution, or the principles for which it stands. Nor does he understand the religion he pretends to practice.
http://www.newscorpse.com/ncWP/?p=32527
napkinz
(17,199 posts)Chris Hayes: "Trump threw his briefers under the bus."