Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
Fri Sep 9, 2016, 03:00 PM Sep 2016

Sex is bad for older men, and even worse when it's good

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/09/06/active_love_life_bad_for_older_men/

?x=648&y=348&crop=1

Men of a certain age who enjoy frequent sex are putting themselves at higher risk of heart attacks and other cardiovascular problems, US researchers have warned. And just to rub salt in the wounds, older ladies who still enjoy a bit of the other reap positive benefits from frequent nookie.

The frankly depressing revelation comes in research from Michigan State University on how sex affects heart health in later life, published today in the Journal of Health and Social Behaviour.

A team led by associate professor of sociology Hui Liu analysed data covering 2,204 people aged 57 to 85 in 2005 in the National Social Life, Health and Aging project.

The study found that older men who had sex once a week or more were “much more likely to experience cardiovascular events five years later than men who were sexually inactive.” It also found that, bluntly put, “This risk was not found among older women.”

on edit:

Working from a social relationship and life course perspective, we provide generalizable population-based evidence on partnered sexuality linked to cardiovascular risk in later life using national longitudinal data from the National Social Life, Health and Aging Project (NSHAP) (N = 2,204). We consider characteristics of partnered sexuality of older men and women, particularly sexual activity and sexual quality, as they affect cardiovascular risk. Cardiovascular risk is defined as hypertension, rapid heart rate, elevated C-reactive protein (CRP), and general cardiovascular events. We find that older men are more likely to report being sexually active, having sex more often, and more enjoyably than are older women. Results from cross-lagged models suggest that high frequency of sex is positively related to later risk of cardiovascular events for men but not women, whereas good sexual quality seems to protect women but not men from cardiovascular risk in later life. We find no evidence that poor cardiovascular health interferes with later sexuality for either gender.


from: http://hsb.sagepub.com/content/57/3/276.abstract

You have to pay to get more than that.
60 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sex is bad for older men, and even worse when it's good (Original Post) steve2470 Sep 2016 OP
I find this hard to believe. Exilednight Sep 2016 #1
#1 cause of heart attacks in older men is waking up in the morning geek tragedy Sep 2016 #8
"Wake up and die!" Sounds like a punk rock lyric. Eleanors38 Sep 2016 #13
depends on the position used snooper2 Sep 2016 #25
The key to this is "quite healthy" FreakinDJ Sep 2016 #27
There are worse ways to die! liberal N proud Sep 2016 #2
Definitely! yeoman6987 Sep 2016 #19
Not a bad way to go I guess Go Vols Sep 2016 #3
if you refrain from such enjoyments you can probably live to be 100 geek tragedy Sep 2016 #4
so true lol nt steve2470 Sep 2016 #5
Heh! Better a hot-beef injection than a drip-feed I.V.! Eleanors38 Sep 2016 #9
We had a good friend who said this regularly malaise Sep 2016 #42
does sex for older men cause heart problems or safeinOhio Sep 2016 #6
I doubt it but I have not read the study steve2470 Sep 2016 #7
Took both course in college safeinOhio Sep 2016 #10
Looking forward to you guys countering the study with objective evidence! LanternWaste Sep 2016 #23
The study in question has a lot of missing info. Exilednight Sep 2016 #34
Um, no jberryhill Sep 2016 #37
I suspect people who aren't getting laid regularly Warren DeMontague Sep 2016 #53
Lol jberryhill Sep 2016 #57
Fuck That Noise Warren DeMontague Sep 2016 #58
P values are endangered species in psychology Drahthaardogs Sep 2016 #35
Should have asked a Poli-Sci prof. Lots of..... time on their hands. Eleanors38 Sep 2016 #12
ED can be a sign of heart problems because of blood vessel problems womanofthehills Sep 2016 #30
Nonsense ! n/t jaysunb Sep 2016 #11
You gotta die of something, so if you're lucky enough to make 85 and be chasing tail.... NightWatcher Sep 2016 #14
I think theres sort of a Darwanistic feedback loop going on here.... jack_krass Sep 2016 #15
Nature don't care Loki Liesmith Sep 2016 #21
"genes want to get passed on" jack_krass Sep 2016 #22
So that's got to be true for masturbation as well? Laffy Kat Sep 2016 #16
Buy her the best - the Hatachi Magic Wand womanofthehills Sep 2016 #31
I'll take my chances thank you very much. bluesbassman Sep 2016 #17
And they will write this on your tombstone malaise Sep 2016 #43
!!! bluesbassman Sep 2016 #60
I will die happy then. JonathanRackham Sep 2016 #18
At least we will die with a smile on our faces. tonyt53 Sep 2016 #20
Did it take into account physical fitness? EX500rider Sep 2016 #24
It doesn't even measure relative mortality jberryhill Sep 2016 #38
This thread is too good malaise Sep 2016 #44
I know, right? cwydro Sep 2016 #46
If older men refrain from sex lapfog_1 Sep 2016 #26
Fuck that, I'm going to get drunk and laid tonight. eom MohRokTah Sep 2016 #28
I found this sentence to be poorly constructed: jonno99 Sep 2016 #29
Bingo jberryhill Sep 2016 #39
Yep. I'll stick with "do not go gentle...": jonno99 Sep 2016 #48
This belongs here malaise Sep 2016 #32
Ha! that is a great one - thanks! nt jonno99 Sep 2016 #47
You're welcome malaise Sep 2016 #59
even worse if Benny Hill came on the tv Warren DeMontague Sep 2016 #51
Getting up off the floor malaise Sep 2016 #54
Those Llamas are having none of it Warren DeMontague Sep 2016 #55
Freaking hilarious malaise Sep 2016 #56
Oh well. If it's my time to go then it's my time to go. vdogg Sep 2016 #33
Eh, might as well go out with a bang. NuclearDem Sep 2016 #36
Did the study control for masturbation? JoePhilly Sep 2016 #40
In addition to the very valid criticisms of the statistical methodologies, there is the issue of.... LongTomH Sep 2016 #41
So if you tell your wife and your sex life gets better Warren DeMontague Sep 2016 #45
Don't rule that out either malaise Sep 2016 #49
Maybe this is why women on average live longer than men? eom PufPuf23 Sep 2016 #50
OK, look...This is ONLY about "sexual intercourse". trof Sep 2016 #52
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
8. #1 cause of heart attacks in older men is waking up in the morning
Fri Sep 9, 2016, 03:11 PM
Sep 2016

I don't find this surprising at all.

malaise

(268,701 posts)
42. We had a good friend who said this regularly
Fri Sep 9, 2016, 06:24 PM
Sep 2016

Better to be a has been than a never was- we're all going to die anyway.

safeinOhio

(32,641 posts)
6. does sex for older men cause heart problems or
Fri Sep 9, 2016, 03:07 PM
Sep 2016

do heart problems cause more sex in older men..did they control for that?

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
7. I doubt it but I have not read the study
Fri Sep 9, 2016, 03:09 PM
Sep 2016

The professor who did it is a sociology professor, which is a huge red flag right there.

safeinOhio

(32,641 posts)
10. Took both course in college
Fri Sep 9, 2016, 03:12 PM
Sep 2016

Psych stats and Social science stats.

In SS stats 2 numbers equal data.

Right on Steve

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
23. Looking forward to you guys countering the study with objective evidence!
Fri Sep 9, 2016, 04:22 PM
Sep 2016

Looking forward to you guys countering the study with objective evidence! Otherwise, dime-store criticism is little more than another bumper sticker, with even less supporting evidence than the study in question.

Good luck!

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
37. Um, no
Fri Sep 9, 2016, 06:00 PM
Sep 2016

One does not need evidence to point out potential flaws in the methodology and/or analysis.

Or indeed, my question of what, if anything, is this study measuring.

A couple of things jump out, even in this popular press rendition:

"Sex is bad for older men"

That statement is made on what purports to be a study of men, aged 57-85 (thus longevity is apparently not considered as a potential positive outcome, and says:

"Results from cross-lagged models suggest that high frequency of sex is positively related to later risk of cardiovascular events for men"

where

"Cardiovascular risk is defined as hypertension, rapid heart rate, elevated C-reactive protein (CRP), and general cardiovascular events."

Okay, fine.

Now, what was the difference in mortality rate from these cardiovascular events between the two populations?

Does it say?

Does it examine any other measure of "health" than the incidence of cardiovascular events?

I will tell you this - middle aged men who ride bicycles are orders of magnitude more likely to be killed by cars than middle aged men who do not ride bicycles.

Are they healthier? Do they live longer? You don't know. What you know is that, sure, bicyclists are more likely to get hit by cars.

What about other forms of exercise?

Do men, between the ages of 57-85, who run 5 kilometers every weekend, have a higher incidence of "cardiovascular events"? I would bet that they do, and I would bet that they do so for the same reason - they are exerting themselves regularly, and exposing themselves to a greater risk of such events, than men who do not. But that says ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about relative mortality or health.

People who are in good shape have heart attacks. People who are in bad shape have heart attacks. People who exert themselves at anything are at greater risk of having them. HOWEVER, people who are in good shape and engage in regular exercise are also probably better positioned to survive them.

You don't need "data" in order to look at "what is this study actually measuring" and is the thing it is measuring whether "Sex is bad for older men"?

It is clearly not measuring anything which is a general proxy for "bad". Regular ejaculation decreases the risk of prostate cancer. Incidence of "Cardiovascular events" - independent of any other measure of mortality or health - are not the be-all and end-all of "bad", and nobody needs data to understand that.

womanofthehills

(8,661 posts)
30. ED can be a sign of heart problems because of blood vessel problems
Fri Sep 9, 2016, 05:04 PM
Sep 2016

If you are older and don't have ED, sounds like you are good to go.

Surprisingly, ED might be a sign of heart problems. It is important to discuss sexual health with your doctor. Not only can your doctor prescribe medications to improve sexual function, but together you may be able to prevent a major heart problem like a heart attack. This article outlines the steps that you should take if you think you have ED.

http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/123/21/e609

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
14. You gotta die of something, so if you're lucky enough to make 85 and be chasing tail....
Fri Sep 9, 2016, 03:22 PM
Sep 2016

You may as well go for it

 

jack_krass

(1,009 posts)
15. I think theres sort of a Darwanistic feedback loop going on here....
Fri Sep 9, 2016, 03:25 PM
Sep 2016

Nature wants the young to reproduce, not the old.

 

jack_krass

(1,009 posts)
22. "genes want to get passed on"
Fri Sep 9, 2016, 04:19 PM
Sep 2016

Yes, but they don't always get what they want (speaking from a macro scale here). Evolutionary forces work in many mysterious ways, and here also possibly.

Laffy Kat

(16,373 posts)
16. So that's got to be true for masturbation as well?
Fri Sep 9, 2016, 03:27 PM
Sep 2016

Seems like the effects would be the same, for both women and men. If so, gift your grandmother a vibrator for her 80th birthday!

EX500rider

(10,809 posts)
24. Did it take into account physical fitness?
Fri Sep 9, 2016, 04:30 PM
Sep 2016

I could see how being out of shape might make vigorous sex a danger at a advanced age..

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
38. It doesn't even measure relative mortality
Fri Sep 9, 2016, 06:02 PM
Sep 2016

"Bicycle Riding Is Bad For Older Men

A recent study found that older men who bicycle are 100 times more likely to be hit by a car than older men who do not."

That's about what is being said here.

jonno99

(2,620 posts)
29. I found this sentence to be poorly constructed:
Fri Sep 9, 2016, 05:00 PM
Sep 2016
The study found that older men who had sex once a week or more were “much more likely to experience cardiovascular events five years later than men who were sexually inactive.”


This study begs the question: if you substituted sex for jogging, biking or some other strenuous activity, would you see similar incidences of "cardiovascular events"?

IOW - could the study have been titled "Getting your heart racing when you're old could cause a "cardiovascular event".

As if that is a surprise.
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
39. Bingo
Fri Sep 9, 2016, 06:04 PM
Sep 2016

It doesn't even say whether those who have sex are more likely to survive them. It just says that they are more likely to have them.

As you point out, plenty of older joggers and bikers also probably have a higher incidence of "cardiovascular events". Big deal. Are they healthier?

But here, you'll note that the study cuts the age range from "57-85", so there's not even an impact on longevity under consideration.

jonno99

(2,620 posts)
48. Yep. I'll stick with "do not go gentle...":
Fri Sep 9, 2016, 07:05 PM
Sep 2016

Do not go gentle into that good night,
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

Though wise men at their end know dark is right,
Because their words had forked no lightning they
Do not go gentle into that good night.

Good men, the last wave by, crying how bright
Their frail deeds might have danced in a green bay,
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

Wild men who caught and sang the sun in flight,
And learn, too late, they grieved it on its way,
Do not go gentle into that good night.

Grave men, near death, who see with blinding sight
Blind eyes could blaze like meteors and be gay,
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

And you, my father, there on the sad height,
Curse, bless, me now with your fierce tears, I pray.
Do not go gentle into that good night.
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
- Dylan Thomas, 1914 - 1953


https://www.poets.org/poetsorg/poem/do-not-go-gentle-good-night

malaise

(268,701 posts)
32. This belongs here
Fri Sep 9, 2016, 05:16 PM
Sep 2016

On hearing that her elderly grandfather had just passed away, Katie went straight to her grandparent's house to visit her 95 year old grandmother and comfort her. When she asked how her grandfather had died, her grandmother replied, "He had a heart attack while we were making love on Sunday morning." Horrified, Katie told her grandmother that 2 people nearly 100 years old having sex would surely be asking for trouble. "Oh no, my dear, " replied granny. "Many years ago, realizing our advanced age, we figured out the best time to do it was when the church bells would start to ring. It was just the right rhythm. Nice and slow and even. Nothing too strenuous, simply in on the Ding and out on the Dong." She paused, wiped away a tear and then continued, "And if that damned ice cream truck hadn't come along, he'd still be alive today!"



source: http://www.jokes4us.com/dirtyjokes/churchbellsjokes.html

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
40. Did the study control for masturbation?
Fri Sep 9, 2016, 06:10 PM
Sep 2016

Seriously ...

Consider an older person who plays a sport, like softball. If you play a game once or twice a week, you get hurt.

But if you practice more regularly, you are less likely to get hurt.

Did they control for orgasms?

Viagra use?

There are a lot of factors here to consider.

On edit: Did they include AGE OF PARTNER? Old guy, young woman ... just saying!

LongTomH

(8,636 posts)
41. In addition to the very valid criticisms of the statistical methodologies, there is the issue of....
Fri Sep 9, 2016, 06:18 PM
Sep 2016

.....quality of life measured against length.

trof

(54,256 posts)
52. OK, look...This is ONLY about "sexual intercourse".
Fri Sep 9, 2016, 07:30 PM
Sep 2016

You know, genital to genital.
Fellatio is NO PROBLEM!
Honest.
BJs are NOT A PROBLEM for us...um...THOSE OLDER GUYS.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sex is bad for older men,...