Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lovuian

(19,362 posts)
Sat Sep 10, 2016, 11:04 PM Sep 2016

Glyphosate Found in Childhood Vaccines

http://www.ecowatch.com/glyphosate-vaccines-1999343362.html

Glyphosate, the active ingredient in Monsanto's flagship herbicide Roundup and hundreds of other herbicides, has been found in vaccines. Moms Across America received preliminary screening results from Microbe Inotech Laboratories Inc. of St. Louis, Missouri, which showed:

MMR II (Merk) vaccine had 2.671 parts per billion (ppb) of glyphosate
DTap Adacel (Sanofi Pasteur) vaccine had 0.123 ppb of glyphosate
Influenza Fluvirin (Novaris) 0.331 ppb of glyphosate
HepB Energix-B (Glaxo Smith Kline) 0.325 ppb of glyphosate
Pneumonoccal Vax Polyvalent Pneumovax 23 (Merk) had 0.107 ppb of glyphosate

The MMR II vaccine had levels up to 25 times higher than the other vaccines. Following our test, additional independent tests have confirmed these findings at or above the same levels. The tests were conducted using the ELISA method.


200 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Glyphosate Found in Childhood Vaccines (Original Post) lovuian Sep 2016 OP
And? linuxman Sep 2016 #1
This is the 3rd time they've used the same fucked up lab Major Nikon Sep 2016 #6
Maybe you don't want an herbicide/pesticide injected into your body - Duh! womanofthehills Sep 2016 #12
Don't use any dollar bills. You are likely to get addicted to cocaine by your logic (see post #9).nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2016 #15
Cocaine is not being injected to my body - bad analogy womanofthehills Sep 2016 #45
Yes it is. You absorb it through your skin from 9 out of 10 paper money bills. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2016 #47
Your comments in this post really speak to a lack of Scientific knowledge. stevenleser Sep 2016 #125
+1,000 nt okaawhatever Sep 2016 #182
It gets even better Major Nikon Sep 2016 #185
But homeopathically, the stuff is lethal...nt SidDithers Sep 2016 #191
Looks like "Mom's Across America" is using the same fucked up pseudoscience lab Major Nikon Sep 2016 #2
And?? La Lioness Priyanka Sep 2016 #3
Oh ffs Warren DeMontague Sep 2016 #4
Junk Science Botany Sep 2016 #5
Do you have any idea how little .123 parts per billion is? LeftyMom Sep 2016 #7
8 times that much is 1 drop of water in an olympic sized swimming pool Major Nikon Sep 2016 #10
You mean it's not going to kill bermuda grass? LeftyMom Sep 2016 #13
Diluted at the rate of 1 drop per 8 olympic sized swimming pools, probably not Major Nikon Sep 2016 #38
Water has a memory Warren DeMontague Sep 2016 #22
you win this thread. La Lioness Priyanka Sep 2016 #129
LMAO n/t trotsky Sep 2016 #200
Vaccines cause autism Major Nikon Sep 2016 #8
No. Your scientist says vaccines DO NOT cause autism. Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2016 #14
Correct. The post was intended to show the same source as the OP is a dipshit anti-vax site Major Nikon Sep 2016 #39
Maybe Robert F. Kennedy won lots of vaccine injury lawsuits womanofthehills Sep 2016 #65
He's an anti-vaxxer, so it's not surprising that he's your hero Major Nikon Sep 2016 #66
lol -nt Bradical79 Sep 2016 #178
Same bogus kind of statistic as cocaine on dollar bills. Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2016 #9
My god! Don't those people know they are swinning in industial solvent?!? LongtimeAZDem Sep 2016 #88
BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!! MohRokTah Sep 2016 #11
Vaccine ingredients - latex, mercury, formaldehyde, egg, antiobiotics, dog kidney cells , aluminum womanofthehills Sep 2016 #16
Wackadoo woo MohRokTah Sep 2016 #17
The US flu vaccines are made by about 8 different companies with different formulas womanofthehills Sep 2016 #18
Please stop spreading anti-vaxxer woo. eom MohRokTah Sep 2016 #19
Time magazine - Some people may get a new flu shot that’s made with dog cells womanofthehills Sep 2016 #40
What is anti-science about listing flu shot ingredients? womanofthehills Sep 2016 #20
When your list is complete anti-vaxxer woo. eom MohRokTah Sep 2016 #21
CDC list of vaccine ingredients - How is the list WOO - it's just a fact womanofthehills Sep 2016 #51
Did you know high concentrations of table salt and sugar have antibiotic qualities? Essential oils uppityperson Sep 2016 #148
Nothing. Your CONCLUSIONs are anti-science. Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2016 #23
You have choices - you can choose a vaccine without mercury womanofthehills Sep 2016 #34
You have choices. You can stop eating. You can become a Breatharian. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2016 #36
You now can choose a clean vaccine womanofthehills Sep 2016 #82
You misspelled two of your scary ingredients. LeftyMom Sep 2016 #91
But "antiobiotics, alluminum" are really scary uppityperson Sep 2016 #149
You also have a choice not to be an anti-vaxxer Major Nikon Sep 2016 #42
Or I could be a pro-vaxxer but want a cleaner flu vaccine womanofthehills Sep 2016 #54
No, you just want to scaremonger while simultaneously claiming not to be an anti-vaxxer Major Nikon Sep 2016 #55
My children and grandchildren have had all their childhood vaccines womanofthehills Sep 2016 #62
You do realize getting the actual flu is a much bigger risk with GBS, right? Major Nikon Sep 2016 #69
You are MUCH more likely to get GBS from having the flu than any vx uppityperson Sep 2016 #150
Let me guess... GulfCoast66 Sep 2016 #180
The injuries are not due to the ingredients unless the person is allergic tymorial Sep 2016 #137
The best way to avoid a vx injury is get it in a clinic from a nurse who knows how to safely give vx uppityperson Sep 2016 #152
Antivax shitpost. nt Dr Hobbitstein Sep 2016 #171
Another example of anti-vax nonsense from one of our resident anti-vaxxers Major Nikon Sep 2016 #41
I'm not an anti-vaxxer, BUT.... Dr Hobbitstein Sep 2016 #52
People are so uninformed - they don't even know there are 12 different flu vaccines this season womanofthehills Sep 2016 #63
"People are so uninformed" Dr Hobbitstein Sep 2016 #193
So we are not to discuss any problems with vaccines - zero discussion allowed womanofthehills Sep 2016 #71
Actually, the problem with this sort of discussion Cal Carpenter Sep 2016 #147
I've yet to meet an anti-vaxxer who admits they are anti-vax. MohRokTah Sep 2016 #56
Post #54 Major Nikon Sep 2016 #59
Look at this list of vaccine injuries in babies - most are from the flu vaccine womanofthehills Sep 2016 #61
Just more proof you have no clue about cause and effect Major Nikon Sep 2016 #64
Other countries can sue pharma and they have changed some of their vaccines to make them safer womanofthehills Sep 2016 #70
Jebus, you trot out the right wing loon, Mercola and now the right wing loon, Jeffry Aufderheide Major Nikon Sep 2016 #74
It really doesn't matter about the link - it's a fact - Japan now gives measles, mumps and rubella womanofthehills Sep 2016 #80
Sure, just a coincidence your get your "facts" from anti-vax right wing loons Major Nikon Sep 2016 #84
I see 2 in there that indicate improper administration. Infants get shots not in their shoulder but uppityperson Sep 2016 #154
Post removed Post removed Sep 2016 #75
You can thank biotech and GMO Major Nikon Sep 2016 #92
I think it's a big step in the right direction womanofthehills Sep 2016 #119
Agreed. GMO has all sorts of tangible benefits Major Nikon Sep 2016 #121
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! MohRokTah Sep 2016 #94
You post YouTube cartoons? Mr Maru Sep 2016 #95
Never eat at a restaurant! They use aluminum pots and more of that gets into food! . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2016 #24
are you really suggesting people shouldnt vaccinate their kids? Warren DeMontague Sep 2016 #25
I'm suggesting people look at the different flu vaccine and make an educated choice womanofthehills Sep 2016 #26
"Educated choice" Dr Hobbitstein Sep 2016 #29
To her it means education from quacks and cranks Major Nikon Sep 2016 #46
Add another loon to the list Major Nikon Sep 2016 #77
You actually have a choice of about 15 vaccines including the pure Flublock womanofthehills Sep 2016 #81
Educated = choice based upon the woo narrative tymorial Sep 2016 #140
Right, but that's not the proper definition of educated. Dr Hobbitstein Sep 2016 #172
Oh I absolutely agree tymorial Sep 2016 #174
oh, but you're talking about more than just the flu vaccine, aren't you. Warren DeMontague Sep 2016 #30
Not really, the childhood vaccines are very safe now womanofthehills Sep 2016 #73
So the list in post #16 only applies to the annual flu vaccine, then. Warren DeMontague Sep 2016 #78
Childhood vaccines have a good safety record compared to flu vaccines womanofthehills Sep 2016 #83
You are parroting out more anti-vax nonsense Major Nikon Sep 2016 #106
Dog kidney cells?! More vaccines made in a lab mathematic Sep 2016 #28
No, not "dog". Cocker spaniels! uppityperson Sep 2016 #37
Actually I don't know why Novartis picked Cocker Spaniels womanofthehills Sep 2016 #67
It's a cell line, not "female cocker spaniels". The cell line was started in 1958. LeftyMom Sep 2016 #89
Actually it's a cell line from a cocker spaniel in 1958. You do know they grew vxs in horse serum, uppityperson Sep 2016 #144
Yeah, as opposed to using chicken embryos Major Nikon Sep 2016 #53
Actually it's a new different process womanofthehills Sep 2016 #79
None of them contain any fucking latex in the medication itself. LeftyMom Sep 2016 #86
Except you're an anti-vaxxer that prefers to promote right wing anti-vax sites to vaccines Major Nikon Sep 2016 #90
...So you're switching antibiotics for a GMO? Lancero Sep 2016 #96
Now you prefer to inject yourself with a vx made with GMOs? uppityperson Sep 2016 #146
That glass of water on my table Sgent Sep 2016 #58
Evidence and reality are just technicalities that can be easily avoided if one tries hard enough Major Nikon Sep 2016 #60
Woooooooo.... Dr Hobbitstein Sep 2016 #27
you kind of knew eventually these two deals would hook up. Warren DeMontague Sep 2016 #31
They'll be hanging with the flat-earthers and global warming denialists in no time. Dr Hobbitstein Sep 2016 #32
No, they've been that way all along Major Nikon Sep 2016 #57
I think I've been subjected to that wisdom once or twice Warren DeMontague Sep 2016 #76
oh, and do not forget GulfCoast66 Sep 2016 #181
Same. nt Dr Hobbitstein Sep 2016 #194
Separate groups. immoderate Sep 2016 #33
Not according to article in the OP. Dr Hobbitstein Sep 2016 #35
Rarely yes Major Nikon Sep 2016 #48
Not really, they have a tendency to congregate together, you should check out the... Humanist_Activist Sep 2016 #126
See the Time Magazine article above - and CDC info below - Madin-Darby Canine Kidney womanofthehills Sep 2016 #44
Yeah, nice job of editing the Time article by adding emphasis where there was none Major Nikon Sep 2016 #49
It's obvious you have NO idea what you're talking about. Dr Hobbitstein Sep 2016 #50
Post removed Post removed Sep 2016 #97
Sometimes stupidity has it's own level of toxicity Major Nikon Sep 2016 #102
This is not "anti-vaxxer shitbaggery" PatSeg Sep 2016 #132
Which is equally as nutty, but do go on with your bad self... Humanist_Activist Sep 2016 #138
Thank you for enlightening me PatSeg Sep 2016 #143
I have a question, can you give a mechanism of action describing how glyphosate is dangerous... Humanist_Activist Sep 2016 #151
Because you are really interested? PatSeg Sep 2016 #153
Curious, mostly, I mean, I would be happy to change my mind if actual evidence was presented. n/t Humanist_Activist Sep 2016 #159
Okay, I'm sorry PatSeg Sep 2016 #161
Your civility is as broad as is your relevant knowledge. LanternWaste Sep 2016 #196
I find civility is wasted on the alt-reality crowd. n/t Humanist_Activist Sep 2016 #199
ok still_one Sep 2016 #43
From that Science Based Medicine article radical noodle Sep 2016 #85
Glyphosate is less toxic than table salt or household vinegar Major Nikon Sep 2016 #93
Are you sure you don't mean dihydrogen monoxide? Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2016 #98
... Major Nikon Sep 2016 #100
How do they get the level this low? Cicada Sep 2016 #68
The lab that the crank site, "Mom's Across America" uses isn't certified Major Nikon Sep 2016 #72
Agreed, Roundup is in everything now womanofthehills Sep 2016 #87
So is hydric acid Major Nikon Sep 2016 #101
I am so very tired of woo tymorial Sep 2016 #99
Anti "glyphosate" PatSeg Sep 2016 #133
Give me a break. tymorial Sep 2016 #135
Woo Hoo to You Too! PatSeg Sep 2016 #141
Does this mean another year ismnotwasm Sep 2016 #103
Anti-vaxxers at DU should be treated the same as chemtrailers...nt SidDithers Sep 2016 #104
Yup ismnotwasm Sep 2016 #105
Chemtrail stupidity never killed anyone Major Nikon Sep 2016 #107
Yup. Agschmid Sep 2016 #110
Same level of ignorance ... but anti-vax nonsense poses a clear and present danger ... etherealtruth Sep 2016 #127
I wish. Starry Messenger Sep 2016 #165
Or birthers -nt Bradical79 Sep 2016 #179
So many elitists on DU that don't even have a scientific background Harmony Blue Sep 2016 #108
Seneff and Seralini are both crank magnet quacks who make their living peddling pseudoscience Major Nikon Sep 2016 #109
Post removed Post removed Sep 2016 #114
The IARC specifically rejected Seralini's research as complete shit Major Nikon Sep 2016 #122
You cite Seneff AND Seralini? Archae Sep 2016 #115
Give me a break - Seralini's study was exactly the same as Monsanto's only way way longer womanofthehills Sep 2016 #118
BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!! MohRokTah Sep 2016 #128
Anyone referencing Seralini has no business questioning the scientific background of DU posters...nt SidDithers Sep 2016 #123
i do have a scientific background and fearmongering is not science. nt La Lioness Priyanka Sep 2016 #130
Woo posts belong in Creative Speculation and nowhere else. SwankyXomb Sep 2016 #131
And asbestos as well PatSeg Sep 2016 #134
"Elitists", you mean people who actually know a thing or two about chemistry and biology? Humanist_Activist Sep 2016 #136
Yeah right PatSeg Sep 2016 #142
From what I can tell, you fail high school level science with the BS you spout... Humanist_Activist Sep 2016 #145
I really don't know how you PatSeg Sep 2016 #156
I'm basing it on all your past posting history, not just this thread. n/t Humanist_Activist Sep 2016 #158
I will abstain PatSeg Sep 2016 #160
Actually I have nothing to be afraid of with my posting history, here, do you want help? Humanist_Activist Sep 2016 #162
Ha, ha! PatSeg Sep 2016 #164
I don't. Who do you mean by "elitist"? uppityperson Sep 2016 #163
I'm sorry PatSeg Sep 2016 #166
Aha, thank you, I appreciate it. Nt uppityperson Sep 2016 #167
Who do you mean by "elitists"? uppityperson Sep 2016 #168
It makes sense, as many vaccines are made with eggs - and glyphosate levels in eggs are higher womanofthehills Sep 2016 #111
You also think right wing loons make sense Major Nikon Sep 2016 #112
You are the one who seems to have a problem with all the progressive sites womanofthehills Sep 2016 #116
Sure, "all" of them Major Nikon Sep 2016 #120
Their science is as bad as their editing. Merck, not Merk, Novartis, not Novaris. RayOfHope Sep 2016 #113
Wait, they misspelled the vaccines in the article? uppityperson Sep 2016 #157
They misspelled the names of two of the manufacturers, Merck and Novartis. RayOfHope Sep 2016 #175
Same nutbag claimed organic food cures autism, fibromyaglia, and Crohn's Major Nikon Sep 2016 #186
It is mighty elitist GulfCoast66 Sep 2016 #183
Using ELISA for this kind of work, and then releasing the results publicly? Buzz Clik Sep 2016 #117
lolz obamanut2012 Sep 2016 #124
Woo site. Odin2005 Sep 2016 #139
wow zappaman Sep 2016 #155
And in everything else, too. MineralMan Sep 2016 #169
Here is just another leg in the Monsanto regime that won't work nolabels Sep 2016 #170
Science just has to evolve too Loki Liesmith Sep 2016 #177
You can observe weed adaptations by just mowing your lawn Major Nikon Sep 2016 #184
Actually grass is the reason we walk mostly on our hind legs nolabels Sep 2016 #189
Had we not developed intelligence we would still be living in trees throwing our shit at each other Major Nikon Sep 2016 #195
We never got to choose what that environment was and we adapted to most of them nolabels Sep 2016 #198
It's no doubt found in infants' amniotic fluid and mothers' breast milk as well. Your point? Hekate Sep 2016 #173
and our kids don't have weeds Enrique Sep 2016 #176
Does this mean we can lump all the anti-vax and GMO hysteria threads together now? msanthrope Sep 2016 #187
For the love of Athena... anti-vaxxers need to learn what the term trace means! Nt LostOne4Ever Sep 2016 #188
So, it's Dorian Gray Sep 2016 #190
Aiiiiiiiieeeeee!!! progressoid Sep 2016 #192
Willful ignorance is a scary thing Blecht Sep 2016 #197
 

linuxman

(2,337 posts)
1. And?
Sat Sep 10, 2016, 11:13 PM
Sep 2016

What is it about that particular compound that bothers "Mom's across America"?

Lot of degrees in that bunch?

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
6. This is the 3rd time they've used the same fucked up lab
Sat Sep 10, 2016, 11:29 PM
Sep 2016

First they manufactured bullshit from the same lab that nobody could reproduce
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Glyphosate#Glyphosate_detected_in_breast_milk

Then they said glyphosate was found in wine (same lab) at levels 10 times lower than what the EPA allows for grapes causing the naive to freak out about a possibly not carcinogenic substance measured in parts per billion contaminating a definitely carcinogenic substance measured in ounces.

So now we must freak out from another fucked up pseudoscience report produced by the same scaremongering group of dipshits using the same pseudoscientific lab that specifically caters to the dipshit scaremongering crowd.

womanofthehills

(8,701 posts)
12. Maybe you don't want an herbicide/pesticide injected into your body - Duh!
Sat Sep 10, 2016, 11:47 PM
Sep 2016

and the World Health Organization's IARC, ( International Agency for Research on Cancer) says glyphosate is a possible carcinogen.

Problem with American Moms??? - you don't have to be a scientist to look at all the research.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
125. Your comments in this post really speak to a lack of Scientific knowledge.
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 10:28 AM
Sep 2016

There are all kinds of molecules in minute quantities flying around in the air, molecules of natural carcinogenic or toxic substances. If you knew what they were and didn't understand how small and insignificant the quantities were, you would freak out.

The quantities listed in the OP are so small, there is virtually no poisonous or carcinogenic substance that would be problematic in concentrations a hundred to a thousand times as much. You are inhaling and ingesting molecules of naturally occurring toxic and carcinogenic substances at those levels all the time with no ill effects.

It is important to know not only the concentration of a substance in the air or water or in our food or in a vaccine, but also the level at which it is considered toxic.

Carbon Dioxide is in the air naturally occurring at concentrations of 360 parts per million. That is around 100,000 times the concentration of the substances in the OP. And Carbon Dioxide is an asphyxiate. Concentrations of 70,000 to 100,000 parts per million will cause death in humans within an hour or so.

Now if I told you that Carbon Dioxide is an asphyxiant gas and where you are we have found concentrations of 360 parts per million, without knowing the danger level of that gas you might freak out, not knowing that it has to be 30 times that concentration to be at all problematic and 200 times that concentration to be fatal.

You need all these pieces of knowledge to know whether a given concentration of a substance is a problem and the OP does not provide all this information.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
185. It gets even better
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 11:05 PM
Sep 2016

The same poster was freaking out about a report from the same lab and same group of cranks that said glyphosate, measured in parts per billion, was found in California wine. Now just imagine how scientifically illiterate you have to be to freak out over a de minimis amount of a possibly not carcinogenic substance contaminating a definitely carcinogenic substance measured in ounces.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
2. Looks like "Mom's Across America" is using the same fucked up pseudoscience lab
Sat Sep 10, 2016, 11:17 PM
Sep 2016

...scaremongering over bullshit as usual.

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
7. Do you have any idea how little .123 parts per billion is?
Sat Sep 10, 2016, 11:34 PM
Sep 2016

That's 0.0000000123% of the whole.

In other words, if this test was accurate a .5 mL dose of dtap might contain .00000000615mL of glyphosate.

In homeopathy that means a dtap shot will kill weeds. In the real world it means shots are made with eggs or glycerin which are made with farmed animals which are fed wheat and corn.

Christ, anti-vaxxers are dumb.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
10. 8 times that much is 1 drop of water in an olympic sized swimming pool
Sat Sep 10, 2016, 11:42 PM
Sep 2016

And that's assuming their fucked up pseudoscience "lab" results are even accurate, and there's no reason to suspect they are.

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,000 posts)
14. No. Your scientist says vaccines DO NOT cause autism.
Sat Sep 10, 2016, 11:52 PM
Sep 2016
Very recently, Mr. Richard Morgan, Esq., Dr. Thompson’s whistle blower attorney, stated that Dr. Thompson will be publishing a paper in May, 2016, where he will assert that the MMR vaccine is not linked to autism in African American males. Instead Dr. Thompson will state that socioeconomic factors alone in the African American community account for the original MMR-African American male “effect” (the effect that he is on record as stating the CDC purposefully hid). https://www.focusforhealth.org/dr-brian-hooker-statement-william-thompson/


Dishonest editing of Thompson's statements by Andrew Wakefield: https://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/2016/03/22/andrew-wakefield-releases-the-trailer-for-his-william-thompson-video-slick-production-and-dishonesty/

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
39. Correct. The post was intended to show the same source as the OP is a dipshit anti-vax site
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 12:42 AM
Sep 2016

Anyone site that posts Robert F. Kennedy, Jr's thoughts on autism and vaccines can be summarily dismissed on the subject.

womanofthehills

(8,701 posts)
65. Maybe Robert F. Kennedy won lots of vaccine injury lawsuits
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 01:47 AM
Sep 2016

and the US court has paid for vaccine injury for autism. When the court pays out for vaccine injury, it never admits the vaccine caused it. It is standard on their form.


Vaccine Court Awards Millions to Two Children With Autism

The federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, better known as “vaccine court,” has just awarded millions of dollars to two children with autism for “pain and suffering” and lifelong care of their injuries, which together could cost tens of millions of dollars.

The government did not admit that vaccines caused autism, at least in one of the children. Both cases were “unpublished,” meaning information is limited, and access to medical records and other exhibits is blocked. Much of the information presented here comes from documents found at the vaccine court website.

Some observers will say the vaccine-induced encephalopathy (brain disease) documented in both children is unrelated to their autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Others will say there is plenty of evidence to suggest otherwise.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-kirby/post2468343_b_2468343.html

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
66. He's an anti-vaxxer, so it's not surprising that he's your hero
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 01:50 AM
Sep 2016

But you're not an anti-vaxxer yourself, right?

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,000 posts)
9. Same bogus kind of statistic as cocaine on dollar bills.
Sat Sep 10, 2016, 11:41 PM
Sep 2016

Something like 90% of US paper money has detectable cocaine residue on them. That does not mean that 90% of Americans are cocaine users.

Do you have any conception of what a tenth of a part per billion is? Let me help you understand.

2.671 ppb = 0.000000002671 = 0.0000002671 %.

You would have to mix one teaspoon of glyphosate into 374,391,614 teaspoons of water to get that concentration.

That is 487,489 gallons. That's an Olympic sized swimming pool.

2,500,000 L in an Olympic pool (550,000 imp gal; 660,000 US gal), assuming a nominal depth of 2 m. 2,500 m3 (88,000 cu ft) in cubic units. About 2 acre-feet.

About 8 to 20 Olympic sized swimming pools for the other measurements.

Glyphosate is in the environment. Get used to it. Chicken-Little alarmism does not help your cause.



Eight pools:

















LongtimeAZDem

(4,494 posts)
88. My god! Don't those people know they are swinning in industial solvent?!?
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 02:55 AM
Sep 2016

It's used in gold mining, fer crissake!

womanofthehills

(8,701 posts)
16. Vaccine ingredients - latex, mercury, formaldehyde, egg, antiobiotics, dog kidney cells , aluminum
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 12:03 AM
Sep 2016

dog kidney cells from female cocker spaniels (wondering how many dogs they use or if they just keep replicating the cells)


Might as well add a little pesticide to the mix!!!

Last year, only one third of the flu vaccines were mercury free.

womanofthehills

(8,701 posts)
18. The US flu vaccines are made by about 8 different companies with different formulas
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 12:07 AM
Sep 2016

tell me one ingredient on my list that is not in a flu vaccine.

womanofthehills

(8,701 posts)
40. Time magazine - Some people may get a new flu shot that’s made with dog cells
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 12:43 AM
Sep 2016

For those of you who are allergic to eggs


Some people may get a new flu shot that’s made with dog cells instead of chicken eggs

This year Novartis shipped its first full batch of Flucelvax, a new vaccine that was only approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2012. The company made a limited amount of the shot last year, but there are more doses to go around this flu season. And for the first time, the doses were made at the company’s newly approved U.S. plant in Holly Springs, North Carolina.

The vaccine is made without growing the influenza virus in chicken eggs, which is the way that flu shots were made for more than four decades. Instead, Flucelvax is grown in KIDNEY CELLLS FROM DOGS. The technology means that the shot can be made in less time than a traditional flu shot—enough virus can be churned out in about 65 hours to 75 hours, compared to the six months or so it takes to grow in chicken eggs. It also means that people who are allergic to eggs now have another option for getting immunized against the flu.

The cell-based technology is also a plus during a flu pandemic, since the platform can produce more doses quickly to control an outbreak as a particular influenza virus spreads among a population. The kidney cells are frozen and can be thawed quickly to begin growing virus. The company has produced doses of pandemic flu vaccine against H5N1 using the cell technology, and it’s keeping them in deep freeze as part of the U.S. government stockpile in the event of a pandemic.

http://time.com/3548419/flu-shot-flucelvax/

womanofthehills

(8,701 posts)
51. CDC list of vaccine ingredients - How is the list WOO - it's just a fact
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 01:02 AM
Sep 2016

From CDC website. There are many different flu vaccine formulations to choose from.


Common substances found in vaccines include.

Aluminum gels or salts of aluminum which are added as adjuvants to help the vaccine stimulate a better response. Adjuvants help promote an earlier, more potent response, and more persistent immune response to the vaccine.
Antibiotics which are added to some vaccines to prevent the growth of germs (bacteria) during production and storage of the vaccine. No vaccine produced in the United States contains penicillin.
Egg protein is found in influenza and yellow fever vaccines, which are prepared using chicken eggs. Ordinarily, persons who are able to eat eggs or egg products safely can receive these vaccines.
Formaldehyde is used to inactivate bacterial products for toxoid vaccines, (these are vaccines that use an inactive bacterial toxin to produce immunity.) It is also used to kill unwanted viruses and bacteria that might contaminate the vaccine during production. Most formaldehyde is removed from the vaccine before it is packaged.
Monosodium glutamate (MSG) and 2-phenoxy-ethanol which are used as stabilizers in a few vaccines to help the vaccine remain unchanged when the vaccine is exposed to heat, light, acidity, or humidity.
Thimerosal is a mercury-containing preservative that is added to vials of vaccine that contain more than one dose to prevent contamination and growth of potentially harmful bacteria.

For children with a prior history of allergic reactions to any of these substances in vaccines, parents should consult their child’s healthcare provider before vaccination

http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/additives.htm

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
148. Did you know high concentrations of table salt and sugar have antibiotic qualities? Essential oils
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 12:41 PM
Sep 2016

do also. Lavender, rosemary, tea tree oils are used topically for their antibiotic qualities.

I'd rather have my vaccine not be growing toxic bacteria.

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,000 posts)
23. Nothing. Your CONCLUSIONs are anti-science.
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 12:13 AM
Sep 2016

You eat as much of those ingredients (and probably much more) in a year as you ingest of them via a flu shot a year.

You better stop eating because there is more mercury in the food you eat.

womanofthehills

(8,701 posts)
82. You now can choose a clean vaccine
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 02:42 AM
Sep 2016

without mercury, latex, antiobiotics, alluminum, egg, dog kidney cells - it's Flublok

womanofthehills

(8,701 posts)
54. Or I could be a pro-vaxxer but want a cleaner flu vaccine
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 01:06 AM
Sep 2016

As of now, the childhood vaccines are the safest. The flu vaccines have the most vaccine injurys according to the vaccine injury charts.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
55. No, you just want to scaremonger while simultaneously claiming not to be an anti-vaxxer
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 01:13 AM
Sep 2016

As if anyone is supposed to believe that.

womanofthehills

(8,701 posts)
62. My children and grandchildren have had all their childhood vaccines
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 01:29 AM
Sep 2016

but none are getting the flu shot until Guillain Barre is not listed as a possible side effect.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
69. You do realize getting the actual flu is a much bigger risk with GBS, right?
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 02:01 AM
Sep 2016

If you actually were concerned about GBS seems like you'd be more worried about them not getting the flu shot, but then that would shatter your manufactured anti-vaxx concerns.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
150. You are MUCH more likely to get GBS from having the flu than any vx
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 12:47 PM
Sep 2016
http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/guillain-barre-syndrome/basics/causes/con-20025832

The exact cause of Guillain-Barre syndrome isn't known. The disorder usually appears days or weeks after a respiratory or digestive tract infection. Rarely, recent surgery or immunization can trigger Guillain-Barre syndrome.


http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/gbs/detail_gbs.htm
Usually Guillain-Barré occurs a few days or weeks after the patient has had symptoms of a respiratory or gastrointestinal viral infection. Occasionally surgery will trigger the syndrome. Recently, some countries worldwide have reported an increased incidence of GBS following infection with the Zika virus. In rare instances vaccinations may increase the risk of GBS



http://www.cdc.gov/flu/protect/vaccine/guillainbarre.htm
Many things can cause GBS; about two-thirds of people who develop GBS symptoms do so several days or weeks after they have been sick with diarrhea or a respiratory illness. Infection with the bacterium Campylobacter jejuni is one of the most common risk factors for GBS. People also can develop GBS after having the flu or other infections (such as cytomegalovirus and Epstein Barr virus). On very rare occasions, they may develop GBS in the days or weeks after getting a vaccination.

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
180. Let me guess...
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 10:14 PM
Sep 2016

You do not like math.

Especially statistics?

Do you wear a seat belt? Because you could potentially be trapped in a burning car or drown if your car goes underwater because you are wearing one. Of course, the chances are much greater you will be killed dead in a collision of you are not wearing one.

Perfect analogy.

tymorial

(3,433 posts)
137. The injuries are not due to the ingredients unless the person is allergic
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 12:07 PM
Sep 2016

The vast majority of injuries from flu vaccine is improper administration. This of course doesn't fit your narrative so let's just leave out pertinent information and just make blanket statements.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
152. The best way to avoid a vx injury is get it in a clinic from a nurse who knows how to safely give vx
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 12:51 PM
Sep 2016

and you can adequately expose your entire shoulder for them to see when giving it.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
41. Another example of anti-vax nonsense from one of our resident anti-vaxxers
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 12:44 AM
Sep 2016

Who claims not to be an anti-vaxxer (like the rest of them).

womanofthehills

(8,701 posts)
63. People are so uninformed - they don't even know there are 12 different flu vaccines this season
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 01:40 AM
Sep 2016

Most are made by pharma companies not in the USA

Some must be better than others, some must have fewer side effects - but we can't discuss this or we will be an anti-vaxxer

womanofthehills

(8,701 posts)
71. So we are not to discuss any problems with vaccines - zero discussion allowed
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 02:10 AM
Sep 2016

Some kids are still dying but we cannot talk about it.

Cal Carpenter

(4,959 posts)
147. Actually, the problem with this sort of discussion
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 12:37 PM
Sep 2016

(meaning one based on bad science), distract from scientifically and intellectually honest discussions about ways to improve vaccines. Discussions like this OP do nothing but increase the divide between "pro-vax" vs. "anti-vax" mentalities and leave the actual nuances out of the picture. They make everyone more reactionary and these threads become an ideological shit show rather than a real discussion of any actual problems in vaccines with the goal of improving them.

Can many vaccines be further improved? Yes. Are virtually all vaccines a massive success in harm reduction despite a minuscule number of adverse effects? YES. Does real, good science advance these goals? ABSOLUTELY.

If your goal is to actually IMPROVE vaccines then leave the crap pseudo-science and court decisions (courts are not laboratories; judges are not scientists) and hyperbole and outdated information out of it because you are hurting your cause more than helping it. Stop using sources that are opportunistic fear-mongerers who are twisting bits of truth with lots of lies and misleading info.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
56. I've yet to meet an anti-vaxxer who admits they are anti-vax.
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 01:17 AM
Sep 2016

Yet they are completely anti-vax in everything they say and do.

womanofthehills

(8,701 posts)
61. Look at this list of vaccine injuries in babies - most are from the flu vaccine
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 01:27 AM
Sep 2016

Every 3 months a list like this comes out with children whose parents have been compensated by the government for vaccine injury. In the USA we cannot sue pharma for vaccine injury like other countries, we have to take it to the US government vaccine court. Every three months a report comes out. If this many toddlers got sick from Zita is would be big news, but these kids getting sick for life is not news. (and this is just the babies list, not the adult compensation list- and just a 3 month list. There are about 100 lawyers in the US who do vaccine injury = only lawyers who are certified by the government to do it - at least the lawyers are free to the public and take none of the compensation paid.

I'm not saying don't get a flu shot because the shots save lives, but I'll get one when Guillian Barre is not listed as a possible side effect.
this one is just children - reported every three months.


Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
64. Just more proof you have no clue about cause and effect
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 01:42 AM
Sep 2016

The US vaccine court was set up because idiots were literally suing vaccine manufacturers out of business causing a public health crisis. You keep pretending court judgments are scientific proof of anything which is utterly ridiculous. Vaccine settlements through that court are even less so because the standard of proof is even lower and there's absolutely no burden to prove cause and effect which you pretend exists.

Meanwhile you dig up nonsense like this along with every other piece of extremely rare side effect remotely associated with vaccines and then claim to not be an anti-vaxxer as if anyone is actually buying that. It would be almost as hilarious as your posts promoting homeopathy, were it not for the fact that anti-vax nonsense manages to kill children you pretend to be concerned about.

For further reading see...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll#Concern_troll

womanofthehills

(8,701 posts)
70. Other countries can sue pharma and they have changed some of their vaccines to make them safer
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 02:08 AM
Sep 2016

Like Japan - now they give the ingredients in the MMR individually and their are fewer adverse reactions

Japanese Government Continues to Ban the MMR Vaccine

The MMR Vaccine’s Tragic History in Japan

The MMR vaccine was introduced in Japan in April 1989, and parents who refused the compulsory vaccine were fined. After three months of analysis, officials realized that one in 900 children developed adverse reactions to the vaccine, a rate that was 2,000 times higher than the expected rate.

Officials had hoped to resolve the problem by switching to another version of the vaccine, but the excessive amount of adverse reactions persisted, with one in 1,755 children affected. Testing of 125 children’s spinal fluid determined that the vaccines had entered one child’s nervous system, with two additional suspected cases.

Four years later, in 1993, the government removed the MMR mandate against measles and rubella. A doctor from Japan’s Ministry of Health and Welfare admitted that the separate, individual doses of measles and rubella cost twice as much to administer, and he defended the decision, stating, “but we believe it is worth it.” Furthermore, a member of the health ministry also stated that the ban has not caused an increase in deaths from measles. [4]

Japanese officials were also concerned about the MMR vaccine causing additional cases of mumps, citing numerous studies in The Lancet.


Mumps and hepatitis B vaccines are not part of the national immunization program in Japan.
https://vactruth.com/2016/06/23/japanese-government-bans-mmr-vaccine/


Why Japan stopped using MMR http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/1808316.stm

Japan stopped using MMR because it was linked to outbreaks of non-viral meningitis and other damaging side-effects. Doctors say there were problems with the vaccine which was of a different type to that used in the UK.

They stopped using the MMR vaccine in 1993 and reverted to three separate injections for measles, mumps and rubella.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
74. Jebus, you trot out the right wing loon, Mercola and now the right wing loon, Jeffry Aufderheide
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 02:21 AM
Sep 2016

It's just a coincidence that your latest source is buds with fellow right wing nutbag Alex Fucking Jones, right?

But you're not an anti-vaxxer, right?

womanofthehills

(8,701 posts)
80. It really doesn't matter about the link - it's a fact - Japan now gives measles, mumps and rubella
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 02:38 AM
Sep 2016

as separate vaccinations. Lots of links about it.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
84. Sure, just a coincidence your get your "facts" from anti-vax right wing loons
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 02:46 AM
Sep 2016

But you're not an anti-vaxxer, right?

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
154. I see 2 in there that indicate improper administration. Infants get shots not in their shoulder but
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 01:00 PM
Sep 2016

In the vastus lateralis muscle of their thigh. I have had parents insistent on giving the vx in their deltoid and have had to educated them why that is a bad idea. It's possible that those were given there at parental insistence "give it there or nowhere".

Response to MohRokTah (Reply #17)

 

Dr Hobbitstein

(6,568 posts)
29. "Educated choice"
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 12:24 AM
Sep 2016

I'm not quite sure you know what that phrase means.

I mean, you believe a handful of uneducated alarmists over millions of scientists.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
46. To her it means education from quacks and cranks
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 12:57 AM
Sep 2016

Here's some of her favorite sources....

Globalresearch

Mae-Wan Ho

Jeffrey Smith

Food Babe

Mercola

 

Dr Hobbitstein

(6,568 posts)
172. Right, but that's not the proper definition of educated.
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 04:25 PM
Sep 2016

If anything, it's closer to the definition of grossly uneducated.

womanofthehills

(8,701 posts)
73. Not really, the childhood vaccines are very safe now
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 02:15 AM
Sep 2016

they have had years to perfect them. They have about 3 or 4 weeks of testing on each yrs new flu vaccines.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
78. So the list in post #16 only applies to the annual flu vaccine, then.
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 02:29 AM
Sep 2016

And the glyphosate "issue", here-- again, the concern is only with the annual flu vaccine?

womanofthehills

(8,701 posts)
83. Childhood vaccines have a good safety record compared to flu vaccines
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 02:46 AM
Sep 2016

Because they don't have to be made new each year, they have years of research behind them. The majority of vaccine injuries are from flu shots and the main injury is Guillain Barre. The majority of the population does well, but I find all the lawsuits alarming. Vaccines for children can not have mercury - that's for the adults.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
106. You are parroting out more anti-vax nonsense
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 09:07 AM
Sep 2016

Which isn't surprising since you get your "education" from right wing anti-vax loons.

GBS is exceptionally rare and nobody who knows shit from beans about the subject says the flu shot is a causal factor for GBS. A study done 40 years ago suggests that one series of the flu shot at the time might have slightly increased the risk of triggering GBS in individuals who were already predisposed to it. No study since then has validated that hypothesis and there's been over 40 different series of flu vaccines since with numerous varietals.

Meanwhile we know that actually getting the flu is a trigger for GBS, which means that getting the flu shot lowers the already low risk of contracting GBS.

Anti-vax stupid sometimes kills people.

womanofthehills

(8,701 posts)
67. Actually I don't know why Novartis picked Cocker Spaniels
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 01:53 AM
Sep 2016

but it's also mentioned only female cocker spaniels - ask for Flucelvax if you love dogs and want their DNA.

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
89. It's a cell line, not "female cocker spaniels". The cell line was started in 1958.
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 02:56 AM
Sep 2016

Christ, it's like saying anything made with HeLa cells is made with agricultural workers.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
144. Actually it's a cell line from a cocker spaniel in 1958. You do know they grew vxs in horse serum,
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 12:33 PM
Sep 2016

don't you? Yes, many of us were injected with vaccines grown in horse serum.

womanofthehills

(8,701 posts)
79. Actually it's a new different process
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 02:34 AM
Sep 2016

called cell culture technology - eliminating the use of antiobiotics. It's free of preservatives and latex and can be made very fast unlike egg vaccines.

But the newest vaccine is free of everything even dead flu virus - Flublock

https://www.flublok.com/ (nice visuals on web page)

You have a choice in flu vaccines. Make a PURE choice.

Rather than grow an influenza virus, we make only the small piece of the virus that is needed for immunity. This piece is called the hemagglutinin, or HA protein. We do this by taking the genetic information that tells cells how to make the HA protein and putting it into cultured cells that are grown in large stainless steel tanks. These cells act as powerful protein-producing machines and make hundreds of copies of the HA protein. We then purify these proteins and package them into Flublok. Each Flublok dose contains HA proteins that match the three most prominent flu viruses circulating during a given year, so that you are maximally protected.


I guess if I was going to get a flu shot, Flublock would be the one I would pick.

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
86. None of them contain any fucking latex in the medication itself.
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 02:51 AM
Sep 2016

Pre-measured syringes of Fluvarin and Flucelvax by Novartis may contain latex in the syringe tip cap. Literally no other flu shot on the US market has any latex at all.

Christ almighty, stop making shit up.

-Very irritated person with a latex allergy

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
90. Except you're an anti-vaxxer that prefers to promote right wing anti-vax sites to vaccines
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 02:59 AM
Sep 2016

Meanwhile flublok is produced with GMO, which is another one of your "concerns". Guess you missed that part.

Sgent

(5,857 posts)
58. That glass of water on my table
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 01:18 AM
Sep 2016

has hydrogen in it. I think I'll launch the next space shuttle after I finish blowing up the Hindenburg with it.

Ethylmercury is not elemental Mercury, much like the glass of water isn't elemental hydrogen. Chemical form matters -- there's no evidence of harm to humans of ethylmercury.

 

Dr Hobbitstein

(6,568 posts)
27. Woooooooo....
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 12:20 AM
Sep 2016

Woo woo woo woo woo.

The anti-science crowd never ceases to amaze. It's like a perfect circle, where the anti-vaxxers and anti-GMO troglodytes come together in harmony.

 

Dr Hobbitstein

(6,568 posts)
32. They'll be hanging with the flat-earthers and global warming denialists in no time.
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 12:28 AM
Sep 2016

Flocks of them, dragging their knuckles around, grunting about "me no science, me do research".

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
57. No, they've been that way all along
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 01:18 AM
Sep 2016

Some of them just also go even deeper into the nutbaggery like AIDS-denialism, fluoridation conspiracy theories, 9-11 truthers, UFOs, New World Order, etc. One of our resident anti-vaxxers frequently trots out a source that checks all those crazy blocks along with several others.

 

Dr Hobbitstein

(6,568 posts)
35. Not according to article in the OP.
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 12:32 AM
Sep 2016

They've come full circle. Anti-GMO hysteria mixed with anti-vax FUD.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
48. Rarely yes
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 12:59 AM
Sep 2016

More often than not they are the same pseudoscience cranks. The source of the OP is an excellent example.

 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
126. Not really, they have a tendency to congregate together, you should check out the...
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 10:31 AM
Sep 2016

"March against Monsanto" sometime.

womanofthehills

(8,701 posts)
44. See the Time Magazine article above - and CDC info below - Madin-Darby Canine Kidney
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 12:51 AM
Sep 2016

information from CDC on their cell based vaccines - I do Not think the CDC is WOO

What are cell-based flu vaccines?

‘Cell-based’ refers to how the flu vaccine is made. Cell-based flu vaccines are made by growing viruses in animal cells. Cell-based flu vaccines are developed through a different manufacturing process than the traditional egg-based manufacturing process that is used to develop flu vaccines. Cell-based influenza vaccines are similar to the egg-based influenza vaccines, but a significant difference is that the influenza A and B viruses included in the cell-based vaccine are grown in cultured cells of mammalian origin instead of in hens’ eggs.
How is the cell-based vaccine manufacturing process different than the traditional egg-based manufacturing process?

In place of fertilized chicken eggs, the cell-based vaccine manufacturing process for Flucelvax uses animal cells (Madin-Darby Canine Kidney, or MDCK) in liquid culture as a host for the growing influenza virus.
Why are cell-based flu vaccines being developed?

Cell-based flu vaccines are being developed as an alternative to the egg-based manufacturing process. Cell culture technology is potentially more flexible than the traditional technology, which relies upon adequate supply of eggs.

http://www.cdc.gov/flu/protect/vaccine/cell-based.htm

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
49. Yeah, nice job of editing the Time article by adding emphasis where there was none
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 01:01 AM
Sep 2016

And then quoting it as if it appeared that way originally.

But you're not an anti-vaxxer, right?

 

Dr Hobbitstein

(6,568 posts)
50. It's obvious you have NO idea what you're talking about.
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 01:02 AM
Sep 2016

Just quit, you're making yourself look more and more foolish.

Response to womanofthehills (Reply #44)

PatSeg

(47,418 posts)
132. This is not "anti-vaxxer shitbaggery"
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 11:24 AM
Sep 2016

It is anti glyphosate.

And yes, calling a fellow DUer a "moron" could have repercussions. You might want to edit this comment.

 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
138. Which is equally as nutty, but do go on with your bad self...
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 12:07 PM
Sep 2016

why don't you post this in creative speculation or on your resident woo/conspiracy theorist website instead?

 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
151. I have a question, can you give a mechanism of action describing how glyphosate is dangerous...
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 12:48 PM
Sep 2016

to humans?

PatSeg

(47,418 posts)
161. Okay, I'm sorry
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 01:24 PM
Sep 2016

but you must think I am as gullible as you keep saying I am! Or you have a really sardonic sense of humor.


 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
196. Your civility is as broad as is your relevant knowledge.
Mon Sep 12, 2016, 01:27 PM
Sep 2016

Your civility is as broad as is your relevant knowledge.

(rationalize below...)

still_one

(92,181 posts)
43. ok
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 12:46 AM
Sep 2016
https://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/glyphosate-the-new-bogeyman/

or

http://www.snopes.com/medical/toxins/glyphosate.asp

or

https://www.biofortified.org/2015/01/medical-doctors-weigh-in-on-glyphosate-claims/

"The bottom line is that the crank magnetism is strong in Dr. Seneff. She’s antivaccine and anti-GMO. She is full of Dunning-Kruger, thinking that she can transfer her computer science and artificial intelligence knowledge to knowledge of epidemiology, biochemistry, and medicine. She can’t. Happy New Years."

radical noodle

(8,000 posts)
85. From that Science Based Medicine article
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 02:49 AM
Sep 2016
Glyphosate is one of the least toxic herbicides used. It inhibits the enzyme 5-enolpyruvylshikimic acid-3-phosphate synthase which interferes with the shikimic pathway in plants, resulting in the accumulation of shikimic acid in plant tissues and ultimately plant death. The enzyme and pathway do not exist in animals, which is why toxicity is so low. Still, chemicals can have multiple effects and so toxicity needs to be directly measured and its epidemiology studied.


~Words in bold are my emphasis, not the author's.~

Great article!

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
93. Glyphosate is less toxic than table salt or household vinegar
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 03:14 AM
Sep 2016

Kinda funny how some people freak out over a substance measured in parts per BILLION.

Meanwhile hydric acid is now found in most food ingredients and isn't required to be labeled even though it can be toxic even in small doses. It's commonly used as an industrial solvent and it's what killed Andy Warhol.

Cicada

(4,533 posts)
68. How do they get the level this low?
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 01:57 AM
Sep 2016

Roundup is everywhere. Isn't the level in breast milk a hundred times greater than the highest level shown in vaccines? And don't children consume millions of times more milk than is in a vaccination?

Personally I am amazed the level in the vaccines is so low. We have to take in zillions more roundup molecules in other things we all consume.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
72. The lab that the crank site, "Mom's Across America" uses isn't certified
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 02:12 AM
Sep 2016

The same crank source used the same crank lab to produce the phony glyphosate/breast milk data that accredited labs can't seem to duplicate.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
101. So is hydric acid
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 08:50 AM
Sep 2016

Hydric acid is now found in most food ingredients and isn't required to be labeled even though it can be toxic even in small doses. It's commonly used as an industrial solvent and it's what killed Andy Warhol.

tymorial

(3,433 posts)
99. I am so very tired of woo
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 08:37 AM
Sep 2016

And the idiots that spread it. Yes, I mean idiots. Yes, I am likely insulting other DUers. Yes, I expect this to be reported for jury. I am completely unapologetic. I will remain so even if this post is removed.

Antivax nonsense has caused needless illness. It places people at risk and not just the children with stupid parents.

ismnotwasm

(41,976 posts)
103. Does this mean another year
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 08:54 AM
Sep 2016

Of repeated exposure to preventable diseases for me at work because of Anti-vax bullshit?

etherealtruth

(22,165 posts)
127. Same level of ignorance ... but anti-vax nonsense poses a clear and present danger ...
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 10:36 AM
Sep 2016

...chem trail nonsense doesn't (just highlights ignorance and stupidity)

Harmony Blue

(3,978 posts)
108. So many elitists on DU that don't even have a scientific background
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 09:14 AM
Sep 2016

and didn't bother to read the article in length putting down people that are genuinely concerned and asking the right questions. Science is not an unwavering dogma carved in stones and asking questions is always a good thing because that is the core of science.

The article was well balanced and here is some excerpts about it:

"]According to MIT scientist Dr. Stephanie Seneff, "Glyphosate could easily be present in vaccines due to the fact that certain vaccine viruses including measles in MMR and flu are grown on gelatin derived from the ligaments of pigs fed heavy doses of glyphosate in their GMO feed. Gelatin comes from collagen which has lots of glycine. Livestock feed is allowed to have up to 400 PPM [parts per million] of glyphosate residues by the EPA, thousands of times higher than has been shown to cause harm in numerous studies."

This points out how could glyphosate can be found in vaccines and what the accepted levels are according to the EPA.


"French scientist and glyphosate expert Gilles-Eric Séralini has shown in his research that glyphosate is never used alone. It is always used with adjuvants (co-formulants/other chemicals) and he has found those adjuvants to make Roundup 1,000 times more toxic. The detection of glyphosate in vaccines with this methodology would indicate the presence of other co-formulants which are also toxic."

This is a concern and people have the right to ask tough questions.

Our understanding is not resolute which is why the levels of lead exposure that we have found acceptable to the human body has changed constantly over time, because the science changes and our technology improves as we learn more.



Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
109. Seneff and Seralini are both crank magnet quacks who make their living peddling pseudoscience
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 09:21 AM
Sep 2016

Someone who floats those names as having any degree of legitimacy can safely assumed to be wrong on pretty much everything on the subject.

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gilles-Eric_S%C3%A9ralini

http://www.alternet.org/food/meet-controversial-mit-scientist-who-claims-have-discovered-cause-gluten-sensitivty

Response to Major Nikon (Reply #109)

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
122. The IARC specifically rejected Seralini's research as complete shit
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 10:11 AM
Sep 2016

Meanwhile....

Whistleblower Prize

The Whistleblower Prize worth 3,000 euro, is given biannually and was established in 1999.[8] In 2015, the selection of Gilles-Éric Séralini generated some controversy. Ulrich Bahnsen in Die Zeit described VDW and ILANA as consisting of busybodys with best wills - and worst possible outcome in the case of this award.[9] The opinion piece, featured in Zeit Online, described the awarding of Séralini as a failure, and viewed his status as a "whistleblower" as questionable, in light of his use of "junk science" to support anti-GMO activism.[10]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federation_of_German_Scientists

Archae

(46,325 posts)
115. You cite Seneff AND Seralini?
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 09:36 AM
Sep 2016

Seneff is a computer scientist, who blames GMO's for concussions.

Seralini's study was shown to be fatally flawed, starting with the fact he used rats that were prone to tumors, to claim that Roundup caused tumors.
AND he got paid quite well by the Organic Growers Association.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
128. BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 10:55 AM
Sep 2016
SUPPORTING ONE GARBAGE SOURCE WITH ANOTHER GARBAGE SOURCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!











SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
123. Anyone referencing Seralini has no business questioning the scientific background of DU posters...nt
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 10:21 AM
Sep 2016

Sid

PatSeg

(47,418 posts)
134. And asbestos as well
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 11:37 AM
Sep 2016

It does appear to be a lot of "elitists", but it really is only a handful that manage to show up for any thread about Monsanto or GMOs. They often shut down any meaningful discussion, so it looks like they are a majority. They aren't. They are just louder, more obnoxious, and frequently insulting, making a civil conversation impossible. Their favorite tactic is ridicule!

 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
136. "Elitists", you mean people who actually know a thing or two about chemistry and biology?
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 12:06 PM
Sep 2016

Why is this anti-intellectualism that you spout so fucking infectious?

 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
145. From what I can tell, you fail high school level science with the BS you spout...
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 12:33 PM
Sep 2016

apparently anyone more educated than middle school in those subjects is "elitist" to you.

Seriously, you have yet to post anything even remotely accurate on any biologically oriented subject. You fail to understand chemistry or biology, and worse yet, you revel in that, ignorance isn't strength. Learn about the subjects you are so critical of, I don't understand why people are so incurious about facts and the truth.

PatSeg

(47,418 posts)
156. I really don't know how you
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 01:04 PM
Sep 2016

came to those conclusions from what I've posted. Actually I have just corrected a few people on their perception of what the thread was about.

It sounds as if you are just talking generally and then directing those generalizations towards me OR perhaps you think I am someone else, as what you've said has nothing to do with me.

"From what I can tell..........." appears to be not much of anything, but apparently ridicule must work well for you or you wouldn't use it so often.

PatSeg

(47,418 posts)
160. I will abstain
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 01:19 PM
Sep 2016

from remarking on your past posting history, as we both know what it reflects.

Have a nice day!

PatSeg

(47,418 posts)
166. I'm sorry
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 02:44 PM
Sep 2016

It was a reference to comment #108 from Harmony Blue.

So many elitists on DU that don't even have a scientific background and didn't bother to read the article in length putting down people that are genuinely concerned and asking the right questions. Science is not an unwavering dogma carved in stones and asking questions is always a good thing because that is the core of science.


It wasn't my word, that is why I put in quotation marks.

womanofthehills

(8,701 posts)
111. It makes sense, as many vaccines are made with eggs - and glyphosate levels in eggs are higher
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 09:25 AM
Sep 2016

than other foods because of chicken feed. Animal feed is allowed to have higher levels of glyphosate.

womanofthehills

(8,701 posts)
116. You are the one who seems to have a problem with all the progressive sites
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 09:37 AM
Sep 2016

like Ring of Fire, Projection!!!!

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
120. Sure, "all" of them
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 10:07 AM
Sep 2016


Actually I don't even have a problem with that one, because even though Papantonio sometimes parrots out quacks like Seralini, at least as a lawyer he's smart enough not to make demonstrably false claims. Obviously YMMV.

Meanwhile the example I gave is just one of the many loony sources you "educate" yourself with like Mercola, Food Babe, Mae-Wan Ho, Globalresearch, et al.

RayOfHope

(1,829 posts)
113. Their science is as bad as their editing. Merck, not Merk, Novartis, not Novaris.
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 09:33 AM
Sep 2016

Its not helping their cause any

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
186. Same nutbag claimed organic food cures autism, fibromyaglia, and Crohn's
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 11:16 PM
Sep 2016

The stupid is strong with that one.

 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
117. Using ELISA for this kind of work, and then releasing the results publicly?
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 09:37 AM
Sep 2016

Holy crapoli.

I guess these guys don't give a damn about false positives.

(And 0.3 ppb? Sweet jeebus, are we really pissing ourselves over those levels determined by an unreliable method?)

MineralMan

(146,288 posts)
169. And in everything else, too.
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 03:20 PM
Sep 2016

Many things can be detected at parts per billion levels in almost anything. That fact, alone, is meaningless, without examining what the presence of the material really means.

See this thread:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028158315

nolabels

(13,133 posts)
170. Here is just another leg in the Monsanto regime that won't work
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 04:16 PM
Sep 2016

Hello Monsanto,

You only have about a billion years of evolution to try and outsmart, good luck


Mutated pests are quickly adapting to biotech crops in unpredicted and disturbing ways
by George Dvorsky
http://io9.com/5921741/mutated-pests-are-quickly-adapting-to-biotech-crops-in-unpredicted-and-disturbing-ways

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
184. You can observe weed adaptations by just mowing your lawn
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 10:58 PM
Sep 2016

In an unmowed or infrequently mowed field, dandelions will bloom on relatively long stems. If you mow your lawn regularly, the dandelions will adapt by blooming on shorter stems and defeating your pest control.

The fact that you can travel a short distance to your local market and find a huge variety of produce year round is testament to people winning battles in the war between beneficial plants and their pests. This war didn't just start because Monsanto figured out a way to make plants adapt to inherently produce a desirable pesticide. The war actually started by the plants themselves adapting to their environment and people have been helping that process along for the last several thousand years or so. It's only recently that we figured out a much more efficient way of doing it.

nolabels

(13,133 posts)
189. Actually grass is the reason we walk mostly on our hind legs
Mon Sep 12, 2016, 05:50 AM
Sep 2016

And without plants adapting us, as primates we would all be somewhat color blind like the rest of the mammals. It's like what came first, the chicken or the egg. We are all captives of our environment and stop gap ideas to modify food crops with gene splicing is mostly folly. If we become real stewards of our world we might insure a rung on the ladder for us to step up. Every other living organism goes along to get along. Our hubris, for which we have been warned by many a philosophers through the ages now goes unheeded. It will take something the like a black plague or something worse before people start understanding with more reverence how we should proceed.

Adapting to how nature works is how we got where we are somewhat. That is the winning strategy and this new thinking of trying to overcome laws of physics and logic is where i think we are taking the wrong turn,

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
195. Had we not developed intelligence we would still be living in trees throwing our shit at each other
Mon Sep 12, 2016, 10:32 AM
Sep 2016

That intelligence is what allowed us to adapt and thrive. Humans didn't get to where we are by simply mindlessly accepting whatever our environment gives us and the suggestion we should simply revert to doing so just doesn't seem like a very good one. Prior to the development of agriculture we were living in caves and huts constantly skirmishing with each other over meager resources. Personally I'd just as soon not revert to that. YMMV.

nolabels

(13,133 posts)
198. We never got to choose what that environment was and we adapted to most of them
Mon Sep 12, 2016, 02:39 PM
Sep 2016

The world was once entirely covered with forest until grass got a toe hold and started grabbing its stake in the wide open spaces. That small population that began slowly rising up was now able to use its forelimbs to manipulate things. It took a couple of million years but gathering that full time use of the forelimbs and the increased vision over the grassland gave us that advantage and time to expand our tool use and social skills. The intelligence capacity is nothing without others to mirror and learn from.

Agriculture was a strategy developed much later in our development and even part of the reason we prey on each other and enslave others. It's also why with that same thought process some see things in a linear fashion while at different times others see it in wide three dimensional range.

We couldn't get to where we are without both thought modalities and our complex emotional system. We all share in it jointly along with a most revolutionary idea or device partly known as myth. The thinking that ideas can exist in an entire group's thinking and never really materialized into a physical being (also known as belief). They have also mapped out parts that in places of brains (some larger than others) where such a capacity exists. This never existed till us humans came along.

We and everything else is very complex, I just hope we get to hang around long enough to understand it (at least a little better anyway )

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
187. Does this mean we can lump all the anti-vax and GMO hysteria threads together now?
Mon Sep 12, 2016, 12:28 AM
Sep 2016

I appreciate the attempt to consolidate the woo.

Blecht

(3,803 posts)
197. Willful ignorance is a scary thing
Mon Sep 12, 2016, 01:31 PM
Sep 2016

It forces people to search out utter bullshit to support their nutty beliefs.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Glyphosate Found in Child...