General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhen Hillary emerged from Chelsea's apt., a little girl ran up to her & asked her to pose for photo
(mho) This is what it is all about:
https://twitter.com/kenvogel/status/775000147860172800/photo/1
philosslayer
(3,076 posts)A great, completely spontaneous moment.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)Hekate
(90,645 posts)matt819
(10,749 posts)A comparable scene with the orange one?
sarae
(3,284 posts)to ask him anything. He looks like the boogie monster.
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)and his supporters would jeer death threats and insults at the girl and her family.
Motley13
(3,867 posts)GoCubsGo
(32,080 posts)mcar
(42,302 posts)run_mac_run
(14 posts)we refer to Donald Trump as Trump. I've never seen Trump called Donald.
I used to think that it's because is to avoid the confusion between Hillary and Bill - but then I remembered we've had George H. Bush and George W. Bush. In referring to the younger Bush, we always said Bush, knowing that context will explain which Bush we meant.
This problem is in both 'liberal' and 'right-wing' media.
The only reason is misogyny, subconscious or otherwise. This actually delegitimizes Mrs Clinton.
mnhtnbb
(31,384 posts)Take it up with her.
https://www.hillaryclinton.com/
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)Also, Hillary tends to use her own name for her campaign. Her logo is "H", not "C" or even "HRC".
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)stopbush
(24,396 posts)Your point?
a kennedy
(29,655 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(48,999 posts)Lochloosa
(16,063 posts)mountain grammy
(26,619 posts)in my opinion. Bernie is Bernie, Hillary is Hillary and Trump is an asshole, or at least that's how I refer to him.
a kennedy
(29,655 posts)BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)He's Shit Weaselhat to me.
mountain grammy
(26,619 posts)BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)I'm kind of liking that one, but yours is good too!
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,999 posts)mountain grammy
(26,619 posts)Rhythm
(5,435 posts)Rhythm
(5,435 posts)TeamPooka
(24,221 posts)IronLionZion
(45,431 posts)"We" do all sorts of stuff. I often refer to him as Drumpf or Donny. And George W. Bush was often referred to as W. There's even a movie called W.
Cracklin Charlie
(12,904 posts)I hope it does.
I will not speak or write his name.
Akamai
(1,779 posts)republican enablers -- especially SCOTUS and the MSM, including the NYTIMES -- curse words do not begin to express my anger!!!
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)At least that's why I do it.
whopis01
(3,510 posts)Enrique
(27,461 posts)please design a new logo for her with a C instead of an H, and then we can all insist that she change it.
calimary
(81,220 posts)Some of us have frequently used "The Donald" to refer to Humpty Trumpty (or Trumpty Dumpty).
I also use "Hillary" and "HRC." I've used "Clinton" and "Mrs. Clinton" but I find myself kinda veering away from the "Mrs." part.
There's just a whole bunch of new territory that now has to be considered if she wins. There's just a whole bunch of new territory re: what we call her, AND him. As minuscule as this is, in the greater scheme of things, it's something that has to be considered. Would she be "Madam President"? Would he be "First Spouse"? Or "First Gentleman?" Frankly, there will eventually be a second woman President at some point in the future, so that's gonna matter. And will she be "President Clinton"? Does that matter, since we've already had a "President Clinton"? With Bush 1 versus Bush 2, to differentiate, you always had to emphasize the "H-W" for the first President Bush so it was clear you weren't talking about his ne'er-do-well son. Would we have to refer to her by her full name and title for that reason? To differentiate between President Bill Clinton and President Hillary Clinton? Or will she want Rodham to figure in there, officially, too? Would she want to be referred to as "President Hillary" for that matter?
We just don't know yet. I'm actually rather fascinated by it, by this aspect in particular. Because again, we'd be breaking new ground, and setting a new standard - a new tradition.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)him Bush, but W, or the shrub.
Response to run_mac_run (Reply #8)
Pacifist Patriot This message was self-deleted by its author.
madokie
(51,076 posts)tRump is referred to as tRump but myself and some others here. He's not a president in anyones imagination and will be beat like a drum come november 8
Blue Idaho
(5,049 posts)It is a title she earned and honored by her work. It is in line with all previous Secretaries of State and as it is considered her highest government rank it is appropriate... Until we can call her President Hillary Clinton that is...
greymattermom
(5,754 posts)Bill was Governor Clinton. Before their presidential elections, that is.
Blue Idaho
(5,049 posts)I hope soon we will be able to confuse Bill and Hillary by talking about "President Clinton" as in... "Which one?"
MADem
(135,425 posts)And we call Donald "The Donald" -- or "The Con-ald" plenty. In fact, "The Donald" was known as "The Donald" before Hillary came on the national scene. You have not been paying attention if you did not know this.
They're still using that term--between eagle attacks:
Let's look at a couple of HRC signs:
?w=500&h=282
She made her candidacy announcement standing on a MASSIVE, GIANT "H" for HILLARY -- not a stage that spelled out "Clinton."
If it were up to her, she would have kept "Rodham." She liked her name. Society and faux conventions pushed her into taking Bill's name, and she did it so he'd win an election.
And we didn't (and do not) always call Bush "Bush." The older one is Bush the elder, Bush the First, George H.W, or Bush 41. The younger one, when we aren't calling him Dimsum or Idiot or Moron, is Bush 43, Dubya, or W.
Rose Siding
(32,623 posts)within the same piece, whether written or on tv. When the press is talking about both they should both be referred to at the same level of formality or it is misogynistic.
Here, it just seems more familiar, and she did encourage it among supporters. I usually write HRC. I've read that's how staff always referenced her to differentiate between Clintons.
Welcome to DU
cwydro
(51,308 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)I don't want him to sound serious.
One thing Ted Cruz did right (and it may be the only thing) was that he addressed him as "Donald." He has not titles like Governor or Senator and that should be highlighted.
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)The Trump campaign emphasizes his last name because of the Trump brand.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)It was their own doing. Look at Clintons logo.
kentuck
(111,079 posts)This was in the comments in the tweet above:
Could we get a show of hands for all those Trump followers that are offended by the terms, "racist", "xenophobic" or "sexist"??
LiberalLovinLug
(14,173 posts)The majority of those comments are saying it was staged. She simply cannot be allowed to be seen as human. The Hate Media has so tarred her that anything positive that may go her way is immediately dismissed as orchestrated, no matter how small.
Its very concerning to me that even if she gets in, almost half the population will already have been marinated in Hillary/Clinton hate for decades, and it will only increase on Hate Media during her term. And gawd help her if she makes any kind of stumble in office. Obama at least had a honeymoon period because not too many knew much about him, and he had no baggage, whether real or invented.
kentuck
(111,079 posts)no matter what you may have thought of him as a person.
TNNurse
(6,926 posts)I would not call that nasty little GOP meeting immediately agreeing to block anything he wanted a "honeymoon period".
LiberalLovinLug
(14,173 posts)I guess I was meaning more that what you describe, the blocking, happened because they had nothing else they could do. They had no "dirt" they could blow up and exaggerate. With Hillary they have a running start.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)Get.Real.Now
(10 posts)I have loved seeing the joy and sense of possibility Obama's presidency has brought to people of color, especially the children. I look forward similar inspiration from Hillary's Presidency.
p.s. I know it is a little washed out but does'nt pink count as a color?
calimary
(81,220 posts)"The sense of possibility." That is a great point. A great way to word it. I get that, completely.
Something that really drove this home was a comment made by some politician guesting on one of the MSNBC shows, who also was the father of school-age children. He recounted one morning at the kitchen table, wherein his little girl was eating her breakfast on her little plastic placemat that featured all the Presidents. "Meet the Presidents," I think - because my kids had that one, too, along with the ones about the solar system, the map of the US, the map of the world, various dinosaurs, and so forth. He said his daughter looked up at him, after regarding that placemat, and asked - "why aren't there any girls?" And her dad concluded his interview segment by pointing out that this really gave him pause, and that he didn't have a good answer for her. Which was one of many reasons why he was supporting Hillary Clinton.
I remember reading about how amazing and revolutionary the whole concept was to wrap one's brain around, because of President Obama: the very idea that Black kids actually can now look at the Presidency, for the first time in ANY of our lives, and see themselves in the Oval Office because of who the occupant of that office is. But then, for me anyway, I started wondering how little Black girls see that. Do they see a difference? How do they see it, versus how little Black boys see it? Any of our Black sons surely sees himself in the Oval Office, since President Obama. How about our Black daughters? Or is something still not quite there yet?
lupinella
(365 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Truly iconic. What an adorable little girl!
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)these people just can't get any more loony.
Democat
(11,617 posts)Or a drone?
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)Odin2005
(53,521 posts)yuiyoshida
(41,831 posts)Change her life. Future voting Democrat! She is sweet, ne?
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)Motley13
(3,867 posts)although DD is good too.
I cringe when they call him mr. trump (i can't even give him a capital letter)
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)Response to kpete (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
OnlinePoker
(5,719 posts)She is contagious.
hexola
(4,835 posts)Doesn't seem like a great move, regardless of how cute it may be...
http://www.people.com/article/hillary-clinton-staff-sick-pneumonia
"Everyone's been sick," a campaign source tells PEOPLE.
Moonwalk
(2,322 posts)...politicians have to shake hands, hold babies, and give little girls photo ops when they spontaneously run up. I've never yet heard of a male presidential candidate, who had come down with something after being on the campaign trail, saying along the way, "I can't give you a photo, handshake or kiss the baby because I may be coming down with something..."
Once again, the double standard reigns. Male politicians are just reported as being sick and taking a rest after a hard campaign. Hillary is seen as being cruel and horrible for maybe infecting a child.
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)If they don't know, that is a different story. ANY politician.
Moonwalk
(2,322 posts)...after male president who KNEW they had something wrong with them, and they kept it secret and there was never a "they would have said!" afterwards. From FDR's heart to Kennedy's back to Reagan's Alzheimer's. Now before you yell "That's not the same!" YES, I know that. HOWEVER, there is no way I can prove that any male politician who took time off during a campaign to recover from a contagious disease KNEW he had it while he was out shaking hands and kissing babies.
That has never yet been reported by the news. THAT is my point. I find to believe that it NEVER happened to anyone running for president before. And I find it hard to believe the it NEVER happened within the last, say, 40 years of wide spread media news and doctors confirming someone has something contagious like a cold, flu, etc. and that's why they're taking a rest.
So, I stand by that double standard. I'm not saying it makes it right for Hillary to have interacted with other people and the little girl IF there was a strong chance she had this and was contagious, which there was given that others had come down with it. BUT I do think that, as usual, she's going to get hammered for it where as if Trump had been the one, he wouldn't.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Good grief, don't swallow the right wing themes so easily.
We rely on science.
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)to the statement that being on antibiotics for 3 days makes you not contagious? What exact type does she have anyway?
MADem
(135,425 posts)Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)As a reference for a statement on a scientific paper. Would not pass peer review.
In any case, my friend Google does not agree with the statement: after 3 days on being on antibiotics, a person with pneumonia is not contagious.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)The question is: Is a person with pneumonia still contagious after 3 days of being on antibiotics? As you claimed.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Don't worry about what I like--really.
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Nice sig line.
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)WillowTree
(5,325 posts)Most pneumonia is viral so antibiotics don't treat the disease. Antibiotics are still prescribed (usually) with viral pneumonia to help the patient ward off further infections when their immune systems are compromised, but they wouldn't affect whether or not she would be contagious.
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)It's not a kind that is very contagious? http://www.medicinenet.com/is_pneumonia_contagious/page2.htm
If the mother and the kid knew Hillary had pneumonia, then I'm OK with it. Otherwise I'm a bit disturbed by it.
shireen
(8,333 posts)That was decent of them.
And i LOVE her yellow shoes!
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Because, seriously, they don't let people simply run up toward her.
Abouttime
(675 posts)Politics is all about image, the staffer who staged this photo was brilliant, it's the perfect image to portray Hillary after such a horrible video of her being shoved into the van.
Hillarys staffers need to get much tighter control of the images coming out in these last weeks of the campaign. Another image of Hillary falling or staring blankly off into space will further the talk of her (alleged) health problems. We've got this thing just about in the bag, we cannot afford anything coming out that doesn't fit with what the public is being told, just a case of dehydration and pneumonia.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)But I do find it amusing that people think that it was spontaneous, and that this child just happened to run up to her and was permitted to do so without being checked out.
shireen
(8,333 posts)I watched the video again. It looked like the kid was standing nearby. Hillary gestured to her to come over, then asked her name. It was really sweet. s
Bucky
(53,998 posts)She needs to be brought in for questioning. Maybe she needs a nice long recess in Gitmo.
Guy Whitey Corngood
(26,500 posts)being too damn adorable!
GoCubsGo
(32,080 posts)But, seriously. This is the latest conspiracy theory floating around the wing-nut-o-sphere. Not kidding.
Response to GoCubsGo (Reply #74)
Helen Borg This message was self-deleted by its author.
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)Considering since recent reports of ISIS using kids as suicide bombers, I can't imagine secret service just lets someone random...even a kid, run up to her like that without being questioned or vetted or checked out.
Jim Beard
(2,535 posts)I thought it was her granddaughter at first. it was a quick image on TV